All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>
To: Guenter Roeck <linux@roeck-us.net>
Cc: Stephen Warren <swarren@wwwdotorg.org>,
	Jean Delvare <khali@linux-fr.org>,
	Liam Girdwood <lgirdwood@gmail.com>, Wei Ni <wni@nvidia.com>,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	LM Sensors <lm-sensors@lm-sensors.org>
Subject: Re: [lm-sensors] lm90 driver no longer working on PCs in 3.13
Date: Mon, 27 Jan 2014 22:36:43 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20140127223643.GA5010@sirena.org.uk> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20140127185031.GA28910@roeck-us.net>


[-- Attachment #1.1: Type: text/plain, Size: 603 bytes --]

On Mon, Jan 27, 2014 at 10:50:31AM -0800, Guenter Roeck wrote:

> Turns out that won't help either after Mark's patches to ACPI and
> to the regulator core are applied. Right now I don't have a solution
> that would work for all systems.

Could you be more explicit in your logic here please?  Given that those
patches should only affect non-DT platforms (modulo the fact that it's
compile time only which I guess you see is an issue) and that your bodge
consists of ignoring all errors for non-DT platforms I honestly can't
think what impact they would have on the bodge so I'm now even more
confused.

[-- Attachment #1.2: Digital signature --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 836 bytes --]

[-- Attachment #2: Type: text/plain, Size: 153 bytes --]

_______________________________________________
lm-sensors mailing list
lm-sensors@lm-sensors.org
http://lists.lm-sensors.org/mailman/listinfo/lm-sensors

WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>
To: Guenter Roeck <linux@roeck-us.net>
Cc: Stephen Warren <swarren@wwwdotorg.org>,
	Jean Delvare <khali@linux-fr.org>,
	Liam Girdwood <lgirdwood@gmail.com>, Wei Ni <wni@nvidia.com>,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	LM Sensors <lm-sensors@lm-sensors.org>
Subject: Re: [lm-sensors] lm90 driver no longer working on PCs in 3.13
Date: Mon, 27 Jan 2014 22:36:43 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20140127223643.GA5010@sirena.org.uk> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20140127185031.GA28910@roeck-us.net>

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 603 bytes --]

On Mon, Jan 27, 2014 at 10:50:31AM -0800, Guenter Roeck wrote:

> Turns out that won't help either after Mark's patches to ACPI and
> to the regulator core are applied. Right now I don't have a solution
> that would work for all systems.

Could you be more explicit in your logic here please?  Given that those
patches should only affect non-DT platforms (modulo the fact that it's
compile time only which I guess you see is an issue) and that your bodge
consists of ignoring all errors for non-DT platforms I honestly can't
think what impact they would have on the bodge so I'm now even more
confused.

[-- Attachment #2: Digital signature --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 836 bytes --]

  parent reply	other threads:[~2014-01-27 22:36 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 62+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2014-01-26 19:28 [lm-sensors] lm90 driver no longer working on PCs in 3.13 Guenter Roeck
2014-01-26 19:28 ` Guenter Roeck
2014-01-26 20:13 ` [lm-sensors] " Jean Delvare
2014-01-26 20:13   ` Jean Delvare
2014-01-26 20:42   ` [lm-sensors] " Mark Brown
2014-01-26 20:42     ` Mark Brown
2014-01-26 20:44   ` [lm-sensors] " Guenter Roeck
2014-01-26 20:44     ` Guenter Roeck
2014-01-26 20:49     ` [lm-sensors] " Jean Delvare
2014-01-26 20:49       ` Jean Delvare
2014-01-26 21:22       ` [lm-sensors] " Mark Brown
2014-01-26 21:22         ` Mark Brown
2014-01-26 21:40         ` [lm-sensors] " Guenter Roeck
2014-01-26 21:40           ` Guenter Roeck
2014-01-26 21:53           ` [lm-sensors] " Mark Brown
2014-01-26 21:53             ` Mark Brown
2014-01-26 22:02             ` [lm-sensors] " Guenter Roeck
2014-01-26 22:02               ` Guenter Roeck
2014-01-26 23:37               ` [lm-sensors] " Mark Brown
2014-01-26 23:37                 ` Mark Brown
2014-01-26 21:44         ` [lm-sensors] " Jean Delvare
2014-01-26 21:44           ` Jean Delvare
2014-01-26 23:15           ` [lm-sensors] " Mark Brown
2014-01-26 23:15             ` Mark Brown
2014-01-27 10:10             ` [lm-sensors] " Geert Uytterhoeven
2014-01-27 10:10               ` Geert Uytterhoeven
2014-01-27 13:18               ` [lm-sensors] " Mark Brown
2014-01-27 13:18                 ` Mark Brown
2014-01-26 21:50       ` [lm-sensors] " Guenter Roeck
2014-01-26 21:50         ` Guenter Roeck
2014-01-26 22:04         ` [lm-sensors] " Guenter Roeck
2014-01-26 22:04           ` Guenter Roeck
2014-01-26 23:51           ` Mark Brown
2014-01-26 23:51             ` Mark Brown
2014-01-27  4:16             ` Guenter Roeck
2014-01-27  4:16               ` Guenter Roeck
2014-01-27 10:34               ` Mark Brown
2014-01-27 10:34                 ` Mark Brown
2014-01-27 17:19             ` Stephen Warren
2014-01-27 17:19               ` Stephen Warren
2014-01-27 18:50               ` Guenter Roeck
2014-01-27 18:50                 ` Guenter Roeck
2014-01-27 22:04                 ` Jean Delvare
2014-01-27 22:04                   ` Jean Delvare
2014-01-27 23:41                   ` Guenter Roeck
2014-01-27 23:41                     ` Guenter Roeck
2014-01-27 23:58                     ` Mark Brown
2014-01-27 23:58                       ` Mark Brown
2014-01-28  2:33                       ` Guenter Roeck
2014-01-28  2:33                         ` Guenter Roeck
2014-01-28 10:24                         ` Mark Brown
2014-01-28 10:24                           ` Mark Brown
2014-01-28 12:34                   ` Mark Brown
2014-01-28 12:34                     ` Mark Brown
2014-01-27 22:36                 ` Mark Brown [this message]
2014-01-27 22:36                   ` Mark Brown
2014-01-26 20:52     ` Mark Brown
2014-01-26 20:52       ` Mark Brown
2014-01-26 21:47       ` [lm-sensors] " Guenter Roeck
2014-01-26 21:47         ` Guenter Roeck
2014-01-26 22:01         ` [lm-sensors] " Mark Brown
2014-01-26 22:01           ` Mark Brown

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20140127223643.GA5010@sirena.org.uk \
    --to=broonie@kernel.org \
    --cc=khali@linux-fr.org \
    --cc=lgirdwood@gmail.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux@roeck-us.net \
    --cc=lm-sensors@lm-sensors.org \
    --cc=swarren@wwwdotorg.org \
    --cc=wni@nvidia.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body. 
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.