All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Darren Hart <dvhart-wEGCiKHe2LqWVfeAwA7xHQ@public.gmane.org>
To: Thomas Gleixner <tglx-hfZtesqFncYOwBW4kG4KsQ@public.gmane.org>
Cc: "Michael Kerrisk (man-pages)"
	<mtk.manpages-Re5JQEeQqe8AvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org>,
	Torvald Riegel <triegel-H+wXaHxf7aLQT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org>,
	Carlos O'Donell <carlos-H+wXaHxf7aLQT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org>,
	Ingo Molnar <mingo-X9Un+BFzKDI@public.gmane.org>,
	Jakub Jelinek <jakub-H+wXaHxf7aLQT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org>,
	linux-man <linux-man-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org>,
	lkml <linux-kernel-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org>,
	Davidlohr Bueso <dave-h16yJtLeMjHk1uMJSBkQmQ@public.gmane.org>,
	Arnd Bergmann <arnd-r2nGTMty4D4@public.gmane.org>,
	Steven Rostedt <rostedt-nx8X9YLhiw1AfugRpC6u6w@public.gmane.org>,
	Peter Zijlstra <peterz-wEGCiKHe2LqWVfeAwA7xHQ@public.gmane.org>,
	Linux API <linux-api-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org>,
	Roland McGrath <roland-/Z5OmTQCD9xF6kxbq+BtvQ@public.gmane.org>,
	Anton Blanchard <anton-eUNUBHrolfbYtjvyW6yDsg@public.gmane.org>,
	Eric Dumazet <edumazet-hpIqsD4AKlfQT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org>,
	bill o gallmeister
	<bgallmeister-Re5JQEeQqe8AvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org>,
	Jan Kiszka <jan.kiszka-kv7WeFo6aLtBDgjK7y7TUQ@public.gmane.org>,
	Daniel Wagner <wagi-kQCPcA+X3s7YtjvyW6yDsg@public.gmane.org>,
	Rich Felker <dalias-8zAoT0mYgF4@public.gmane.org>,
	Andy Lutomirski <luto-kltTT9wpgjJwATOyAt5JVQ@public.gmane.org>,
	bert hubert <bert.hubert-dxZxOz86jR8sYtaaK7K+xw@public.gmane.org>,
	Rusty Russell <rusty-8n+1lVoiYb80n/F98K4Iww@public.gmane.org>,
	Heinrich Schuchardt <xypron.glpk-Mmb7MZpHnFY@public.gmane.org>
Subject: Re: Next round: revised futex(2) man page for review
Date: Tue, 25 Aug 2015 23:29:58 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20150826062958.GB50910@vmdeb7> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <alpine.DEB.2.11.1508200042180.3873@nanos>

On Thu, Aug 20, 2015 at 01:17:03AM +0200, Thomas Gleixner wrote:

...

> > >> .\" FIXME XXX In discussing errors for FUTEX_CMP_REQUEUE_PI, Darren Hart
> > >> .\"       made the observation that "EINVAL is returned if the non-pi 
> > >> .\"       to pi or op pairing semantics are violated."
> > >> .\"       Probably there needs to be a general statement about this
> > >> .\"       requirement, probably located at about this point in the page.
> > >> .\"       Darren (or someone else), care to take a shot at this?
> > > 
> > > Well, that's hard to describe because the kernel only has a limited
> > > way of detecting such mismatches. It only can detect it when there are
> > > non PI waiters on a futex and a PI function is called or vice versa.
> > 
> > Hmmm. Okay, I filed your comments away for reference, but
> > hopefully someone can help with some actual text.
> 
> I let Darren come up with something sensible :)

Heh, right, no pressure then...

I responded to Michael on this recently, copied here for reference:


FUTEX_WAIT_REQUEUE_PI can return -EINVAL if called with invalid parameters, such
as uaddr==uaddr2, or (in the case of SHARED futexes), the associated keys match
(meaning it's the same futex word - shared memory, inode, etc.). This can't
happen if the stated policy of requeueing from non-pi to pi is followed as the
same word cannot be both non-pi and pi at the same time, requiring them to be
unique futex words.

FUTEX_CMP_REQUEUE_PI will fail similarly if uaddr and uaddr2 are the same futex
word. Also, if nr_wake != 1.

But, to the point I was making above, FUTEX_CMP_REQUEUE_PI must requeue uaddr to
the same uaddr2 specified in the previous FUTEX_WAIT_REQUEUE_PI call.
FUTEX_WAIT_REQUEUE_PI sets up the operation, FUTEX_CMP_REQUEUE_PI completes it,
and they must agree on uaddr and uaddr2.


Michael, are you still looking for something more from me, or is this FIXME now
complete?



-- 
Darren Hart
Intel Open Source Technology Center

WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Darren Hart <dvhart@infradead.org>
To: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Cc: "Michael Kerrisk (man-pages)" <mtk.manpages@gmail.com>,
	Torvald Riegel <triegel@redhat.com>,
	"Carlos O'Donell" <carlos@redhat.com>,
	Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>, Jakub Jelinek <jakub@redhat.com>,
	linux-man <linux-man@vger.kernel.org>,
	lkml <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	Davidlohr Bueso <dave@stgolabs.net>,
	Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>,
	Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org>,
	Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>,
	Linux API <linux-api@vger.kernel.org>,
	Roland McGrath <roland@hack.frob.com>,
	Anton Blanchard <anton@samba.org>,
	Eric Dumazet <edumazet@google.com>,
	bill o gallmeister <bgallmeister@gmail.com>,
	Jan Kiszka <jan.kiszka@siemens.com>,
	Daniel Wagner <wagi@monom.org>, Rich Felker <dalias@libc.org>,
	Andy Lutomirski <luto@amacapital.net>,
	bert hubert <bert.hubert@netherlabs.nl>,
	Rusty Russell <rusty@rustcorp.com.au>,
	Heinrich Schuchardt <xypron.glpk@gmx.de>
Subject: Re: Next round: revised futex(2) man page for review
Date: Tue, 25 Aug 2015 23:29:58 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20150826062958.GB50910@vmdeb7> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <alpine.DEB.2.11.1508200042180.3873@nanos>

On Thu, Aug 20, 2015 at 01:17:03AM +0200, Thomas Gleixner wrote:

...

> > >> .\" FIXME XXX In discussing errors for FUTEX_CMP_REQUEUE_PI, Darren Hart
> > >> .\"       made the observation that "EINVAL is returned if the non-pi 
> > >> .\"       to pi or op pairing semantics are violated."
> > >> .\"       Probably there needs to be a general statement about this
> > >> .\"       requirement, probably located at about this point in the page.
> > >> .\"       Darren (or someone else), care to take a shot at this?
> > > 
> > > Well, that's hard to describe because the kernel only has a limited
> > > way of detecting such mismatches. It only can detect it when there are
> > > non PI waiters on a futex and a PI function is called or vice versa.
> > 
> > Hmmm. Okay, I filed your comments away for reference, but
> > hopefully someone can help with some actual text.
> 
> I let Darren come up with something sensible :)

Heh, right, no pressure then...

I responded to Michael on this recently, copied here for reference:


FUTEX_WAIT_REQUEUE_PI can return -EINVAL if called with invalid parameters, such
as uaddr==uaddr2, or (in the case of SHARED futexes), the associated keys match
(meaning it's the same futex word - shared memory, inode, etc.). This can't
happen if the stated policy of requeueing from non-pi to pi is followed as the
same word cannot be both non-pi and pi at the same time, requiring them to be
unique futex words.

FUTEX_CMP_REQUEUE_PI will fail similarly if uaddr and uaddr2 are the same futex
word. Also, if nr_wake != 1.

But, to the point I was making above, FUTEX_CMP_REQUEUE_PI must requeue uaddr to
the same uaddr2 specified in the previous FUTEX_WAIT_REQUEUE_PI call.
FUTEX_WAIT_REQUEUE_PI sets up the operation, FUTEX_CMP_REQUEUE_PI completes it,
and they must agree on uaddr and uaddr2.


Michael, are you still looking for something more from me, or is this FIXME now
complete?



-- 
Darren Hart
Intel Open Source Technology Center

  reply	other threads:[~2015-08-26  6:29 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 45+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2015-07-27 12:07 Next round: revised futex(2) man page for review Michael Kerrisk (man-pages)
2015-07-27 12:07 ` Michael Kerrisk (man-pages)
     [not found] ` <55B61EF3.7080302-Re5JQEeQqe8AvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org>
2015-07-28 20:23   ` Thomas Gleixner
2015-07-28 20:23     ` Thomas Gleixner
2015-07-28 20:45     ` Peter Zijlstra
2015-07-28 20:45       ` Peter Zijlstra
     [not found]       ` <20150728204508.GG19282-ndre7Fmf5hadTX5a5knrm8zTDFooKrT+cvkQGrU6aU0@public.gmane.org>
2015-07-28 21:03         ` Thomas Gleixner
2015-07-28 21:03           ` Thomas Gleixner
2015-08-08  6:56           ` Michael Kerrisk (man-pages)
2015-08-08  6:56             ` Michael Kerrisk (man-pages)
2015-07-29  2:09         ` Davidlohr Bueso
2015-07-29  2:09           ` Davidlohr Bueso
2015-07-29  4:11     ` Darren Hart
2015-07-29  4:11       ` Darren Hart
2015-07-29  4:21       ` Darren Hart
2015-07-29  4:21         ` Darren Hart
2015-07-29 12:00         ` Thomas Gleixner
2015-07-29 12:00           ` Thomas Gleixner
2015-07-30  8:19         ` Michael Kerrisk (man-pages)
2015-07-30  8:19           ` Michael Kerrisk (man-pages)
2015-08-08  6:53     ` Michael Kerrisk (man-pages)
2015-08-08  6:53       ` Michael Kerrisk (man-pages)
     [not found]       ` <55C5A787.9010806-Re5JQEeQqe8AvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org>
2015-08-19 23:17         ` Thomas Gleixner
2015-08-19 23:17           ` Thomas Gleixner
2015-08-26  6:29           ` Darren Hart [this message]
2015-08-26  6:29             ` Darren Hart
2015-10-07  8:30           ` Michael Kerrisk (man-pages)
2015-10-07  8:30             ` Michael Kerrisk (man-pages)
     [not found]             ` <5614D836.7070506-Re5JQEeQqe8AvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org>
2015-10-08 14:36               ` Darren Hart
2015-10-08 14:36                 ` Darren Hart
2015-08-05 22:21 ` Darren Hart
2015-08-08  6:57   ` Michael Kerrisk (man-pages)
2015-08-08  6:57     ` Michael Kerrisk (man-pages)
     [not found]     ` <55C5A85F.3020202-Re5JQEeQqe8AvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org>
2015-08-24 21:47       ` Darren Hart
2015-08-24 21:47         ` Darren Hart
2015-08-19 22:40   ` Thomas Gleixner
2015-08-19 22:40     ` Thomas Gleixner
2015-08-18 12:45     ` Darren Hart
2015-08-18 12:45       ` Darren Hart
2015-10-07  9:34     ` Michael Kerrisk (man-pages)
2015-10-07  9:34       ` Michael Kerrisk (man-pages)
     [not found]       ` <5614E71B.3040500-Re5JQEeQqe8AvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org>
2015-10-08 14:46         ` Darren Hart
2015-10-08 14:46           ` Darren Hart
     [not found] <trinity-f9a7a25f-09e9-4409-b656-0e035dfca0b5-1438006633780@msvc-mesg-gmx010>
2015-07-27 14:44 ` Michael Kerrisk (man-pages)
2015-07-27 14:44   ` Michael Kerrisk (man-pages)

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20150826062958.GB50910@vmdeb7 \
    --to=dvhart-wegcikhe2lqwvfeawa7xhq@public.gmane.org \
    --cc=anton-eUNUBHrolfbYtjvyW6yDsg@public.gmane.org \
    --cc=arnd-r2nGTMty4D4@public.gmane.org \
    --cc=bert.hubert-dxZxOz86jR8sYtaaK7K+xw@public.gmane.org \
    --cc=bgallmeister-Re5JQEeQqe8AvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org \
    --cc=carlos-H+wXaHxf7aLQT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org \
    --cc=dalias-8zAoT0mYgF4@public.gmane.org \
    --cc=dave-h16yJtLeMjHk1uMJSBkQmQ@public.gmane.org \
    --cc=edumazet-hpIqsD4AKlfQT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org \
    --cc=jakub-H+wXaHxf7aLQT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org \
    --cc=jan.kiszka-kv7WeFo6aLtBDgjK7y7TUQ@public.gmane.org \
    --cc=linux-api-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org \
    --cc=linux-man-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org \
    --cc=luto-kltTT9wpgjJwATOyAt5JVQ@public.gmane.org \
    --cc=mingo-X9Un+BFzKDI@public.gmane.org \
    --cc=mtk.manpages-Re5JQEeQqe8AvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org \
    --cc=peterz-wEGCiKHe2LqWVfeAwA7xHQ@public.gmane.org \
    --cc=roland-/Z5OmTQCD9xF6kxbq+BtvQ@public.gmane.org \
    --cc=rostedt-nx8X9YLhiw1AfugRpC6u6w@public.gmane.org \
    --cc=rusty-8n+1lVoiYb80n/F98K4Iww@public.gmane.org \
    --cc=tglx-hfZtesqFncYOwBW4kG4KsQ@public.gmane.org \
    --cc=triegel-H+wXaHxf7aLQT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org \
    --cc=wagi-kQCPcA+X3s7YtjvyW6yDsg@public.gmane.org \
    --cc=xypron.glpk-Mmb7MZpHnFY@public.gmane.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.