All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz>
To: Zheng Liu <gnehzuil.liu@gmail.com>
Cc: Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz>,
	linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org, Zheng Liu <wenqing.lz@taobao.com>,
	Theodore Ts'o <tytso@mit.edu>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 05/10 v5] ext4: lookup block mapping in extent status tree
Date: Fri, 15 Feb 2013 17:47:51 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20130215164751.GE7458@quack.suse.cz> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20130215070626.GD26945@gmail.com>

On Fri 15-02-13 15:06:26, Zheng Liu wrote:
> On Tue, Feb 12, 2013 at 01:31:42PM +0100, Jan Kara wrote:
> > On Fri 08-02-13 16:44:01, Zheng Liu wrote:
> > > From: Zheng Liu <wenqing.lz@taobao.com>
> > > 
> > > After tracking all extent status, we already have a extent cache in
> > > memory.  Every time we want to lookup a block mapping, we can first
> > > try to lookup it in extent status tree to avoid a potential disk I/O.
> > > 
> > > A new function called ext4_es_lookup_extent is defined to finish this
> > > work.  When we try to lookup a block mapping, we always call
> > > ext4_map_blocks and/or ext4_da_map_blocks.  So in these functions we
> > > first try to lookup a block mapping in extent status tree.
> > > 
> > > A new flag EXT4_GET_BLOCKS_NO_PUT_HOLE is used in ext4_da_map_blocks
> > > in order not to put a hole into extent status tree because this hole
> > > will be converted to delayed extent in the tree immediately.
> >   It looks somewhat inconsistent that you put hole into the extent tree in
> > ext4_ext_map_blocks() but all other extent types are handled in
> > ext4_map_blocks() or ext4_da_map_blocks(). Can we put the handling in one
> > place?
> 
> It seems that putting all handlings in one place is too complex because
> ext4_da_map_blocks() calls ext4_ext_map_blocks() and ext4_ind_map_blocks()
> directly.  So now we put all extent except hole in ext4_map_blocks() and
> ext4_da_map_blocks().  For the hole, it will be inserted into the status
> tree in ext4_ext_put_gap_in_cache().  In this function we can get the
> the length of the hole.  If we handle it in ext4_da_map_blocks() or
> ext4_map_blocks(), we only can insert a hole which the length of this
> hole is 1 because in these functions we couldn't know the length of the
> hole.
  Ah right, thanks for explanation.

								Honza
-- 
Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz>
SUSE Labs, CR

  reply	other threads:[~2013-02-15 16:47 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 37+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2013-02-08  8:43 [PATCH 00/10 v5] ext4: extent status tree (step2) Zheng Liu
2013-02-08  8:43 ` [PATCH 01/10 v5] ext4: refine extent status tree Zheng Liu
2013-02-08 15:35   ` Jan Kara
2013-02-15  6:38     ` Zheng Liu
2013-02-08  8:43 ` [PATCH 02/10 v5] ext4: add physical block and status member into " Zheng Liu
2013-02-08 15:39   ` Jan Kara
2013-02-08  8:43 ` [PATCH 03/10 v5] ext4: let ext4_ext_map_blocks return EXT4_MAP_UNWRITTEN flag Zheng Liu
2013-02-08 15:41   ` Jan Kara
2013-02-08  8:44 ` [PATCH 04/10 v5] ext4: track all extent status in extent status tree Zheng Liu
2013-02-11 12:21   ` Jan Kara
2013-02-15  6:45     ` Zheng Liu
2013-02-13  3:28   ` Theodore Ts'o
2013-02-13  3:46     ` [PATCH 1/2] ext4: rename ext4_es_find_extent() to ext4_es_find_delayed_extent() Theodore Ts'o
2013-02-13  3:46       ` [PATCH 2/2] ext4: track all extent status in extent status tree Theodore Ts'o
2013-02-15  6:53     ` [PATCH 04/10 v5] " Zheng Liu
2013-02-17 16:26     ` Zheng Liu
2013-02-08  8:44 ` [PATCH 05/10 v5] ext4: lookup block mapping " Zheng Liu
2013-02-12 12:31   ` Jan Kara
2013-02-15  7:06     ` Zheng Liu
2013-02-15 16:47       ` Jan Kara [this message]
2013-02-15 17:25       ` Theodore Ts'o
2013-02-16  2:32         ` Zheng Liu
2013-02-16 16:18           ` Possible TODO projects for the map_blocks() code path (was: Re: [PATCH 05/10 v5] ext4: lookup block mapping in extent status tree) Theodore Ts'o
2013-02-17  3:15             ` Zheng Liu
2013-02-08  8:44 ` [PATCH 06/10 v5] ext4: remove single extent cache Zheng Liu
2013-02-08  8:44 ` [PATCH 07/10 v5] ext4: adjust some functions for reclaiming extents from extent status tree Zheng Liu
2013-02-08  8:44 ` [PATCH 08/10 v5] ext4: reclaim " Zheng Liu
2013-02-08  8:44 ` [PATCH 09/10 v5] ext4: convert unwritten extents from extent status tree in end_io Zheng Liu
2013-02-10  8:45   ` Zheng Liu
2013-02-11  1:52     ` Theodore Ts'o
2013-02-12 12:51   ` Jan Kara
2013-02-15  7:12     ` Zheng Liu
2013-02-08  8:44 ` [PATCH 10/10 v5] ext4: remove bogus wait for unwritten extents in ext4_ind_direct_IO Zheng Liu
2013-02-12 12:58   ` Jan Kara
2013-02-15  7:14     ` Zheng Liu
2013-02-10  1:38 ` [PATCH 00/10 v5] ext4: extent status tree (step2) Theodore Ts'o
2013-02-10  8:40   ` Zheng Liu

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20130215164751.GE7458@quack.suse.cz \
    --to=jack@suse.cz \
    --cc=gnehzuil.liu@gmail.com \
    --cc=linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=tytso@mit.edu \
    --cc=wenqing.lz@taobao.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.