All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>
To: Xiao Guangrong <xiaoguangrong@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Cc: Takuya Yoshikawa <yoshikawa_takuya_b1@lab.ntt.co.jp>,
	gleb@redhat.com, kvm@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] KVM: x86: Avoid zapping mmio sptes twice for generation wraparound
Date: Wed, 03 Jul 2013 10:50:06 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <51D3E5BE.1020200@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <51D3E33D.1090704@linux.vnet.ibm.com>

Il 03/07/2013 10:39, Xiao Guangrong ha scritto:
> On 07/03/2013 04:28 PM, Paolo Bonzini wrote:
>> Il 03/07/2013 10:18, Takuya Yoshikawa ha scritto:
>>> Since kvm_arch_prepare_memory_region() is called right after installing
>>> the slot marked invalid, wraparound checking should be there to avoid
>>> zapping mmio sptes when mmio generation is still MMIO_MAX_GEN - 1.
>>>
>>> Signed-off-by: Takuya Yoshikawa <yoshikawa_takuya_b1@lab.ntt.co.jp>
>>> ---
>>>  This seems to be the simplest solution for fixing the off-by-one issue
>>>  we discussed before.
>>>
>>>  arch/x86/kvm/mmu.c |    5 +----
>>>  arch/x86/kvm/x86.c |    7 +++++++
>>>  2 files changed, 8 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
>>>
>>> diff --git a/arch/x86/kvm/mmu.c b/arch/x86/kvm/mmu.c
>>> index 0d094da..bf7af1e 100644
>>> --- a/arch/x86/kvm/mmu.c
>>> +++ b/arch/x86/kvm/mmu.c
>>> @@ -4383,11 +4383,8 @@ void kvm_mmu_invalidate_mmio_sptes(struct kvm *kvm)
>>>  	/*
>>>  	 * The very rare case: if the generation-number is round,
>>>  	 * zap all shadow pages.
>>> -	 *
>>> -	 * The max value is MMIO_MAX_GEN - 1 since it is not called
>>> -	 * when mark memslot invalid.
>>>  	 */
>>> -	if (unlikely(kvm_current_mmio_generation(kvm) >= (MMIO_MAX_GEN - 1))) {
>>> +	if (unlikely(kvm_current_mmio_generation(kvm) >= MMIO_MAX_GEN)) {
>>>  		printk_ratelimited(KERN_INFO "kvm: zapping shadow pages for mmio generation wraparound\n");
>>>  		kvm_mmu_invalidate_zap_all_pages(kvm);
>>>  	}
>>> diff --git a/arch/x86/kvm/x86.c b/arch/x86/kvm/x86.c
>>> index 7d71c0f..9ddd4ff 100644
>>> --- a/arch/x86/kvm/x86.c
>>> +++ b/arch/x86/kvm/x86.c
>>> @@ -7046,6 +7046,13 @@ int kvm_arch_prepare_memory_region(struct kvm *kvm,
>>>  		memslot->userspace_addr = userspace_addr;
>>>  	}
>>>  
>>> +	/*
>>> +	 * In these cases, slots->generation has been increased for marking the
>>> +	 * slot invalid, so we need wraparound checking here.
>>> +	 */
>>> +	if ((change == KVM_MR_DELETE) || (change == KVM_MR_MOVE))
>>> +		kvm_mmu_invalidate_mmio_sptes(kvm);
>>> +
>>>  	return 0;
>>>  }
>>>  
>>>
>>
>> Applied, thanks.
> 
> Please wait a while. I can not understand it very clearly.

I'm only applying to queue anyway until Linus pulls.

> This conditional check will cause caching a overflow value into mmio spte.
> The simple case is that kvm adds new slots for many times, the mmio-gen is easily
> more than MMIO_MAX_GEN.

The mmio generation is masked to MMIO_GEN_MASK:

        return (kvm_memslots(kvm)->generation +
                      MMIO_MAX_GEN - 150) & MMIO_GEN_MASK;

What Takuya's patch does is basically "if __kvm_set_memory_region called
install_new_memslots, call kvm_mmu_invalidate_mmio_sptes".

kvm_arch_prepare_memory_region is preceded by install_new_memslots if
change is KVM_MR_DELETE or KVM_MR_MOVE.  kvm_arch_commit_memory_region
is always preceded by install_new_memslots.  So the logic in x86.c
matches the one in __kvm_set_memory_region.

With this change, each change to the regions is matched by a call to
kvm_mmu_invalidate_mmio_sptes, and there is no need to invalidate twice
before wraparound.

Paolo

  parent reply	other threads:[~2013-07-03  8:50 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 18+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2013-07-03  8:18 [PATCH] KVM: x86: Avoid zapping mmio sptes twice for generation wraparound Takuya Yoshikawa
2013-07-03  8:28 ` Paolo Bonzini
2013-07-03  8:39   ` Xiao Guangrong
2013-07-03  8:50     ` Takuya Yoshikawa
2013-07-03  8:50       ` Xiao Guangrong
2013-07-03  8:50     ` Paolo Bonzini [this message]
2013-07-03  9:00       ` Xiao Guangrong
2013-07-03  8:50     ` Xiao Guangrong
2013-07-03  8:53       ` Gleb Natapov
2013-07-03  8:57         ` Paolo Bonzini
2013-07-03  9:03           ` Gleb Natapov
2013-07-03  8:53       ` Paolo Bonzini
2013-07-03  9:05         ` Takuya Yoshikawa
2013-07-03  9:05           ` Gleb Natapov
2013-07-03  9:08             ` Paolo Bonzini
2013-07-03  9:10               ` Gleb Natapov
2013-07-03  9:17                 ` Takuya Yoshikawa
2013-07-03  9:18                 ` Paolo Bonzini

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=51D3E5BE.1020200@redhat.com \
    --to=pbonzini@redhat.com \
    --cc=gleb@redhat.com \
    --cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=xiaoguangrong@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
    --cc=yoshikawa_takuya_b1@lab.ntt.co.jp \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.