All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Bjorn Helgaas <helgaas@kernel.org>
To: David Daney <ddaney.cavm@gmail.com>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Bjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@google.com>,
	linux-pci@vger.kernel.org, Will Deacon <will.deacon@arm.com>,
	Rob Herring <robh+dt@kernel.org>, Pawel Moll <pawel.moll@arm.com>,
	Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com>,
	Ian Campbell <ijc+devicetree@hellion.org.uk>,
	Kumar Gala <galak@codeaurora.org>,
	linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, devicetree@vger.kernel.org,
	Marc Zyngier <marc.zyngier@arm.com>,
	David Daney <david.daney@cavium.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 1/5] PCI: Add pci_bus_fixup_irqs().
Date: Wed, 7 Oct 2015 14:44:26 -0500	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20151007194426.GF27633@localhost> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1443811443-18878-2-git-send-email-ddaney.cavm@gmail.com>

Hi David,

On Fri, Oct 02, 2015 at 11:43:59AM -0700, David Daney wrote:
> From: David Daney <david.daney@cavium.com>
> 
> pci_bus_fixup_irqs() works like pci_fixup_irqs(), except it only does
> the fixups for devices on the specified bus.
> 
> Follow-on patch will use the new function.
> 
> Signed-off-by: David Daney <david.daney@cavium.com>
> ---
> No change from v2.
> 
>  drivers/pci/setup-irq.c | 30 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>  include/linux/pci.h     |  4 ++++
>  2 files changed, 34 insertions(+)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/pci/setup-irq.c b/drivers/pci/setup-irq.c
> index 95c225b..189ad17 100644
> --- a/drivers/pci/setup-irq.c
> +++ b/drivers/pci/setup-irq.c
> @@ -66,3 +66,33 @@ void pci_fixup_irqs(u8 (*swizzle)(struct pci_dev *, u8 *),
>  		pdev_fixup_irq(dev, swizzle, map_irq);
>  }
>  EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(pci_fixup_irqs);
> +
> +struct pci_bus_fixup_cb_info {
> +	u8 (*swizzle)(struct pci_dev *, u8 *);
> +	int (*map_irq)(const struct pci_dev *, u8, u8);
> +};
> +
> +static int pci_bus_fixup_irq_cb(struct pci_dev *dev, void *arg)
> +{
> +	struct pci_bus_fixup_cb_info *info = arg;
> +
> +	pdev_fixup_irq(dev, info->swizzle, info->map_irq);
> +	return 0;
> +}
> +
> +/*
> + * Fixup the irqs only for devices on the given bus using supplied
> + * swizzle and map_irq function pointers
> + */
> +void pci_bus_fixup_irqs(struct pci_bus *bus,
> +			u8 (*swizzle)(struct pci_dev *, u8 *),
> +			int (*map_irq)(const struct pci_dev *, u8, u8))
> +{
> +	struct pci_bus_fixup_cb_info info;
> +
> +	info.swizzle = swizzle;
> +	info.map_irq = map_irq;
> +	pci_walk_bus(bus, pci_bus_fixup_irq_cb, &info);

I don't like the existing pci_fixup_irqs(), so by transitivity, I
don't like pci_bus_fixup_irqs() either.  The problem is that in both
cases this is a one-time pass over the tree, so we don't handle
hot-added devices correctly.

I think we need to get rid of pci_fixup_irqs() and somehow integrate
it into the pci_device_add() path, where it would be done once for
every device we enumerate.  If we did that, I don't think you would
need to add pci_bus_fixup_irqs(), would you?

Bjorn

> +
> +}
> +EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(pci_bus_fixup_irqs);
> diff --git a/include/linux/pci.h b/include/linux/pci.h
> index e90eb22..b505b50 100644
> --- a/include/linux/pci.h
> +++ b/include/linux/pci.h
> @@ -1120,6 +1120,10 @@ void pdev_enable_device(struct pci_dev *);
>  int pci_enable_resources(struct pci_dev *, int mask);
>  void pci_fixup_irqs(u8 (*)(struct pci_dev *, u8 *),
>  		    int (*)(const struct pci_dev *, u8, u8));
> +void pci_bus_fixup_irqs(struct pci_bus *,
> +			u8 (*)(struct pci_dev *, u8 *),
> +			int (*)(const struct pci_dev *, u8, u8));
> +
>  #define HAVE_PCI_REQ_REGIONS	2
>  int __must_check pci_request_regions(struct pci_dev *, const char *);
>  int __must_check pci_request_regions_exclusive(struct pci_dev *, const char *);
> -- 
> 1.9.1
> 
> --
> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
> the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
> More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
> Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: helgaas@kernel.org (Bjorn Helgaas)
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: [PATCH v4 1/5] PCI: Add pci_bus_fixup_irqs().
Date: Wed, 7 Oct 2015 14:44:26 -0500	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20151007194426.GF27633@localhost> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1443811443-18878-2-git-send-email-ddaney.cavm@gmail.com>

Hi David,

On Fri, Oct 02, 2015 at 11:43:59AM -0700, David Daney wrote:
> From: David Daney <david.daney@cavium.com>
> 
> pci_bus_fixup_irqs() works like pci_fixup_irqs(), except it only does
> the fixups for devices on the specified bus.
> 
> Follow-on patch will use the new function.
> 
> Signed-off-by: David Daney <david.daney@cavium.com>
> ---
> No change from v2.
> 
>  drivers/pci/setup-irq.c | 30 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>  include/linux/pci.h     |  4 ++++
>  2 files changed, 34 insertions(+)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/pci/setup-irq.c b/drivers/pci/setup-irq.c
> index 95c225b..189ad17 100644
> --- a/drivers/pci/setup-irq.c
> +++ b/drivers/pci/setup-irq.c
> @@ -66,3 +66,33 @@ void pci_fixup_irqs(u8 (*swizzle)(struct pci_dev *, u8 *),
>  		pdev_fixup_irq(dev, swizzle, map_irq);
>  }
>  EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(pci_fixup_irqs);
> +
> +struct pci_bus_fixup_cb_info {
> +	u8 (*swizzle)(struct pci_dev *, u8 *);
> +	int (*map_irq)(const struct pci_dev *, u8, u8);
> +};
> +
> +static int pci_bus_fixup_irq_cb(struct pci_dev *dev, void *arg)
> +{
> +	struct pci_bus_fixup_cb_info *info = arg;
> +
> +	pdev_fixup_irq(dev, info->swizzle, info->map_irq);
> +	return 0;
> +}
> +
> +/*
> + * Fixup the irqs only for devices on the given bus using supplied
> + * swizzle and map_irq function pointers
> + */
> +void pci_bus_fixup_irqs(struct pci_bus *bus,
> +			u8 (*swizzle)(struct pci_dev *, u8 *),
> +			int (*map_irq)(const struct pci_dev *, u8, u8))
> +{
> +	struct pci_bus_fixup_cb_info info;
> +
> +	info.swizzle = swizzle;
> +	info.map_irq = map_irq;
> +	pci_walk_bus(bus, pci_bus_fixup_irq_cb, &info);

I don't like the existing pci_fixup_irqs(), so by transitivity, I
don't like pci_bus_fixup_irqs() either.  The problem is that in both
cases this is a one-time pass over the tree, so we don't handle
hot-added devices correctly.

I think we need to get rid of pci_fixup_irqs() and somehow integrate
it into the pci_device_add() path, where it would be done once for
every device we enumerate.  If we did that, I don't think you would
need to add pci_bus_fixup_irqs(), would you?

Bjorn

> +
> +}
> +EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(pci_bus_fixup_irqs);
> diff --git a/include/linux/pci.h b/include/linux/pci.h
> index e90eb22..b505b50 100644
> --- a/include/linux/pci.h
> +++ b/include/linux/pci.h
> @@ -1120,6 +1120,10 @@ void pdev_enable_device(struct pci_dev *);
>  int pci_enable_resources(struct pci_dev *, int mask);
>  void pci_fixup_irqs(u8 (*)(struct pci_dev *, u8 *),
>  		    int (*)(const struct pci_dev *, u8, u8));
> +void pci_bus_fixup_irqs(struct pci_bus *,
> +			u8 (*)(struct pci_dev *, u8 *),
> +			int (*)(const struct pci_dev *, u8, u8));
> +
>  #define HAVE_PCI_REQ_REGIONS	2
>  int __must_check pci_request_regions(struct pci_dev *, const char *);
>  int __must_check pci_request_regions_exclusive(struct pci_dev *, const char *);
> -- 
> 1.9.1
> 
> --
> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
> the body of a message to majordomo at vger.kernel.org
> More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
> Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

  reply	other threads:[~2015-10-07 19:44 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 47+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2015-10-02 18:43 [PATCH v4 0/5] PCI: generic: Misc. bug fixes/enhancements David Daney
2015-10-02 18:43 ` David Daney
2015-10-02 18:43 ` [PATCH v4 1/5] PCI: Add pci_bus_fixup_irqs() David Daney
2015-10-02 18:43   ` David Daney
2015-10-07 19:44   ` Bjorn Helgaas [this message]
2015-10-07 19:44     ` Bjorn Helgaas
2015-10-07 20:08     ` David Daney
2015-10-07 20:08       ` David Daney
2015-10-07 20:08       ` David Daney
2015-10-07 23:08       ` Bjorn Helgaas
2015-10-07 23:08         ` Bjorn Helgaas
2015-10-08  2:07         ` Matthew Minter
2015-10-08  2:07           ` Matthew Minter
2015-10-08  2:07           ` Matthew Minter
2015-10-08  9:18           ` Lorenzo Pieralisi
2015-10-08  9:18             ` Lorenzo Pieralisi
2015-10-08  9:18             ` Lorenzo Pieralisi
2015-10-02 18:44 ` [PATCH v4 2/5] PCI: generic: Only fixup irqs for bus we are creating David Daney
2015-10-02 18:44   ` David Daney
2015-10-02 18:44 ` [PATCH v4 3/5] PCI: generic: Quit clobbering our pci_ops David Daney
2015-10-02 18:44   ` David Daney
2015-10-08 15:02   ` Bjorn Helgaas
2015-10-08 15:02     ` Bjorn Helgaas
2015-10-08 15:02     ` Bjorn Helgaas
2015-10-08 15:09     ` Arnd Bergmann
2015-10-08 15:09       ` Arnd Bergmann
2015-10-02 18:44 ` [PATCH v4 4/5] PCI: generic: Correct, and avoid overflow, in bus_max calculation David Daney
2015-10-02 18:44   ` David Daney
2015-10-08 15:02   ` Bjorn Helgaas
2015-10-08 15:02     ` Bjorn Helgaas
2015-10-08 15:11     ` Arnd Bergmann
2015-10-08 15:11       ` Arnd Bergmann
2015-10-08 15:18       ` Arnd Bergmann
2015-10-08 15:18         ` Arnd Bergmann
2015-10-08 15:39         ` David Daney
2015-10-08 15:39           ` David Daney
2015-10-08 15:39           ` David Daney
2015-10-08 17:27           ` Lorenzo Pieralisi
2015-10-08 17:27             ` Lorenzo Pieralisi
2015-10-08 17:27             ` Lorenzo Pieralisi
2015-10-02 18:44 ` [PATCH v4 5/5] PCI: generic: Pass proper starting bus number to pci_scan_root_bus() David Daney
2015-10-02 18:44   ` David Daney
2015-10-08 15:28 ` [PATCH v4 0/5] PCI: generic: Misc. bug fixes/enhancements Bjorn Helgaas
2015-10-08 15:28   ` Bjorn Helgaas
2015-10-08 15:44   ` David Daney
2015-10-08 15:44     ` David Daney
2015-10-08 15:44     ` David Daney

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20151007194426.GF27633@localhost \
    --to=helgaas@kernel.org \
    --cc=bhelgaas@google.com \
    --cc=david.daney@cavium.com \
    --cc=ddaney.cavm@gmail.com \
    --cc=devicetree@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=galak@codeaurora.org \
    --cc=ijc+devicetree@hellion.org.uk \
    --cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-pci@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=marc.zyngier@arm.com \
    --cc=mark.rutland@arm.com \
    --cc=pawel.moll@arm.com \
    --cc=robh+dt@kernel.org \
    --cc=will.deacon@arm.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.