From: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>
To: Guenter Roeck <linux@roeck-us.net>
Cc: "linux-watchdog@vger.kernel.org" <linux-watchdog@vger.kernel.org>,
"linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org"
<linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org>,
Wim Van Sebroeck <wim@iguana.be>,
Maxime Ripard <maxime.ripard@free-electrons.com>,
Will Deacon <Will.Deacon@arm.com>, Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>,
Heiko Stuebner <heiko@sntech.de>,
Russell King <linux@arm.linux.org.uk>,
Jonas Jensen <jonas.jensen@gmail.com>,
Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@infradead.org>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>,
Dmitry Eremin-Solenikov <dbaryshkov@gmail.com>,
David Woodhouse <dwmw2@infradead.org>,
Tomasz Figa <t.figa@samsung.com>,
"linux-doc@vger.kernel.org" <linux-doc@vger.kernel.org>,
"linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 5/7] watchdog: moxart: Register restart handler with restart notifier
Date: Mon, 14 Jul 2014 16:11:19 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20140714151119.GG1112@arm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <53C3EC0B.7090702@roeck-us.net>
On Mon, Jul 14, 2014 at 03:41:15PM +0100, Guenter Roeck wrote:
> On 07/14/2014 07:19 AM, Catalin Marinas wrote:
> > On Sun, Jul 13, 2014 at 04:30:29PM +0100, Guenter Roeck wrote:
> >> diff --git a/drivers/watchdog/moxart_wdt.c b/drivers/watchdog/moxart_wdt.c
> >> index 4aa3a8a..5080b50 100644
> >> --- a/drivers/watchdog/moxart_wdt.c
> >> +++ b/drivers/watchdog/moxart_wdt.c
> > [...]
> >> -static void moxart_wdt_restart(enum reboot_mode reboot_mode, const char *cmd)
> >> +static int moxart_restart_notify(struct notifier_block *this,
> >> + unsigned long mode, void *cmd)
> >> {
> >> - writel(1, moxart_restart_ctx->base + REG_COUNT);
> >> - writel(0x5ab9, moxart_restart_ctx->base + REG_MODE);
> >> - writel(0x03, moxart_restart_ctx->base + REG_ENABLE);
> >> + struct moxart_wdt_dev *moxart_wdt = container_of(this,
> >> + struct moxart_wdt_dev,
> >> + restart_notifier);
> >> + writel(1, moxart_wdt->base + REG_COUNT);
> >> + writel(0x5ab9, moxart_wdt->base + REG_MODE);
> >> + writel(0x03, moxart_wdt->base + REG_ENABLE);
> >> +
> >> + return NOTIFY_DONE;
> >> }
> >
> > Wondering whether NOTIFY_OK or even NOTIFY_STOP_MASK is better here.
>
> Personally I would rather call all of them if more than one notifier is
> registered to ensure that (at least) one does what it is intended to do,
> but I am open to suggestions.
Probably fine. I guess there won't be more than one handler registered
in most cases anyway.
--
Catalin
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: catalin.marinas@arm.com (Catalin Marinas)
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: [PATCH v4 5/7] watchdog: moxart: Register restart handler with restart notifier
Date: Mon, 14 Jul 2014 16:11:19 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20140714151119.GG1112@arm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <53C3EC0B.7090702@roeck-us.net>
On Mon, Jul 14, 2014 at 03:41:15PM +0100, Guenter Roeck wrote:
> On 07/14/2014 07:19 AM, Catalin Marinas wrote:
> > On Sun, Jul 13, 2014 at 04:30:29PM +0100, Guenter Roeck wrote:
> >> diff --git a/drivers/watchdog/moxart_wdt.c b/drivers/watchdog/moxart_wdt.c
> >> index 4aa3a8a..5080b50 100644
> >> --- a/drivers/watchdog/moxart_wdt.c
> >> +++ b/drivers/watchdog/moxart_wdt.c
> > [...]
> >> -static void moxart_wdt_restart(enum reboot_mode reboot_mode, const char *cmd)
> >> +static int moxart_restart_notify(struct notifier_block *this,
> >> + unsigned long mode, void *cmd)
> >> {
> >> - writel(1, moxart_restart_ctx->base + REG_COUNT);
> >> - writel(0x5ab9, moxart_restart_ctx->base + REG_MODE);
> >> - writel(0x03, moxart_restart_ctx->base + REG_ENABLE);
> >> + struct moxart_wdt_dev *moxart_wdt = container_of(this,
> >> + struct moxart_wdt_dev,
> >> + restart_notifier);
> >> + writel(1, moxart_wdt->base + REG_COUNT);
> >> + writel(0x5ab9, moxart_wdt->base + REG_MODE);
> >> + writel(0x03, moxart_wdt->base + REG_ENABLE);
> >> +
> >> + return NOTIFY_DONE;
> >> }
> >
> > Wondering whether NOTIFY_OK or even NOTIFY_STOP_MASK is better here.
>
> Personally I would rather call all of them if more than one notifier is
> registered to ensure that (at least) one does what it is intended to do,
> but I am open to suggestions.
Probably fine. I guess there won't be more than one handler registered
in most cases anyway.
--
Catalin
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2014-07-14 15:11 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 42+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2014-07-13 15:30 [PATCH v4 0/7] kernel: Add support for restart notifier call chain Guenter Roeck
2014-07-13 15:30 ` Guenter Roeck
2014-07-13 15:30 ` [PATCH v4 1/7] " Guenter Roeck
2014-07-13 15:30 ` Guenter Roeck
2014-07-14 14:53 ` Catalin Marinas
2014-07-14 14:53 ` Catalin Marinas
2014-07-14 14:58 ` Guenter Roeck
2014-07-14 14:58 ` Guenter Roeck
2014-07-15 16:12 ` Guenter Roeck
2014-07-15 16:12 ` Guenter Roeck
2014-07-13 15:30 ` [PATCH v4 2/7] arm64: Support restart through " Guenter Roeck
2014-07-13 15:30 ` Guenter Roeck
2014-07-14 14:55 ` Catalin Marinas
2014-07-14 14:55 ` Catalin Marinas
2014-07-14 15:01 ` Guenter Roeck
2014-07-14 15:01 ` Guenter Roeck
2014-07-14 15:07 ` Catalin Marinas
2014-07-14 15:07 ` Catalin Marinas
2014-07-13 15:30 ` [PATCH v4 3/7] arm: " Guenter Roeck
2014-07-13 15:30 ` Guenter Roeck
2014-07-13 15:30 ` [PATCH v4 4/7] power/restart: Call machine_restart instead of arm_pm_restart Guenter Roeck
2014-07-13 15:30 ` Guenter Roeck
2014-07-13 15:30 ` [PATCH v4 5/7] watchdog: moxart: Register restart handler with restart notifier Guenter Roeck
2014-07-13 15:30 ` Guenter Roeck
2014-07-14 14:19 ` Catalin Marinas
2014-07-14 14:19 ` Catalin Marinas
2014-07-14 14:41 ` Guenter Roeck
2014-07-14 14:41 ` Guenter Roeck
2014-07-14 15:11 ` Catalin Marinas [this message]
2014-07-14 15:11 ` Catalin Marinas
2014-07-13 15:30 ` [PATCH v4 6/7] watchdog: alim7101: " Guenter Roeck
2014-07-13 15:30 ` Guenter Roeck
2014-07-13 15:30 ` [PATCH v4 7/7] arm/arm64: Unexport restart handlers Guenter Roeck
2014-07-13 15:30 ` Guenter Roeck
2014-07-14 14:22 ` Catalin Marinas
2014-07-14 14:22 ` Catalin Marinas
2014-07-14 14:39 ` Guenter Roeck
2014-07-14 14:39 ` Guenter Roeck
2014-07-14 15:09 ` Catalin Marinas
2014-07-14 15:09 ` Catalin Marinas
2014-07-14 16:26 ` Guenter Roeck
2014-07-14 16:26 ` Guenter Roeck
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20140714151119.GG1112@arm.com \
--to=catalin.marinas@arm.com \
--cc=Will.Deacon@arm.com \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=arnd@arndb.de \
--cc=dbaryshkov@gmail.com \
--cc=dwmw2@infradead.org \
--cc=heiko@sntech.de \
--cc=jonas.jensen@gmail.com \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-doc@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-watchdog@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux@arm.linux.org.uk \
--cc=linux@roeck-us.net \
--cc=maxime.ripard@free-electrons.com \
--cc=mingo@kernel.org \
--cc=rdunlap@infradead.org \
--cc=rostedt@goodmis.org \
--cc=t.figa@samsung.com \
--cc=wim@iguana.be \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.