All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Boaz Harrosh <boaz@plexistor.com>
To: Dave Chinner <david@fromorbit.com>
Cc: Brian Foster <bfoster@redhat.com>,
	fstests@vger.kernel.org, linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org,
	axboe@fb.com
Subject: Re: ramdisk problems in 4.0-rc1? (was Re: [PATCH 1/4] xfs/104: log size too small for 4k sector drives)
Date: Sun, 01 Mar 2015 10:27:49 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <54F2CD85.3060303@plexistor.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20150227005837.GG18360@dastard>

On 02/27/2015 02:58 AM, Dave Chinner wrote:
<>
>>
>> Sigh, thanks Dave. Yes you are correct my patch enabled the
>> udev events, as part of fixing ramdisk with partitions.
>> This is because if you do not enable them then mount by UUID
>> and all sort of lsblk and friends do not work.
> 
> Sure, that's what the gendisk abstraction just you. But why am I
> seeing random partition probes on a ramdisk that *isn't using
> partitions*?
> 

Yes, There should be the one new event on create (modprobe or
mknod) which was not there before. Perhaps it triggers a systemd
process that never used to run before. (And is now sitting there
and making a mess)

<>
>> It looks like the system anticipates that ramdisk "should
>> not have these events"
> 
> Right, but not because it's a ramdisk. Those events should not be
> occurring because I'm not creating or destroying devices, I'm not
> changing partition tables, I'm not resizing ramdisks or partitions,
> and so on. I'm simply mkfs'ing, mounting and unmounting filesystems
> on the ramdisks - nothing should be generating device based udev
> events...
> 
> Finding the trigger that is causing these events will tell us what
> the bug is - 

> restricting the config won't help, especially as DAX
> will *always* be enabled on my test machines as it's something
> needed in my test matrix.

No the "if DAX" is for the 4k thing. The enablement of the uevents is
with a new "part_show" module parameter (See patch-1).

> I'm not sure how to go about finding that
> trigger right now and as such I won't really have time to look at it
> until after lsfmm/vault...
> 

I'll try to reproduce this here. What Fedora version do I need?

> Cheers,
> Dave.
> 

Thanks
Boaz


  reply	other threads:[~2015-03-01  8:27 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 25+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2015-02-24 22:54 [PATCH v2 0/4] fstests: sector size fixes and whiteouts Dave Chinner
2015-02-24 22:54 ` [PATCH 1/4] xfs/104: log size too small for 4k sector drives Dave Chinner
2015-02-25 16:11   ` Brian Foster
2015-02-25 22:32     ` ramdisk problems in 4.0-rc1? (was Re: [PATCH 1/4] xfs/104: log size too small for 4k sector drives) Dave Chinner
2015-02-25 23:31       ` Brian Foster
2015-02-25 23:43         ` Dave Chinner
2015-02-26  7:46           ` Boaz Harrosh
2015-02-26 17:23             ` Brian Foster
2015-03-01  8:49               ` Boaz Harrosh
2015-03-01 14:28                 ` Brian Foster
2015-02-27  0:58             ` Dave Chinner
2015-03-01  8:27               ` Boaz Harrosh [this message]
2015-03-02  1:09                 ` Dave Chinner
2015-03-02  9:40                   ` Boaz Harrosh
2015-02-26  8:14       ` [PATCH] brd: Re-instate ram disk visibility option (part_show) Boaz Harrosh
2015-02-26  8:41         ` [PATCH] brd: Only request 4K sectors if DAX is enabled Boaz Harrosh
2015-02-26  8:48           ` Boaz Harrosh
2015-02-27  0:23           ` Dave Chinner
2015-03-01  8:30             ` Boaz Harrosh
2015-02-24 22:54 ` [PATCH 2/4] xfs: don't output mkfs sector sizes into golden output Dave Chinner
2015-02-27 18:56   ` Brian Foster
2015-02-24 22:54 ` [PATCH 3/4] xfs/049: umount -d fails when kernel wins teardown race Dave Chinner
2015-02-27 18:56   ` Brian Foster
2015-02-24 22:54 ` [PATCH 4/4] generic: Add rudimetary RENAME_WHITEOUT test Dave Chinner
2015-02-27 18:57   ` Brian Foster

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=54F2CD85.3060303@plexistor.com \
    --to=boaz@plexistor.com \
    --cc=axboe@fb.com \
    --cc=bfoster@redhat.com \
    --cc=david@fromorbit.com \
    --cc=fstests@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.