From: Gleb Natapov <gleb@redhat.com>
To: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>
Cc: Xiao Guangrong <xiaoguangrong@linux.vnet.ibm.com>,
Takuya Yoshikawa <yoshikawa_takuya_b1@lab.ntt.co.jp>,
kvm@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] KVM: x86: Avoid zapping mmio sptes twice for generation wraparound
Date: Wed, 3 Jul 2013 12:03:27 +0300 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20130703090327.GE18508@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <51D3E77F.2060805@redhat.com>
On Wed, Jul 03, 2013 at 10:57:35AM +0200, Paolo Bonzini wrote:
> Il 03/07/2013 10:53, Gleb Natapov ha scritto:
> >>> > > Please wait a while. I can not understand it very clearly.
> >>> > >
> >>> > > This conditional check will cause caching a overflow value into mmio spte.
> >>> > > The simple case is that kvm adds new slots for many times, the mmio-gen is easily
> >>> > > more than MMIO_MAX_GEN.
> >>> > >
> >> >
> >> > Actually, the double zapping can be avoided by moving kvm_mmu_invalidate_mmio_sptes to
> >> > the end of install_new_memslots().
> >> >
> > Exactly. Why should we hide it in obscure functions?
>
> Because kvm_mmu_invalidate_mmio_sptes is an x86-specific function, and
> we already have a good arch API to hook into __kvm_set_memory_region.
>
>From this patch it can be seen that the API is not good enough.
Generation update API is missing.
> Another possible implementation is to cache the last memslot generation,
> check it in kvm_arch_prepare/commit_memory_region, and call
> kvm_mmu_invalidate_mmio_sptes if it changed. This would avoid the need
> to keep "((change == KVM_MR_DELETE) || (change == KVM_MR_MOVE))" in sync
> between the two places. But I don't think it is a substantial improvement.
>
Why are you trying to overcome API shortcomings instead of fixing the API.
--
Gleb.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2013-07-03 9:03 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 18+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2013-07-03 8:18 [PATCH] KVM: x86: Avoid zapping mmio sptes twice for generation wraparound Takuya Yoshikawa
2013-07-03 8:28 ` Paolo Bonzini
2013-07-03 8:39 ` Xiao Guangrong
2013-07-03 8:50 ` Takuya Yoshikawa
2013-07-03 8:50 ` Xiao Guangrong
2013-07-03 8:50 ` Paolo Bonzini
2013-07-03 9:00 ` Xiao Guangrong
2013-07-03 8:50 ` Xiao Guangrong
2013-07-03 8:53 ` Gleb Natapov
2013-07-03 8:57 ` Paolo Bonzini
2013-07-03 9:03 ` Gleb Natapov [this message]
2013-07-03 8:53 ` Paolo Bonzini
2013-07-03 9:05 ` Takuya Yoshikawa
2013-07-03 9:05 ` Gleb Natapov
2013-07-03 9:08 ` Paolo Bonzini
2013-07-03 9:10 ` Gleb Natapov
2013-07-03 9:17 ` Takuya Yoshikawa
2013-07-03 9:18 ` Paolo Bonzini
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20130703090327.GE18508@redhat.com \
--to=gleb@redhat.com \
--cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=pbonzini@redhat.com \
--cc=xiaoguangrong@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
--cc=yoshikawa_takuya_b1@lab.ntt.co.jp \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.