All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Theodore Ts'o <tytso@mit.edu>
To: Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz>,
	linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org, Zheng Liu <wenqing.lz@taobao.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 05/10 v5] ext4: lookup block mapping in extent status tree
Date: Fri, 15 Feb 2013 12:25:49 -0500	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20130215172549.GB31172@thunk.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20130215070626.GD26945@gmail.com>

On Fri, Feb 15, 2013 at 03:06:26PM +0800, Zheng Liu wrote:
> 
> I am planning to refine the get_block_t and *map_blocks functions.  At
> that time I will try to fix this problem.

Note that get_block_t can't be changed without disrupting the Direct
I/O functions which are generic VFS functions.  There's been talk of
trying to clean up DIO, but it will probably require building a
parallel infrastructure in the generic layer, and then transitioning
individual file systems over to it.  It is definitely a mess, but it's
going to be a very tricky problem.  I suspect we'll be talking about
it at LSF/MM.

One thing thing which might be an interesting thing to do that
wouldn't require wholesale changes to generic code would be to
transition ext4_readpages() to use fs/ext4/page-io.c.  Not for this
merge window, in all likelihood, but right now we are calling
ext4_get_block() for every single page that we read in, while is
wasteful.  It would be nice if ext4_readpages() called
ext4_map_blocks() for each extent, and then submitted it using the
page-io.c functions so we don't end up calling into ext4_map_blocks()
quite as much.

That will ease our scalability and remove locking overhead, in
addition to saving CPU for the buffered I/O readpages path.
Eventually it would be good to do this for DIO as well, but that's
going to require a lot more work, and coordination with the developers
of btrfs, xfs, etc.

					- Ted

  parent reply	other threads:[~2013-02-15 17:25 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 37+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2013-02-08  8:43 [PATCH 00/10 v5] ext4: extent status tree (step2) Zheng Liu
2013-02-08  8:43 ` [PATCH 01/10 v5] ext4: refine extent status tree Zheng Liu
2013-02-08 15:35   ` Jan Kara
2013-02-15  6:38     ` Zheng Liu
2013-02-08  8:43 ` [PATCH 02/10 v5] ext4: add physical block and status member into " Zheng Liu
2013-02-08 15:39   ` Jan Kara
2013-02-08  8:43 ` [PATCH 03/10 v5] ext4: let ext4_ext_map_blocks return EXT4_MAP_UNWRITTEN flag Zheng Liu
2013-02-08 15:41   ` Jan Kara
2013-02-08  8:44 ` [PATCH 04/10 v5] ext4: track all extent status in extent status tree Zheng Liu
2013-02-11 12:21   ` Jan Kara
2013-02-15  6:45     ` Zheng Liu
2013-02-13  3:28   ` Theodore Ts'o
2013-02-13  3:46     ` [PATCH 1/2] ext4: rename ext4_es_find_extent() to ext4_es_find_delayed_extent() Theodore Ts'o
2013-02-13  3:46       ` [PATCH 2/2] ext4: track all extent status in extent status tree Theodore Ts'o
2013-02-15  6:53     ` [PATCH 04/10 v5] " Zheng Liu
2013-02-17 16:26     ` Zheng Liu
2013-02-08  8:44 ` [PATCH 05/10 v5] ext4: lookup block mapping " Zheng Liu
2013-02-12 12:31   ` Jan Kara
2013-02-15  7:06     ` Zheng Liu
2013-02-15 16:47       ` Jan Kara
2013-02-15 17:25       ` Theodore Ts'o [this message]
2013-02-16  2:32         ` Zheng Liu
2013-02-16 16:18           ` Possible TODO projects for the map_blocks() code path (was: Re: [PATCH 05/10 v5] ext4: lookup block mapping in extent status tree) Theodore Ts'o
2013-02-17  3:15             ` Zheng Liu
2013-02-08  8:44 ` [PATCH 06/10 v5] ext4: remove single extent cache Zheng Liu
2013-02-08  8:44 ` [PATCH 07/10 v5] ext4: adjust some functions for reclaiming extents from extent status tree Zheng Liu
2013-02-08  8:44 ` [PATCH 08/10 v5] ext4: reclaim " Zheng Liu
2013-02-08  8:44 ` [PATCH 09/10 v5] ext4: convert unwritten extents from extent status tree in end_io Zheng Liu
2013-02-10  8:45   ` Zheng Liu
2013-02-11  1:52     ` Theodore Ts'o
2013-02-12 12:51   ` Jan Kara
2013-02-15  7:12     ` Zheng Liu
2013-02-08  8:44 ` [PATCH 10/10 v5] ext4: remove bogus wait for unwritten extents in ext4_ind_direct_IO Zheng Liu
2013-02-12 12:58   ` Jan Kara
2013-02-15  7:14     ` Zheng Liu
2013-02-10  1:38 ` [PATCH 00/10 v5] ext4: extent status tree (step2) Theodore Ts'o
2013-02-10  8:40   ` Zheng Liu

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20130215172549.GB31172@thunk.org \
    --to=tytso@mit.edu \
    --cc=jack@suse.cz \
    --cc=linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=wenqing.lz@taobao.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.