From: arnd@arndb.de (Arnd Bergmann)
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: [PATCH 04/14] bus: mvebu-mbus: Add static window allocation to the DT binding
Date: Wed, 12 Jun 2013 23:52:32 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <201306122352.32749.arnd@arndb.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20130612213620.GC23012@localhost>
On Wednesday 12 June 2013, Ezequiel Garcia wrote:
> Right. And just to confirm: this kernel side dynamic implementation
> will be completely independent of the MBus DT layout proposal.
> So I think it's best to agree on this binding first.
>
> I'll post a v2 with the progress I've made using the preprocessor.
Right. My thought was just that with the of_bus handler it might end up
being /easier/ to do the dynamic mapping than it is to preconfigure
it in the DT.
Whether that results in an optimum mapping or not depends on the actual
sizes for the child nodes. Since everything is a power-of-two size,
a first-fit algorithm actually isn't bad at all.
Arnd
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Arnd Bergmann <arnd-r2nGTMty4D4@public.gmane.org>
To: Ezequiel Garcia
<ezequiel.garcia-wi1+55ScJUtKEb57/3fJTNBPR1lH4CV8@public.gmane.org>
Cc: Lior Amsalem <alior-eYqpPyKDWXRBDgjK7y7TUQ@public.gmane.org>,
Jason Cooper <jason-NLaQJdtUoK4Be96aLqz0jA@public.gmane.org>,
Andrew Lunn <andrew-g2DYL2Zd6BY@public.gmane.org>,
devicetree-discuss-uLR06cmDAlY/bJ5BZ2RsiQ@public.gmane.org,
Jason Gunthorpe
<jgunthorpe-ePGOBjL8dl3ta4EC/59zMFaTQe2KTcn/@public.gmane.org>,
Maen Suleiman <maen-eYqpPyKDWXRBDgjK7y7TUQ@public.gmane.org>,
linux-arm-kernel-IAPFreCvJWM7uuMidbF8XUB+6BGkLq7r@public.gmane.org,
Sebastian Hesselbarth
<sebastian.hesselbarth-Re5JQEeQqe8AvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 04/14] bus: mvebu-mbus: Add static window allocation to the DT binding
Date: Wed, 12 Jun 2013 23:52:32 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <201306122352.32749.arnd@arndb.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20130612213620.GC23012@localhost>
On Wednesday 12 June 2013, Ezequiel Garcia wrote:
> Right. And just to confirm: this kernel side dynamic implementation
> will be completely independent of the MBus DT layout proposal.
> So I think it's best to agree on this binding first.
>
> I'll post a v2 with the progress I've made using the preprocessor.
Right. My thought was just that with the of_bus handler it might end up
being /easier/ to do the dynamic mapping than it is to preconfigure
it in the DT.
Whether that results in an optimum mapping or not depends on the actual
sizes for the child nodes. Since everything is a power-of-two size,
a first-fit algorithm actually isn't bad at all.
Arnd
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2013-06-12 21:52 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 136+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2013-06-07 16:47 [PATCH 00/14] MBus device tree binding Ezequiel Garcia
2013-06-07 16:47 ` Ezequiel Garcia
2013-06-07 16:47 ` [PATCH 01/14] bus: mvebu-mbus: Use pr_fmt Ezequiel Garcia
2013-06-07 16:47 ` Ezequiel Garcia
2013-06-07 16:56 ` Thomas Petazzoni
2013-06-07 16:56 ` Thomas Petazzoni
2013-06-08 14:15 ` Jason Cooper
2013-06-08 14:15 ` Jason Cooper
2013-06-07 16:47 ` [PATCH 02/14] bus: mvebu-mbus: Factor out initialization details Ezequiel Garcia
2013-06-07 16:47 ` Ezequiel Garcia
2013-06-07 16:47 ` [PATCH 03/14] bus: mvebu-mbus: Introduce device tree binding Ezequiel Garcia
2013-06-07 16:47 ` Ezequiel Garcia
2013-06-07 19:10 ` Arnd Bergmann
2013-06-07 19:10 ` Arnd Bergmann
2013-06-07 19:44 ` Jason Gunthorpe
2013-06-07 19:44 ` Jason Gunthorpe
2013-06-07 19:53 ` Arnd Bergmann
2013-06-07 19:53 ` Arnd Bergmann
2013-06-07 20:09 ` Jason Gunthorpe
2013-06-07 20:09 ` Jason Gunthorpe
2013-06-07 21:15 ` Arnd Bergmann
2013-06-07 21:15 ` Arnd Bergmann
2013-06-08 0:26 ` Jason Gunthorpe
2013-06-08 0:26 ` Jason Gunthorpe
2013-06-08 17:29 ` Ezequiel Garcia
2013-06-08 17:29 ` Ezequiel Garcia
2013-06-07 16:47 ` [PATCH 04/14] bus: mvebu-mbus: Add static window allocation to the DT binding Ezequiel Garcia
2013-06-07 16:47 ` Ezequiel Garcia
2013-06-07 19:01 ` Arnd Bergmann
2013-06-07 19:01 ` Arnd Bergmann
2013-06-07 20:00 ` Jason Gunthorpe
2013-06-07 20:00 ` Jason Gunthorpe
2013-06-07 21:07 ` Arnd Bergmann
2013-06-07 21:07 ` Arnd Bergmann
2013-06-08 18:38 ` Ezequiel Garcia
2013-06-08 18:38 ` Ezequiel Garcia
2013-06-09 1:45 ` Jason Gunthorpe
2013-06-09 1:45 ` Jason Gunthorpe
2013-06-09 14:39 ` Ezequiel Garcia
2013-06-09 14:39 ` Ezequiel Garcia
2013-06-11 13:57 ` Ezequiel Garcia
2013-06-11 13:57 ` Ezequiel Garcia
2013-06-11 15:26 ` Arnd Bergmann
2013-06-11 15:26 ` Arnd Bergmann
2013-06-11 21:50 ` Jason Gunthorpe
2013-06-11 21:50 ` Jason Gunthorpe
2013-06-11 22:22 ` Sebastian Hesselbarth
2013-06-11 22:22 ` Sebastian Hesselbarth
2013-06-11 23:02 ` Arnd Bergmann
2013-06-11 23:02 ` Arnd Bergmann
2013-06-11 23:08 ` Jason Gunthorpe
2013-06-11 23:08 ` Jason Gunthorpe
2013-06-12 7:37 ` Sebastian Hesselbarth
2013-06-12 7:37 ` Sebastian Hesselbarth
2013-06-11 22:34 ` Arnd Bergmann
2013-06-11 22:34 ` Arnd Bergmann
2013-06-11 22:58 ` Jason Gunthorpe
2013-06-11 22:58 ` Jason Gunthorpe
2013-06-11 23:10 ` Arnd Bergmann
2013-06-11 23:10 ` Arnd Bergmann
2013-06-12 11:14 ` Grant Likely
2013-06-12 11:14 ` Grant Likely
2013-06-12 20:45 ` Arnd Bergmann
2013-06-12 20:45 ` Arnd Bergmann
2013-06-12 21:12 ` Ezequiel Garcia
2013-06-12 21:12 ` Ezequiel Garcia
2013-06-12 21:26 ` Jason Gunthorpe
2013-06-12 21:26 ` Jason Gunthorpe
2013-06-12 21:36 ` Ezequiel Garcia
2013-06-12 21:36 ` Ezequiel Garcia
2013-06-12 21:52 ` Arnd Bergmann [this message]
2013-06-12 21:52 ` Arnd Bergmann
2013-06-12 22:02 ` Jason Gunthorpe
2013-06-12 22:02 ` Jason Gunthorpe
2013-06-12 22:20 ` Arnd Bergmann
2013-06-12 22:20 ` Arnd Bergmann
2013-06-12 22:24 ` Arnd Bergmann
2013-06-12 22:24 ` Arnd Bergmann
2013-06-15 16:03 ` Grant Likely
2013-06-15 16:03 ` Grant Likely
2013-06-12 20:02 ` Ezequiel Garcia
2013-06-12 20:02 ` Ezequiel Garcia
2013-06-12 20:12 ` Jason Gunthorpe
2013-06-12 20:12 ` Jason Gunthorpe
2013-06-12 21:50 ` Arnd Bergmann
2013-06-12 21:50 ` Arnd Bergmann
2013-06-12 11:07 ` Grant Likely
2013-06-12 11:07 ` Grant Likely
2013-06-12 11:43 ` Arnd Bergmann
2013-06-12 11:43 ` Arnd Bergmann
2013-06-12 11:54 ` Grant Likely
2013-06-12 11:54 ` Grant Likely
2013-06-12 11:58 ` Arnd Bergmann
2013-06-12 11:58 ` Arnd Bergmann
2013-06-12 10:52 ` Grant Likely
2013-06-12 10:52 ` Grant Likely
2013-06-09 13:42 ` Arnd Bergmann
2013-06-09 13:42 ` Arnd Bergmann
2013-06-09 14:34 ` Ezequiel Garcia
2013-06-09 14:34 ` Ezequiel Garcia
2013-06-09 15:37 ` Arnd Bergmann
2013-06-09 15:37 ` Arnd Bergmann
2013-06-12 10:48 ` Grant Likely
2013-06-12 10:48 ` Grant Likely
2013-06-11 13:31 ` Ezequiel Garcia
2013-06-11 13:31 ` Ezequiel Garcia
2013-06-11 15:02 ` Arnd Bergmann
2013-06-11 15:02 ` Arnd Bergmann
2013-06-07 16:47 ` [PATCH 05/14] bus: mvebu-mbus: Update the mbus-compatible node's ranges property Ezequiel Garcia
2013-06-07 16:47 ` Ezequiel Garcia
2013-06-12 10:25 ` Grant Likely
2013-06-12 10:25 ` Grant Likely
2013-06-07 16:47 ` [PATCH 06/14] ARM: mvebu: Initialize MBus using the DT binding Ezequiel Garcia
2013-06-07 16:47 ` Ezequiel Garcia
2013-06-07 16:47 ` [PATCH 07/14] ARM: mvebu: Remove the harcoded BootROM window allocation Ezequiel Garcia
2013-06-07 16:47 ` Ezequiel Garcia
2013-06-07 16:47 ` [PATCH 08/14] memory: mvebu-devbus: Remove address decoding window workaround Ezequiel Garcia
2013-06-07 16:47 ` Ezequiel Garcia
2013-06-07 16:47 ` [PATCH 09/14] ARM: mvebu: Add MBus to Armada 370/XP device tree Ezequiel Garcia
2013-06-07 16:47 ` Ezequiel Garcia
2013-06-07 16:47 ` [PATCH 10/14] ARM: mvebu: Add BootROM " Ezequiel Garcia
2013-06-07 16:47 ` Ezequiel Garcia
2013-06-07 16:47 ` [PATCH 11/14] ARM: mvebu: Relocate Armada 370/XP DeviceBus device tree nodes Ezequiel Garcia
2013-06-07 16:47 ` Ezequiel Garcia
2013-06-07 19:18 ` Arnd Bergmann
2013-06-07 19:18 ` Arnd Bergmann
2013-06-07 16:47 ` [PATCH 12/14] ARM: mvebu: Remove device tree unused properties on A370 Ezequiel Garcia
2013-06-07 16:47 ` Ezequiel Garcia
2013-06-07 16:56 ` Thomas Petazzoni
2013-06-07 16:56 ` Thomas Petazzoni
2013-06-08 14:18 ` Jason Cooper
2013-06-08 14:18 ` Jason Cooper
2013-06-07 16:47 ` [PATCH 13/14] ARM: mvebu: Relocate Armada 370 PCIe device tree nodes Ezequiel Garcia
2013-06-07 16:47 ` Ezequiel Garcia
2013-06-07 16:47 ` [PATCH 14/14] ARM: mvebu: Relocate Armada XP " Ezequiel Garcia
2013-06-07 16:47 ` Ezequiel Garcia
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=201306122352.32749.arnd@arndb.de \
--to=arnd@arndb.de \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.