From: Lorenzo Pieralisi <lorenzo.pieralisi@arm.com>
To: Matthew Minter <matt@masarand.com>
Cc: Bjorn Helgaas <helgaas@kernel.org>,
Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com>,
devicetree@vger.kernel.org, Pawel Moll <pawel.moll@arm.com>,
Ian Campbell <ijc+devicetree@hellion.org.uk>,
Marc Zyngier <marc.zyngier@arm.com>,
linux-pci@vger.kernel.org, David Daney <david.daney@cavium.com>,
Will Deacon <will.deacon@arm.com>,
David Daney <ddaney@caviumnetworks.com>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Rob Herring <robh+dt@kernel.org>,
David Daney <ddaney.cavm@gmail.com>,
Kumar Gala <galak@codeaurora.org>,
Bjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@google.com>,
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 1/5] PCI: Add pci_bus_fixup_irqs().
Date: Thu, 8 Oct 2015 10:18:43 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20151008091843.GA31644@red-moon> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1906663.FAJXtJhtPt@shredder>
Hi Matthew,
On Thu, Oct 08, 2015 at 03:07:34AM +0100, Matthew Minter wrote:
> On Wednesday 07 October 2015 18:08:47 Bjorn Helgaas wrote:
[...]
> Yes, I had been working on this last year, and got a patchset that was tested
> on arm, x86 (and amd64), and slightly tested on powerpc. However I was not
> able to test other architectures as they were not available in the software
> lab I work in but should in theory work on all arches the kernel runs on.
>
> I can say that that patchset is being used by several projects out of tree
> currently but unfortunately due to a shift in priorities in the lab I was
> working for I lost access to the resources to develop and test the patch
> easily.
>
> I have done some additional work personally on it but so far have not got
> anything that I am happy to submit for inclusion in tree. (due to a number of
> issues in structure and a complication relating to weak functions where
> multiple variations of the same arch exist.
>
> You can see in thread that is linked above
> (http://lkml.kernel.org/r/1412222866-21068-1-git-send-email-matt@masarand.com)
> some feedback on the issues that need to be solved.
>
> I also expect that the patchset needs to be pulled forward to a newer kernel
> as I have been working in a frozen tree without rebasing to reduce test
> complexity.
>
> I would be happy to put some time this weekend if possible into reviewing the
> state of this and seeing if I can at least put together a version running on a
> recent kernel. I can also go over the issues again which were proving
> problematic and see if any of them are easy to fix.
>
> However I can only work on this in my own time for now and on my own boxes
> (which are all x86 and amd64) so the amount I can do will be limited.
I was not aware of your patchset but I am happy to see that code since it
is definitely the right approach and I am willing to help you test it on
arm with the HW I have (probably it will also help remove some code
from arm64 too), let me know when you have a branch ready to test and
if you need any help in rebasing the set.
Thanks,
Lorenzo
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: lorenzo.pieralisi@arm.com (Lorenzo Pieralisi)
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: [PATCH v4 1/5] PCI: Add pci_bus_fixup_irqs().
Date: Thu, 8 Oct 2015 10:18:43 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20151008091843.GA31644@red-moon> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1906663.FAJXtJhtPt@shredder>
Hi Matthew,
On Thu, Oct 08, 2015 at 03:07:34AM +0100, Matthew Minter wrote:
> On Wednesday 07 October 2015 18:08:47 Bjorn Helgaas wrote:
[...]
> Yes, I had been working on this last year, and got a patchset that was tested
> on arm, x86 (and amd64), and slightly tested on powerpc. However I was not
> able to test other architectures as they were not available in the software
> lab I work in but should in theory work on all arches the kernel runs on.
>
> I can say that that patchset is being used by several projects out of tree
> currently but unfortunately due to a shift in priorities in the lab I was
> working for I lost access to the resources to develop and test the patch
> easily.
>
> I have done some additional work personally on it but so far have not got
> anything that I am happy to submit for inclusion in tree. (due to a number of
> issues in structure and a complication relating to weak functions where
> multiple variations of the same arch exist.
>
> You can see in thread that is linked above
> (http://lkml.kernel.org/r/1412222866-21068-1-git-send-email-matt at masarand.com)
> some feedback on the issues that need to be solved.
>
> I also expect that the patchset needs to be pulled forward to a newer kernel
> as I have been working in a frozen tree without rebasing to reduce test
> complexity.
>
> I would be happy to put some time this weekend if possible into reviewing the
> state of this and seeing if I can at least put together a version running on a
> recent kernel. I can also go over the issues again which were proving
> problematic and see if any of them are easy to fix.
>
> However I can only work on this in my own time for now and on my own boxes
> (which are all x86 and amd64) so the amount I can do will be limited.
I was not aware of your patchset but I am happy to see that code since it
is definitely the right approach and I am willing to help you test it on
arm with the HW I have (probably it will also help remove some code
from arm64 too), let me know when you have a branch ready to test and
if you need any help in rebasing the set.
Thanks,
Lorenzo
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Lorenzo Pieralisi <lorenzo.pieralisi@arm.com>
To: Matthew Minter <matt@masarand.com>
Cc: Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com>,
devicetree@vger.kernel.org, Pawel Moll <pawel.moll@arm.com>,
Ian Campbell <ijc+devicetree@hellion.org.uk>,
Marc Zyngier <marc.zyngier@arm.com>,
linux-pci@vger.kernel.org, David Daney <david.daney@cavium.com>,
Will Deacon <will.deacon@arm.com>,
David Daney <ddaney@caviumnetworks.com>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Rob Herring <robh+dt@kernel.org>,
Bjorn Helgaas <helgaas@kernel.org>,
David Daney <ddaney.cavm@gmail.com>,
Kumar Gala <galak@codeaurora.org>,
Bjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@google.com>,
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 1/5] PCI: Add pci_bus_fixup_irqs().
Date: Thu, 8 Oct 2015 10:18:43 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20151008091843.GA31644@red-moon> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1906663.FAJXtJhtPt@shredder>
Hi Matthew,
On Thu, Oct 08, 2015 at 03:07:34AM +0100, Matthew Minter wrote:
> On Wednesday 07 October 2015 18:08:47 Bjorn Helgaas wrote:
[...]
> Yes, I had been working on this last year, and got a patchset that was tested
> on arm, x86 (and amd64), and slightly tested on powerpc. However I was not
> able to test other architectures as they were not available in the software
> lab I work in but should in theory work on all arches the kernel runs on.
>
> I can say that that patchset is being used by several projects out of tree
> currently but unfortunately due to a shift in priorities in the lab I was
> working for I lost access to the resources to develop and test the patch
> easily.
>
> I have done some additional work personally on it but so far have not got
> anything that I am happy to submit for inclusion in tree. (due to a number of
> issues in structure and a complication relating to weak functions where
> multiple variations of the same arch exist.
>
> You can see in thread that is linked above
> (http://lkml.kernel.org/r/1412222866-21068-1-git-send-email-matt@masarand.com)
> some feedback on the issues that need to be solved.
>
> I also expect that the patchset needs to be pulled forward to a newer kernel
> as I have been working in a frozen tree without rebasing to reduce test
> complexity.
>
> I would be happy to put some time this weekend if possible into reviewing the
> state of this and seeing if I can at least put together a version running on a
> recent kernel. I can also go over the issues again which were proving
> problematic and see if any of them are easy to fix.
>
> However I can only work on this in my own time for now and on my own boxes
> (which are all x86 and amd64) so the amount I can do will be limited.
I was not aware of your patchset but I am happy to see that code since it
is definitely the right approach and I am willing to help you test it on
arm with the HW I have (probably it will also help remove some code
from arm64 too), let me know when you have a branch ready to test and
if you need any help in rebasing the set.
Thanks,
Lorenzo
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2015-10-08 9:18 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 47+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2015-10-02 18:43 [PATCH v4 0/5] PCI: generic: Misc. bug fixes/enhancements David Daney
2015-10-02 18:43 ` David Daney
2015-10-02 18:43 ` [PATCH v4 1/5] PCI: Add pci_bus_fixup_irqs() David Daney
2015-10-02 18:43 ` David Daney
2015-10-07 19:44 ` Bjorn Helgaas
2015-10-07 19:44 ` Bjorn Helgaas
2015-10-07 20:08 ` David Daney
2015-10-07 20:08 ` David Daney
2015-10-07 20:08 ` David Daney
2015-10-07 23:08 ` Bjorn Helgaas
2015-10-07 23:08 ` Bjorn Helgaas
2015-10-08 2:07 ` Matthew Minter
2015-10-08 2:07 ` Matthew Minter
2015-10-08 2:07 ` Matthew Minter
2015-10-08 9:18 ` Lorenzo Pieralisi [this message]
2015-10-08 9:18 ` Lorenzo Pieralisi
2015-10-08 9:18 ` Lorenzo Pieralisi
2015-10-02 18:44 ` [PATCH v4 2/5] PCI: generic: Only fixup irqs for bus we are creating David Daney
2015-10-02 18:44 ` David Daney
2015-10-02 18:44 ` [PATCH v4 3/5] PCI: generic: Quit clobbering our pci_ops David Daney
2015-10-02 18:44 ` David Daney
2015-10-08 15:02 ` Bjorn Helgaas
2015-10-08 15:02 ` Bjorn Helgaas
2015-10-08 15:02 ` Bjorn Helgaas
2015-10-08 15:09 ` Arnd Bergmann
2015-10-08 15:09 ` Arnd Bergmann
2015-10-02 18:44 ` [PATCH v4 4/5] PCI: generic: Correct, and avoid overflow, in bus_max calculation David Daney
2015-10-02 18:44 ` David Daney
2015-10-08 15:02 ` Bjorn Helgaas
2015-10-08 15:02 ` Bjorn Helgaas
2015-10-08 15:11 ` Arnd Bergmann
2015-10-08 15:11 ` Arnd Bergmann
2015-10-08 15:18 ` Arnd Bergmann
2015-10-08 15:18 ` Arnd Bergmann
2015-10-08 15:39 ` David Daney
2015-10-08 15:39 ` David Daney
2015-10-08 15:39 ` David Daney
2015-10-08 17:27 ` Lorenzo Pieralisi
2015-10-08 17:27 ` Lorenzo Pieralisi
2015-10-08 17:27 ` Lorenzo Pieralisi
2015-10-02 18:44 ` [PATCH v4 5/5] PCI: generic: Pass proper starting bus number to pci_scan_root_bus() David Daney
2015-10-02 18:44 ` David Daney
2015-10-08 15:28 ` [PATCH v4 0/5] PCI: generic: Misc. bug fixes/enhancements Bjorn Helgaas
2015-10-08 15:28 ` Bjorn Helgaas
2015-10-08 15:44 ` David Daney
2015-10-08 15:44 ` David Daney
2015-10-08 15:44 ` David Daney
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20151008091843.GA31644@red-moon \
--to=lorenzo.pieralisi@arm.com \
--cc=bhelgaas@google.com \
--cc=david.daney@cavium.com \
--cc=ddaney.cavm@gmail.com \
--cc=ddaney@caviumnetworks.com \
--cc=devicetree@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=galak@codeaurora.org \
--cc=helgaas@kernel.org \
--cc=ijc+devicetree@hellion.org.uk \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-pci@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=marc.zyngier@arm.com \
--cc=mark.rutland@arm.com \
--cc=matt@masarand.com \
--cc=pawel.moll@arm.com \
--cc=robh+dt@kernel.org \
--cc=will.deacon@arm.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.