All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Tejun Heo <tj-DgEjT+Ai2ygdnm+yROfE0A@public.gmane.org>
To: hannes-druUgvl0LCNAfugRpC6u6w@public.gmane.org,
	mhocko-DgEjT+Ai2ygdnm+yROfE0A@public.gmane.org,
	akpm-de/tnXTf+JLsfHDXvbKv3WD2FQJk+8+b@public.gmane.org
Cc: cgroups-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org,
	linux-mm-Bw31MaZKKs3YtjvyW6yDsg@public.gmane.org,
	vdavydov-bzQdu9zFT3WakBO8gow8eQ@public.gmane.org,
	kernel-team-b10kYP2dOMg@public.gmane.org
Subject: [PATCH 1/2] memcg: flatten task_struct->memcg_oom
Date: Fri, 28 Aug 2015 18:01:58 -0400	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20150828220158.GD11089@htj.dyndns.org> (raw)

task_struct->memcg_oom is a sub-struct containing fields which are
used for async memcg oom handling.  Most task_struct fields aren't
packaged this way and it can lead to unnecessary alignment paddings.
This patch flattens it.

* task.memcg_oom.memcg          -> task.memcg_in_oom
* task.memcg_oom.gfp_mask	-> task.memcg_oom_gfp_mask
* task.memcg_oom.order          -> task.memcg_oom_order
* task.memcg_oom.may_oom        -> task.memcg_may_oom

In addition, task.memcg_may_oom is relocated to where other bitfields
are which reduces the size of task_struct.

Signed-off-by: Tejun Heo <tj-DgEjT+Ai2ygdnm+yROfE0A@public.gmane.org>
---
Hello,

These two patches are what survived from the following patchset.

 http://lkml.kernel.org/g/1440775530-18630-1-git-send-email-tj-DgEjT+Ai2ygdnm+yROfE0A@public.gmane.org

Thanks.

 include/linux/memcontrol.h |   10 +++++-----
 include/linux/sched.h      |   13 ++++++-------
 mm/memcontrol.c            |   16 ++++++++--------
 3 files changed, 19 insertions(+), 20 deletions(-)

--- a/include/linux/memcontrol.h
+++ b/include/linux/memcontrol.h
@@ -407,19 +407,19 @@ void mem_cgroup_print_oom_info(struct me
 
 static inline void mem_cgroup_oom_enable(void)
 {
-	WARN_ON(current->memcg_oom.may_oom);
-	current->memcg_oom.may_oom = 1;
+	WARN_ON(current->memcg_may_oom);
+	current->memcg_may_oom = 1;
 }
 
 static inline void mem_cgroup_oom_disable(void)
 {
-	WARN_ON(!current->memcg_oom.may_oom);
-	current->memcg_oom.may_oom = 0;
+	WARN_ON(!current->memcg_may_oom);
+	current->memcg_may_oom = 0;
 }
 
 static inline bool task_in_memcg_oom(struct task_struct *p)
 {
-	return p->memcg_oom.memcg;
+	return p->memcg_in_oom;
 }
 
 bool mem_cgroup_oom_synchronize(bool wait);
--- a/include/linux/sched.h
+++ b/include/linux/sched.h
@@ -1451,7 +1451,9 @@ struct task_struct {
 	unsigned sched_reset_on_fork:1;
 	unsigned sched_contributes_to_load:1;
 	unsigned sched_migrated:1;
-
+#ifdef CONFIG_MEMCG
+	unsigned memcg_may_oom:1;
+#endif
 #ifdef CONFIG_MEMCG_KMEM
 	unsigned memcg_kmem_skip_account:1;
 #endif
@@ -1782,12 +1784,9 @@ struct task_struct {
 	unsigned long trace_recursion;
 #endif /* CONFIG_TRACING */
 #ifdef CONFIG_MEMCG
-	struct memcg_oom_info {
-		struct mem_cgroup *memcg;
-		gfp_t gfp_mask;
-		int order;
-		unsigned int may_oom:1;
-	} memcg_oom;
+	struct mem_cgroup *memcg_in_oom;
+	gfp_t memcg_oom_gfp_mask;
+	int memcg_oom_order;
 #endif
 #ifdef CONFIG_UPROBES
 	struct uprobe_task *utask;
--- a/mm/memcontrol.c
+++ b/mm/memcontrol.c
@@ -1652,7 +1652,7 @@ static void memcg_oom_recover(struct mem
 
 static void mem_cgroup_oom(struct mem_cgroup *memcg, gfp_t mask, int order)
 {
-	if (!current->memcg_oom.may_oom)
+	if (!current->memcg_may_oom)
 		return;
 	/*
 	 * We are in the middle of the charge context here, so we
@@ -1669,9 +1669,9 @@ static void mem_cgroup_oom(struct mem_cg
 	 * and when we know whether the fault was overall successful.
 	 */
 	css_get(&memcg->css);
-	current->memcg_oom.memcg = memcg;
-	current->memcg_oom.gfp_mask = mask;
-	current->memcg_oom.order = order;
+	current->memcg_in_oom = memcg;
+	current->memcg_oom_gfp_mask = mask;
+	current->memcg_oom_order = order;
 }
 
 /**
@@ -1693,7 +1693,7 @@ static void mem_cgroup_oom(struct mem_cg
  */
 bool mem_cgroup_oom_synchronize(bool handle)
 {
-	struct mem_cgroup *memcg = current->memcg_oom.memcg;
+	struct mem_cgroup *memcg = current->memcg_in_oom;
 	struct oom_wait_info owait;
 	bool locked;
 
@@ -1721,8 +1721,8 @@ bool mem_cgroup_oom_synchronize(bool han
 	if (locked && !memcg->oom_kill_disable) {
 		mem_cgroup_unmark_under_oom(memcg);
 		finish_wait(&memcg_oom_waitq, &owait.wait);
-		mem_cgroup_out_of_memory(memcg, current->memcg_oom.gfp_mask,
-					 current->memcg_oom.order);
+		mem_cgroup_out_of_memory(memcg, current->memcg_oom_gfp_mask,
+					 current->memcg_oom_order);
 	} else {
 		schedule();
 		mem_cgroup_unmark_under_oom(memcg);
@@ -1739,7 +1739,7 @@ bool mem_cgroup_oom_synchronize(bool han
 		memcg_oom_recover(memcg);
 	}
 cleanup:
-	current->memcg_oom.memcg = NULL;
+	current->memcg_in_oom = NULL;
 	css_put(&memcg->css);
 	return true;
 }

WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>
To: hannes@cmpxchg.org, mhocko@kernel.org, akpm@linux-foundation.org
Cc: cgroups@vger.kernel.org, linux-mm@kvack.org,
	vdavydov@parallels.com, kernel-team@fb.com
Subject: [PATCH 1/2] memcg: flatten task_struct->memcg_oom
Date: Fri, 28 Aug 2015 18:01:58 -0400	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20150828220158.GD11089@htj.dyndns.org> (raw)

task_struct->memcg_oom is a sub-struct containing fields which are
used for async memcg oom handling.  Most task_struct fields aren't
packaged this way and it can lead to unnecessary alignment paddings.
This patch flattens it.

* task.memcg_oom.memcg          -> task.memcg_in_oom
* task.memcg_oom.gfp_mask	-> task.memcg_oom_gfp_mask
* task.memcg_oom.order          -> task.memcg_oom_order
* task.memcg_oom.may_oom        -> task.memcg_may_oom

In addition, task.memcg_may_oom is relocated to where other bitfields
are which reduces the size of task_struct.

Signed-off-by: Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>
---
Hello,

These two patches are what survived from the following patchset.

 http://lkml.kernel.org/g/1440775530-18630-1-git-send-email-tj@kernel.org

Thanks.

 include/linux/memcontrol.h |   10 +++++-----
 include/linux/sched.h      |   13 ++++++-------
 mm/memcontrol.c            |   16 ++++++++--------
 3 files changed, 19 insertions(+), 20 deletions(-)

--- a/include/linux/memcontrol.h
+++ b/include/linux/memcontrol.h
@@ -407,19 +407,19 @@ void mem_cgroup_print_oom_info(struct me
 
 static inline void mem_cgroup_oom_enable(void)
 {
-	WARN_ON(current->memcg_oom.may_oom);
-	current->memcg_oom.may_oom = 1;
+	WARN_ON(current->memcg_may_oom);
+	current->memcg_may_oom = 1;
 }
 
 static inline void mem_cgroup_oom_disable(void)
 {
-	WARN_ON(!current->memcg_oom.may_oom);
-	current->memcg_oom.may_oom = 0;
+	WARN_ON(!current->memcg_may_oom);
+	current->memcg_may_oom = 0;
 }
 
 static inline bool task_in_memcg_oom(struct task_struct *p)
 {
-	return p->memcg_oom.memcg;
+	return p->memcg_in_oom;
 }
 
 bool mem_cgroup_oom_synchronize(bool wait);
--- a/include/linux/sched.h
+++ b/include/linux/sched.h
@@ -1451,7 +1451,9 @@ struct task_struct {
 	unsigned sched_reset_on_fork:1;
 	unsigned sched_contributes_to_load:1;
 	unsigned sched_migrated:1;
-
+#ifdef CONFIG_MEMCG
+	unsigned memcg_may_oom:1;
+#endif
 #ifdef CONFIG_MEMCG_KMEM
 	unsigned memcg_kmem_skip_account:1;
 #endif
@@ -1782,12 +1784,9 @@ struct task_struct {
 	unsigned long trace_recursion;
 #endif /* CONFIG_TRACING */
 #ifdef CONFIG_MEMCG
-	struct memcg_oom_info {
-		struct mem_cgroup *memcg;
-		gfp_t gfp_mask;
-		int order;
-		unsigned int may_oom:1;
-	} memcg_oom;
+	struct mem_cgroup *memcg_in_oom;
+	gfp_t memcg_oom_gfp_mask;
+	int memcg_oom_order;
 #endif
 #ifdef CONFIG_UPROBES
 	struct uprobe_task *utask;
--- a/mm/memcontrol.c
+++ b/mm/memcontrol.c
@@ -1652,7 +1652,7 @@ static void memcg_oom_recover(struct mem
 
 static void mem_cgroup_oom(struct mem_cgroup *memcg, gfp_t mask, int order)
 {
-	if (!current->memcg_oom.may_oom)
+	if (!current->memcg_may_oom)
 		return;
 	/*
 	 * We are in the middle of the charge context here, so we
@@ -1669,9 +1669,9 @@ static void mem_cgroup_oom(struct mem_cg
 	 * and when we know whether the fault was overall successful.
 	 */
 	css_get(&memcg->css);
-	current->memcg_oom.memcg = memcg;
-	current->memcg_oom.gfp_mask = mask;
-	current->memcg_oom.order = order;
+	current->memcg_in_oom = memcg;
+	current->memcg_oom_gfp_mask = mask;
+	current->memcg_oom_order = order;
 }
 
 /**
@@ -1693,7 +1693,7 @@ static void mem_cgroup_oom(struct mem_cg
  */
 bool mem_cgroup_oom_synchronize(bool handle)
 {
-	struct mem_cgroup *memcg = current->memcg_oom.memcg;
+	struct mem_cgroup *memcg = current->memcg_in_oom;
 	struct oom_wait_info owait;
 	bool locked;
 
@@ -1721,8 +1721,8 @@ bool mem_cgroup_oom_synchronize(bool han
 	if (locked && !memcg->oom_kill_disable) {
 		mem_cgroup_unmark_under_oom(memcg);
 		finish_wait(&memcg_oom_waitq, &owait.wait);
-		mem_cgroup_out_of_memory(memcg, current->memcg_oom.gfp_mask,
-					 current->memcg_oom.order);
+		mem_cgroup_out_of_memory(memcg, current->memcg_oom_gfp_mask,
+					 current->memcg_oom_order);
 	} else {
 		schedule();
 		mem_cgroup_unmark_under_oom(memcg);
@@ -1739,7 +1739,7 @@ bool mem_cgroup_oom_synchronize(bool han
 		memcg_oom_recover(memcg);
 	}
 cleanup:
-	current->memcg_oom.memcg = NULL;
+	current->memcg_in_oom = NULL;
 	css_put(&memcg->css);
 	return true;
 }

--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@kvack.org.  For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@kvack.org"> email@kvack.org </a>

             reply	other threads:[~2015-08-28 22:01 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 41+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2015-08-28 22:01 Tejun Heo [this message]
2015-08-28 22:01 ` [PATCH 1/2] memcg: flatten task_struct->memcg_oom Tejun Heo
     [not found] ` <20150828220158.GD11089-Gd/HAXX7CRxy/B6EtB590w@public.gmane.org>
2015-08-28 22:02   ` [PATCH 2/2] memcg: always enable kmemcg on the default hierarchy Tejun Heo
2015-08-28 22:02     ` Tejun Heo
2015-08-31 22:54     ` Andrew Morton
2015-09-04 21:00     ` [PATCH v2 3/2] memcg: punt high overage reclaim to return-to-userland path Tejun Heo
     [not found]       ` <20150904210011.GH25329-qYNAdHglDFBN0TnZuCh8vA@public.gmane.org>
2015-09-07  9:23         ` Michal Hocko
2015-09-07  9:23           ` Michal Hocko
     [not found]           ` <20150907092346.GC6022-2MMpYkNvuYDjFM9bn6wA6Q@public.gmane.org>
2015-09-08 16:59             ` Tejun Heo
2015-09-08 16:59               ` Tejun Heo
2015-09-07 11:38         ` Vladimir Davydov
2015-09-07 11:38           ` Vladimir Davydov
2015-09-08 17:00           ` Tejun Heo
2015-09-08 17:00             ` Tejun Heo
     [not found]     ` <20150828220237.GE11089-Gd/HAXX7CRxy/B6EtB590w@public.gmane.org>
2015-09-15  9:20       ` [PATCH 2/2] memcg: always enable kmemcg on the default hierarchy Johannes Weiner
2015-09-15  9:20         ` Johannes Weiner
2015-09-01 15:25   ` [PATCH 1/2] memcg: flatten task_struct->memcg_oom Michal Hocko
2015-09-01 15:25     ` Michal Hocko
2015-09-02 11:45   ` Vladimir Davydov
2015-09-02 11:45     ` Vladimir Davydov
  -- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2015-09-13 18:59 Tejun Heo
2015-09-13 18:59 ` Tejun Heo
     [not found] ` <20150913185940.GA25369-piEFEHQLUPpN0TnZuCh8vA@public.gmane.org>
2015-09-15  7:37   ` Johannes Weiner
2015-09-15  7:37     ` Johannes Weiner
2015-09-20 14:45   ` Sasha Levin
2015-09-20 14:45     ` Sasha Levin
     [not found]     ` <55FEC685.5010404-QHcLZuEGTsvQT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org>
2015-09-21 20:01       ` Tejun Heo
2015-09-21 20:01         ` Tejun Heo
     [not found]         ` <20150921200141.GH13263-qYNAdHglDFBN0TnZuCh8vA@public.gmane.org>
2015-09-30 18:54           ` Tejun Heo
2015-09-30 18:54             ` Tejun Heo
2015-11-25 14:43           ` Peter Zijlstra
2015-11-25 14:43             ` Peter Zijlstra
     [not found]             ` <20151125144354.GB17308-ndre7Fmf5hadTX5a5knrm8zTDFooKrT+cvkQGrU6aU0@public.gmane.org>
2015-11-25 15:02               ` Peter Zijlstra
2015-11-25 15:02                 ` Peter Zijlstra
2015-11-25 15:31                 ` Andrey Ryabinin
     [not found]                   ` <CAPAsAGwa9-7UBUnhysfek3kyWKMgaUJRwtDPEqas1rKwkeTtoA-JsoAwUIsXosN+BqQ9rBEUg@public.gmane.org>
2015-11-25 17:34                     ` Dmitry Vyukov
2015-11-25 17:34                       ` Dmitry Vyukov
2015-11-25 17:44                   ` Peter Zijlstra
     [not found]                     ` <20151125174449.GD17308-ndre7Fmf5hadTX5a5knrm8zTDFooKrT+cvkQGrU6aU0@public.gmane.org>
2015-12-11 16:25                       ` Tejun Heo
2015-12-11 16:25                         ` Tejun Heo
2015-12-15 19:22                         ` Peter Zijlstra

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20150828220158.GD11089@htj.dyndns.org \
    --to=tj-dgejt+ai2ygdnm+yrofe0a@public.gmane.org \
    --cc=akpm-de/tnXTf+JLsfHDXvbKv3WD2FQJk+8+b@public.gmane.org \
    --cc=cgroups-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org \
    --cc=hannes-druUgvl0LCNAfugRpC6u6w@public.gmane.org \
    --cc=kernel-team-b10kYP2dOMg@public.gmane.org \
    --cc=linux-mm-Bw31MaZKKs3YtjvyW6yDsg@public.gmane.org \
    --cc=mhocko-DgEjT+Ai2ygdnm+yROfE0A@public.gmane.org \
    --cc=vdavydov-bzQdu9zFT3WakBO8gow8eQ@public.gmane.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.