From: wsa@the-dreams.de (Wolfram Sang)
To: cocci@systeme.lip6.fr
Subject: [Cocci] [RFC] drop owner assignment from platform_drivers
Date: Sun, 12 Oct 2014 07:51:46 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20141012055146.GA1310@katana> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20141011205527.GA30877@kroah.com>
> I missed the one code path you pointed out, and that should be fixed,
> but that doesn't mean that the original patch should be reverted, as it
> is the way we want things to be, let's just fix up the bug and move on.
OK, that is a clear statement.
So, what is your opinion on the original cleanup series removing
unnecessary '.owner = THIS_MODULE' lines in drivers? Helpful? Noise?
Thanks,
Wolfram
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 819 bytes
Desc: Digital signature
URL: <https://systeme.lip6.fr/pipermail/cocci/attachments/20141012/e36936a0/attachment.asc>
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Wolfram Sang <wsa@the-dreams.de>
To: cocci@systeme.lip6.fr
Subject: Re: [RFC] drop owner assignment from platform_drivers
Date: Sun, 12 Oct 2014 05:51:46 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20141012055146.GA1310@katana> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20141011205527.GA30877@kroah.com>
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 410 bytes --]
> I missed the one code path you pointed out, and that should be fixed,
> but that doesn't mean that the original patch should be reverted, as it
> is the way we want things to be, let's just fix up the bug and move on.
OK, that is a clear statement.
So, what is your opinion on the original cleanup series removing
unnecessary '.owner = THIS_MODULE' lines in drivers? Helpful? Noise?
Thanks,
Wolfram
[-- Attachment #2: Digital signature --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 819 bytes --]
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: wsa@the-dreams.de (Wolfram Sang)
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: [RFC] drop owner assignment from platform_drivers
Date: Sun, 12 Oct 2014 07:51:46 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20141012055146.GA1310@katana> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20141011205527.GA30877@kroah.com>
> I missed the one code path you pointed out, and that should be fixed,
> but that doesn't mean that the original patch should be reverted, as it
> is the way we want things to be, let's just fix up the bug and move on.
OK, that is a clear statement.
So, what is your opinion on the original cleanup series removing
unnecessary '.owner = THIS_MODULE' lines in drivers? Helpful? Noise?
Thanks,
Wolfram
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 819 bytes
Desc: Digital signature
URL: <http://lists.infradead.org/pipermail/linux-arm-kernel/attachments/20141012/e36936a0/attachment-0001.sig>
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Wolfram Sang <wsa@the-dreams.de>
To: Greg KH <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
Cc: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>,
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
Russell King - ARM Linux <linux@arm.linux.org.uk>,
kernel-janitors@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
cocci@systeme.lip6.fr
Subject: Re: [RFC] drop owner assignment from platform_drivers
Date: Sun, 12 Oct 2014 07:51:46 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20141012055146.GA1310@katana> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20141011205527.GA30877@kroah.com>
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 410 bytes --]
> I missed the one code path you pointed out, and that should be fixed,
> but that doesn't mean that the original patch should be reverted, as it
> is the way we want things to be, let's just fix up the bug and move on.
OK, that is a clear statement.
So, what is your opinion on the original cleanup series removing
unnecessary '.owner = THIS_MODULE' lines in drivers? Helpful? Noise?
Thanks,
Wolfram
[-- Attachment #2: Digital signature --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 819 bytes --]
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2014-10-12 5:51 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 64+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2014-10-10 7:24 [Cocci] [RFC] drop owner assignment from platform_drivers Wolfram Sang
2014-10-10 7:24 ` Wolfram Sang
2014-10-10 7:24 ` Wolfram Sang
2014-10-10 7:24 ` Wolfram Sang
2014-10-10 7:54 ` [Cocci] " Julia Lawall
2014-10-10 7:54 ` Julia Lawall
2014-10-10 7:54 ` Julia Lawall
2014-10-10 7:54 ` Julia Lawall
2014-10-10 18:04 ` Wolfram Sang
2014-10-10 18:04 ` Wolfram Sang
2014-10-10 18:04 ` Wolfram Sang
2014-10-10 18:04 ` Wolfram Sang
2014-10-10 8:30 ` Arnd Bergmann
2014-10-10 8:30 ` Arnd Bergmann
2014-10-10 8:30 ` Arnd Bergmann
2014-10-10 8:30 ` Arnd Bergmann
2014-10-10 18:12 ` [Cocci] " Wolfram Sang
2014-10-10 18:12 ` Wolfram Sang
2014-10-10 18:12 ` Wolfram Sang
2014-10-10 18:12 ` Wolfram Sang
2014-10-10 19:39 ` [Cocci] " Arnd Bergmann
2014-10-10 19:39 ` Arnd Bergmann
2014-10-10 19:39 ` Arnd Bergmann
2014-10-10 19:39 ` Arnd Bergmann
2014-10-10 8:36 ` [Cocci] " Russell King - ARM Linux
2014-10-10 8:36 ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2014-10-10 8:36 ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2014-10-10 8:36 ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2014-10-10 18:26 ` [Cocci] " Wolfram Sang
2014-10-10 18:26 ` Wolfram Sang
2014-10-10 18:26 ` Wolfram Sang
2014-10-10 18:26 ` Wolfram Sang
2014-10-10 19:42 ` [Cocci] " Arnd Bergmann
2014-10-10 19:42 ` Arnd Bergmann
2014-10-10 19:42 ` Arnd Bergmann
2014-10-10 19:42 ` Arnd Bergmann
2014-10-11 16:56 ` [Cocci] " Wolfram Sang
2014-10-11 16:56 ` Wolfram Sang
2014-10-11 16:56 ` Wolfram Sang
2014-10-11 16:56 ` Wolfram Sang
2014-10-11 17:15 ` [Cocci] " Russell King - ARM Linux
2014-10-11 17:15 ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2014-10-11 17:15 ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2014-10-11 17:15 ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2014-10-11 20:55 ` [Cocci] " Greg KH
2014-10-11 20:55 ` Greg KH
2014-10-11 20:55 ` Greg KH
2014-10-11 20:55 ` Greg KH
2014-10-12 5:51 ` Wolfram Sang [this message]
2014-10-12 5:51 ` Wolfram Sang
2014-10-12 5:51 ` Wolfram Sang
2014-10-12 5:51 ` Wolfram Sang
2014-10-12 14:24 ` [Cocci] " Greg KH
2014-10-12 14:24 ` Greg KH
2014-10-12 14:24 ` Greg KH
2014-10-12 14:24 ` Greg KH
2014-10-12 17:01 ` [Cocci] " Wolfram Sang
2014-10-12 17:01 ` Wolfram Sang
2014-10-12 17:01 ` Wolfram Sang
2014-10-12 17:01 ` Wolfram Sang
2014-10-10 21:34 ` [Cocci] " Russell King - ARM Linux
2014-10-10 21:34 ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2014-10-10 21:34 ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2014-10-10 21:34 ` Russell King - ARM Linux
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20141012055146.GA1310@katana \
--to=wsa@the-dreams.de \
--cc=cocci@systeme.lip6.fr \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.