All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Guenter Roeck <linux@roeck-us.net>
To: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>
Cc: "linux-watchdog@vger.kernel.org" <linux-watchdog@vger.kernel.org>,
	"linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org"
	<linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org>,
	Wim Van Sebroeck <wim@iguana.be>,
	Maxime Ripard <maxime.ripard@free-electrons.com>,
	Will Deacon <Will.Deacon@arm.com>, Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>,
	Heiko Stuebner <heiko@sntech.de>,
	Russell King <linux@arm.linux.org.uk>,
	Jonas Jensen <jonas.jensen@gmail.com>,
	Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@infradead.org>,
	Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
	Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org>,
	Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>,
	Dmitry Eremin-Solenikov <dbaryshkov@gmail.com>,
	David Woodhouse <dwmw2@infradead.org>,
	Tomasz Figa <t.figa@samsung.com>,
	"linux-doc@vger.kernel.org" <linux-doc@vger.kernel.org>,
	"linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 1/7] kernel: Add support for restart notifier call chain
Date: Tue, 15 Jul 2014 09:12:51 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20140715161251.GA14534@roeck-us.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <53C3F033.9070408@roeck-us.net>

On Mon, Jul 14, 2014 at 07:58:59AM -0700, Guenter Roeck wrote:
> On 07/14/2014 07:53 AM, Catalin Marinas wrote:
[ ... ]
> >
> >I'm not fully convinced implying a 'notifier' is the right approach
> >here. By analogy with the reboot notifier, this is something drivers
> >would want to know about and do some work before the actual system
> >restart (e.g. disable watchdogs as in the reboot notifier case). The
> >restart notifier here is meant to perform the actual system restart.
> >Arguably, the actual restart should be handled by priority 0 with some
> >preparation before but we have reboot notifier already, so I don't think
> >it's worth another notifier.
> >
> >While re-using the notifier mechanism behind the scene is fine, I think
> >we should at least rename the functions to something like
> >(un)register_restart_handler().
> >
> 
> Fine with me. Any other comments / suggestions on the name of the function ?
> 
Any further feedback on the function names ? If not I'll resubmit the series
tonight or tomorrow morning with the functions renamed as suggested above.

Guenter

WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: linux@roeck-us.net (Guenter Roeck)
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: [PATCH v4 1/7] kernel: Add support for restart notifier call chain
Date: Tue, 15 Jul 2014 09:12:51 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20140715161251.GA14534@roeck-us.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <53C3F033.9070408@roeck-us.net>

On Mon, Jul 14, 2014 at 07:58:59AM -0700, Guenter Roeck wrote:
> On 07/14/2014 07:53 AM, Catalin Marinas wrote:
[ ... ]
> >
> >I'm not fully convinced implying a 'notifier' is the right approach
> >here. By analogy with the reboot notifier, this is something drivers
> >would want to know about and do some work before the actual system
> >restart (e.g. disable watchdogs as in the reboot notifier case). The
> >restart notifier here is meant to perform the actual system restart.
> >Arguably, the actual restart should be handled by priority 0 with some
> >preparation before but we have reboot notifier already, so I don't think
> >it's worth another notifier.
> >
> >While re-using the notifier mechanism behind the scene is fine, I think
> >we should at least rename the functions to something like
> >(un)register_restart_handler().
> >
> 
> Fine with me. Any other comments / suggestions on the name of the function ?
> 
Any further feedback on the function names ? If not I'll resubmit the series
tonight or tomorrow morning with the functions renamed as suggested above.

Guenter

  reply	other threads:[~2014-07-15 16:12 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 42+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2014-07-13 15:30 [PATCH v4 0/7] kernel: Add support for restart notifier call chain Guenter Roeck
2014-07-13 15:30 ` Guenter Roeck
2014-07-13 15:30 ` [PATCH v4 1/7] " Guenter Roeck
2014-07-13 15:30   ` Guenter Roeck
2014-07-14 14:53   ` Catalin Marinas
2014-07-14 14:53     ` Catalin Marinas
2014-07-14 14:58     ` Guenter Roeck
2014-07-14 14:58       ` Guenter Roeck
2014-07-15 16:12       ` Guenter Roeck [this message]
2014-07-15 16:12         ` Guenter Roeck
2014-07-13 15:30 ` [PATCH v4 2/7] arm64: Support restart through " Guenter Roeck
2014-07-13 15:30   ` Guenter Roeck
2014-07-14 14:55   ` Catalin Marinas
2014-07-14 14:55     ` Catalin Marinas
2014-07-14 15:01     ` Guenter Roeck
2014-07-14 15:01       ` Guenter Roeck
2014-07-14 15:07       ` Catalin Marinas
2014-07-14 15:07         ` Catalin Marinas
2014-07-13 15:30 ` [PATCH v4 3/7] arm: " Guenter Roeck
2014-07-13 15:30   ` Guenter Roeck
2014-07-13 15:30 ` [PATCH v4 4/7] power/restart: Call machine_restart instead of arm_pm_restart Guenter Roeck
2014-07-13 15:30   ` Guenter Roeck
2014-07-13 15:30 ` [PATCH v4 5/7] watchdog: moxart: Register restart handler with restart notifier Guenter Roeck
2014-07-13 15:30   ` Guenter Roeck
2014-07-14 14:19   ` Catalin Marinas
2014-07-14 14:19     ` Catalin Marinas
2014-07-14 14:41     ` Guenter Roeck
2014-07-14 14:41       ` Guenter Roeck
2014-07-14 15:11       ` Catalin Marinas
2014-07-14 15:11         ` Catalin Marinas
2014-07-13 15:30 ` [PATCH v4 6/7] watchdog: alim7101: " Guenter Roeck
2014-07-13 15:30   ` Guenter Roeck
2014-07-13 15:30 ` [PATCH v4 7/7] arm/arm64: Unexport restart handlers Guenter Roeck
2014-07-13 15:30   ` Guenter Roeck
2014-07-14 14:22   ` Catalin Marinas
2014-07-14 14:22     ` Catalin Marinas
2014-07-14 14:39     ` Guenter Roeck
2014-07-14 14:39       ` Guenter Roeck
2014-07-14 15:09       ` Catalin Marinas
2014-07-14 15:09         ` Catalin Marinas
2014-07-14 16:26         ` Guenter Roeck
2014-07-14 16:26           ` Guenter Roeck

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20140715161251.GA14534@roeck-us.net \
    --to=linux@roeck-us.net \
    --cc=Will.Deacon@arm.com \
    --cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=arnd@arndb.de \
    --cc=catalin.marinas@arm.com \
    --cc=dbaryshkov@gmail.com \
    --cc=dwmw2@infradead.org \
    --cc=heiko@sntech.de \
    --cc=jonas.jensen@gmail.com \
    --cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=linux-doc@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-watchdog@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux@arm.linux.org.uk \
    --cc=maxime.ripard@free-electrons.com \
    --cc=mingo@kernel.org \
    --cc=rdunlap@infradead.org \
    --cc=rostedt@goodmis.org \
    --cc=t.figa@samsung.com \
    --cc=wim@iguana.be \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.