From: mark.rutland@arm.com (Mark Rutland)
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: [PATCH v5 07/11] arm-cci: Add routines to save/restore all counters
Date: Mon, 11 Jan 2016 10:50:07 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20160111105006.GF6499@leverpostej> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1451908490-2615-8-git-send-email-suzuki.poulose@arm.com>
On Mon, Jan 04, 2016 at 11:54:46AM +0000, Suzuki K. Poulose wrote:
> Adds helper routines to disable the counter controls for
> all the counters on the CCI PMU and restore it back, by
> preserving the original state in caller provided mask.
>
> Cc: Punit Agrawal <punit.agrawal@arm.com>
> Cc: Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com>
> Signed-off-by: Suzuki K. Poulose <suzuki.poulose@arm.com>
> ---
> drivers/bus/arm-cci.c | 38 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> 1 file changed, 38 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/bus/arm-cci.c b/drivers/bus/arm-cci.c
> index a3938ef..2f1fcf0 100644
> --- a/drivers/bus/arm-cci.c
> +++ b/drivers/bus/arm-cci.c
> @@ -672,6 +672,44 @@ static void pmu_set_event(struct cci_pmu *cci_pmu, int idx, unsigned long event)
> }
>
> /*
> + * For all counters on the CCI-PMU, disable any 'enabled' counters,
> + * saving the changed counters in the mask, so that we can restore
> + * it later using pmu_restore_counters. The mask is private to the
> + * caller. We cannot rely on the used_mask maintained by the CCI_PMU
> + * as it only tells us if the counter is assigned to perf_event or not.
> + * The state of the perf_event cannot be locked by the PMU layer, hence
> + * we check the individual counter status (which can be locked by
> + * cci_pm->hw_events->pmu_lock).
> + *
> + * @mask should be initialised by the caller.
We should probably state "initialised to zero", or "empty".
> + */
> +static void __maybe_unused
> +pmu_save_counters(struct cci_pmu *cci_pmu, unsigned long *mask)
> +{
> + int i;
> +
> + for (i = 0; i < cci_pmu->num_cntrs; i++) {
> + if (pmu_counter_is_enabled(cci_pmu, i)) {
> + set_bit(i, mask);
> + pmu_disable_counter(cci_pmu, i);
> + }
> + }
> +}
> +
> +/*
> + * Restore the status of the counters. Reversal of the pmu_disable_counters().
> + * For each counter set in the mask, enable the counter back.
> + */
Shouldn't that say pmu_save_counters?
With that:
Acked-by: Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com>
Mark.
> +static void __maybe_unused
> +pmu_restore_counters(struct cci_pmu *cci_pmu, unsigned long *mask)
> +{
> + int i;
> +
> + for_each_set_bit(i, mask, cci_pmu->num_cntrs)
> + pmu_enable_counter(cci_pmu, i);
> +}
> +
> +/*
> * Returns the number of programmable counters actually implemented
> * by the cci
> */
> --
> 1.7.9.5
>
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com>
To: "Suzuki K. Poulose" <suzuki.poulose@arm.com>
Cc: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, arm@kernel.org,
punit.agrawal@arm.com, peterz@infradead.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 07/11] arm-cci: Add routines to save/restore all counters
Date: Mon, 11 Jan 2016 10:50:07 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20160111105006.GF6499@leverpostej> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1451908490-2615-8-git-send-email-suzuki.poulose@arm.com>
On Mon, Jan 04, 2016 at 11:54:46AM +0000, Suzuki K. Poulose wrote:
> Adds helper routines to disable the counter controls for
> all the counters on the CCI PMU and restore it back, by
> preserving the original state in caller provided mask.
>
> Cc: Punit Agrawal <punit.agrawal@arm.com>
> Cc: Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com>
> Signed-off-by: Suzuki K. Poulose <suzuki.poulose@arm.com>
> ---
> drivers/bus/arm-cci.c | 38 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> 1 file changed, 38 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/bus/arm-cci.c b/drivers/bus/arm-cci.c
> index a3938ef..2f1fcf0 100644
> --- a/drivers/bus/arm-cci.c
> +++ b/drivers/bus/arm-cci.c
> @@ -672,6 +672,44 @@ static void pmu_set_event(struct cci_pmu *cci_pmu, int idx, unsigned long event)
> }
>
> /*
> + * For all counters on the CCI-PMU, disable any 'enabled' counters,
> + * saving the changed counters in the mask, so that we can restore
> + * it later using pmu_restore_counters. The mask is private to the
> + * caller. We cannot rely on the used_mask maintained by the CCI_PMU
> + * as it only tells us if the counter is assigned to perf_event or not.
> + * The state of the perf_event cannot be locked by the PMU layer, hence
> + * we check the individual counter status (which can be locked by
> + * cci_pm->hw_events->pmu_lock).
> + *
> + * @mask should be initialised by the caller.
We should probably state "initialised to zero", or "empty".
> + */
> +static void __maybe_unused
> +pmu_save_counters(struct cci_pmu *cci_pmu, unsigned long *mask)
> +{
> + int i;
> +
> + for (i = 0; i < cci_pmu->num_cntrs; i++) {
> + if (pmu_counter_is_enabled(cci_pmu, i)) {
> + set_bit(i, mask);
> + pmu_disable_counter(cci_pmu, i);
> + }
> + }
> +}
> +
> +/*
> + * Restore the status of the counters. Reversal of the pmu_disable_counters().
> + * For each counter set in the mask, enable the counter back.
> + */
Shouldn't that say pmu_save_counters?
With that:
Acked-by: Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com>
Mark.
> +static void __maybe_unused
> +pmu_restore_counters(struct cci_pmu *cci_pmu, unsigned long *mask)
> +{
> + int i;
> +
> + for_each_set_bit(i, mask, cci_pmu->num_cntrs)
> + pmu_enable_counter(cci_pmu, i);
> +}
> +
> +/*
> * Returns the number of programmable counters actually implemented
> * by the cci
> */
> --
> 1.7.9.5
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2016-01-11 10:50 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 58+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2016-01-04 11:54 [PATCH v5 00/11] arm-cci: PMU updates Suzuki K. Poulose
2016-01-04 11:54 ` Suzuki K. Poulose
2016-01-04 11:54 ` [PATCH v5 01/11] arm-cci: Define CCI counter period Suzuki K. Poulose
2016-01-04 11:54 ` Suzuki K. Poulose
2016-01-04 18:27 ` Mark Rutland
2016-01-04 18:27 ` Mark Rutland
2016-01-05 9:50 ` Suzuki K. Poulose
2016-01-05 9:50 ` Suzuki K. Poulose
2016-01-04 11:54 ` [PATCH v5 02/11] arm-cci: Refactor pmu_write_counter Suzuki K. Poulose
2016-01-04 11:54 ` Suzuki K. Poulose
2016-01-04 19:01 ` Mark Rutland
2016-01-04 19:01 ` Mark Rutland
2016-01-04 11:54 ` [PATCH v5 03/11] arm-cci: Group writes to counter Suzuki K. Poulose
2016-01-04 11:54 ` Suzuki K. Poulose
2016-01-04 19:03 ` Mark Rutland
2016-01-04 19:03 ` Mark Rutland
2016-01-05 10:51 ` Suzuki K. Poulose
2016-01-05 10:51 ` Suzuki K. Poulose
2016-01-11 10:44 ` Mark Rutland
2016-01-11 10:44 ` Mark Rutland
2016-01-11 10:48 ` Suzuki K. Poulose
2016-01-11 10:48 ` Suzuki K. Poulose
2016-01-04 11:54 ` [PATCH v5 04/11] arm-cci: Refactor CCI PMU enable/disable methods Suzuki K. Poulose
2016-01-04 11:54 ` Suzuki K. Poulose
2016-01-04 11:54 ` [PATCH v5 05/11] arm-cci PMU: Delay counter writes to pmu_enable Suzuki K. Poulose
2016-01-04 11:54 ` Suzuki K. Poulose
2016-01-04 19:24 ` Mark Rutland
2016-01-04 19:24 ` Mark Rutland
2016-01-05 9:59 ` Suzuki K. Poulose
2016-01-05 9:59 ` Suzuki K. Poulose
2016-01-11 10:46 ` Mark Rutland
2016-01-11 10:46 ` Mark Rutland
2016-01-11 11:08 ` Suzuki K. Poulose
2016-01-11 11:08 ` Suzuki K. Poulose
2016-01-11 11:24 ` Mark Rutland
2016-01-11 11:24 ` Mark Rutland
2016-01-11 18:12 ` Suzuki K. Poulose
2016-01-11 18:12 ` Suzuki K. Poulose
2016-01-04 11:54 ` [PATCH v5 06/11] arm-cci: Get the status of a counter Suzuki K. Poulose
2016-01-04 11:54 ` Suzuki K. Poulose
2016-01-04 11:54 ` [PATCH v5 07/11] arm-cci: Add routines to save/restore all counters Suzuki K. Poulose
2016-01-04 11:54 ` Suzuki K. Poulose
2016-01-11 10:50 ` Mark Rutland [this message]
2016-01-11 10:50 ` Mark Rutland
2016-01-11 10:58 ` Suzuki K. Poulose
2016-01-11 10:58 ` Suzuki K. Poulose
2016-01-04 11:54 ` [PATCH v5 08/11] arm-cci: Provide hook for writing to PMU counters Suzuki K. Poulose
2016-01-04 11:54 ` Suzuki K. Poulose
2016-01-11 10:54 ` Mark Rutland
2016-01-11 10:54 ` Mark Rutland
2016-01-11 12:14 ` Suzuki K. Poulose
2016-01-11 12:14 ` Suzuki K. Poulose
2016-01-04 11:54 ` [PATCH v5 09/11] arm-cci: CCI-500: Work around PMU counter writes Suzuki K. Poulose
2016-01-04 11:54 ` Suzuki K. Poulose
2016-01-04 11:54 ` [PATCH v5 10/11] arm-cci500: Rearrange PMU driver for code sharing with CCI-550 PMU Suzuki K. Poulose
2016-01-04 11:54 ` Suzuki K. Poulose
2016-01-04 11:54 ` [PATCH v5 11/11] arm-cci: CoreLink CCI-550 PMU driver Suzuki K. Poulose
2016-01-04 11:54 ` Suzuki K. Poulose
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20160111105006.GF6499@leverpostej \
--to=mark.rutland@arm.com \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.