All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Borislav Petkov <bp@alien8.de>
To: Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@intel.com>
Cc: Toshi Kani <toshi.kani@hpe.com>,
	Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
	"Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@rjwysocki.net>,
	Tony Luck <tony.luck@intel.com>,
	Vishal L Verma <vishal.l.verma@intel.com>,
	Linux MM <linux-mm@kvack.org>,
	"linux-nvdimm@lists.01.org" <linux-nvdimm@lists.01.org>,
	Linux ACPI <linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org>,
	"linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 1/3] resource: Add @flags to region_intersects()
Date: Tue, 1 Dec 2015 18:13:22 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20151201171322.GD4341@pd.tnic> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAPcyv4g2n9yTWye2aVvKMP0X7mrm_NLKmGd5WBO2SesTj77gbg@mail.gmail.com>

On Tue, Dec 01, 2015 at 08:54:23AM -0800, Dan Williams wrote:
> On Tue, Dec 1, 2015 at 5:50 AM, Borislav Petkov <bp@alien8.de> wrote:
> > On Tue, Nov 24, 2015 at 03:33:36PM -0700, Toshi Kani wrote:
> >> region_intersects() checks if a specified region partially overlaps
> >> or fully eclipses a resource identified by @name.  It currently sets
> >> resource flags statically, which prevents the caller from specifying
> >> a non-RAM region, such as persistent memory.  Add @flags so that
> >> any region can be specified to the function.
> >>
> >> A helper function, region_intersects_ram(), is added so that the
> >> callers that check a RAM region do not have to specify its iomem
> >> resource name and flags.  This interface is exported for modules,
> >> such as the EINJ driver.
> >>
> >> Signed-off-by: Toshi Kani <toshi.kani@hpe.com>
> >> Reviewed-by: Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@intel.com>
> >> Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
> >> Cc: Vishal Verma <vishal.l.verma@intel.com>
> >> ---
> >>  include/linux/mm.h |    4 +++-
> >>  kernel/memremap.c  |    5 ++---
> >>  kernel/resource.c  |   23 ++++++++++++++++-------
> >>  3 files changed, 21 insertions(+), 11 deletions(-)
> >>
> >> diff --git a/include/linux/mm.h b/include/linux/mm.h
> >> index 00bad77..c776af3 100644
> >> --- a/include/linux/mm.h
> >> +++ b/include/linux/mm.h
> >> @@ -362,7 +362,9 @@ enum {
> >>       REGION_MIXED,
> >>  };
> >>
> >> -int region_intersects(resource_size_t offset, size_t size, const char *type);
> >> +int region_intersects(resource_size_t offset, size_t size, const char *type,
> >> +                     unsigned long flags);
> >> +int region_intersects_ram(resource_size_t offset, size_t size);
> >>
> >>  /* Support for virtually mapped pages */
> >>  struct page *vmalloc_to_page(const void *addr);
> >> diff --git a/kernel/memremap.c b/kernel/memremap.c
> >> index 7658d32..98f52f1 100644
> >> --- a/kernel/memremap.c
> >> +++ b/kernel/memremap.c
> >> @@ -57,7 +57,7 @@ static void *try_ram_remap(resource_size_t offset, size_t size)
> >>   */
> >>  void *memremap(resource_size_t offset, size_t size, unsigned long flags)
> >>  {
> >> -     int is_ram = region_intersects(offset, size, "System RAM");
> >
> > Ok, question: why do those resource things types gets identified with
> > a string?! We have here "System RAM" and next patch adds "Persistent
> > Memory".
> >
> > And "persistent memory" or "System RaM" won't work and this is just
> > silly.
> >
> > Couldn't struct resource have gained some typedef flags instead which we
> > can much easily test? Using the strings looks really yucky.
> >
> 
> At least in the case of region_intersects() I was just following
> existing strcmp() convention from walk_system_ram_range.

Oh sure, I didn't mean you. I was simply questioning that whole
identify-resource-by-its-name approach. And that came with:

67cf13ceed89 ("x86: optimize resource lookups for ioremap")

I just think it is silly and that we should be identifying resource
things in a more robust way.

Btw, the ->name thing in struct resource has been there since a *long*
time, added by:

commit 40f6b7cc623f95d2a08b9adae7a6793055af4768
Author: linus1 <torvalds@linuxfoundation.org>
Date:   Wed Jun 30 11:00:00 1999 -0600

    Import 2.3.11pre1

I'm not sure what it was used for, perhaps for human-readable output in
/proc/iomem.

Let me CC Linus, he would know, most likely. akpm is already on CC.

> We could define 'const char *system_ram = "System RAM"' somewhere and
> then do pointer comparisons to cut down on the thrash of adding new
> flags to 'struct resource'?

See above. I think flags or type_flags or so should be cleaner/better...

I could be missing some aspect though, according to which, the name is
the proper way to ident those but I can't think of one...

-- 
Regards/Gruss,
    Boris.

ECO tip #101: Trim your mails when you reply.

WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Borislav Petkov <bp@alien8.de>
To: Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@intel.com>
Cc: Toshi Kani <toshi.kani@hpe.com>,
	Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
	"Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@rjwysocki.net>,
	Tony Luck <tony.luck@intel.com>,
	Vishal L Verma <vishal.l.verma@intel.com>,
	Linux MM <linux-mm@kvack.org>,
	"linux-nvdimm@lists.01.org" <linux-nvdimm@ml01.01.org>,
	Linux ACPI <linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org>,
	"linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 1/3] resource: Add @flags to region_intersects()
Date: Tue, 1 Dec 2015 18:13:22 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20151201171322.GD4341@pd.tnic> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAPcyv4g2n9yTWye2aVvKMP0X7mrm_NLKmGd5WBO2SesTj77gbg@mail.gmail.com>

On Tue, Dec 01, 2015 at 08:54:23AM -0800, Dan Williams wrote:
> On Tue, Dec 1, 2015 at 5:50 AM, Borislav Petkov <bp@alien8.de> wrote:
> > On Tue, Nov 24, 2015 at 03:33:36PM -0700, Toshi Kani wrote:
> >> region_intersects() checks if a specified region partially overlaps
> >> or fully eclipses a resource identified by @name.  It currently sets
> >> resource flags statically, which prevents the caller from specifying
> >> a non-RAM region, such as persistent memory.  Add @flags so that
> >> any region can be specified to the function.
> >>
> >> A helper function, region_intersects_ram(), is added so that the
> >> callers that check a RAM region do not have to specify its iomem
> >> resource name and flags.  This interface is exported for modules,
> >> such as the EINJ driver.
> >>
> >> Signed-off-by: Toshi Kani <toshi.kani@hpe.com>
> >> Reviewed-by: Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@intel.com>
> >> Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
> >> Cc: Vishal Verma <vishal.l.verma@intel.com>
> >> ---
> >>  include/linux/mm.h |    4 +++-
> >>  kernel/memremap.c  |    5 ++---
> >>  kernel/resource.c  |   23 ++++++++++++++++-------
> >>  3 files changed, 21 insertions(+), 11 deletions(-)
> >>
> >> diff --git a/include/linux/mm.h b/include/linux/mm.h
> >> index 00bad77..c776af3 100644
> >> --- a/include/linux/mm.h
> >> +++ b/include/linux/mm.h
> >> @@ -362,7 +362,9 @@ enum {
> >>       REGION_MIXED,
> >>  };
> >>
> >> -int region_intersects(resource_size_t offset, size_t size, const char *type);
> >> +int region_intersects(resource_size_t offset, size_t size, const char *type,
> >> +                     unsigned long flags);
> >> +int region_intersects_ram(resource_size_t offset, size_t size);
> >>
> >>  /* Support for virtually mapped pages */
> >>  struct page *vmalloc_to_page(const void *addr);
> >> diff --git a/kernel/memremap.c b/kernel/memremap.c
> >> index 7658d32..98f52f1 100644
> >> --- a/kernel/memremap.c
> >> +++ b/kernel/memremap.c
> >> @@ -57,7 +57,7 @@ static void *try_ram_remap(resource_size_t offset, size_t size)
> >>   */
> >>  void *memremap(resource_size_t offset, size_t size, unsigned long flags)
> >>  {
> >> -     int is_ram = region_intersects(offset, size, "System RAM");
> >
> > Ok, question: why do those resource things types gets identified with
> > a string?! We have here "System RAM" and next patch adds "Persistent
> > Memory".
> >
> > And "persistent memory" or "System RaM" won't work and this is just
> > silly.
> >
> > Couldn't struct resource have gained some typedef flags instead which we
> > can much easily test? Using the strings looks really yucky.
> >
> 
> At least in the case of region_intersects() I was just following
> existing strcmp() convention from walk_system_ram_range.

Oh sure, I didn't mean you. I was simply questioning that whole
identify-resource-by-its-name approach. And that came with:

67cf13ceed89 ("x86: optimize resource lookups for ioremap")

I just think it is silly and that we should be identifying resource
things in a more robust way.

Btw, the ->name thing in struct resource has been there since a *long*
time, added by:

commit 40f6b7cc623f95d2a08b9adae7a6793055af4768
Author: linus1 <torvalds@linuxfoundation.org>
Date:   Wed Jun 30 11:00:00 1999 -0600

    Import 2.3.11pre1

I'm not sure what it was used for, perhaps for human-readable output in
/proc/iomem.

Let me CC Linus, he would know, most likely. akpm is already on CC.

> We could define 'const char *system_ram = "System RAM"' somewhere and
> then do pointer comparisons to cut down on the thrash of adding new
> flags to 'struct resource'?

See above. I think flags or type_flags or so should be cleaner/better...

I could be missing some aspect though, according to which, the name is
the proper way to ident those but I can't think of one...

-- 
Regards/Gruss,
    Boris.

ECO tip #101: Trim your mails when you reply.

  parent reply	other threads:[~2015-12-01 17:13 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 35+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2015-11-24 22:33 [PATCH v3 0/3] Allow EINJ to inject memory error to NVDIMM Toshi Kani
2015-11-24 22:33 ` Toshi Kani
2015-11-24 22:33 ` [PATCH v3 1/3] resource: Add @flags to region_intersects() Toshi Kani
2015-11-24 22:33   ` Toshi Kani
2015-12-01 13:50   ` Borislav Petkov
2015-12-01 13:50     ` Borislav Petkov
2015-12-01 16:54     ` Dan Williams
2015-12-01 16:54       ` Dan Williams
2015-12-01 16:54       ` Dan Williams
2015-12-01 17:02       ` Jeff Moyer
2015-12-01 17:02         ` Jeff Moyer
2015-12-01 17:02         ` Jeff Moyer
2015-12-01 17:13       ` Borislav Petkov [this message]
2015-12-01 17:13         ` Borislav Petkov
2015-12-01 17:19         ` Linus Torvalds
2015-12-01 17:19           ` Linus Torvalds
2015-12-01 17:19           ` Linus Torvalds
2015-12-03 18:54           ` Toshi Kani
2015-12-03 18:54             ` Toshi Kani
2015-12-03 18:40             ` Borislav Petkov
2015-12-03 18:40               ` Borislav Petkov
2015-12-03 19:01               ` Linus Torvalds
2015-12-03 19:01                 ` Linus Torvalds
2015-12-03 19:01                 ` Linus Torvalds
2015-12-03 20:35                 ` Toshi Kani
2015-12-03 20:35                   ` Toshi Kani
2015-12-09 16:25                   ` Dan Williams
2015-12-09 16:25                     ` Dan Williams
2015-12-09 16:25                     ` Dan Williams
2015-12-09 21:44                     ` Toshi Kani
2015-12-09 21:44                       ` Toshi Kani
2015-11-24 22:33 ` [PATCH v3 2/3] resource: Add region_intersects_pmem() Toshi Kani
2015-11-24 22:33   ` Toshi Kani
2015-11-24 22:33 ` [PATCH v3 3/3] ACPI/APEI/EINJ: Allow memory error injection to NVDIMM Toshi Kani
2015-11-24 22:33   ` Toshi Kani

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20151201171322.GD4341@pd.tnic \
    --to=bp@alien8.de \
    --cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=dan.j.williams@intel.com \
    --cc=linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
    --cc=linux-nvdimm@lists.01.org \
    --cc=rjw@rjwysocki.net \
    --cc=tony.luck@intel.com \
    --cc=torvalds@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=toshi.kani@hpe.com \
    --cc=vishal.l.verma@intel.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.