From: "Theodore Ts'o" <tytso@mit.edu>
To: John Stultz <john.stultz@linaro.org>
Cc: Stephan Mueller <smueller@chronox.de>,
LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
dave.taht@bufferbloat.net,
Frederic Weisbecker <fweisbec@gmail.com>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] /dev/random: Insufficient of entropy on many architectures
Date: Tue, 10 Sep 2013 20:50:47 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20130911005047.GA13315@thunk.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <522FB9F1.3070905@linaro.org>
On Tue, Sep 10, 2013 at 05:31:45PM -0700, John Stultz wrote:
> Yea, that point about "every single interrupt" vs "every timer
> interrupt". I suspect that if its every timer interrupt, this can be
> done easily w/ clocksources as we already do that read, but every single
> interrupt would have potential problems with various other devices with
> high irq frequency.
Yep. The worse case would probably a serial port running at 230400
bps. Even with a 16550A UART with the 16-byte FIFO, we're talking
about close to 2,000 interrupts per second. A 16450 running at 115200
bps would give us 11,520 interrupts per second....
> Right so get_cycles() really sounds like the right thing here.
For those platforms which have them, yes.
> Although I wonder if you run into issues with counters that wrap
> quickly? Or does that not matter?
No, it doesn't matter. It's really the low bits of the counter which
are really important to us anyway. For example on MIPS there is a
register which is bumped on every CPU cycle, but its kept mod the
number of entries in the TLB (it's used for random TLB eviction).
That's what we'll probably ending using for MIPS, since its cycle
counter is not guaranteed to be there, and had a bug which could cause
timer interrupts to get lost if you tried reading from it at the wrong
time.
> Right. In many cases jiffies is all that we have. Thus the check for
> timekeeping_valid_for_hres() can be used to at least flag that case. Not
> that I know what you want to do if it comes up false.
Right now, if get_cycles() returns 0, we fall back to only mixing in
the IP register from the interrupt plus the jiffies counter. The
platforms where get_cycles returns 0 is:
- MIPS (solution pending)
- User mode Linux
- Sparc 32 bit
- M68K
- M32R
- Hexagon
- H8/300
- FR-V
- CRIS
- AVR32
- ARC
- METAG
- Microblaze
- SCORE
- SH
- Unicore32
Would I be correct in assuming that most of these probably don't have a
high-res clocksource, and so would fall back to jiffies anyway?
Thanks,
- Ted
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2013-09-11 0:50 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 58+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2013-09-10 11:31 [PATCH] /dev/random: Insufficient of entropy on many architectures Stephan Mueller
2013-09-10 11:46 ` Geert Uytterhoeven
2013-09-10 15:04 ` Theodore Ts'o
2013-09-10 16:54 ` Stephan Mueller
2013-09-10 18:25 ` Theodore Ts'o
2013-09-10 19:15 ` Stephan Mueller
2013-10-10 6:50 ` Pavel Machek
2013-10-14 21:13 ` Theodore Ts'o
2013-09-10 20:48 ` Geert Uytterhoeven
2013-09-10 21:14 ` Theodore Ts'o
2013-09-11 6:49 ` Stephan Mueller
2013-09-12 11:59 ` Geert Uytterhoeven
2013-09-12 12:08 ` Stephan Mueller
2013-09-12 12:15 ` Geert Uytterhoeven
2013-09-12 12:35 ` Stephan Mueller
2013-09-12 12:47 ` Geert Uytterhoeven
2013-09-12 12:57 ` Stephan Mueller
2013-09-12 21:18 ` Jörn Engel
2013-09-13 11:33 ` Thorsten Glaser
2013-09-12 14:25 ` Theodore Ts'o
2013-09-10 19:38 ` John Stultz
2013-09-10 19:44 ` John Stultz
2013-09-10 19:47 ` Stephan Mueller
2013-09-10 20:35 ` John Stultz
2013-09-10 20:38 ` Theodore Ts'o
2013-09-10 20:46 ` John Stultz
2013-09-10 21:10 ` Theodore Ts'o
2013-09-10 22:08 ` John Stultz
2013-09-10 22:33 ` Theodore Ts'o
2013-09-11 0:31 ` John Stultz
2013-09-11 0:50 ` Theodore Ts'o [this message]
2013-09-11 1:14 ` John Stultz
2013-09-12 20:46 ` H. Peter Anvin
2013-09-12 21:07 ` Jörn Engel
2013-09-12 23:31 ` Theodore Ts'o
2013-09-12 23:35 ` Jörn Engel
2013-09-13 0:00 ` Jörn Engel
2013-09-16 15:40 ` [PATCH,RFC] random: make fast_mix() honor its name Jörn Engel
2013-09-21 21:25 ` Theodore Ts'o
2013-09-21 21:41 ` Theodore Ts'o
2013-09-22 3:05 ` Theodore Ts'o
2013-09-22 21:01 ` Jörg-Volker Peetz
2013-09-22 21:27 ` Theodore Ts'o
2013-09-22 20:53 ` Jörn Engel
2013-09-22 23:36 ` Theodore Ts'o
2013-09-23 0:16 ` Jörn Engel
2013-09-23 2:43 ` Theodore Ts'o
2013-09-23 15:02 ` Jörn Engel
2013-09-23 7:39 ` Jörg-Volker Peetz
2013-09-22 20:31 ` Jörn Engel
2013-09-22 20:14 ` Jörn Engel
2013-09-12 21:31 ` [PATCH] /dev/random: Insufficient of entropy on many architectures Jörn Engel
2013-09-13 5:36 ` Stephan Mueller
2013-09-13 11:54 ` Thorsten Glaser
2013-09-13 19:29 ` Theodore Ts'o
2013-09-13 15:26 ` Jörn Engel
2013-09-13 18:59 ` Theodore Ts'o
2013-09-15 11:12 ` Stephan Mueller
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20130911005047.GA13315@thunk.org \
--to=tytso@mit.edu \
--cc=dave.taht@bufferbloat.net \
--cc=fweisbec@gmail.com \
--cc=john.stultz@linaro.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=smueller@chronox.de \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.