All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Boaz Harrosh <boaz@plexistor.com>
To: Brian Foster <bfoster@redhat.com>, Jens Axboe <axboe@fb.com>
Cc: Dave Chinner <david@fromorbit.com>,
	fstests@vger.kernel.org, linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: ramdisk problems in 4.0-rc1? (was Re: [PATCH 1/4] xfs/104: log size too small for 4k sector drives)
Date: Sun, 01 Mar 2015 10:49:16 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <54F2D28C.8070903@plexistor.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20150226172313.GA2520@laptop.bfoster>

On 02/26/2015 07:23 PM, Brian Foster wrote:
<>
> 
> Thanks Boaz, but I still see the same behavior with the part_show patch.
> It seems to be something that broke in systemd on Fedora between
> versions systemd-218 and systemd-219. The latter is broken on a 3.19
> kernel as well.
> 
> I've filed a systemd bug so we'll see what comes of it from that end:
> 
> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1196452
> 
> Brian
> 

Hi Brian

It says in bugzilla (link above) that this issue is "fixed in git" so
I guess we should be fine ?

Jens does *not* need to take
	[PATCH] brd: Re-instate ram disk visibility option (part_show)

Please confirm.

Please tell me if there is anything I can help with?

Thanks
Boaz


  reply	other threads:[~2015-03-01  8:49 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 25+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2015-02-24 22:54 [PATCH v2 0/4] fstests: sector size fixes and whiteouts Dave Chinner
2015-02-24 22:54 ` [PATCH 1/4] xfs/104: log size too small for 4k sector drives Dave Chinner
2015-02-25 16:11   ` Brian Foster
2015-02-25 22:32     ` ramdisk problems in 4.0-rc1? (was Re: [PATCH 1/4] xfs/104: log size too small for 4k sector drives) Dave Chinner
2015-02-25 23:31       ` Brian Foster
2015-02-25 23:43         ` Dave Chinner
2015-02-26  7:46           ` Boaz Harrosh
2015-02-26 17:23             ` Brian Foster
2015-03-01  8:49               ` Boaz Harrosh [this message]
2015-03-01 14:28                 ` Brian Foster
2015-02-27  0:58             ` Dave Chinner
2015-03-01  8:27               ` Boaz Harrosh
2015-03-02  1:09                 ` Dave Chinner
2015-03-02  9:40                   ` Boaz Harrosh
2015-02-26  8:14       ` [PATCH] brd: Re-instate ram disk visibility option (part_show) Boaz Harrosh
2015-02-26  8:41         ` [PATCH] brd: Only request 4K sectors if DAX is enabled Boaz Harrosh
2015-02-26  8:48           ` Boaz Harrosh
2015-02-27  0:23           ` Dave Chinner
2015-03-01  8:30             ` Boaz Harrosh
2015-02-24 22:54 ` [PATCH 2/4] xfs: don't output mkfs sector sizes into golden output Dave Chinner
2015-02-27 18:56   ` Brian Foster
2015-02-24 22:54 ` [PATCH 3/4] xfs/049: umount -d fails when kernel wins teardown race Dave Chinner
2015-02-27 18:56   ` Brian Foster
2015-02-24 22:54 ` [PATCH 4/4] generic: Add rudimetary RENAME_WHITEOUT test Dave Chinner
2015-02-27 18:57   ` Brian Foster

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=54F2D28C.8070903@plexistor.com \
    --to=boaz@plexistor.com \
    --cc=axboe@fb.com \
    --cc=bfoster@redhat.com \
    --cc=david@fromorbit.com \
    --cc=fstests@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.