From: Dave Jones <davej@redhat.com>
To: Dave Chinner <david@fromorbit.com>
Cc: Eric Sandeen <sandeen@sandeen.net>,
xfs@oss.sgi.com, Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>,
Al Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>,
Linux Kernel <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: 3.14-rc2 XFS backtrace because irqs_disabled.
Date: Sat, 15 Feb 2014 17:28:44 -0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20140215222844.GA18201@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20140215222356.GU13997@dastard>
On Sun, Feb 16, 2014 at 09:23:56AM +1100, Dave Chinner wrote:
> There's a pretty massive difference between the actual stack usage
> of the local variables and the amount of stack being used by the
> compiled code.
>
> What it appears to be is that the compiler is pushing 6-10 registers
> to the stack on every function call. So a function that only has 3
> local variables and does very little but allocate a structure and
> call other functions saves an 6 registers to the stack before it
> starts:
I've got a shitload of debug options enabled, which may explain it.
Or perhaps that new STACK_PROTECTOR_STRONG stuff ?
Dave
_______________________________________________
xfs mailing list
xfs@oss.sgi.com
http://oss.sgi.com/mailman/listinfo/xfs
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Dave Jones <davej@redhat.com>
To: Dave Chinner <david@fromorbit.com>
Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>,
Al Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>,
Eric Sandeen <sandeen@sandeen.net>,
Linux Kernel <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
xfs@oss.sgi.com
Subject: Re: 3.14-rc2 XFS backtrace because irqs_disabled.
Date: Sat, 15 Feb 2014 17:28:44 -0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20140215222844.GA18201@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20140215222356.GU13997@dastard>
On Sun, Feb 16, 2014 at 09:23:56AM +1100, Dave Chinner wrote:
> There's a pretty massive difference between the actual stack usage
> of the local variables and the amount of stack being used by the
> compiled code.
>
> What it appears to be is that the compiler is pushing 6-10 registers
> to the stack on every function call. So a function that only has 3
> local variables and does very little but allocate a structure and
> call other functions saves an 6 registers to the stack before it
> starts:
I've got a shitload of debug options enabled, which may explain it.
Or perhaps that new STACK_PROTECTOR_STRONG stuff ?
Dave
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2014-02-15 22:28 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 132+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2014-02-11 17:27 3.14-rc2 XFS backtrace because irqs_disabled Dave Jones
2014-02-11 17:27 ` Dave Jones
2014-02-11 21:08 ` Dave Chinner
2014-02-11 21:08 ` Dave Chinner
2014-02-11 21:49 ` Eric Sandeen
2014-02-11 21:49 ` Eric Sandeen
2014-02-12 0:44 ` Dave Jones
2014-02-12 0:44 ` Dave Jones
2014-02-12 1:09 ` Al Viro
2014-02-12 1:09 ` Al Viro
2014-02-12 2:52 ` Linus Torvalds
2014-02-12 2:52 ` Linus Torvalds
2014-02-12 4:03 ` Dave Jones
2014-02-12 4:03 ` Dave Jones
2014-02-12 4:22 ` Al Viro
2014-02-12 4:22 ` Al Viro
2014-02-12 5:40 ` Dave Chinner
2014-02-12 5:40 ` Dave Chinner
2014-02-12 5:50 ` Dave Jones
2014-02-12 5:50 ` Dave Jones
2014-02-12 6:10 ` Dave Chinner
2014-02-12 6:10 ` Dave Chinner
2014-02-12 6:31 ` Dave Chinner
2014-02-12 6:31 ` Dave Chinner
2014-02-12 6:59 ` Linus Torvalds
2014-02-12 6:59 ` Linus Torvalds
2014-02-12 8:13 ` Tejun Heo
2014-02-12 8:13 ` Tejun Heo
2014-02-12 12:44 ` Steven Rostedt
2014-02-12 12:44 ` Steven Rostedt
2014-02-12 8:35 ` Dave Chinner
2014-02-12 8:35 ` Dave Chinner
2014-02-12 12:50 ` Steven Rostedt
2014-02-12 12:50 ` Steven Rostedt
2014-02-12 12:40 ` Steven Rostedt
2014-02-12 12:40 ` Steven Rostedt
2014-02-12 13:29 ` Peter Zijlstra
2014-02-12 13:29 ` Peter Zijlstra
2014-02-12 14:25 ` Dave Jones
2014-02-12 14:25 ` Dave Jones
2014-02-12 21:14 ` Dave Chinner
2014-02-12 21:14 ` Dave Chinner
2014-02-12 15:57 ` Eric Sandeen
2014-02-12 15:57 ` Eric Sandeen
2014-02-12 6:28 ` Linus Torvalds
2014-02-12 6:28 ` Linus Torvalds
2014-02-12 7:18 ` Dave Chinner
2014-02-12 7:18 ` Dave Chinner
2014-02-14 0:24 ` Dave Chinner
2014-02-14 0:24 ` Dave Chinner
2014-02-14 16:01 ` Dave Jones
2014-02-14 16:01 ` Dave Jones
2014-02-15 22:23 ` Dave Chinner
2014-02-15 22:23 ` Dave Chinner
2014-02-15 22:28 ` Dave Jones [this message]
2014-02-15 22:28 ` Dave Jones
2014-02-15 22:43 ` Linus Torvalds
2014-02-15 22:43 ` Linus Torvalds
2014-02-15 23:50 ` Linus Torvalds
2014-02-15 23:50 ` Linus Torvalds
2014-02-15 23:50 ` Linus Torvalds
2014-02-18 1:27 ` Dave Chinner
2014-02-18 1:27 ` Dave Chinner
2014-02-18 1:27 ` Dave Chinner
2014-02-12 11:39 ` Al Viro
2014-02-12 11:39 ` Al Viro
2014-02-12 20:13 ` Linus Torvalds
2014-02-12 20:13 ` Linus Torvalds
2014-02-12 21:14 ` Al Viro
2014-02-12 21:14 ` Al Viro
2014-02-12 21:32 ` Linus Torvalds
2014-02-12 21:32 ` Linus Torvalds
2014-02-12 21:44 ` Al Viro
2014-02-12 21:44 ` Al Viro
2014-02-13 20:51 ` Al Viro
2014-02-13 20:51 ` Al Viro
2014-02-14 0:09 ` Al Viro
2014-02-14 0:09 ` Al Viro
2014-02-14 13:25 ` Christoph Hellwig
2014-02-14 13:25 ` Christoph Hellwig
2014-02-14 13:29 ` Richard Weinberger
2014-02-14 13:29 ` Richard Weinberger
2014-02-14 15:20 ` Al Viro
2014-02-14 15:20 ` Al Viro
2014-02-14 16:08 ` Oleg Nesterov
2014-02-14 16:08 ` Oleg Nesterov
2014-02-13 17:40 ` Oleg Nesterov
2014-02-13 17:40 ` Oleg Nesterov
2014-02-13 17:58 ` Linus Torvalds
2014-02-13 17:58 ` Linus Torvalds
2014-02-13 18:10 ` Oleg Nesterov
2014-02-13 18:10 ` Oleg Nesterov
2014-02-13 18:37 ` Oleg Nesterov
2014-02-13 18:37 ` Oleg Nesterov
2014-02-15 5:25 ` Al Viro
2014-02-15 5:25 ` Al Viro
2014-02-15 14:27 ` Oleg Nesterov
2014-02-15 14:27 ` Oleg Nesterov
2014-02-15 15:22 ` Al Viro
2014-02-15 15:22 ` Al Viro
2014-02-15 15:33 ` Oleg Nesterov
2014-02-15 15:33 ` Oleg Nesterov
2014-02-15 15:36 ` Al Viro
2014-02-15 15:36 ` Al Viro
2014-02-15 15:58 ` Al Viro
2014-02-15 15:58 ` Al Viro
2014-02-15 16:59 ` Al Viro
2014-02-15 16:59 ` Al Viro
2014-02-15 17:43 ` Oleg Nesterov
2014-02-15 17:43 ` Oleg Nesterov
2014-02-15 18:05 ` Al Viro
2014-02-15 18:05 ` Al Viro
2014-02-15 18:45 ` Oleg Nesterov
2014-02-15 18:45 ` Oleg Nesterov
2014-02-17 16:57 ` Oleg Nesterov
2014-02-17 16:57 ` Oleg Nesterov
2014-02-17 17:40 ` Al Viro
2014-02-17 17:40 ` Al Viro
2014-02-17 17:46 ` Oleg Nesterov
2014-02-17 17:46 ` Oleg Nesterov
2014-02-17 17:54 ` Al Viro
2014-02-17 17:54 ` Al Viro
2014-02-14 16:13 ` Christoph Hellwig
2014-02-14 16:13 ` Christoph Hellwig
2014-02-14 16:16 ` Al Viro
2014-02-14 16:16 ` Al Viro
2014-02-14 16:18 ` Al Viro
2014-02-14 16:18 ` Al Viro
2014-02-14 16:19 ` Christoph Hellwig
2014-02-14 16:19 ` Christoph Hellwig
2014-02-15 14:46 ` Oleg Nesterov
2014-02-15 14:46 ` Oleg Nesterov
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20140215222844.GA18201@redhat.com \
--to=davej@redhat.com \
--cc=david@fromorbit.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=sandeen@sandeen.net \
--cc=torvalds@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk \
--cc=xfs@oss.sgi.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.