From: andrew@lunn.ch (Andrew Lunn)
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: [PATCH 5/6] ARM: dove: Remove watchdog from DT
Date: Tue, 25 Sep 2012 12:31:41 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20120925103141.GG27099@lunn.ch> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20120925121439.49c5d0dd@skate>
On Tue, Sep 25, 2012 at 12:14:39PM +0200, Thomas Petazzoni wrote:
> Dear Andrew Lunn,
>
> On Tue, 25 Sep 2012 11:46:10 +0200, Andrew Lunn wrote:
>
> > I principle, i agree. However, i'm not too sure about mach-orion5x &
> > mach-mv78xx0. orion5x has probably been broken since -rc1 was released
> > and nobody noticed. In the same time, we got around 5 people
> > independently reporting kirkwood was broken. We have not received any
> > new boards for orion5x in the time i've been looking at Orion
> > platforms. mv78xx0 only has one board which is not a Marvell reference
> > design. So im tempted to not spend any effort moving orion5x or
> > mv78xx0 to DT unless these actually hinder the effort of moving the
> > others to DT. What may make sense is to flatten mv78xx0 and orion5x
> > into plat-orion and then just watch the bit-rot happen.
>
> I'll try to see if I can get people from LaCie to test mach-orion5x as
> I have a few contacts there, and I'll contact Marvell to see if they can
> still provide Orion-based platforms.
Marvell supplied my one one reference platform. So i can do some
testing that the basic infrastructure works.
But the problem with converting to DT is that there is a lot of
brainless monkey work needed per supported board, and its very easy to
make a typo. So each board converted to DT needs testing. I don't know
if we can find testers for all the boards. But should we throw out
working boards just because we cannot find somebody to test the DT
version?
Andrew
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Andrew Lunn <andrew@lunn.ch>
To: Thomas Petazzoni <thomas.petazzoni@free-electrons.com>
Cc: Andrew Lunn <andrew@lunn.ch>,
Sebastian Hesselbarth <sebastian.hesselbarth@gmail.com>,
Russell King <linux@arm.linux.org.uk>,
Jason Cooper <jason@lakedaemon.net>,
Olof Johansson <olof@lixom.net>, Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>,
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
Gregory Clement <gregory.clement@free-electrons.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 5/6] ARM: dove: Remove watchdog from DT
Date: Tue, 25 Sep 2012 12:31:41 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20120925103141.GG27099@lunn.ch> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20120925121439.49c5d0dd@skate>
On Tue, Sep 25, 2012 at 12:14:39PM +0200, Thomas Petazzoni wrote:
> Dear Andrew Lunn,
>
> On Tue, 25 Sep 2012 11:46:10 +0200, Andrew Lunn wrote:
>
> > I principle, i agree. However, i'm not too sure about mach-orion5x &
> > mach-mv78xx0. orion5x has probably been broken since -rc1 was released
> > and nobody noticed. In the same time, we got around 5 people
> > independently reporting kirkwood was broken. We have not received any
> > new boards for orion5x in the time i've been looking at Orion
> > platforms. mv78xx0 only has one board which is not a Marvell reference
> > design. So im tempted to not spend any effort moving orion5x or
> > mv78xx0 to DT unless these actually hinder the effort of moving the
> > others to DT. What may make sense is to flatten mv78xx0 and orion5x
> > into plat-orion and then just watch the bit-rot happen.
>
> I'll try to see if I can get people from LaCie to test mach-orion5x as
> I have a few contacts there, and I'll contact Marvell to see if they can
> still provide Orion-based platforms.
Marvell supplied my one one reference platform. So i can do some
testing that the basic infrastructure works.
But the problem with converting to DT is that there is a lot of
brainless monkey work needed per supported board, and its very easy to
make a typo. So each board converted to DT needs testing. I don't know
if we can find testers for all the boards. But should we throw out
working boards just because we cannot find somebody to test the DT
version?
Andrew
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2012-09-25 10:31 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 49+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2012-09-25 0:02 [PATCH 0/6] Dove fixes for arm-soc/for-next Sebastian Hesselbarth
2012-09-25 0:02 ` Sebastian Hesselbarth
2012-09-25 0:02 ` [PATCH 1/6] ARM: dove: Add pcie clock support Sebastian Hesselbarth
2012-09-25 0:02 ` Sebastian Hesselbarth
2012-09-25 0:02 ` [PATCH 2/6] ARM: dove: Fix tauros2 device tree init Sebastian Hesselbarth
2012-09-25 0:02 ` Sebastian Hesselbarth
2012-09-25 1:22 ` Sebastian Hesselbarth
2012-09-25 1:22 ` Sebastian Hesselbarth
2012-09-25 5:19 ` Andrew Lunn
2012-09-25 5:19 ` Andrew Lunn
2012-09-25 8:56 ` Sebastian Hesselbarth
2012-09-25 8:56 ` Sebastian Hesselbarth
2012-09-25 0:02 ` [PATCH 3/6] ARM: dove: Fix clock names of sata and gbe Sebastian Hesselbarth
2012-09-25 0:02 ` Sebastian Hesselbarth
2012-09-25 0:02 ` [PATCH 4/6] ARM: dove: Restructure SoC device tree descriptor Sebastian Hesselbarth
2012-09-25 0:02 ` Sebastian Hesselbarth
2012-09-25 0:02 ` [PATCH 5/6] ARM: dove: Remove watchdog from DT Sebastian Hesselbarth
2012-09-25 0:02 ` Sebastian Hesselbarth
2012-09-25 5:35 ` Andrew Lunn
2012-09-25 5:35 ` Andrew Lunn
2012-09-25 9:11 ` Sebastian Hesselbarth
2012-09-25 9:11 ` Sebastian Hesselbarth
2012-09-25 9:18 ` Thomas Petazzoni
2012-09-25 9:18 ` Thomas Petazzoni
2012-09-25 9:46 ` Andrew Lunn
2012-09-25 9:46 ` Andrew Lunn
2012-09-25 10:14 ` Thomas Petazzoni
2012-09-25 10:14 ` Thomas Petazzoni
2012-09-25 10:31 ` Andrew Lunn [this message]
2012-09-25 10:31 ` Andrew Lunn
2012-09-25 11:20 ` Arnd Bergmann
2012-09-25 11:20 ` Arnd Bergmann
2012-09-25 11:48 ` Arnaud Patard (Rtp)
2012-09-25 11:48 ` Arnaud Patard
2012-09-25 12:28 ` Arnd Bergmann
2012-09-25 12:28 ` Arnd Bergmann
2012-10-08 18:40 ` Martin Michlmayr
2012-10-08 19:57 ` Andrew Lunn
2012-10-08 20:10 ` Arnd Bergmann
2012-10-08 20:29 ` Andrew Lunn
2012-09-25 12:33 ` Arnd Bergmann
2012-09-25 12:33 ` Arnd Bergmann
2012-09-25 18:25 ` sebastien requiem
2012-09-25 20:02 ` Arnd Bergmann
2012-09-25 20:02 ` Arnd Bergmann
2012-09-25 0:02 ` [PATCH 6/6] ARM: dove: Add crypto engine to DT Sebastian Hesselbarth
2012-09-25 0:02 ` Sebastian Hesselbarth
2012-09-25 5:37 ` [PATCH 0/6] Dove fixes for arm-soc/for-next Andrew Lunn
2012-09-25 5:37 ` Andrew Lunn
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20120925103141.GG27099@lunn.ch \
--to=andrew@lunn.ch \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.