From: "Theodore Ts'o" <tytso@mit.edu>
To: "Jörn Engel" <joern@logfs.org>
Cc: John Stultz <john.stultz@linaro.org>,
Stephan Mueller <smueller@chronox.de>,
LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
dave.taht@bufferbloat.net,
Frederic Weisbecker <fweisbec@gmail.com>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Subject: Re: [PATCH,RFC] random: make fast_mix() honor its name
Date: Sat, 21 Sep 2013 17:25:10 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20130921212510.GD8606@thunk.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20130916154026.GA23345@logfs.org>
On Mon, Sep 16, 2013 at 11:40:27AM -0400, Jörn Engel wrote:
>
> Here is a patch to make add_interrupt_randomness() significantly
> cheaper without significantly impacting the quality. The second part
> is my personal opinion and others might disagree.
>
> So far this has only seen userspace performance testing, so don't
> merge it in a hurry.
Performance testing, but your new fast_mix pool has some serious
problems in terms of how well it works.
First of all, I think this is a typo:
> + for (i = 0; i < 3; i++) {
This means that pool[3] is always 0, and the input[3] is never mixed
in. Hence, the pool is now only 96 bits instead of 128 bits, and the
last 4 bytes of the input pool are not getting mixed in.
Secondly, if you change this so that we actually use the whole pool,
and you mix in a constant set of inputs like this:
for (i = 0; i < 100; i++) {
input[0] = i;
input[1] = i;
input[2] = i;
input[3] = i;
fast_mix(&pool, input);
print_pool(&pool);
}
you see something like this:
pool:
0x00000000
0x00000000
0x00000000
0x00000000
pool:
0x00000001
0x00000001
0x00000001
0x00000001
pool:
0x00000082
0x00000082
0x00000082
0x00000082
pool:
0x00004103
0x00004103
0x00004103
0x00004103
pool:
0x00208184
0x00208184
0x00208184
0x00208184
pool:
0x1040c205
0x1040c205
0x1040c205
0x1040c205
Granted, it's unlikely that we will be mixing numbers like this, but
it's a great demonstration of why I added the input_rotate aspect to
my mixing functions.
See my testing program below. I need to think a bit more about
whether I'm comfortable with the new fast_mix that you've proposed
with the input_rotate restored, but at the minimum I think the rotate
is needed.
Regards,
- Ted
#include <stdio.h>
#include <unistd.h>
#include <stdlib.h>
#include <string.h>
/* #define ORIG_MIX */
#define ADD_ROTATE
/* #define DEBUG_POOL */
#ifdef DEBUG_POOL
#define NUM_LOOPS 32
#else
#define NUM_LOOPS 1000000
#endif
typedef unsigned int __u32;
struct fast_pool {
__u32 pool[4];
unsigned long last;
unsigned short count;
unsigned char rotate;
unsigned char last_timer_intr;
};
static __u32 const twist_table[8] = {
0x00000000, 0x3b6e20c8, 0x76dc4190, 0x4db26158,
0xedb88320, 0xd6d6a3e8, 0x9b64c2b0, 0xa00ae278 };
/**
* rol32 - rotate a 32-bit value left
* @word: value to rotate
* @shift: bits to roll
*/
static inline __u32 rol32(__u32 word, unsigned int shift)
{
return (word << shift) | (word >> (32 - shift));
}
#ifdef ORIG_MIX
/*
* This is a fast mixing routine used by the interrupt randomness
* collector. It's hardcoded for an 128 bit pool and assumes that any
* locks that might be needed are taken by the caller.
*/
static void fast_mix(struct fast_pool *f, const void *in, int nbytes)
{
const char *bytes = in;
__u32 w;
unsigned i = f->count;
unsigned input_rotate = f->rotate;
while (nbytes--) {
w = rol32(*bytes++, input_rotate & 31) ^ f->pool[i & 3] ^
f->pool[(i + 1) & 3];
f->pool[i & 3] = (w >> 3) ^ twist_table[w & 7];
input_rotate += (i++ & 3) ? 7 : 14;
}
f->count = i;
f->rotate = input_rotate;
}
#else
static void fast_mix(struct fast_pool *f, __u32 input[4])
{
int i = f->count;
__u32 acc, carry = f->pool[3] >> 25;
unsigned input_rotate = f->rotate;
for (i = 0; i < 4; i++) {
#ifdef ADD_ROTATE
acc = (f->pool[i] << 7) ^ rol32(input[i], input_rotate & 31) ^
carry;
#else
acc = (f->pool[i] << 7) ^ input[i] ^ carry;
#endif
carry = f->pool[i] >> 25;
f->pool[i] = acc;
input_rotate += 7;
}
f->count++;
f->rotate = input_rotate;
}
#endif
void print_pool(struct fast_pool *pool)
{
int i;
printf("pool:\n");
for (i = 0; i < 4; i++) {
printf("\t0x%08x\n", pool->pool[i]);
}
}
int main(const char *argv, int argc)
{
struct fast_pool pool;
int i;
unsigned int input[4];
memset(&pool, 0, sizeof(struct fast_pool));
srandom(42);
for (i = 0; i < NUM_LOOPS; i++) {
input[0] = i;
input[1] = i;
input[2] = i;
input[3] = i;
#ifdef ORIG_MIX
fast_mix(&pool, &input, sizeof(input));
#else
fast_mix(&pool, input);
#endif
#ifdef DEBUG_POOL
print_pool(&pool);
#endif
}
#ifndef DEBUG_POOL
print_pool(&pool);
#endif
return 0;
}
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2013-09-21 21:32 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 58+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2013-09-10 11:31 [PATCH] /dev/random: Insufficient of entropy on many architectures Stephan Mueller
2013-09-10 11:46 ` Geert Uytterhoeven
2013-09-10 15:04 ` Theodore Ts'o
2013-09-10 16:54 ` Stephan Mueller
2013-09-10 18:25 ` Theodore Ts'o
2013-09-10 19:15 ` Stephan Mueller
2013-10-10 6:50 ` Pavel Machek
2013-10-14 21:13 ` Theodore Ts'o
2013-09-10 20:48 ` Geert Uytterhoeven
2013-09-10 21:14 ` Theodore Ts'o
2013-09-11 6:49 ` Stephan Mueller
2013-09-12 11:59 ` Geert Uytterhoeven
2013-09-12 12:08 ` Stephan Mueller
2013-09-12 12:15 ` Geert Uytterhoeven
2013-09-12 12:35 ` Stephan Mueller
2013-09-12 12:47 ` Geert Uytterhoeven
2013-09-12 12:57 ` Stephan Mueller
2013-09-12 21:18 ` Jörn Engel
2013-09-13 11:33 ` Thorsten Glaser
2013-09-12 14:25 ` Theodore Ts'o
2013-09-10 19:38 ` John Stultz
2013-09-10 19:44 ` John Stultz
2013-09-10 19:47 ` Stephan Mueller
2013-09-10 20:35 ` John Stultz
2013-09-10 20:38 ` Theodore Ts'o
2013-09-10 20:46 ` John Stultz
2013-09-10 21:10 ` Theodore Ts'o
2013-09-10 22:08 ` John Stultz
2013-09-10 22:33 ` Theodore Ts'o
2013-09-11 0:31 ` John Stultz
2013-09-11 0:50 ` Theodore Ts'o
2013-09-11 1:14 ` John Stultz
2013-09-12 20:46 ` H. Peter Anvin
2013-09-12 21:07 ` Jörn Engel
2013-09-12 23:31 ` Theodore Ts'o
2013-09-12 23:35 ` Jörn Engel
2013-09-13 0:00 ` Jörn Engel
2013-09-16 15:40 ` [PATCH,RFC] random: make fast_mix() honor its name Jörn Engel
2013-09-21 21:25 ` Theodore Ts'o [this message]
2013-09-21 21:41 ` Theodore Ts'o
2013-09-22 3:05 ` Theodore Ts'o
2013-09-22 21:01 ` Jörg-Volker Peetz
2013-09-22 21:27 ` Theodore Ts'o
2013-09-22 20:53 ` Jörn Engel
2013-09-22 23:36 ` Theodore Ts'o
2013-09-23 0:16 ` Jörn Engel
2013-09-23 2:43 ` Theodore Ts'o
2013-09-23 15:02 ` Jörn Engel
2013-09-23 7:39 ` Jörg-Volker Peetz
2013-09-22 20:31 ` Jörn Engel
2013-09-22 20:14 ` Jörn Engel
2013-09-12 21:31 ` [PATCH] /dev/random: Insufficient of entropy on many architectures Jörn Engel
2013-09-13 5:36 ` Stephan Mueller
2013-09-13 11:54 ` Thorsten Glaser
2013-09-13 19:29 ` Theodore Ts'o
2013-09-13 15:26 ` Jörn Engel
2013-09-13 18:59 ` Theodore Ts'o
2013-09-15 11:12 ` Stephan Mueller
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20130921212510.GD8606@thunk.org \
--to=tytso@mit.edu \
--cc=dave.taht@bufferbloat.net \
--cc=fweisbec@gmail.com \
--cc=joern@logfs.org \
--cc=john.stultz@linaro.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=smueller@chronox.de \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.