All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Boaz Harrosh <boaz@plexistor.com>
To: Dave Chinner <david@fromorbit.com>, Boaz Harrosh <boaz@plexistor.com>
Cc: Brian Foster <bfoster@redhat.com>,
	fstests@vger.kernel.org, linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org,
	axboe@fb.com
Subject: Re: ramdisk problems in 4.0-rc1? (was Re: [PATCH 1/4] xfs/104: log size too small for 4k sector drives)
Date: Mon, 02 Mar 2015 11:40:35 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <54F43013.10305@plexistor.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20150302010924.GQ4251@dastard>

On 03/02/2015 03:09 AM, Dave Chinner wrote:
> On Sun, Mar 01, 2015 at 10:27:49AM +0200, Boaz Harrosh wrote:
>> On 02/27/2015 02:58 AM, Dave Chinner wrote:
<>
>> No the "if DAX" is for the 4k thing. The enablement of the uevents is
>> with a new "part_show" module parameter (See patch-1).
> 
> Sure, but that doesn't answer my question: what is generating device
> level uevents when all I'm doing is mkfs/mount/umount on the device?
> 

I was suspecting it is this systemd bug which keeps trying to tier-down
the devices.

>>> I'm not sure how to go about finding that
>>> trigger right now and as such I won't really have time to look at it
>>> until after lsfmm/vault...
>>>
>>
>> I'll try to reproduce this here. What Fedora version do I need?
> 
> I'm running debian unstable w/ systemd-215 on the particular test
> machine that is hitting this problem.
> 

Oooff, On my fedora 20 I'm at systemd 208. I'll see if I have time to
install an fc21 vm or maybe upgrade from source. (Any easy way?)

I have setup my xfs rig and ran "./check -g auto" by now. I tried both
part_show=1/0 and both look working as expected.
(Do I need any special $MKFS_OPTIONS or anything else)

I'll probably be giving up soon, and will just wait for more reports.

With the patch-1 I sent I am reverting to old behavior so I need a
reproducer to try and run with patch-1 and part_show=1 should show
the problem and part_show=0 should not. Else this is something else

> Cheers,
> Dave.
> 

Thanks Dave, sorry for trapping you in this boring mess, life
at Kernel the one reproducing the problem needs to help fix it ;-)

Have an enjoyable and productive LSF
Thanks
Boaz


  reply	other threads:[~2015-03-02  9:40 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 25+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2015-02-24 22:54 [PATCH v2 0/4] fstests: sector size fixes and whiteouts Dave Chinner
2015-02-24 22:54 ` [PATCH 1/4] xfs/104: log size too small for 4k sector drives Dave Chinner
2015-02-25 16:11   ` Brian Foster
2015-02-25 22:32     ` ramdisk problems in 4.0-rc1? (was Re: [PATCH 1/4] xfs/104: log size too small for 4k sector drives) Dave Chinner
2015-02-25 23:31       ` Brian Foster
2015-02-25 23:43         ` Dave Chinner
2015-02-26  7:46           ` Boaz Harrosh
2015-02-26 17:23             ` Brian Foster
2015-03-01  8:49               ` Boaz Harrosh
2015-03-01 14:28                 ` Brian Foster
2015-02-27  0:58             ` Dave Chinner
2015-03-01  8:27               ` Boaz Harrosh
2015-03-02  1:09                 ` Dave Chinner
2015-03-02  9:40                   ` Boaz Harrosh [this message]
2015-02-26  8:14       ` [PATCH] brd: Re-instate ram disk visibility option (part_show) Boaz Harrosh
2015-02-26  8:41         ` [PATCH] brd: Only request 4K sectors if DAX is enabled Boaz Harrosh
2015-02-26  8:48           ` Boaz Harrosh
2015-02-27  0:23           ` Dave Chinner
2015-03-01  8:30             ` Boaz Harrosh
2015-02-24 22:54 ` [PATCH 2/4] xfs: don't output mkfs sector sizes into golden output Dave Chinner
2015-02-27 18:56   ` Brian Foster
2015-02-24 22:54 ` [PATCH 3/4] xfs/049: umount -d fails when kernel wins teardown race Dave Chinner
2015-02-27 18:56   ` Brian Foster
2015-02-24 22:54 ` [PATCH 4/4] generic: Add rudimetary RENAME_WHITEOUT test Dave Chinner
2015-02-27 18:57   ` Brian Foster

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=54F43013.10305@plexistor.com \
    --to=boaz@plexistor.com \
    --cc=axboe@fb.com \
    --cc=bfoster@redhat.com \
    --cc=david@fromorbit.com \
    --cc=fstests@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.