Re: [PATCH] mm: hugetlbfs: Close race during teardown of hugetlbfs shared page tables v2

[Larry Woodman <lwoodman@redhat.com>]

On 07/20/2012 09:49 AM, Mel Gorman wrote:
> +retry:
>   	mutex_lock(&mapping->i_mmap_mutex);
>   	vma_prio_tree_foreach(svma,&iter,&mapping->i_mmap, idx, idx) {
>   		if (svma == vma)
>   			continue;
> +		if (svma->vm_mm == vma->vm_mm)
> +			continue;
> +
> +		/*
> +		 * The target mm could be in the process of tearing down
> +		 * its page tables and the i_mmap_mutex on its own is
> +		 * not sufficient. To prevent races against teardown and
> +		 * pagetable updates, we acquire the mmap_sem and pagetable
> +		 * lock of the remote address space. down_read_trylock()
> +		 * is necessary as the other process could also be trying
> +		 * to share pagetables with the current mm. In the fork
> +		 * case, we are already both mm's so check for that
> +		 */
> +		if (locked_mm != svma->vm_mm) {
> +			if (!down_read_trylock(&svma->vm_mm->mmap_sem)) {
> +				mutex_unlock(&mapping->i_mmap_mutex);
> +				goto retry;
> +			}
> +			smmap_sem =&svma->vm_mm->mmap_sem;
> +		}
> +
> +		spage_table_lock =&svma->vm_mm->page_table_lock;
> +		spin_lock_nested(spage_table_lock, SINGLE_DEPTH_NESTING);
>
>   		saddr = page_table_shareable(svma, vma, addr, idx);
>   		if (saddr) {

Hi Mel, FYI I tried this and ran into a problem.  When there are 
multiple processes
in huge_pmd_share() just faulting in the same i_map they all have their 
mmap_sem
down for write so the down_read_trylock(&svma->vm_mm->mmap_sem) never
succeeds.  What am I missing?

Thanks, Larry

--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@kvack.org.  For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@kvack.org"> email@kvack.org </a>