Re: virtio ring cleanups, which save stack on older gcc

[Minchan Kim <minchan@kernel.org>]

Hello Rusty,

On Thu, May 29, 2014 at 04:56:41PM +0930, Rusty Russell wrote:
> They don't make much difference: the easier fix is use gcc 4.8
> which drops stack required across virtio block's virtio_queue_rq
> down to that kmalloc in virtio_ring from 528 to 392 bytes.
> 
> Still, these (*lightly tested*) patches reduce to 432 bytes,
> even for gcc 4.6.4.  Posted here FYI.

I am testing with below which was hack for Dave's idea so don't have
a machine to test your patches until tomorrow.
So, I will queue your patches into testing machine tomorrow morning.

Thanks!

diff --git a/kernel/sched/core.c b/kernel/sched/core.c
index f5c6635b806c..95f169e85dbe 100644
--- a/kernel/sched/core.c
+++ b/kernel/sched/core.c
@@ -4241,10 +4241,13 @@ EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(yield_to);
 void __sched io_schedule(void)
 {
 	struct rq *rq = raw_rq();
+	struct blk_plug *plug = current->plug;
 
 	delayacct_blkio_start();
 	atomic_inc(&rq->nr_iowait);
-	blk_flush_plug(current);
+	if (plug)
+		blk_flush_plug_list(plug, true);
+
 	current->in_iowait = 1;
 	schedule();
 	current->in_iowait = 0;

> 
> Cheers,
> Rusty.
> 
> --
> To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
> the body to majordomo@kvack.org.  For more info on Linux MM,
> see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
> Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@kvack.org"> email@kvack.org </a>

-- 
Kind regards,
Minchan Kim

--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@kvack.org.  For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@kvack.org"> email@kvack.org </a>