[PATCH 1/9] clk: sunxi: Give sunxi_factors_register a registers parameter

[maxime.ripard@free-electrons.com (Maxime Ripard)]

Hi Hans,

On Thu, Nov 20, 2014 at 04:55:20PM +0100, Hans de Goede wrote:
> Before this commit sunxi_factors_register uses of_iomap(node, 0) to get
> the clk registers. The sun6i prcm has factor clocks, for which we want to
> use sunxi_factors_register, but of_iomap(node, 0) does not work for the prcm
> factor clocks, because the prcm uses the mfd framework, so the registers
> are not part of the dt-node, instead they are added to the platform_device,
> as platform_device resources.
> 
> This commit makes getting the registers the callers duty, so that
> sunxi_factors_register can be used with mfd instantiated platform device too.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Hans de Goede <hdegoede@redhat.com>

Funny, I was thinking of doing exactly the same thing for MMC clocks :)

> ---
>  drivers/clk/sunxi/clk-factors.c    | 10 ++++------
>  drivers/clk/sunxi/clk-factors.h    |  7 ++++---
>  drivers/clk/sunxi/clk-mod0.c       |  6 ++++--
>  drivers/clk/sunxi/clk-sun8i-mbus.c |  2 +-
>  drivers/clk/sunxi/clk-sunxi.c      |  3 ++-
>  5 files changed, 15 insertions(+), 13 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/clk/sunxi/clk-factors.c b/drivers/clk/sunxi/clk-factors.c
> index f83ba09..fc4f4b5 100644
> --- a/drivers/clk/sunxi/clk-factors.c
> +++ b/drivers/clk/sunxi/clk-factors.c
> @@ -156,9 +156,10 @@ static const struct clk_ops clk_factors_ops = {
>  	.set_rate = clk_factors_set_rate,
>  };
>  
> -struct clk * __init sunxi_factors_register(struct device_node *node,
> -					   const struct factors_data *data,
> -					   spinlock_t *lock)
> +struct clk *sunxi_factors_register(struct device_node *node,
> +				   const struct factors_data *data,
> +				   spinlock_t *lock,
> +				   void __iomem *reg)
>  {
>  	struct clk *clk;
>  	struct clk_factors *factors;
> @@ -168,11 +169,8 @@ struct clk * __init sunxi_factors_register(struct device_node *node,
>  	struct clk_hw *mux_hw = NULL;
>  	const char *clk_name = node->name;
>  	const char *parents[FACTORS_MAX_PARENTS];
> -	void __iomem *reg;
>  	int i = 0;
>  
> -	reg = of_iomap(node, 0);
> -
>  	/* if we have a mux, we will have >1 parents */
>  	while (i < FACTORS_MAX_PARENTS &&
>  	       (parents[i] = of_clk_get_parent_name(node, i)) != NULL)
> diff --git a/drivers/clk/sunxi/clk-factors.h b/drivers/clk/sunxi/clk-factors.h
> index 9913840..1f5526d 100644
> --- a/drivers/clk/sunxi/clk-factors.h
> +++ b/drivers/clk/sunxi/clk-factors.h
> @@ -37,8 +37,9 @@ struct clk_factors {
>  	spinlock_t *lock;
>  };
>  
> -struct clk * __init sunxi_factors_register(struct device_node *node,
> -					   const struct factors_data *data,
> -					   spinlock_t *lock);
> +struct clk *sunxi_factors_register(struct device_node *node,
> +				   const struct factors_data *data,
> +				   spinlock_t *lock,
> +				   void __iomem *reg);

Why are you dropping the __init there?

>  
>  #endif
> diff --git a/drivers/clk/sunxi/clk-mod0.c b/drivers/clk/sunxi/clk-mod0.c
> index 4a56385..9530833 100644
> --- a/drivers/clk/sunxi/clk-mod0.c
> +++ b/drivers/clk/sunxi/clk-mod0.c
> @@ -78,7 +78,8 @@ static DEFINE_SPINLOCK(sun4i_a10_mod0_lock);
>  
>  static void __init sun4i_a10_mod0_setup(struct device_node *node)
>  {
> -	sunxi_factors_register(node, &sun4i_a10_mod0_data, &sun4i_a10_mod0_lock);
> +	sunxi_factors_register(node, &sun4i_a10_mod0_data,
> +			       &sun4i_a10_mod0_lock, of_iomap(node, 0));

As of_iomap can fail, I'd rather check the returned value before
calling sunxi_factors_register.

I know it wasn't done before, but it's the right thing to do, as it
would lead to an instant crash if that fails.

Thanks!
Maxime

-- 
Maxime Ripard, Free Electrons
Embedded Linux, Kernel and Android engineering
http://free-electrons.com
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 819 bytes
Desc: Digital signature
URL: <http://lists.infradead.org/pipermail/linux-arm-kernel/attachments/20141121/c32f1a95/attachment-0001.sig>