All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Larry Woodman <lwoodman@redhat.com>
To: Mel Gorman <mgorman@suse.de>
Cc: Rik van Riel <riel@redhat.com>, Hugh Dickins <hughd@google.com>,
	Michal Hocko <mhocko@suse.cz>, Linux-MM <linux-mm@kvack.org>,
	David Gibson <david@gibson.dropbear.id.au>,
	Ken Chen <kenchen@google.com>,
	Cong Wang <xiyou.wangcong@gmail.com>,
	LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH -alternative] mm: hugetlbfs: Close race during teardown of hugetlbfs shared page tables V2 (resend)
Date: Mon, 30 Jul 2012 15:11:27 -0400	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <5016DC5F.7030604@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20120727102356.GD612@suse.de>

On 07/27/2012 06:23 AM, Mel Gorman wrote:
> On Thu, Jul 26, 2012 at 11:48:56PM -0400, Larry Woodman wrote:
>> On 07/26/2012 02:37 PM, Rik van Riel wrote:
>>> On 07/23/2012 12:04 AM, Hugh Dickins wrote:
>>>
>>>> I spent hours trying to dream up a better patch, trying various
>>>> approaches.  I think I have a nice one now, what do you think?  And
>>>> more importantly, does it work?  I have not tried to test it at all,
>>>> that I'm hoping to leave to you, I'm sure you'll attack it with gusto!
>>>>
>>>> If you like it, please take it over and add your comments and signoff
>>>> and send it in.  The second part won't come up in your testing,
>>>> and could
>>>> be made a separate patch if you prefer: it's a related point that struck
>>>> me while I was playing with a different approach.
>>>>
>>>> I'm sorely tempted to leave a dangerous pair of eyes off the Cc,
>>>> but that too would be unfair.
>>>>
>>>> Subject-to-your-testing-
>>>> Signed-off-by: Hugh Dickins<hughd@google.com>
>>> This patch looks good to me.
>>>
>>> Larry, does Hugh's patch survive your testing?
>>>
>>>
>> Like I said earlier, no.
> That is a surprise. Can you try your test case on 3.4 and tell us if the
> patch fixes the problem there? I would like to rule out the possibility
> that the locking rules are slightly different in RHEL. If it hits on 3.4
> then it's also possible you are seeing a different bug, more on this later.
>

Sorry for the delay Mel, here is the BUG() traceback from the 3.4 kernel 
with your
patches:

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
[ 1106.156569] ------------[ cut here ]------------
[ 1106.161731] kernel BUG at mm/filemap.c:135!
[ 1106.166395] invalid opcode: 0000 [#1] SMP
[ 1106.170975] CPU 22
[ 1106.173115] Modules linked in: bridge stp llc sunrpc binfmt_misc 
dcdbas microcode pcspkr acpi_pad acpi]
[ 1106.201770]
[ 1106.203426] Pid: 18001, comm: mpitest Tainted: G        W    3.3.0+ 
#4 Dell Inc. PowerEdge R620/07NDJ2
[ 1106.213822] RIP: 0010:[<ffffffff8112cfed>]  [<ffffffff8112cfed>] 
__delete_from_page_cache+0x15d/0x170
[ 1106.224117] RSP: 0018:ffff880428973b88  EFLAGS: 00010002
[ 1106.230032] RAX: 0000000000000001 RBX: ffffea0006b80000 RCX: 
00000000ffffffb0
[ 1106.237979] RDX: 0000000000016df1 RSI: 0000000000000009 RDI: 
ffff88043ffd9e00
[ 1106.245927] RBP: ffff880428973b98 R08: 0000000000000050 R09: 
0000000000000003
[ 1106.253876] R10: 000000000000000d R11: 0000000000000000 R12: 
ffff880428708150
[ 1106.261826] R13: ffff880428708150 R14: 0000000000000000 R15: 
ffffea0006b80000
[ 1106.269780] FS:  0000000000000000(0000) GS:ffff88042fd60000(0000) 
knlGS:0000000000000000
[ 1106.278794] CS:  0010 DS: 0000 ES: 0000 CR0: 0000000080050033
[ 1106.285193] CR2: 0000003a1d38c4a8 CR3: 000000000187d000 CR4: 
00000000000406e0
[ 1106.293149] DR0: 0000000000000000 DR1: 0000000000000000 DR2: 
0000000000000000
[ 1106.301097] DR3: 0000000000000000 DR6: 00000000ffff0ff0 DR7: 
0000000000000400
[ 1106.309046] Process mpitest (pid: 18001, threadinfo ffff880428972000, 
task ffff880428b5cc20)
[ 1106.318447] Stack:
[ 1106.320690]  ffffea0006b80000 0000000000000000 ffff880428973bc8 
ffffffff8112d040
[ 1106.328958]  ffff880428973bc8 00000000000002ab 00000000000002a0 
ffff880428973c18
[ 1106.337234]  ffff880428973cc8 ffffffff8125b405 ffff880400000001 
0000000000000000
[ 1106.345513] Call Trace:
[ 1106.348235]  [<ffffffff8112d040>] delete_from_page_cache+0x40/0x80
[ 1106.355128]  [<ffffffff8125b405>] truncate_hugepages+0x115/0x1f0
[ 1106.361826]  [<ffffffff8125b4f8>] hugetlbfs_evict_inode+0x18/0x30
[ 1106.368615]  [<ffffffff811ab1af>] evict+0x9f/0x1b0
[ 1106.373951]  [<ffffffff811ab3a3>] iput_final+0xe3/0x1e0
[ 1106.379773]  [<ffffffff811ab4de>] iput+0x3e/0x50
[ 1106.384922]  [<ffffffff811a8e18>] d_kill+0xf8/0x110
[ 1106.390356]  [<ffffffff811a8f12>] dput+0xe2/0x1b0
[ 1106.395595]  [<ffffffff81193612>] __fput+0x162/0x240
[ 1106.401124]  [<ffffffff81193715>] fput+0x25/0x30
[ 1106.406265]  [<ffffffff8118f6c3>] filp_close+0x63/0x90
[ 1106.411997]  [<ffffffff8106058f>] put_files_struct+0x7f/0xf0
[ 1106.418302]  [<ffffffff8106064c>] exit_files+0x4c/0x60
[ 1106.424025]  [<ffffffff810629d7>] do_exit+0x1a7/0x470
[ 1106.429652]  [<ffffffff81062cf5>] do_group_exit+0x55/0xd0
[ 1106.435665]  [<ffffffff81062d87>] sys_exit_group+0x17/0x20
[ 1106.441777]  [<ffffffff815d0229>] system_call_fastpath+0x16/0x1b
[ 1106.448474] Code: 66 0f 1f 44 00 00 48 8b 47 08 48 8b 00 48 8b 40 28 
44 8b 80 38 03 00 00 45 85 c0 0f
[ 1106.470022] RIP  [<ffffffff8112cfed>] 
__delete_from_page_cache+0x15d/0x170
[ 1106.477693]  RSP <ffff880428973b88>
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

I'll see if I can distribute the program that causes the panic, I dont 
have source, only binary.

Larry


BTW, the only way Ilve been able to get the panic to stop is:

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
diff --git a/mm/hugetlb.c b/mm/hugetlb.c
index c36febb..cc023b8 100644
--- a/mm/hugetlb.c
+++ b/mm/hugetlb.c
@@ -2151,7 +2151,7 @@ int copy_hugetlb_page_range(struct mm_struct *dst, 
struct mm_struct *src,
                         goto nomem;

                 /* If the pagetables are shared don't copy or take 
references */
-               if (dst_pte == src_pte)
+               if (*(unsigned long *)dst_pte == *(unsigned long *)src_pte)
                         continue;
                 spin_lock(&dst->page_table_lock);
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------


--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@kvack.org.  For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@kvack.org"> email@kvack.org </a>

WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Larry Woodman <lwoodman@redhat.com>
To: Mel Gorman <mgorman@suse.de>
Cc: Rik van Riel <riel@redhat.com>, Hugh Dickins <hughd@google.com>,
	Michal Hocko <mhocko@suse.cz>, Linux-MM <linux-mm@kvack.org>,
	David Gibson <david@gibson.dropbear.id.au>,
	Ken Chen <kenchen@google.com>,
	Cong Wang <xiyou.wangcong@gmail.com>,
	LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH -alternative] mm: hugetlbfs: Close race during teardown of hugetlbfs shared page tables V2 (resend)
Date: Mon, 30 Jul 2012 15:11:27 -0400	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <5016DC5F.7030604@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20120727102356.GD612@suse.de>

On 07/27/2012 06:23 AM, Mel Gorman wrote:
> On Thu, Jul 26, 2012 at 11:48:56PM -0400, Larry Woodman wrote:
>> On 07/26/2012 02:37 PM, Rik van Riel wrote:
>>> On 07/23/2012 12:04 AM, Hugh Dickins wrote:
>>>
>>>> I spent hours trying to dream up a better patch, trying various
>>>> approaches.  I think I have a nice one now, what do you think?  And
>>>> more importantly, does it work?  I have not tried to test it at all,
>>>> that I'm hoping to leave to you, I'm sure you'll attack it with gusto!
>>>>
>>>> If you like it, please take it over and add your comments and signoff
>>>> and send it in.  The second part won't come up in your testing,
>>>> and could
>>>> be made a separate patch if you prefer: it's a related point that struck
>>>> me while I was playing with a different approach.
>>>>
>>>> I'm sorely tempted to leave a dangerous pair of eyes off the Cc,
>>>> but that too would be unfair.
>>>>
>>>> Subject-to-your-testing-
>>>> Signed-off-by: Hugh Dickins<hughd@google.com>
>>> This patch looks good to me.
>>>
>>> Larry, does Hugh's patch survive your testing?
>>>
>>>
>> Like I said earlier, no.
> That is a surprise. Can you try your test case on 3.4 and tell us if the
> patch fixes the problem there? I would like to rule out the possibility
> that the locking rules are slightly different in RHEL. If it hits on 3.4
> then it's also possible you are seeing a different bug, more on this later.
>

Sorry for the delay Mel, here is the BUG() traceback from the 3.4 kernel 
with your
patches:

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
[ 1106.156569] ------------[ cut here ]------------
[ 1106.161731] kernel BUG at mm/filemap.c:135!
[ 1106.166395] invalid opcode: 0000 [#1] SMP
[ 1106.170975] CPU 22
[ 1106.173115] Modules linked in: bridge stp llc sunrpc binfmt_misc 
dcdbas microcode pcspkr acpi_pad acpi]
[ 1106.201770]
[ 1106.203426] Pid: 18001, comm: mpitest Tainted: G        W    3.3.0+ 
#4 Dell Inc. PowerEdge R620/07NDJ2
[ 1106.213822] RIP: 0010:[<ffffffff8112cfed>]  [<ffffffff8112cfed>] 
__delete_from_page_cache+0x15d/0x170
[ 1106.224117] RSP: 0018:ffff880428973b88  EFLAGS: 00010002
[ 1106.230032] RAX: 0000000000000001 RBX: ffffea0006b80000 RCX: 
00000000ffffffb0
[ 1106.237979] RDX: 0000000000016df1 RSI: 0000000000000009 RDI: 
ffff88043ffd9e00
[ 1106.245927] RBP: ffff880428973b98 R08: 0000000000000050 R09: 
0000000000000003
[ 1106.253876] R10: 000000000000000d R11: 0000000000000000 R12: 
ffff880428708150
[ 1106.261826] R13: ffff880428708150 R14: 0000000000000000 R15: 
ffffea0006b80000
[ 1106.269780] FS:  0000000000000000(0000) GS:ffff88042fd60000(0000) 
knlGS:0000000000000000
[ 1106.278794] CS:  0010 DS: 0000 ES: 0000 CR0: 0000000080050033
[ 1106.285193] CR2: 0000003a1d38c4a8 CR3: 000000000187d000 CR4: 
00000000000406e0
[ 1106.293149] DR0: 0000000000000000 DR1: 0000000000000000 DR2: 
0000000000000000
[ 1106.301097] DR3: 0000000000000000 DR6: 00000000ffff0ff0 DR7: 
0000000000000400
[ 1106.309046] Process mpitest (pid: 18001, threadinfo ffff880428972000, 
task ffff880428b5cc20)
[ 1106.318447] Stack:
[ 1106.320690]  ffffea0006b80000 0000000000000000 ffff880428973bc8 
ffffffff8112d040
[ 1106.328958]  ffff880428973bc8 00000000000002ab 00000000000002a0 
ffff880428973c18
[ 1106.337234]  ffff880428973cc8 ffffffff8125b405 ffff880400000001 
0000000000000000
[ 1106.345513] Call Trace:
[ 1106.348235]  [<ffffffff8112d040>] delete_from_page_cache+0x40/0x80
[ 1106.355128]  [<ffffffff8125b405>] truncate_hugepages+0x115/0x1f0
[ 1106.361826]  [<ffffffff8125b4f8>] hugetlbfs_evict_inode+0x18/0x30
[ 1106.368615]  [<ffffffff811ab1af>] evict+0x9f/0x1b0
[ 1106.373951]  [<ffffffff811ab3a3>] iput_final+0xe3/0x1e0
[ 1106.379773]  [<ffffffff811ab4de>] iput+0x3e/0x50
[ 1106.384922]  [<ffffffff811a8e18>] d_kill+0xf8/0x110
[ 1106.390356]  [<ffffffff811a8f12>] dput+0xe2/0x1b0
[ 1106.395595]  [<ffffffff81193612>] __fput+0x162/0x240
[ 1106.401124]  [<ffffffff81193715>] fput+0x25/0x30
[ 1106.406265]  [<ffffffff8118f6c3>] filp_close+0x63/0x90
[ 1106.411997]  [<ffffffff8106058f>] put_files_struct+0x7f/0xf0
[ 1106.418302]  [<ffffffff8106064c>] exit_files+0x4c/0x60
[ 1106.424025]  [<ffffffff810629d7>] do_exit+0x1a7/0x470
[ 1106.429652]  [<ffffffff81062cf5>] do_group_exit+0x55/0xd0
[ 1106.435665]  [<ffffffff81062d87>] sys_exit_group+0x17/0x20
[ 1106.441777]  [<ffffffff815d0229>] system_call_fastpath+0x16/0x1b
[ 1106.448474] Code: 66 0f 1f 44 00 00 48 8b 47 08 48 8b 00 48 8b 40 28 
44 8b 80 38 03 00 00 45 85 c0 0f
[ 1106.470022] RIP  [<ffffffff8112cfed>] 
__delete_from_page_cache+0x15d/0x170
[ 1106.477693]  RSP <ffff880428973b88>
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

I'll see if I can distribute the program that causes the panic, I dont 
have source, only binary.

Larry


BTW, the only way Ilve been able to get the panic to stop is:

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
diff --git a/mm/hugetlb.c b/mm/hugetlb.c
index c36febb..cc023b8 100644
--- a/mm/hugetlb.c
+++ b/mm/hugetlb.c
@@ -2151,7 +2151,7 @@ int copy_hugetlb_page_range(struct mm_struct *dst, 
struct mm_struct *src,
                         goto nomem;

                 /* If the pagetables are shared don't copy or take 
references */
-               if (dst_pte == src_pte)
+               if (*(unsigned long *)dst_pte == *(unsigned long *)src_pte)
                         continue;
                 spin_lock(&dst->page_table_lock);
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



  parent reply	other threads:[~2012-07-30 19:11 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 100+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2012-07-20 13:49 [PATCH] mm: hugetlbfs: Close race during teardown of hugetlbfs shared page tables v2 Mel Gorman
2012-07-20 13:49 ` Mel Gorman
2012-07-20 14:11 ` [PATCH] mm: hugetlbfs: Close race during teardown of hugetlbfs shared page tables V2 (resend) Mel Gorman
2012-07-20 14:11   ` Mel Gorman
2012-07-20 14:29   ` Michal Hocko
2012-07-20 14:29     ` Michal Hocko
2012-07-20 14:37     ` Mel Gorman
2012-07-20 14:37       ` Mel Gorman
2012-07-20 14:40       ` Michal Hocko
2012-07-20 14:40         ` Michal Hocko
2012-07-20 14:36   ` [PATCH -alternative] " Michal Hocko
2012-07-20 14:36     ` Michal Hocko
2012-07-20 14:51     ` Mel Gorman
2012-07-20 14:51       ` Mel Gorman
2012-07-23  4:04       ` Hugh Dickins
2012-07-23  4:04         ` Hugh Dickins
2012-07-23 11:40         ` Mel Gorman
2012-07-23 11:40           ` Mel Gorman
2012-07-24  1:08           ` Hugh Dickins
2012-07-24  1:08             ` Hugh Dickins
2012-07-24  8:32             ` Michal Hocko
2012-07-24  8:32               ` Michal Hocko
2012-07-24  9:34             ` Mel Gorman
2012-07-24  9:34               ` Mel Gorman
2012-07-24 10:04               ` Michal Hocko
2012-07-24 10:04                 ` Michal Hocko
2012-07-24 19:23               ` Hugh Dickins
2012-07-24 19:23                 ` Hugh Dickins
2012-07-25  8:36                 ` Mel Gorman
2012-07-25  8:36                   ` Mel Gorman
2012-07-26 17:42         ` Rik van Riel
2012-07-26 17:42           ` Rik van Riel
2012-07-26 18:04           ` Larry Woodman
2012-07-26 18:04             ` Larry Woodman
2012-07-27  8:42           ` Mel Gorman
2012-07-27  8:42             ` Mel Gorman
2012-07-26 18:37         ` Rik van Riel
2012-07-26 18:37           ` Rik van Riel
2012-07-26 21:03           ` Larry Woodman
2012-07-26 21:03             ` Larry Woodman
2012-07-27  3:48           ` Larry Woodman
2012-07-27  3:48             ` Larry Woodman
2012-07-27 10:10             ` Larry Woodman
2012-07-27 10:10               ` Larry Woodman
2012-07-27 10:23             ` Mel Gorman
2012-07-27 10:23               ` Mel Gorman
2012-07-27 10:36               ` Larry Woodman
2012-07-27 10:36                 ` Larry Woodman
2012-07-30 19:11               ` Larry Woodman [this message]
2012-07-30 19:11                 ` Larry Woodman
2012-07-31 12:16                 ` Hillf Danton
2012-07-31 12:16                   ` Hillf Danton
2012-07-31 12:46                 ` Mel Gorman
2012-07-31 12:46                   ` Mel Gorman
2012-07-31 13:07                   ` Larry Woodman
2012-07-31 13:07                     ` Larry Woodman
2012-07-31 13:29                     ` Mel Gorman
2012-07-31 13:29                       ` Mel Gorman
2012-07-31 13:21                   ` Michal Hocko
2012-07-31 13:21                     ` Michal Hocko
2012-07-31 17:49                   ` Larry Woodman
2012-07-31 17:49                     ` Larry Woodman
2012-07-31 20:06                     ` Michal Hocko
2012-07-31 20:06                       ` Michal Hocko
2012-07-31 20:57                       ` Larry Woodman
2012-07-31 20:57                         ` Larry Woodman
2012-08-01  2:45                       ` Larry Woodman
2012-08-01  2:45                         ` Larry Woodman
2012-08-01  8:20                         ` Michal Hocko
2012-08-01  8:20                           ` Michal Hocko
2012-08-01 12:32                           ` Michal Hocko
2012-08-01 12:32                             ` Michal Hocko
2012-08-01 15:06                             ` Larry Woodman
2012-08-01 15:06                               ` Larry Woodman
2012-08-02  7:19                               ` Michal Hocko
2012-08-02  7:19                                 ` Michal Hocko
2012-08-02  7:37                                 ` Mel Gorman
2012-08-02  7:37                                   ` Mel Gorman
2012-08-02 12:36                                   ` Michal Hocko
2012-08-02 12:36                                     ` Michal Hocko
2012-08-02 13:33                                     ` Mel Gorman
2012-08-02 13:33                                       ` Mel Gorman
2012-08-02 13:53                                       ` Michal Hocko
2012-08-02 13:53                                         ` Michal Hocko
2012-07-31 18:03                   ` Rik van Riel
2012-07-31 18:03                     ` Rik van Riel
2012-07-26 18:31     ` Rik van Riel
2012-07-26 18:31       ` Rik van Riel
2012-07-27  9:02       ` Michal Hocko
2012-07-27  9:02         ` Michal Hocko
2012-07-26 16:01 ` [PATCH] mm: hugetlbfs: Close race during teardown of hugetlbfs shared page tables v2 Larry Woodman
2012-07-26 16:01   ` Larry Woodman
2012-07-27  8:47   ` Mel Gorman
2012-07-27  8:47     ` Mel Gorman
2012-07-26 21:00 ` Rik van Riel
2012-07-26 21:00   ` Rik van Riel
2012-07-26 21:54   ` Hugh Dickins
2012-07-26 21:54     ` Hugh Dickins
2012-07-27  8:52   ` Mel Gorman
2012-07-27  8:52     ` Mel Gorman

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=5016DC5F.7030604@redhat.com \
    --to=lwoodman@redhat.com \
    --cc=david@gibson.dropbear.id.au \
    --cc=hughd@google.com \
    --cc=kenchen@google.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
    --cc=mgorman@suse.de \
    --cc=mhocko@suse.cz \
    --cc=riel@redhat.com \
    --cc=xiyou.wangcong@gmail.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.