From: Oleg Nesterov <oleg@redhat.com>
To: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
Cc: Eric Sandeen <sandeen@sandeen.net>,
Linux Kernel <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
xfs@oss.sgi.com, Al Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>,
Dave Jones <davej@redhat.com>
Subject: Re: 3.14-rc2 XFS backtrace because irqs_disabled.
Date: Thu, 13 Feb 2014 19:37:36 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20140213183736.GA16937@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20140213181013.GA15596@redhat.com>
On 02/13, Oleg Nesterov wrote:
>
> On 02/13, Linus Torvalds wrote:
> >
> > On Thu, Feb 13, 2014 at 9:40 AM, Oleg Nesterov <oleg@redhat.com> wrote:
> > >
> > > And we should be careful with SIGQUEUE_PREALLOC, at least
> > > collect_signal() should not do list_del_init()... Plus we need to
> > > handle the SEND_SIG_FORCED-like case.
> >
> > I don't think the users need to care. They'd just call
> > "sigqueue_free()" not knowing about our preallocations etc.
>
> Yes, but we need to be careful to avoid the races with
> release_posix_timer().
Plus we need to delay do_schedule_next_timer() as well. But this
is probably good because we can avoid unlock/lock(siglock) in
dequeue_signal().
Oleg.
_______________________________________________
xfs mailing list
xfs@oss.sgi.com
http://oss.sgi.com/mailman/listinfo/xfs
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Oleg Nesterov <oleg@redhat.com>
To: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
Cc: Al Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>,
Dave Chinner <david@fromorbit.com>, Dave Jones <davej@redhat.com>,
Eric Sandeen <sandeen@sandeen.net>,
Linux Kernel <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
xfs@oss.sgi.com
Subject: Re: 3.14-rc2 XFS backtrace because irqs_disabled.
Date: Thu, 13 Feb 2014 19:37:36 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20140213183736.GA16937@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20140213181013.GA15596@redhat.com>
On 02/13, Oleg Nesterov wrote:
>
> On 02/13, Linus Torvalds wrote:
> >
> > On Thu, Feb 13, 2014 at 9:40 AM, Oleg Nesterov <oleg@redhat.com> wrote:
> > >
> > > And we should be careful with SIGQUEUE_PREALLOC, at least
> > > collect_signal() should not do list_del_init()... Plus we need to
> > > handle the SEND_SIG_FORCED-like case.
> >
> > I don't think the users need to care. They'd just call
> > "sigqueue_free()" not knowing about our preallocations etc.
>
> Yes, but we need to be careful to avoid the races with
> release_posix_timer().
Plus we need to delay do_schedule_next_timer() as well. But this
is probably good because we can avoid unlock/lock(siglock) in
dequeue_signal().
Oleg.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2014-02-13 18:37 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 132+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2014-02-11 17:27 3.14-rc2 XFS backtrace because irqs_disabled Dave Jones
2014-02-11 17:27 ` Dave Jones
2014-02-11 21:08 ` Dave Chinner
2014-02-11 21:08 ` Dave Chinner
2014-02-11 21:49 ` Eric Sandeen
2014-02-11 21:49 ` Eric Sandeen
2014-02-12 0:44 ` Dave Jones
2014-02-12 0:44 ` Dave Jones
2014-02-12 1:09 ` Al Viro
2014-02-12 1:09 ` Al Viro
2014-02-12 2:52 ` Linus Torvalds
2014-02-12 2:52 ` Linus Torvalds
2014-02-12 4:03 ` Dave Jones
2014-02-12 4:03 ` Dave Jones
2014-02-12 4:22 ` Al Viro
2014-02-12 4:22 ` Al Viro
2014-02-12 5:40 ` Dave Chinner
2014-02-12 5:40 ` Dave Chinner
2014-02-12 5:50 ` Dave Jones
2014-02-12 5:50 ` Dave Jones
2014-02-12 6:10 ` Dave Chinner
2014-02-12 6:10 ` Dave Chinner
2014-02-12 6:31 ` Dave Chinner
2014-02-12 6:31 ` Dave Chinner
2014-02-12 6:59 ` Linus Torvalds
2014-02-12 6:59 ` Linus Torvalds
2014-02-12 8:13 ` Tejun Heo
2014-02-12 8:13 ` Tejun Heo
2014-02-12 12:44 ` Steven Rostedt
2014-02-12 12:44 ` Steven Rostedt
2014-02-12 8:35 ` Dave Chinner
2014-02-12 8:35 ` Dave Chinner
2014-02-12 12:50 ` Steven Rostedt
2014-02-12 12:50 ` Steven Rostedt
2014-02-12 12:40 ` Steven Rostedt
2014-02-12 12:40 ` Steven Rostedt
2014-02-12 13:29 ` Peter Zijlstra
2014-02-12 13:29 ` Peter Zijlstra
2014-02-12 14:25 ` Dave Jones
2014-02-12 14:25 ` Dave Jones
2014-02-12 21:14 ` Dave Chinner
2014-02-12 21:14 ` Dave Chinner
2014-02-12 15:57 ` Eric Sandeen
2014-02-12 15:57 ` Eric Sandeen
2014-02-12 6:28 ` Linus Torvalds
2014-02-12 6:28 ` Linus Torvalds
2014-02-12 7:18 ` Dave Chinner
2014-02-12 7:18 ` Dave Chinner
2014-02-14 0:24 ` Dave Chinner
2014-02-14 0:24 ` Dave Chinner
2014-02-14 16:01 ` Dave Jones
2014-02-14 16:01 ` Dave Jones
2014-02-15 22:23 ` Dave Chinner
2014-02-15 22:23 ` Dave Chinner
2014-02-15 22:28 ` Dave Jones
2014-02-15 22:28 ` Dave Jones
2014-02-15 22:43 ` Linus Torvalds
2014-02-15 22:43 ` Linus Torvalds
2014-02-15 23:50 ` Linus Torvalds
2014-02-15 23:50 ` Linus Torvalds
2014-02-15 23:50 ` Linus Torvalds
2014-02-18 1:27 ` Dave Chinner
2014-02-18 1:27 ` Dave Chinner
2014-02-18 1:27 ` Dave Chinner
2014-02-12 11:39 ` Al Viro
2014-02-12 11:39 ` Al Viro
2014-02-12 20:13 ` Linus Torvalds
2014-02-12 20:13 ` Linus Torvalds
2014-02-12 21:14 ` Al Viro
2014-02-12 21:14 ` Al Viro
2014-02-12 21:32 ` Linus Torvalds
2014-02-12 21:32 ` Linus Torvalds
2014-02-12 21:44 ` Al Viro
2014-02-12 21:44 ` Al Viro
2014-02-13 20:51 ` Al Viro
2014-02-13 20:51 ` Al Viro
2014-02-14 0:09 ` Al Viro
2014-02-14 0:09 ` Al Viro
2014-02-14 13:25 ` Christoph Hellwig
2014-02-14 13:25 ` Christoph Hellwig
2014-02-14 13:29 ` Richard Weinberger
2014-02-14 13:29 ` Richard Weinberger
2014-02-14 15:20 ` Al Viro
2014-02-14 15:20 ` Al Viro
2014-02-14 16:08 ` Oleg Nesterov
2014-02-14 16:08 ` Oleg Nesterov
2014-02-13 17:40 ` Oleg Nesterov
2014-02-13 17:40 ` Oleg Nesterov
2014-02-13 17:58 ` Linus Torvalds
2014-02-13 17:58 ` Linus Torvalds
2014-02-13 18:10 ` Oleg Nesterov
2014-02-13 18:10 ` Oleg Nesterov
2014-02-13 18:37 ` Oleg Nesterov [this message]
2014-02-13 18:37 ` Oleg Nesterov
2014-02-15 5:25 ` Al Viro
2014-02-15 5:25 ` Al Viro
2014-02-15 14:27 ` Oleg Nesterov
2014-02-15 14:27 ` Oleg Nesterov
2014-02-15 15:22 ` Al Viro
2014-02-15 15:22 ` Al Viro
2014-02-15 15:33 ` Oleg Nesterov
2014-02-15 15:33 ` Oleg Nesterov
2014-02-15 15:36 ` Al Viro
2014-02-15 15:36 ` Al Viro
2014-02-15 15:58 ` Al Viro
2014-02-15 15:58 ` Al Viro
2014-02-15 16:59 ` Al Viro
2014-02-15 16:59 ` Al Viro
2014-02-15 17:43 ` Oleg Nesterov
2014-02-15 17:43 ` Oleg Nesterov
2014-02-15 18:05 ` Al Viro
2014-02-15 18:05 ` Al Viro
2014-02-15 18:45 ` Oleg Nesterov
2014-02-15 18:45 ` Oleg Nesterov
2014-02-17 16:57 ` Oleg Nesterov
2014-02-17 16:57 ` Oleg Nesterov
2014-02-17 17:40 ` Al Viro
2014-02-17 17:40 ` Al Viro
2014-02-17 17:46 ` Oleg Nesterov
2014-02-17 17:46 ` Oleg Nesterov
2014-02-17 17:54 ` Al Viro
2014-02-17 17:54 ` Al Viro
2014-02-14 16:13 ` Christoph Hellwig
2014-02-14 16:13 ` Christoph Hellwig
2014-02-14 16:16 ` Al Viro
2014-02-14 16:16 ` Al Viro
2014-02-14 16:18 ` Al Viro
2014-02-14 16:18 ` Al Viro
2014-02-14 16:19 ` Christoph Hellwig
2014-02-14 16:19 ` Christoph Hellwig
2014-02-15 14:46 ` Oleg Nesterov
2014-02-15 14:46 ` Oleg Nesterov
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20140213183736.GA16937@redhat.com \
--to=oleg@redhat.com \
--cc=davej@redhat.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=sandeen@sandeen.net \
--cc=torvalds@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk \
--cc=xfs@oss.sgi.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.