All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz>
To: Zheng Liu <gnehzuil.liu@gmail.com>
Cc: linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org, Zheng Liu <wenqing.lz@taobao.com>,
	Theodore Ts'o <tytso@mit.edu>, Jan kara <jack@suse.cz>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 03/10 v5] ext4: let ext4_ext_map_blocks return EXT4_MAP_UNWRITTEN flag
Date: Fri, 8 Feb 2013 16:41:04 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20130208154104.GC10226@quack.suse.cz> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1360313046-9876-4-git-send-email-wenqing.lz@taobao.com>

On Fri 08-02-13 16:43:59, Zheng Liu wrote:
> From: Zheng Liu <wenqing.lz@taobao.com>
> 
> This commit lets ext4_ext_map_blocks return EXT4_MAP_UNWRITTEN flag
> because in later commit ext4_map_blocks needs to use this flag to
> determine the extent status.
  The patch looks good. You can add:
Reviewed-by: Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz>

								Honza

> 
> Signed-off-by: Zheng Liu <wenqing.lz@taobao.com>
> Cc: "Theodore Ts'o" <tytso@mit.edu>
> Cc: Jan kara <jack@suse.cz>
> ---
>  fs/ext4/extents.c |  6 +++++-
>  fs/ext4/inode.c   | 12 +++---------
>  2 files changed, 8 insertions(+), 10 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/fs/ext4/extents.c b/fs/ext4/extents.c
> index f7bf616..d92947f 100644
> --- a/fs/ext4/extents.c
> +++ b/fs/ext4/extents.c
> @@ -3657,6 +3657,7 @@ ext4_ext_handle_uninitialized_extents(handle_t *handle, struct inode *inode,
>  			ext4_set_io_unwritten_flag(inode, io);
>  		else
>  			ext4_set_inode_state(inode, EXT4_STATE_DIO_UNWRITTEN);
> +		map->m_flags |= EXT4_MAP_UNWRITTEN;
>  		if (ext4_should_dioread_nolock(inode))
>  			map->m_flags |= EXT4_MAP_UNINIT;
>  		goto out;
> @@ -3678,8 +3679,10 @@ ext4_ext_handle_uninitialized_extents(handle_t *handle, struct inode *inode,
>  	 * repeat fallocate creation request
>  	 * we already have an unwritten extent
>  	 */
> -	if (flags & EXT4_GET_BLOCKS_UNINIT_EXT)
> +	if (flags & EXT4_GET_BLOCKS_UNINIT_EXT) {
> +		map->m_flags |= EXT4_MAP_UNWRITTEN;
>  		goto map_out;
> +	}
>  
>  	/* buffered READ or buffered write_begin() lookup */
>  	if ((flags & EXT4_GET_BLOCKS_CREATE) == 0) {
> @@ -4109,6 +4112,7 @@ got_allocated_blocks:
>  	/* Mark uninitialized */
>  	if (flags & EXT4_GET_BLOCKS_UNINIT_EXT){
>  		ext4_ext_mark_uninitialized(&newex);
> +		map->m_flags |= EXT4_MAP_UNWRITTEN;
>  		/*
>  		 * io_end structure was created for every IO write to an
>  		 * uninitialized extent. To avoid unnecessary conversion,
> diff --git a/fs/ext4/inode.c b/fs/ext4/inode.c
> index 7fb00d8..c7e9665 100644
> --- a/fs/ext4/inode.c
> +++ b/fs/ext4/inode.c
> @@ -560,16 +560,10 @@ int ext4_map_blocks(handle_t *handle, struct inode *inode,
>  		return retval;
>  
>  	/*
> -	 * When we call get_blocks without the create flag, the
> -	 * BH_Unwritten flag could have gotten set if the blocks
> -	 * requested were part of a uninitialized extent.  We need to
> -	 * clear this flag now that we are committed to convert all or
> -	 * part of the uninitialized extent to be an initialized
> -	 * extent.  This is because we need to avoid the combination
> -	 * of BH_Unwritten and BH_Mapped flags being simultaneously
> -	 * set on the buffer_head.
> +	 * Here we clear m_flags because after allocating an new extent,
> +	 * it will be set again.
>  	 */
> -	map->m_flags &= ~EXT4_MAP_UNWRITTEN;
> +	map->m_flags &= ~EXT4_MAP_FLAGS;
>  
>  	/*
>  	 * New blocks allocate and/or writing to uninitialized extent
> -- 
> 1.7.12.rc2.18.g61b472e
> 
-- 
Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz>
SUSE Labs, CR

  reply	other threads:[~2013-02-08 15:41 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 37+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2013-02-08  8:43 [PATCH 00/10 v5] ext4: extent status tree (step2) Zheng Liu
2013-02-08  8:43 ` [PATCH 01/10 v5] ext4: refine extent status tree Zheng Liu
2013-02-08 15:35   ` Jan Kara
2013-02-15  6:38     ` Zheng Liu
2013-02-08  8:43 ` [PATCH 02/10 v5] ext4: add physical block and status member into " Zheng Liu
2013-02-08 15:39   ` Jan Kara
2013-02-08  8:43 ` [PATCH 03/10 v5] ext4: let ext4_ext_map_blocks return EXT4_MAP_UNWRITTEN flag Zheng Liu
2013-02-08 15:41   ` Jan Kara [this message]
2013-02-08  8:44 ` [PATCH 04/10 v5] ext4: track all extent status in extent status tree Zheng Liu
2013-02-11 12:21   ` Jan Kara
2013-02-15  6:45     ` Zheng Liu
2013-02-13  3:28   ` Theodore Ts'o
2013-02-13  3:46     ` [PATCH 1/2] ext4: rename ext4_es_find_extent() to ext4_es_find_delayed_extent() Theodore Ts'o
2013-02-13  3:46       ` [PATCH 2/2] ext4: track all extent status in extent status tree Theodore Ts'o
2013-02-15  6:53     ` [PATCH 04/10 v5] " Zheng Liu
2013-02-17 16:26     ` Zheng Liu
2013-02-08  8:44 ` [PATCH 05/10 v5] ext4: lookup block mapping " Zheng Liu
2013-02-12 12:31   ` Jan Kara
2013-02-15  7:06     ` Zheng Liu
2013-02-15 16:47       ` Jan Kara
2013-02-15 17:25       ` Theodore Ts'o
2013-02-16  2:32         ` Zheng Liu
2013-02-16 16:18           ` Possible TODO projects for the map_blocks() code path (was: Re: [PATCH 05/10 v5] ext4: lookup block mapping in extent status tree) Theodore Ts'o
2013-02-17  3:15             ` Zheng Liu
2013-02-08  8:44 ` [PATCH 06/10 v5] ext4: remove single extent cache Zheng Liu
2013-02-08  8:44 ` [PATCH 07/10 v5] ext4: adjust some functions for reclaiming extents from extent status tree Zheng Liu
2013-02-08  8:44 ` [PATCH 08/10 v5] ext4: reclaim " Zheng Liu
2013-02-08  8:44 ` [PATCH 09/10 v5] ext4: convert unwritten extents from extent status tree in end_io Zheng Liu
2013-02-10  8:45   ` Zheng Liu
2013-02-11  1:52     ` Theodore Ts'o
2013-02-12 12:51   ` Jan Kara
2013-02-15  7:12     ` Zheng Liu
2013-02-08  8:44 ` [PATCH 10/10 v5] ext4: remove bogus wait for unwritten extents in ext4_ind_direct_IO Zheng Liu
2013-02-12 12:58   ` Jan Kara
2013-02-15  7:14     ` Zheng Liu
2013-02-10  1:38 ` [PATCH 00/10 v5] ext4: extent status tree (step2) Theodore Ts'o
2013-02-10  8:40   ` Zheng Liu

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20130208154104.GC10226@quack.suse.cz \
    --to=jack@suse.cz \
    --cc=gnehzuil.liu@gmail.com \
    --cc=linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=tytso@mit.edu \
    --cc=wenqing.lz@taobao.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.