All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Dave Chinner <david@fromorbit.com>
To: Michal Hocko <mhocko@suse.cz>
Cc: Rik van Riel <riel@redhat.com>,
	Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
	Al Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>,
	Johannes Weiner <hannes@cmpxchg.org>,
	Mel Gorman <mgorman@suse.de>, Neil Brown <neilb@suse.de>,
	Tetsuo Handa <penguin-kernel@I-love.SAKURA.ne.jp>,
	Sage Weil <sage@inktank.com>, Mark Fasheh <mfasheh@suse.com>,
	linux-mm@kvack.org, LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] mm: Use GFP_KERNEL allocation for the page cache in page_cache_read
Date: Sat, 21 Mar 2015 09:51:39 +1100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20150320225139.GL28621@dastard> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20150320131453.GA4821@dhcp22.suse.cz>

On Fri, Mar 20, 2015 at 02:14:53PM +0100, Michal Hocko wrote:
> On Fri 20-03-15 14:48:20, Dave Chinner wrote:
> > On Thu, Mar 19, 2015 at 01:44:41PM +0100, Michal Hocko wrote:
> > > > allocations where the caller cannot pass a gfp_mask need to obey
> > > > the mapping_gfp_mask that is set by the mapping owner....
> > > 
> > > Hmm, I thought this is true only when the function might be called from
> > > the fs path.
> > 
> > How do you know in, say, mpage_readpages, you aren't being called
> > from a fs path that holds locks? e.g. we can get there from ext4
> > doing readdir, so it is holding an i_mutex lock at that point.
> > 
> > Many other paths into mpages_readpages don't hold locks, but there
> > are some that do, and those that do need functionals like this to
> > obey the mapping_gfp_mask because it is set appropriately for the
> > allocation context of the inode that owns the mapping....
> 
> What about the following?
> ---
> From 5d905cb291138d61bbab056845d6e53bc4451ec8 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
> From: Michal Hocko <mhocko@suse.cz>
> Date: Thu, 19 Mar 2015 14:56:56 +0100
> Subject: [PATCH 1/2] mm: do not ignore mapping_gfp_mask in page cache
>  allocation paths

Looks reasonable, though I though there were more places that that
in the mapping paths that need to be careful...

Cheers,

Dave.
-- 
Dave Chinner
david@fromorbit.com

--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@kvack.org.  For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@kvack.org"> email@kvack.org </a>

WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Dave Chinner <david@fromorbit.com>
To: Michal Hocko <mhocko@suse.cz>
Cc: Rik van Riel <riel@redhat.com>,
	Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
	Al Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>,
	Johannes Weiner <hannes@cmpxchg.org>,
	Mel Gorman <mgorman@suse.de>, Neil Brown <neilb@suse.de>,
	Tetsuo Handa <penguin-kernel@I-love.SAKURA.ne.jp>,
	Sage Weil <sage@inktank.com>, Mark Fasheh <mfasheh@suse.com>,
	linux-mm@kvack.org, LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] mm: Use GFP_KERNEL allocation for the page cache in page_cache_read
Date: Sat, 21 Mar 2015 09:51:39 +1100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20150320225139.GL28621@dastard> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20150320131453.GA4821@dhcp22.suse.cz>

On Fri, Mar 20, 2015 at 02:14:53PM +0100, Michal Hocko wrote:
> On Fri 20-03-15 14:48:20, Dave Chinner wrote:
> > On Thu, Mar 19, 2015 at 01:44:41PM +0100, Michal Hocko wrote:
> > > > allocations where the caller cannot pass a gfp_mask need to obey
> > > > the mapping_gfp_mask that is set by the mapping owner....
> > > 
> > > Hmm, I thought this is true only when the function might be called from
> > > the fs path.
> > 
> > How do you know in, say, mpage_readpages, you aren't being called
> > from a fs path that holds locks? e.g. we can get there from ext4
> > doing readdir, so it is holding an i_mutex lock at that point.
> > 
> > Many other paths into mpages_readpages don't hold locks, but there
> > are some that do, and those that do need functionals like this to
> > obey the mapping_gfp_mask because it is set appropriately for the
> > allocation context of the inode that owns the mapping....
> 
> What about the following?
> ---
> From 5d905cb291138d61bbab056845d6e53bc4451ec8 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
> From: Michal Hocko <mhocko@suse.cz>
> Date: Thu, 19 Mar 2015 14:56:56 +0100
> Subject: [PATCH 1/2] mm: do not ignore mapping_gfp_mask in page cache
>  allocation paths

Looks reasonable, though I though there were more places that that
in the mapping paths that need to be careful...

Cheers,

Dave.
-- 
Dave Chinner
david@fromorbit.com

  reply	other threads:[~2015-03-20 22:51 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 47+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2015-03-18 14:09 [PATCH] mm: Use GFP_KERNEL allocation for the page cache in page_cache_read Michal Hocko
2015-03-18 14:09 ` Michal Hocko
2015-03-18 14:32 ` Rik van Riel
2015-03-18 14:32   ` Rik van Riel
2015-03-18 14:37   ` Michal Hocko
2015-03-18 14:37     ` Michal Hocko
2015-03-18 14:38 ` Mel Gorman
2015-03-18 14:38   ` Mel Gorman
2015-03-18 14:43   ` Michal Hocko
2015-03-18 14:43     ` Michal Hocko
2015-03-18 14:44 ` Rik van Riel
2015-03-18 14:44   ` Rik van Riel
2015-03-18 14:55   ` Michal Hocko
2015-03-18 14:55     ` Michal Hocko
2015-03-19  7:14     ` Dave Chinner
2015-03-19  7:14       ` Dave Chinner
2015-03-19 11:11       ` [PATCH] mm: Use GFP_KERNEL allocation for the page cache inpage_cache_read Tetsuo Handa
2015-03-19 11:11         ` Tetsuo Handa
2015-03-19 12:44       ` [PATCH] mm: Use GFP_KERNEL allocation for the page cache in page_cache_read Michal Hocko
2015-03-19 12:44         ` Michal Hocko
2015-03-20  3:48         ` Dave Chinner
2015-03-20  3:48           ` Dave Chinner
2015-03-20 13:14           ` Michal Hocko
2015-03-20 13:14             ` Michal Hocko
2015-03-20 22:51             ` Dave Chinner [this message]
2015-03-20 22:51               ` Dave Chinner
2015-03-23 13:02               ` Michal Hocko
2015-03-23 13:02                 ` Michal Hocko
2015-03-26  9:53           ` Michal Hocko
2015-03-26  9:53             ` Michal Hocko
2015-03-26 21:43             ` Dave Chinner
2015-03-26 21:43               ` Dave Chinner
2015-03-30  8:22               ` Michal Hocko
2015-03-30  8:22                 ` Michal Hocko
2015-03-31 21:46                 ` Dave Chinner
2015-03-31 21:46                   ` Dave Chinner
2015-04-07 12:16                   ` Michal Hocko
2015-04-07 12:16                     ` Michal Hocko
2015-03-18 15:45 ` Michal Hocko
2015-03-18 15:45   ` Michal Hocko
2015-03-18 21:38   ` NeilBrown
2015-03-19 13:55     ` Michal Hocko
2015-03-19 13:55       ` Michal Hocko
2015-03-19 14:27       ` Michal Hocko
2015-03-19 14:27         ` Michal Hocko
2015-03-20  3:57       ` Dave Chinner
2015-03-20  3:57         ` Dave Chinner

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20150320225139.GL28621@dastard \
    --to=david@fromorbit.com \
    --cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=hannes@cmpxchg.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
    --cc=mfasheh@suse.com \
    --cc=mgorman@suse.de \
    --cc=mhocko@suse.cz \
    --cc=neilb@suse.de \
    --cc=penguin-kernel@I-love.SAKURA.ne.jp \
    --cc=riel@redhat.com \
    --cc=sage@inktank.com \
    --cc=viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.