From: Stephen Boyd <sboyd@codeaurora.org>
To: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>
Cc: Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>,
Rafael Wysocki <rjw@rjwysocki.net>,
Rob Herring <rob.herring@linaro.org>,
Arnd Bergmann <arnd.bergmann@linaro.org>,
Nishanth Menon <nm@ti.com>,
Mike Turquette <mike.turquette@linaro.org>,
Linaro Kernel Mailman List <linaro-kernel@lists.linaro.org>,
"linux-pm@vger.kernel.org" <linux-pm@vger.kernel.org>,
Grant Likely <grant.likely@linaro.org>,
"olof@lixom.net" <olof@lixom.net>,
Sudeep Holla <Sudeep.Holla@arm.com>,
"devicetree@vger.kernel.org" <devicetree@vger.kernel.org>,
Viswanath Puttagunta <viswanath.puttagunta@linaro.org>,
Lucas Stach <l.stach@pengutronix.de>,
Thomas Petazzoni <thomas.petazzoni@free-electrons.com>,
"linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org"
<linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org>,
Thomas Abraham <ta.omasab@gmail.com>,
Abhilash Kesavan <kesavan.abhilash@gmail.com>,
Kevin Hilman <khilman@linaro.org>,
santosh
Subject: Re: [PATCH V4 1/3] OPP: Redefine bindings to overcome shortcomings
Date: Thu, 7 May 2015 14:30:16 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20150507213015.GB2455@codeaurora.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAKohpomYQw67KuX29PLawmd1dSXHx7pMt7+8BzmLPfHSqhMB2g@mail.gmail.com>
On 05/07, Viresh Kumar wrote:
> On 7 May 2015 at 11:22, Stephen Boyd <sboyd@codeaurora.org> wrote:
> > If you look at the cpufreq/clock/pmic code on our codeaurora.org
> > tree you'll see that it's used to pass a value with uA units
> > through the regulator_set_optimum_mode() API. The call to
> > regulator_set_optimum_mode() is here[1], and the place where we
> > parse the OPP table from DT is here[2]. My understanding is that
> > with recent changes to the regulator framework, we would do a
> > s/regulator_set_optimum_mode/regulator_set_load/ and things would
> > otherwise be the same on the consumer side. On the regulator
> > side, we would move the .get_optimum_mode op to .set_load instead
> > of the hack where we write to the hardware in
> > .get_optimum_mode[3].
> >
> > So does that mean it corresponds to a limit, or a nominal
> > constant draw value, or a value to regulator to? From what I can
> > tell it's used to figure out how many phases to enable[4]. I
> > suspect that means it's being used to figure out what value it
> > should regulate to. In newer PMICs this is all done
> > automatically, but at least for some of the PMICs we need to do
> > it manually.
>
> By current phases, you probably meant [1], right ?
>
> Also what I couldn't understand is how are you controlling the
> current here?
>
> - Is this a current only regulator ? Probably not as your code has
> a uv value as well..
No.
>
> - Now if uV is fixed, how is the target current controlled separately ?
uV is not fixed
>
> - Should we have a min/max/target value of this current ? Like what
> we are doing for voltage. Or is this just the 'target' current ?
I don't think so. It's just about setting the load through the
regulator_set_load() API when this OPP is used.
>
> - And finally how exactly should we write this in bindings to make
> it clear to all users ?
>
Let's take this up on my reply to Mark.
--
Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc. is a member of Code Aurora Forum,
a Linux Foundation Collaborative Project
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: sboyd@codeaurora.org (Stephen Boyd)
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: [PATCH V4 1/3] OPP: Redefine bindings to overcome shortcomings
Date: Thu, 7 May 2015 14:30:16 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20150507213015.GB2455@codeaurora.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAKohpomYQw67KuX29PLawmd1dSXHx7pMt7+8BzmLPfHSqhMB2g@mail.gmail.com>
On 05/07, Viresh Kumar wrote:
> On 7 May 2015 at 11:22, Stephen Boyd <sboyd@codeaurora.org> wrote:
> > If you look at the cpufreq/clock/pmic code on our codeaurora.org
> > tree you'll see that it's used to pass a value with uA units
> > through the regulator_set_optimum_mode() API. The call to
> > regulator_set_optimum_mode() is here[1], and the place where we
> > parse the OPP table from DT is here[2]. My understanding is that
> > with recent changes to the regulator framework, we would do a
> > s/regulator_set_optimum_mode/regulator_set_load/ and things would
> > otherwise be the same on the consumer side. On the regulator
> > side, we would move the .get_optimum_mode op to .set_load instead
> > of the hack where we write to the hardware in
> > .get_optimum_mode[3].
> >
> > So does that mean it corresponds to a limit, or a nominal
> > constant draw value, or a value to regulator to? From what I can
> > tell it's used to figure out how many phases to enable[4]. I
> > suspect that means it's being used to figure out what value it
> > should regulate to. In newer PMICs this is all done
> > automatically, but at least for some of the PMICs we need to do
> > it manually.
>
> By current phases, you probably meant [1], right ?
>
> Also what I couldn't understand is how are you controlling the
> current here?
>
> - Is this a current only regulator ? Probably not as your code has
> a uv value as well..
No.
>
> - Now if uV is fixed, how is the target current controlled separately ?
uV is not fixed
>
> - Should we have a min/max/target value of this current ? Like what
> we are doing for voltage. Or is this just the 'target' current ?
I don't think so. It's just about setting the load through the
regulator_set_load() API when this OPP is used.
>
> - And finally how exactly should we write this in bindings to make
> it clear to all users ?
>
Let's take this up on my reply to Mark.
--
Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc. is a member of Code Aurora Forum,
a Linux Foundation Collaborative Project
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2015-05-07 21:30 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 124+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2015-04-30 12:07 [PATCH V4 0/3] OPP: Introduce OPP (V2) bindings Viresh Kumar
2015-04-30 12:07 ` Viresh Kumar
[not found] ` <cover.1430394884.git.viresh.kumar-QSEj5FYQhm4dnm+yROfE0A@public.gmane.org>
2015-04-30 12:07 ` [PATCH V4 1/3] OPP: Redefine bindings to overcome shortcomings Viresh Kumar
2015-04-30 12:07 ` Viresh Kumar
[not found] ` <d225e73f183e01fa0b71e4b9248b6a19a3f7d697.1430394884.git.viresh.kumar-QSEj5FYQhm4dnm+yROfE0A@public.gmane.org>
2015-05-04 12:12 ` Mark Brown
2015-05-04 12:12 ` Mark Brown
2015-05-05 10:48 ` Viresh Kumar
2015-05-05 10:48 ` Viresh Kumar
2015-05-05 10:57 ` Mark Brown
2015-05-05 10:57 ` Mark Brown
[not found] ` <20150505105714.GA22845-GFdadSzt00ze9xe1eoZjHA@public.gmane.org>
2015-05-05 11:43 ` Viresh Kumar
2015-05-05 11:43 ` Viresh Kumar
2015-05-05 17:12 ` Mark Brown
2015-05-05 17:12 ` Mark Brown
2015-05-06 6:53 ` Viresh Kumar
2015-05-06 6:53 ` Viresh Kumar
2015-05-07 5:52 ` Stephen Boyd
2015-05-07 5:52 ` Stephen Boyd
2015-05-07 11:02 ` Mark Brown
2015-05-07 11:02 ` Mark Brown
2015-05-07 21:18 ` Stephen Boyd
2015-05-07 21:18 ` Stephen Boyd
2015-05-07 22:18 ` Mark Brown
2015-05-07 22:18 ` Mark Brown
[not found] ` <20150507221842.GW22845-GFdadSzt00ze9xe1eoZjHA@public.gmane.org>
2015-05-08 6:47 ` Viresh Kumar
2015-05-08 6:47 ` Viresh Kumar
2015-05-08 10:58 ` Mark Brown
2015-05-08 10:58 ` Mark Brown
2015-05-08 11:01 ` Viresh Kumar
2015-05-08 11:01 ` Viresh Kumar
2015-05-11 1:07 ` Nishanth Menon
2015-05-11 1:07 ` Nishanth Menon
2015-05-12 5:20 ` Viresh Kumar
2015-05-12 5:20 ` Viresh Kumar
2015-05-12 19:01 ` Michael Turquette
2015-05-12 19:01 ` Michael Turquette
2015-05-12 19:14 ` Nishanth Menon
2015-05-12 19:14 ` Nishanth Menon
2015-05-12 19:41 ` Mark Brown
2015-05-12 19:41 ` Mark Brown
2015-05-12 19:57 ` Nishanth Menon
2015-05-12 19:57 ` Nishanth Menon
2015-05-13 11:54 ` Mark Brown
2015-05-13 11:54 ` Mark Brown
[not found] ` <20150513115422.GQ3066-GFdadSzt00ze9xe1eoZjHA@public.gmane.org>
2015-05-13 14:24 ` Nishanth Menon
2015-05-13 14:24 ` Nishanth Menon
2015-05-13 15:07 ` Mark Brown
2015-05-13 15:07 ` Mark Brown
2015-05-13 15:43 ` Nishanth Menon
2015-05-13 15:43 ` Nishanth Menon
2015-05-07 12:13 ` Viresh Kumar
2015-05-07 12:13 ` Viresh Kumar
2015-05-07 21:30 ` Stephen Boyd [this message]
2015-05-07 21:30 ` Stephen Boyd
2015-05-08 6:49 ` Viresh Kumar
2015-05-08 6:49 ` Viresh Kumar
2015-05-11 1:02 ` Nishanth Menon
2015-05-11 1:02 ` Nishanth Menon
2015-05-12 5:16 ` Viresh Kumar
2015-05-12 5:16 ` Viresh Kumar
2015-05-12 16:04 ` Nishanth Menon
2015-05-12 16:04 ` Nishanth Menon
2015-05-13 5:05 ` Viresh Kumar
2015-05-13 5:05 ` Viresh Kumar
2015-05-13 15:00 ` Nishanth Menon
2015-05-13 15:00 ` Nishanth Menon
2015-05-13 15:16 ` Mark Brown
2015-05-13 15:16 ` Mark Brown
2015-05-13 16:14 ` Nishanth Menon
2015-05-13 16:14 ` Nishanth Menon
2015-05-13 16:21 ` Mark Brown
2015-05-13 16:21 ` Mark Brown
2015-05-13 16:34 ` Nishanth Menon
2015-05-13 16:34 ` Nishanth Menon
2015-05-12 16:19 ` Felipe Balbi
2015-05-12 16:19 ` Felipe Balbi
2015-05-13 4:45 ` Viresh Kumar
2015-05-13 4:45 ` Viresh Kumar
2015-05-12 21:42 ` Michael Turquette
2015-05-12 21:42 ` Michael Turquette
2015-05-13 8:55 ` Viresh Kumar
2015-05-13 8:55 ` Viresh Kumar
2015-05-13 11:03 ` Mark Brown
2015-05-13 11:03 ` Mark Brown
2015-05-14 0:32 ` Michael Turquette
2015-05-14 0:32 ` Michael Turquette
[not found] ` <CAKohpokeKtcJdrBcPZBBPR2zfJgpvuM_=wRaX5q1Uto2qx1oHQ@mail.gmail.com>
2015-05-15 14:15 ` Viresh Kumar
2015-05-15 14:15 ` Viresh Kumar
2015-05-15 15:43 ` Nishanth Menon
2015-05-15 15:43 ` Nishanth Menon
2015-05-15 17:27 ` Rob Herring
2015-05-15 17:27 ` Rob Herring
2015-05-21 6:02 ` Nishanth Menon
2015-05-21 6:02 ` Nishanth Menon
2015-05-22 14:04 ` Viresh Kumar
2015-05-22 14:04 ` Viresh Kumar
2015-05-22 16:04 ` Rob Herring
2015-05-22 16:04 ` Rob Herring
2015-05-22 17:42 ` Nishanth Menon
2015-05-22 17:42 ` Nishanth Menon
2015-05-26 5:25 ` Viresh Kumar
2015-05-26 5:25 ` Viresh Kumar
2015-05-20 0:51 ` Stephen Boyd
2015-05-20 0:51 ` Stephen Boyd
2015-05-20 2:07 ` Viresh Kumar
2015-05-20 2:07 ` Viresh Kumar
2015-05-20 19:39 ` Stephen Boyd
2015-05-20 19:39 ` Stephen Boyd
2015-05-21 4:33 ` Viresh Kumar
2015-05-21 4:33 ` Viresh Kumar
2015-05-25 11:59 ` Viresh Kumar
2015-05-25 11:59 ` Viresh Kumar
2015-04-30 12:08 ` [PATCH V4 2/3] OPP: Allow multiple OPP tables to be passed via DT Viresh Kumar
2015-04-30 12:08 ` Viresh Kumar
2015-05-12 16:09 ` Nishanth Menon
2015-05-12 16:09 ` Nishanth Menon
2015-05-13 4:41 ` Viresh Kumar
2015-05-13 4:41 ` Viresh Kumar
2015-05-20 0:52 ` Stephen Boyd
2015-05-20 0:52 ` Stephen Boyd
2015-04-30 12:08 ` [PATCH V4 3/3] OPP: Add 'opp-next' in operating-points-v2 bindings Viresh Kumar
2015-04-30 12:08 ` Viresh Kumar
2015-05-12 21:47 ` Michael Turquette
2015-05-12 21:47 ` Michael Turquette
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20150507213015.GB2455@codeaurora.org \
--to=sboyd@codeaurora.org \
--cc=Sudeep.Holla@arm.com \
--cc=arnd.bergmann@linaro.org \
--cc=broonie@kernel.org \
--cc=devicetree@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=grant.likely@linaro.org \
--cc=kesavan.abhilash@gmail.com \
--cc=khilman@linaro.org \
--cc=l.stach@pengutronix.de \
--cc=linaro-kernel@lists.linaro.org \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-pm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mike.turquette@linaro.org \
--cc=nm@ti.com \
--cc=olof@lixom.net \
--cc=rjw@rjwysocki.net \
--cc=rob.herring@linaro.org \
--cc=ta.omasab@gmail.com \
--cc=thomas.petazzoni@free-electrons.com \
--cc=viresh.kumar@linaro.org \
--cc=viswanath.puttagunta@linaro.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.