From: Theodore Ts'o <tytso@mit.edu>
To: Zheng Liu <gnehzuil.liu@gmail.com>
Cc: linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org, Zheng Liu <wenqing.lz@taobao.com>,
Jan kara <jack@suse.cz>, Dmitry Monakhov <dmonakhov@openvz.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 00/10 v5] ext4: extent status tree (step2)
Date: Sat, 9 Feb 2013 20:38:57 -0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20130210013857.GA8526@thunk.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1360313046-9876-1-git-send-email-wenqing.lz@taobao.com>
Hi Zheng,
Thanks for working on this! I've included your v5 extent status tree
patches into the ext4 dev tree. I will start doing further testing.
I suspected it wouldn't make a different, but I tested and confirmed
that your patches don't help fix the regression introduced by the
patch: disable-merging-of-uninitialized-extents
As a result, I've moved the following patches to the unstable portion
of the ext4 patch queue, pending further investigation and discussion:
disable-merging-of-uninitialized-extents
remove-unnecessary-wait-for-extent-coversion-in-ext4_fallocate
ext4_split_extent_should_take_care_of_extent_zeroout
I will be running a full set of tests and looking more deeply at the
patches, but for now I want to get them into linux-next for more
testing and review.
Cheers,
- Ted
On Fri, Feb 08, 2013 at 04:43:56PM +0800, Zheng Liu wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> This is my fifth try to implement the second step of extent status tree.
> The patch set can be divided into the following parts.
>
> Patch 1/10
> This patch refines the extent status tree
>
> Patch 2/10-6/10
> These patches try to track all extent status in extent status tree and
> make it as a extent cache. In extent_status structure bit field is removed
> because we get some warnings from 'sparse'. Now es_pblk and es_status are
> manipulated by ext4_es_*_pblock and ext4_es_*_status directly. Currently
> when an unwritten extent is allocated, we never know it from map->m_flags
> because ext4_ext_map_blocks doesn't return EXT4_MAP_UNWRITTEN flag. A
> patch fixes it and we can determine the extent status according to m_flags.
> According to Jan's feedback, we put the hole into extent cache to avoid
> to access extent tree in disk as far as possible. Here if the whole file
> is a hole, this hole will not be cached in extent status tree because it
> is always splitted immediately. Meanwhile the hole will not be cached
> when ext4_da_map_blocks looks up a block mapping because this hole will be
> as a delayed extent later.
>
> Patch 7/10-8/10
> This two patches try to reclaim memory from extent status tree when we
> are under a high memeory pressure.
>
> Patch 9/10-10/10
> Thses patches are picked up again from 1st version because I aware that
> they could remove a bogus wait in ext4_ind_direct_IO when dioread_nolock
> is enabled. After applied them, the latency of dio read can be reduced.
>
> I measure it using fio and the result shows as below.
>
> config file
> -----------
> [global]
> ioengine=psync
> direct=1
> bs=4k
> thread
> group_reporting
> directory=/mnt/sda1/
> filename=testfile
> filesize=10g
> size=10g
> runtime=120
> iodepth=16
>
> [fio]
> rw=randrw
> numjobs=4
>
> result
> ------
> w/ bogus wait
> read : io=1508.1MB, bw=12876KB/s, iops=3218 , runt=120001msec
> clat (usec): min=128 , max=268738 , avg=718.62, stdev=3703.97
> lat (usec): min=128 , max=268739 , avg=718.78, stdev=3703.97
> write: io=1505.2MB, bw=12843KB/s, iops=3210 , runt=120001msec
> clat (usec): min=47 , max=991727 , avg=520.94, stdev=3451.63
> lat (usec): min=47 , max=991727 , avg=521.31, stdev=3451.63
>
> w/o bogus wait
> read : io=1576.4MB, bw=13451KB/s, iops=3362 , runt=120001msec
> clat (usec): min=128 , max=283906 , avg=685.88, stdev=2762.64
> lat (usec): min=128 , max=283907 , avg=686.05, stdev=2762.64
> write: io=1577.9MB, bw=13458KB/s, iops=3364 , runt=120001msec
> clat (usec): min=48 , max=977942 , avg=498.97, stdev=3093.08
> lat (usec): min=48 , max=977943 , avg=499.33, stdev=3093.08
>
> From the result we can see that the avg. of latency could be reduced a little.
>
> changelog:
> v5 <- v4:
> - drop a patch that removes EXT4_MAP_FROM_CLUSTER flag
> (I will revise it in the patch set of get_block_t refinement)
> - fold original patch 3/9 into patch 4/9
> - manipulate es_pblk and es_status directly
> (bit field is removed because it causes some warnings from 'sparse')
> - let ext4_ext_map_blocks return EXT4_MAP_UNWRITTEN flag
> - rename ext4_es_find_extent with ext4_es_find_delayed_extent
> - add hole status and put hole into extent status tree as a cache
> - convert unwritten extents from extent status tree in ext4_ext_direct_IO
> and end_io callback
> - remove a bogus wait in ext4_ind_direct_IO when dioread_nolock is enabled
>
> v4 <- v3:
> - register a normal shrinker to reclaim extent from extent status tree
>
> v3 <- v2:
> - use prune_super() to reclaim extents from extent status tree
> - stashed es_status into es_pblk
> - remove single extent cache
> - rebase against 3.8-rc4
>
> v2 <- v1:
> - drop patches that try to improve unwritten extent conversion
> - remove EXT4_MAP_FROM_CLUSTER flag
> - add tracepoint for ext4_es_lookup_extent()
> - drop a patch, which tries to fix a warning when bigalloc and delalloc
> are enabled
> - add a shrinker to reclaim memory from extent status tree
> - rebase against 3.8-rc2
>
> v4: http://lwn.net/Articles/536037/
> v3: http://lwn.net/Articles/533730/
> v2: http://lwn.net/Articles/532446/
> v1: http://lwn.net/Articles/531065/
>
> As always, any comments or feedbacks are welcome.
>
> FWIW, when I try to implement patch 3/10, I realize that get_block_t and
> *_map_blocks functions need to be refactored because in ext4 we already
> have six get_block_t functions
> - ext4_get_block
> - ext4_get_block_write
> - ext4_get_block_write_nolock
> - noalloc_get_block_write
> - ext4_da_get_block_prep
> - _ext4_get_block
>
> and four *_map_blocks
> - ext4_map_blocks
> - ext4_da_map_blocks
> - ext4_ext_map_blocks
> - ext4_ind_map_blocks
>
> So I am planning to refine them. First I will try to split ext4_map_blocks
> into two parts, e.g. ext4_map_blocks_read and ext4_map_blocks_write, and
> then try other cleanups and improvmentes.
>
> Thanks,
> - Zheng
>
> Zheng Liu (10):
> ext4: refine extent status tree
> ext4: add physical block and status member into extent status tree
> ext4: let ext4_ext_map_blocks return EXT4_MAP_UNWRITTEN flag
> ext4: track all extent status in extent status tree
> ext4: lookup block mapping in extent status tree
> ext4: remove single extent cache
> ext4: adjust some functions for reclaiming extents from extent status
> tree
> ext4: reclaim extents from extent status tree
> ext4: convert unwritten extents from extent status tree in end_io
> ext4: remove bogus wait for unwritten extents in ext4_ind_direct_IO
>
> fs/ext4/ext4.h | 21 +-
> fs/ext4/ext4_extents.h | 6 -
> fs/ext4/extents.c | 211 ++++--------
> fs/ext4/extents_status.c | 779 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++---------
> fs/ext4/extents_status.h | 84 ++++-
> fs/ext4/file.c | 16 +-
> fs/ext4/indirect.c | 5 -
> fs/ext4/inode.c | 148 +++++++--
> fs/ext4/move_extent.c | 3 -
> fs/ext4/page-io.c | 8 +-
> fs/ext4/super.c | 8 +-
> include/trace/events/ext4.h | 207 ++++++++++--
> 12 files changed, 1075 insertions(+), 421 deletions(-)
>
> --
> 1.7.12.rc2.18.g61b472e
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2013-02-10 1:39 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 37+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2013-02-08 8:43 [PATCH 00/10 v5] ext4: extent status tree (step2) Zheng Liu
2013-02-08 8:43 ` [PATCH 01/10 v5] ext4: refine extent status tree Zheng Liu
2013-02-08 15:35 ` Jan Kara
2013-02-15 6:38 ` Zheng Liu
2013-02-08 8:43 ` [PATCH 02/10 v5] ext4: add physical block and status member into " Zheng Liu
2013-02-08 15:39 ` Jan Kara
2013-02-08 8:43 ` [PATCH 03/10 v5] ext4: let ext4_ext_map_blocks return EXT4_MAP_UNWRITTEN flag Zheng Liu
2013-02-08 15:41 ` Jan Kara
2013-02-08 8:44 ` [PATCH 04/10 v5] ext4: track all extent status in extent status tree Zheng Liu
2013-02-11 12:21 ` Jan Kara
2013-02-15 6:45 ` Zheng Liu
2013-02-13 3:28 ` Theodore Ts'o
2013-02-13 3:46 ` [PATCH 1/2] ext4: rename ext4_es_find_extent() to ext4_es_find_delayed_extent() Theodore Ts'o
2013-02-13 3:46 ` [PATCH 2/2] ext4: track all extent status in extent status tree Theodore Ts'o
2013-02-15 6:53 ` [PATCH 04/10 v5] " Zheng Liu
2013-02-17 16:26 ` Zheng Liu
2013-02-08 8:44 ` [PATCH 05/10 v5] ext4: lookup block mapping " Zheng Liu
2013-02-12 12:31 ` Jan Kara
2013-02-15 7:06 ` Zheng Liu
2013-02-15 16:47 ` Jan Kara
2013-02-15 17:25 ` Theodore Ts'o
2013-02-16 2:32 ` Zheng Liu
2013-02-16 16:18 ` Possible TODO projects for the map_blocks() code path (was: Re: [PATCH 05/10 v5] ext4: lookup block mapping in extent status tree) Theodore Ts'o
2013-02-17 3:15 ` Zheng Liu
2013-02-08 8:44 ` [PATCH 06/10 v5] ext4: remove single extent cache Zheng Liu
2013-02-08 8:44 ` [PATCH 07/10 v5] ext4: adjust some functions for reclaiming extents from extent status tree Zheng Liu
2013-02-08 8:44 ` [PATCH 08/10 v5] ext4: reclaim " Zheng Liu
2013-02-08 8:44 ` [PATCH 09/10 v5] ext4: convert unwritten extents from extent status tree in end_io Zheng Liu
2013-02-10 8:45 ` Zheng Liu
2013-02-11 1:52 ` Theodore Ts'o
2013-02-12 12:51 ` Jan Kara
2013-02-15 7:12 ` Zheng Liu
2013-02-08 8:44 ` [PATCH 10/10 v5] ext4: remove bogus wait for unwritten extents in ext4_ind_direct_IO Zheng Liu
2013-02-12 12:58 ` Jan Kara
2013-02-15 7:14 ` Zheng Liu
2013-02-10 1:38 ` Theodore Ts'o [this message]
2013-02-10 8:40 ` [PATCH 00/10 v5] ext4: extent status tree (step2) Zheng Liu
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20130210013857.GA8526@thunk.org \
--to=tytso@mit.edu \
--cc=dmonakhov@openvz.org \
--cc=gnehzuil.liu@gmail.com \
--cc=jack@suse.cz \
--cc=linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=wenqing.lz@taobao.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.