All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Guenter Roeck <linux@roeck-us.net>
To: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>
Cc: "linux-watchdog@vger.kernel.org" <linux-watchdog@vger.kernel.org>,
	"linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org"
	<linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org>,
	Wim Van Sebroeck <wim@iguana.be>,
	Maxime Ripard <maxime.ripard@free-electrons.com>,
	Will Deacon <Will.Deacon@arm.com>, Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>,
	Heiko Stuebner <heiko@sntech.de>,
	Russell King <linux@arm.linux.org.uk>,
	Jonas Jensen <jonas.jensen@gmail.com>,
	Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@infradead.org>,
	Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
	Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org>,
	Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>,
	Dmitry Eremin-Solenikov <dbaryshkov@gmail.com>,
	David Woodhouse <dwmw2@infradead.org>,
	Tomasz Figa <t.figa@samsung.com>,
	"linux-doc@vger.kernel.org" <linux-doc@vger.kernel.org>,
	"linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 5/7] watchdog: moxart: Register restart handler with restart notifier
Date: Mon, 14 Jul 2014 07:41:15 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <53C3EC0B.7090702@roeck-us.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20140714141904.GA1112@arm.com>

On 07/14/2014 07:19 AM, Catalin Marinas wrote:
> On Sun, Jul 13, 2014 at 04:30:29PM +0100, Guenter Roeck wrote:
>> diff --git a/drivers/watchdog/moxart_wdt.c b/drivers/watchdog/moxart_wdt.c
>> index 4aa3a8a..5080b50 100644
>> --- a/drivers/watchdog/moxart_wdt.c
>> +++ b/drivers/watchdog/moxart_wdt.c
> [...]
>> -static void moxart_wdt_restart(enum reboot_mode reboot_mode, const char *cmd)
>> +static int moxart_restart_notify(struct notifier_block *this,
>> +				 unsigned long mode, void *cmd)
>>   {
>> -	writel(1, moxart_restart_ctx->base + REG_COUNT);
>> -	writel(0x5ab9, moxart_restart_ctx->base + REG_MODE);
>> -	writel(0x03, moxart_restart_ctx->base + REG_ENABLE);
>> +	struct moxart_wdt_dev *moxart_wdt = container_of(this,
>> +							 struct moxart_wdt_dev,
>> +							 restart_notifier);
>> +	writel(1, moxart_wdt->base + REG_COUNT);
>> +	writel(0x5ab9, moxart_wdt->base + REG_MODE);
>> +	writel(0x03, moxart_wdt->base + REG_ENABLE);
>> +
>> +	return NOTIFY_DONE;
>>   }
>
> Wondering whether NOTIFY_OK or even NOTIFY_STOP_MASK is better here.
>

Personally I would rather call all of them if more than one notifier is
registered to ensure that (at least) one does what it is intended to do,
but I am open to suggestions.

Guenter


WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: linux@roeck-us.net (Guenter Roeck)
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: [PATCH v4 5/7] watchdog: moxart: Register restart handler with restart notifier
Date: Mon, 14 Jul 2014 07:41:15 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <53C3EC0B.7090702@roeck-us.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20140714141904.GA1112@arm.com>

On 07/14/2014 07:19 AM, Catalin Marinas wrote:
> On Sun, Jul 13, 2014 at 04:30:29PM +0100, Guenter Roeck wrote:
>> diff --git a/drivers/watchdog/moxart_wdt.c b/drivers/watchdog/moxart_wdt.c
>> index 4aa3a8a..5080b50 100644
>> --- a/drivers/watchdog/moxart_wdt.c
>> +++ b/drivers/watchdog/moxart_wdt.c
> [...]
>> -static void moxart_wdt_restart(enum reboot_mode reboot_mode, const char *cmd)
>> +static int moxart_restart_notify(struct notifier_block *this,
>> +				 unsigned long mode, void *cmd)
>>   {
>> -	writel(1, moxart_restart_ctx->base + REG_COUNT);
>> -	writel(0x5ab9, moxart_restart_ctx->base + REG_MODE);
>> -	writel(0x03, moxart_restart_ctx->base + REG_ENABLE);
>> +	struct moxart_wdt_dev *moxart_wdt = container_of(this,
>> +							 struct moxart_wdt_dev,
>> +							 restart_notifier);
>> +	writel(1, moxart_wdt->base + REG_COUNT);
>> +	writel(0x5ab9, moxart_wdt->base + REG_MODE);
>> +	writel(0x03, moxart_wdt->base + REG_ENABLE);
>> +
>> +	return NOTIFY_DONE;
>>   }
>
> Wondering whether NOTIFY_OK or even NOTIFY_STOP_MASK is better here.
>

Personally I would rather call all of them if more than one notifier is
registered to ensure that (at least) one does what it is intended to do,
but I am open to suggestions.

Guenter

  reply	other threads:[~2014-07-14 14:41 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 42+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2014-07-13 15:30 [PATCH v4 0/7] kernel: Add support for restart notifier call chain Guenter Roeck
2014-07-13 15:30 ` Guenter Roeck
2014-07-13 15:30 ` [PATCH v4 1/7] " Guenter Roeck
2014-07-13 15:30   ` Guenter Roeck
2014-07-14 14:53   ` Catalin Marinas
2014-07-14 14:53     ` Catalin Marinas
2014-07-14 14:58     ` Guenter Roeck
2014-07-14 14:58       ` Guenter Roeck
2014-07-15 16:12       ` Guenter Roeck
2014-07-15 16:12         ` Guenter Roeck
2014-07-13 15:30 ` [PATCH v4 2/7] arm64: Support restart through " Guenter Roeck
2014-07-13 15:30   ` Guenter Roeck
2014-07-14 14:55   ` Catalin Marinas
2014-07-14 14:55     ` Catalin Marinas
2014-07-14 15:01     ` Guenter Roeck
2014-07-14 15:01       ` Guenter Roeck
2014-07-14 15:07       ` Catalin Marinas
2014-07-14 15:07         ` Catalin Marinas
2014-07-13 15:30 ` [PATCH v4 3/7] arm: " Guenter Roeck
2014-07-13 15:30   ` Guenter Roeck
2014-07-13 15:30 ` [PATCH v4 4/7] power/restart: Call machine_restart instead of arm_pm_restart Guenter Roeck
2014-07-13 15:30   ` Guenter Roeck
2014-07-13 15:30 ` [PATCH v4 5/7] watchdog: moxart: Register restart handler with restart notifier Guenter Roeck
2014-07-13 15:30   ` Guenter Roeck
2014-07-14 14:19   ` Catalin Marinas
2014-07-14 14:19     ` Catalin Marinas
2014-07-14 14:41     ` Guenter Roeck [this message]
2014-07-14 14:41       ` Guenter Roeck
2014-07-14 15:11       ` Catalin Marinas
2014-07-14 15:11         ` Catalin Marinas
2014-07-13 15:30 ` [PATCH v4 6/7] watchdog: alim7101: " Guenter Roeck
2014-07-13 15:30   ` Guenter Roeck
2014-07-13 15:30 ` [PATCH v4 7/7] arm/arm64: Unexport restart handlers Guenter Roeck
2014-07-13 15:30   ` Guenter Roeck
2014-07-14 14:22   ` Catalin Marinas
2014-07-14 14:22     ` Catalin Marinas
2014-07-14 14:39     ` Guenter Roeck
2014-07-14 14:39       ` Guenter Roeck
2014-07-14 15:09       ` Catalin Marinas
2014-07-14 15:09         ` Catalin Marinas
2014-07-14 16:26         ` Guenter Roeck
2014-07-14 16:26           ` Guenter Roeck

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=53C3EC0B.7090702@roeck-us.net \
    --to=linux@roeck-us.net \
    --cc=Will.Deacon@arm.com \
    --cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=arnd@arndb.de \
    --cc=catalin.marinas@arm.com \
    --cc=dbaryshkov@gmail.com \
    --cc=dwmw2@infradead.org \
    --cc=heiko@sntech.de \
    --cc=jonas.jensen@gmail.com \
    --cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=linux-doc@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-watchdog@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux@arm.linux.org.uk \
    --cc=maxime.ripard@free-electrons.com \
    --cc=mingo@kernel.org \
    --cc=rdunlap@infradead.org \
    --cc=rostedt@goodmis.org \
    --cc=t.figa@samsung.com \
    --cc=wim@iguana.be \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.