From: ezequiel.garcia@free-electrons.com (Ezequiel Garcia)
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: [PATCH 04/14] bus: mvebu-mbus: Add static window allocation to the DT binding
Date: Wed, 12 Jun 2013 18:12:22 -0300 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20130612211221.GB23012@localhost> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <201306122245.55960.arnd@arndb.de>
On Wed, Jun 12, 2013 at 10:45:55PM +0200, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
> On Wednesday 12 June 2013, Grant Likely wrote:
> > I think we should have almost everything needed already to do this.
> > of_bus allows arbitrary mapping code to be used at any stage in the
> > translation. We might need to add some glue so that of_busses[] can
> > be assembled by the linker to allow an mbus of_bus stanza to live
> > outside of drivers/of/address.c
> >
>
> Actually, the best thing about this solution is that we don't even
> have to bother setting up the mappings when loading the mbus driver:
> We don't need any ranges (other than internal-regs) in DT, and we
> don't need complex logic to search through the child devices to
> figure out what the mappings should be. The only thing one needs
> to do here is check if a mapping already exists when we get into the
> of_bus handler and create one for the device being translated if
> there isn't one!
>
This departs considerably from what I'm aiming right now.
Are you suggesting to not put *any* mapping in the mbus 'ranges' node in
the DT (other than internal-regs)?
In that case, can you explain a bit further how the mbus would
decide a base address for each window? I guess you're thinking
in a first-fit algorithm, right?
--
Ezequiel Garc?a, Free Electrons
Embedded Linux, Kernel and Android Engineering
http://free-electrons.com
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Ezequiel Garcia <ezequiel.garcia-wi1+55ScJUtKEb57/3fJTNBPR1lH4CV8@public.gmane.org>
To: Arnd Bergmann <arnd-r2nGTMty4D4@public.gmane.org>
Cc: Lior Amsalem <alior-eYqpPyKDWXRBDgjK7y7TUQ@public.gmane.org>,
Jason Gunthorpe
<jgunthorpe-ePGOBjL8dl3ta4EC/59zMFaTQe2KTcn/@public.gmane.org>,
Jason Cooper <jason-NLaQJdtUoK4Be96aLqz0jA@public.gmane.org>,
Andrew Lunn <andrew-g2DYL2Zd6BY@public.gmane.org>,
devicetree-discuss-uLR06cmDAlY/bJ5BZ2RsiQ@public.gmane.org,
Maen Suleiman <maen-eYqpPyKDWXRBDgjK7y7TUQ@public.gmane.org>,
linux-arm-kernel-IAPFreCvJWM7uuMidbF8XUB+6BGkLq7r@public.gmane.org,
Sebastian Hesselbarth
<sebastian.hesselbarth-Re5JQEeQqe8AvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 04/14] bus: mvebu-mbus: Add static window allocation to the DT binding
Date: Wed, 12 Jun 2013 18:12:22 -0300 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20130612211221.GB23012@localhost> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <201306122245.55960.arnd-r2nGTMty4D4@public.gmane.org>
On Wed, Jun 12, 2013 at 10:45:55PM +0200, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
> On Wednesday 12 June 2013, Grant Likely wrote:
> > I think we should have almost everything needed already to do this.
> > of_bus allows arbitrary mapping code to be used at any stage in the
> > translation. We might need to add some glue so that of_busses[] can
> > be assembled by the linker to allow an mbus of_bus stanza to live
> > outside of drivers/of/address.c
> >
>
> Actually, the best thing about this solution is that we don't even
> have to bother setting up the mappings when loading the mbus driver:
> We don't need any ranges (other than internal-regs) in DT, and we
> don't need complex logic to search through the child devices to
> figure out what the mappings should be. The only thing one needs
> to do here is check if a mapping already exists when we get into the
> of_bus handler and create one for the device being translated if
> there isn't one!
>
This departs considerably from what I'm aiming right now.
Are you suggesting to not put *any* mapping in the mbus 'ranges' node in
the DT (other than internal-regs)?
In that case, can you explain a bit further how the mbus would
decide a base address for each window? I guess you're thinking
in a first-fit algorithm, right?
--
Ezequiel García, Free Electrons
Embedded Linux, Kernel and Android Engineering
http://free-electrons.com
_______________________________________________
devicetree-discuss mailing list
devicetree-discuss@lists.ozlabs.org
https://lists.ozlabs.org/listinfo/devicetree-discuss
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2013-06-12 21:12 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 136+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2013-06-07 16:47 [PATCH 00/14] MBus device tree binding Ezequiel Garcia
2013-06-07 16:47 ` Ezequiel Garcia
2013-06-07 16:47 ` [PATCH 01/14] bus: mvebu-mbus: Use pr_fmt Ezequiel Garcia
2013-06-07 16:47 ` Ezequiel Garcia
2013-06-07 16:56 ` Thomas Petazzoni
2013-06-07 16:56 ` Thomas Petazzoni
2013-06-08 14:15 ` Jason Cooper
2013-06-08 14:15 ` Jason Cooper
2013-06-07 16:47 ` [PATCH 02/14] bus: mvebu-mbus: Factor out initialization details Ezequiel Garcia
2013-06-07 16:47 ` Ezequiel Garcia
2013-06-07 16:47 ` [PATCH 03/14] bus: mvebu-mbus: Introduce device tree binding Ezequiel Garcia
2013-06-07 16:47 ` Ezequiel Garcia
2013-06-07 19:10 ` Arnd Bergmann
2013-06-07 19:10 ` Arnd Bergmann
2013-06-07 19:44 ` Jason Gunthorpe
2013-06-07 19:44 ` Jason Gunthorpe
2013-06-07 19:53 ` Arnd Bergmann
2013-06-07 19:53 ` Arnd Bergmann
2013-06-07 20:09 ` Jason Gunthorpe
2013-06-07 20:09 ` Jason Gunthorpe
2013-06-07 21:15 ` Arnd Bergmann
2013-06-07 21:15 ` Arnd Bergmann
2013-06-08 0:26 ` Jason Gunthorpe
2013-06-08 0:26 ` Jason Gunthorpe
2013-06-08 17:29 ` Ezequiel Garcia
2013-06-08 17:29 ` Ezequiel Garcia
2013-06-07 16:47 ` [PATCH 04/14] bus: mvebu-mbus: Add static window allocation to the DT binding Ezequiel Garcia
2013-06-07 16:47 ` Ezequiel Garcia
2013-06-07 19:01 ` Arnd Bergmann
2013-06-07 19:01 ` Arnd Bergmann
2013-06-07 20:00 ` Jason Gunthorpe
2013-06-07 20:00 ` Jason Gunthorpe
2013-06-07 21:07 ` Arnd Bergmann
2013-06-07 21:07 ` Arnd Bergmann
2013-06-08 18:38 ` Ezequiel Garcia
2013-06-08 18:38 ` Ezequiel Garcia
2013-06-09 1:45 ` Jason Gunthorpe
2013-06-09 1:45 ` Jason Gunthorpe
2013-06-09 14:39 ` Ezequiel Garcia
2013-06-09 14:39 ` Ezequiel Garcia
2013-06-11 13:57 ` Ezequiel Garcia
2013-06-11 13:57 ` Ezequiel Garcia
2013-06-11 15:26 ` Arnd Bergmann
2013-06-11 15:26 ` Arnd Bergmann
2013-06-11 21:50 ` Jason Gunthorpe
2013-06-11 21:50 ` Jason Gunthorpe
2013-06-11 22:22 ` Sebastian Hesselbarth
2013-06-11 22:22 ` Sebastian Hesselbarth
2013-06-11 23:02 ` Arnd Bergmann
2013-06-11 23:02 ` Arnd Bergmann
2013-06-11 23:08 ` Jason Gunthorpe
2013-06-11 23:08 ` Jason Gunthorpe
2013-06-12 7:37 ` Sebastian Hesselbarth
2013-06-12 7:37 ` Sebastian Hesselbarth
2013-06-11 22:34 ` Arnd Bergmann
2013-06-11 22:34 ` Arnd Bergmann
2013-06-11 22:58 ` Jason Gunthorpe
2013-06-11 22:58 ` Jason Gunthorpe
2013-06-11 23:10 ` Arnd Bergmann
2013-06-11 23:10 ` Arnd Bergmann
2013-06-12 11:14 ` Grant Likely
2013-06-12 11:14 ` Grant Likely
2013-06-12 20:45 ` Arnd Bergmann
2013-06-12 20:45 ` Arnd Bergmann
2013-06-12 21:12 ` Ezequiel Garcia [this message]
2013-06-12 21:12 ` Ezequiel Garcia
2013-06-12 21:26 ` Jason Gunthorpe
2013-06-12 21:26 ` Jason Gunthorpe
2013-06-12 21:36 ` Ezequiel Garcia
2013-06-12 21:36 ` Ezequiel Garcia
2013-06-12 21:52 ` Arnd Bergmann
2013-06-12 21:52 ` Arnd Bergmann
2013-06-12 22:02 ` Jason Gunthorpe
2013-06-12 22:02 ` Jason Gunthorpe
2013-06-12 22:20 ` Arnd Bergmann
2013-06-12 22:20 ` Arnd Bergmann
2013-06-12 22:24 ` Arnd Bergmann
2013-06-12 22:24 ` Arnd Bergmann
2013-06-15 16:03 ` Grant Likely
2013-06-15 16:03 ` Grant Likely
2013-06-12 20:02 ` Ezequiel Garcia
2013-06-12 20:02 ` Ezequiel Garcia
2013-06-12 20:12 ` Jason Gunthorpe
2013-06-12 20:12 ` Jason Gunthorpe
2013-06-12 21:50 ` Arnd Bergmann
2013-06-12 21:50 ` Arnd Bergmann
2013-06-12 11:07 ` Grant Likely
2013-06-12 11:07 ` Grant Likely
2013-06-12 11:43 ` Arnd Bergmann
2013-06-12 11:43 ` Arnd Bergmann
2013-06-12 11:54 ` Grant Likely
2013-06-12 11:54 ` Grant Likely
2013-06-12 11:58 ` Arnd Bergmann
2013-06-12 11:58 ` Arnd Bergmann
2013-06-12 10:52 ` Grant Likely
2013-06-12 10:52 ` Grant Likely
2013-06-09 13:42 ` Arnd Bergmann
2013-06-09 13:42 ` Arnd Bergmann
2013-06-09 14:34 ` Ezequiel Garcia
2013-06-09 14:34 ` Ezequiel Garcia
2013-06-09 15:37 ` Arnd Bergmann
2013-06-09 15:37 ` Arnd Bergmann
2013-06-12 10:48 ` Grant Likely
2013-06-12 10:48 ` Grant Likely
2013-06-11 13:31 ` Ezequiel Garcia
2013-06-11 13:31 ` Ezequiel Garcia
2013-06-11 15:02 ` Arnd Bergmann
2013-06-11 15:02 ` Arnd Bergmann
2013-06-07 16:47 ` [PATCH 05/14] bus: mvebu-mbus: Update the mbus-compatible node's ranges property Ezequiel Garcia
2013-06-07 16:47 ` Ezequiel Garcia
2013-06-12 10:25 ` Grant Likely
2013-06-12 10:25 ` Grant Likely
2013-06-07 16:47 ` [PATCH 06/14] ARM: mvebu: Initialize MBus using the DT binding Ezequiel Garcia
2013-06-07 16:47 ` Ezequiel Garcia
2013-06-07 16:47 ` [PATCH 07/14] ARM: mvebu: Remove the harcoded BootROM window allocation Ezequiel Garcia
2013-06-07 16:47 ` Ezequiel Garcia
2013-06-07 16:47 ` [PATCH 08/14] memory: mvebu-devbus: Remove address decoding window workaround Ezequiel Garcia
2013-06-07 16:47 ` Ezequiel Garcia
2013-06-07 16:47 ` [PATCH 09/14] ARM: mvebu: Add MBus to Armada 370/XP device tree Ezequiel Garcia
2013-06-07 16:47 ` Ezequiel Garcia
2013-06-07 16:47 ` [PATCH 10/14] ARM: mvebu: Add BootROM " Ezequiel Garcia
2013-06-07 16:47 ` Ezequiel Garcia
2013-06-07 16:47 ` [PATCH 11/14] ARM: mvebu: Relocate Armada 370/XP DeviceBus device tree nodes Ezequiel Garcia
2013-06-07 16:47 ` Ezequiel Garcia
2013-06-07 19:18 ` Arnd Bergmann
2013-06-07 19:18 ` Arnd Bergmann
2013-06-07 16:47 ` [PATCH 12/14] ARM: mvebu: Remove device tree unused properties on A370 Ezequiel Garcia
2013-06-07 16:47 ` Ezequiel Garcia
2013-06-07 16:56 ` Thomas Petazzoni
2013-06-07 16:56 ` Thomas Petazzoni
2013-06-08 14:18 ` Jason Cooper
2013-06-08 14:18 ` Jason Cooper
2013-06-07 16:47 ` [PATCH 13/14] ARM: mvebu: Relocate Armada 370 PCIe device tree nodes Ezequiel Garcia
2013-06-07 16:47 ` Ezequiel Garcia
2013-06-07 16:47 ` [PATCH 14/14] ARM: mvebu: Relocate Armada XP " Ezequiel Garcia
2013-06-07 16:47 ` Ezequiel Garcia
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20130612211221.GB23012@localhost \
--to=ezequiel.garcia@free-electrons.com \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.