All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Oleg Nesterov <oleg-H+wXaHxf7aLQT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org>
To: "Eric W. Biederman" <ebiederm-aS9lmoZGLiVWk0Htik3J/w@public.gmane.org>
Cc: Linux Containers
	<containers-cunTk1MwBs9QetFLy7KEm3xJsTq8ys+cHZ5vskTnxNA@public.gmane.org>,
	linux-kernel-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org
Subject: Re: [REVIEW][PATCH 3/5] pidns: Don't have unshare(CLONE_NEWPID) imply CLONE_THREAD
Date: Sun, 8 Sep 2013 19:00:01 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20130908170001.GA1835@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <87a9k0yrvu.fsf-aS9lmoZGLiVWk0Htik3J/w@public.gmane.org>

Sorry for delay, vacation.

On 08/29, Eric W. Biederman wrote:
>
> I goofed when I made unshare(CLONE_NEWPID) only work in a
> single-threaded process.  There is no need for that requirement and in
> fact I analyzied things right for setns.  The hard requirement
> is for tasks that share a VM to all be in the pid namespace and
> we properly prevent that in do_fork.

Yes, agreed, with the current meaning of ->pid_ns unshare(NEWPID)
looks safe even if the caller is multi-threaded... and this matches
pidns_install() which doesn't require single-threaded.

Oleg.

WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Oleg Nesterov <oleg@redhat.com>
To: "Eric W. Biederman" <ebiederm@xmission.com>
Cc: Linux Containers <containers@lists.linux-foundation.org>,
	"Serge E. Hallyn" <serge@hallyn.com>,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [REVIEW][PATCH 3/5] pidns: Don't have unshare(CLONE_NEWPID) imply CLONE_THREAD
Date: Sun, 8 Sep 2013 19:00:01 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20130908170001.GA1835@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <87a9k0yrvu.fsf@xmission.com>

Sorry for delay, vacation.

On 08/29, Eric W. Biederman wrote:
>
> I goofed when I made unshare(CLONE_NEWPID) only work in a
> single-threaded process.  There is no need for that requirement and in
> fact I analyzied things right for setns.  The hard requirement
> is for tasks that share a VM to all be in the pid namespace and
> we properly prevent that in do_fork.

Yes, agreed, with the current meaning of ->pid_ns unshare(NEWPID)
looks safe even if the caller is multi-threaded... and this matches
pidns_install() which doesn't require single-threaded.

Oleg.


  parent reply	other threads:[~2013-09-08 17:00 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 26+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2013-08-29 23:52 [REVIEW][PATCH 0/5] A couple of lingering namespace patches Eric W. Biederman
2013-08-29 23:52 ` Eric W. Biederman
     [not found] ` <87ob8gys0d.fsf-aS9lmoZGLiVWk0Htik3J/w@public.gmane.org>
2013-08-29 23:53   ` [REVIEW][PATCH 1/5] namespaces: Simplify copy_namespaces so it is clear what is going on Eric W. Biederman
2013-08-29 23:53     ` Eric W. Biederman
     [not found]     ` <87ioyoyryr.fsf-aS9lmoZGLiVWk0Htik3J/w@public.gmane.org>
2013-08-30 16:10       ` Serge E. Hallyn
2013-08-30 16:10         ` Serge E. Hallyn
2013-08-29 23:54   ` [REVIEW][PATCH 2/5] userns: Allow PR_CAPBSET_DROP in a user namespace Eric W. Biederman
2013-08-29 23:54     ` Eric W. Biederman
     [not found]     ` <87eh9cyrxj.fsf-aS9lmoZGLiVWk0Htik3J/w@public.gmane.org>
2013-08-30  1:15       ` Serge E. Hallyn
2013-08-30  1:15         ` Serge E. Hallyn
2013-08-29 23:55   ` [REVIEW][PATCH 3/5] pidns: Don't have unshare(CLONE_NEWPID) imply CLONE_THREAD Eric W. Biederman
2013-08-29 23:55     ` Eric W. Biederman
     [not found]     ` <87a9k0yrvu.fsf-aS9lmoZGLiVWk0Htik3J/w@public.gmane.org>
2013-08-30 16:38       ` Serge E. Hallyn
2013-08-30 16:38         ` Serge E. Hallyn
     [not found]         ` <20130830163805.GB18857-7LNsyQBKDXoIagZqoN9o3w@public.gmane.org>
2013-08-30 23:49           ` Eric W. Biederman
2013-08-30 23:49             ` Eric W. Biederman
     [not found]             ` <87ppsuviwb.fsf-aS9lmoZGLiVWk0Htik3J/w@public.gmane.org>
2013-08-31  5:31               ` Serge E. Hallyn
2013-08-31  5:31                 ` Serge E. Hallyn
2013-09-08 17:00       ` Oleg Nesterov [this message]
2013-09-08 17:00         ` Oleg Nesterov
2013-08-29 23:55   ` [REVIEW][PATCH 4/5] capabilities: allow nice if we are privileged Eric W. Biederman
2013-08-29 23:55     ` Eric W. Biederman
2013-08-29 23:56   ` [REVIEW][PATCH 5/5] userns: Kill nsown_capable it makes the wrong thing easy Eric W. Biederman
2013-08-29 23:56     ` Eric W. Biederman
2013-08-30  1:14     ` Serge E. Hallyn
     [not found]     ` <871u5cyrst.fsf-aS9lmoZGLiVWk0Htik3J/w@public.gmane.org>
2013-08-30  1:14       ` Serge E. Hallyn

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20130908170001.GA1835@redhat.com \
    --to=oleg-h+wxahxf7alqt0dzr+alfa@public.gmane.org \
    --cc=containers-cunTk1MwBs9QetFLy7KEm3xJsTq8ys+cHZ5vskTnxNA@public.gmane.org \
    --cc=ebiederm-aS9lmoZGLiVWk0Htik3J/w@public.gmane.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.