From: Dave Chinner <david@fromorbit.com>
To: Boaz Harrosh <boaz@plexistor.com>
Cc: Brian Foster <bfoster@redhat.com>,
fstests@vger.kernel.org, linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org,
axboe@fb.com
Subject: Re: ramdisk problems in 4.0-rc1? (was Re: [PATCH 1/4] xfs/104: log size too small for 4k sector drives)
Date: Mon, 2 Mar 2015 12:09:24 +1100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20150302010924.GQ4251@dastard> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <54F2CD85.3060303@plexistor.com>
On Sun, Mar 01, 2015 at 10:27:49AM +0200, Boaz Harrosh wrote:
> On 02/27/2015 02:58 AM, Dave Chinner wrote:
> >> It looks like the system anticipates that ramdisk "should
> >> not have these events"
> >
> > Right, but not because it's a ramdisk. Those events should not be
> > occurring because I'm not creating or destroying devices, I'm not
> > changing partition tables, I'm not resizing ramdisks or partitions,
> > and so on. I'm simply mkfs'ing, mounting and unmounting filesystems
> > on the ramdisks - nothing should be generating device based udev
> > events...
> >
> > Finding the trigger that is causing these events will tell us what
> > the bug is -
>
> > restricting the config won't help, especially as DAX
> > will *always* be enabled on my test machines as it's something
> > needed in my test matrix.
>
> No the "if DAX" is for the 4k thing. The enablement of the uevents is
> with a new "part_show" module parameter (See patch-1).
Sure, but that doesn't answer my question: what is generating device
level uevents when all I'm doing is mkfs/mount/umount on the device?
> > I'm not sure how to go about finding that
> > trigger right now and as such I won't really have time to look at it
> > until after lsfmm/vault...
> >
>
> I'll try to reproduce this here. What Fedora version do I need?
I'm running debian unstable w/ systemd-215 on the particular test
machine that is hitting this problem.
Cheers,
Dave.
--
Dave Chinner
david@fromorbit.com
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2015-03-02 1:09 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 25+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2015-02-24 22:54 [PATCH v2 0/4] fstests: sector size fixes and whiteouts Dave Chinner
2015-02-24 22:54 ` [PATCH 1/4] xfs/104: log size too small for 4k sector drives Dave Chinner
2015-02-25 16:11 ` Brian Foster
2015-02-25 22:32 ` ramdisk problems in 4.0-rc1? (was Re: [PATCH 1/4] xfs/104: log size too small for 4k sector drives) Dave Chinner
2015-02-25 23:31 ` Brian Foster
2015-02-25 23:43 ` Dave Chinner
2015-02-26 7:46 ` Boaz Harrosh
2015-02-26 17:23 ` Brian Foster
2015-03-01 8:49 ` Boaz Harrosh
2015-03-01 14:28 ` Brian Foster
2015-02-27 0:58 ` Dave Chinner
2015-03-01 8:27 ` Boaz Harrosh
2015-03-02 1:09 ` Dave Chinner [this message]
2015-03-02 9:40 ` Boaz Harrosh
2015-02-26 8:14 ` [PATCH] brd: Re-instate ram disk visibility option (part_show) Boaz Harrosh
2015-02-26 8:41 ` [PATCH] brd: Only request 4K sectors if DAX is enabled Boaz Harrosh
2015-02-26 8:48 ` Boaz Harrosh
2015-02-27 0:23 ` Dave Chinner
2015-03-01 8:30 ` Boaz Harrosh
2015-02-24 22:54 ` [PATCH 2/4] xfs: don't output mkfs sector sizes into golden output Dave Chinner
2015-02-27 18:56 ` Brian Foster
2015-02-24 22:54 ` [PATCH 3/4] xfs/049: umount -d fails when kernel wins teardown race Dave Chinner
2015-02-27 18:56 ` Brian Foster
2015-02-24 22:54 ` [PATCH 4/4] generic: Add rudimetary RENAME_WHITEOUT test Dave Chinner
2015-02-27 18:57 ` Brian Foster
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20150302010924.GQ4251@dastard \
--to=david@fromorbit.com \
--cc=axboe@fb.com \
--cc=bfoster@redhat.com \
--cc=boaz@plexistor.com \
--cc=fstests@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.