From: mark.rutland@arm.com (Mark Rutland)
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: [PATCH v5 08/11] arm-cci: Provide hook for writing to PMU counters
Date: Mon, 11 Jan 2016 10:54:54 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20160111105454.GG6499@leverpostej> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1451908490-2615-9-git-send-email-suzuki.poulose@arm.com>
On Mon, Jan 04, 2016 at 11:54:47AM +0000, Suzuki K. Poulose wrote:
> Add a hook for writing to CCI PMU counters. This callback
> can be used for CCI models which requires some extra work
> to program the PMU counter values. To accommodate group writes
> and single counter writes, the call back accepts a bitmask
> of the counter indices which need to be programmed with the
> given value.
>
> Cc: Punit Agrawal <punit.agrawal@arm.com>
> Cc: Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com>
> Signed-off-by: Suzuki K. Poulose <suzuki.poulose@arm.com>
> ---
> drivers/bus/arm-cci.c | 16 ++++++++++++++--
> 1 file changed, 14 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/bus/arm-cci.c b/drivers/bus/arm-cci.c
> index 2f1fcf0..47c9581 100644
> --- a/drivers/bus/arm-cci.c
> +++ b/drivers/bus/arm-cci.c
> @@ -134,6 +134,7 @@ struct cci_pmu_model {
> struct event_range event_ranges[CCI_IF_MAX];
> int (*validate_hw_event)(struct cci_pmu *, unsigned long);
> int (*get_event_idx)(struct cci_pmu *, struct cci_pmu_hw_events *, unsigned long);
> + void (*write_counters)(struct cci_pmu *, unsigned long *, u32 val);
> };
>
> static struct cci_pmu_model cci_pmu_models[];
> @@ -846,7 +847,15 @@ static void pmu_write_counter(struct perf_event *event, u32 value)
> dev_err(&cci_pmu->plat_device->dev, "Invalid CCI PMU counter %d\n", idx);
> return;
> }
> - __pmu_write_counter(cci_pmu, value, idx);
> +
> + if (cci_pmu->model->write_counters) {
> + unsigned long mask[BITS_TO_LONGS(cci_pmu->num_cntrs)];
> +
> + memset(mask, 0, BITS_TO_LONGS(cci_pmu->num_cntrs) * sizeof(unsigned long));
> + set_bit(idx, mask);
> + cci_pmu->model->write_counters(cci_pmu, mask, value);
> + } else
> + __pmu_write_counter(cci_pmu, value, idx);
> }
It would be much simpler to always log writes here, and only do the real
wirtes in batches when we re-enable the PMU (with appropriate
disable/enable calls in the IRQ handler).
We'd still need special hooks for CCIs which require a special dance to
program them, but all the logic to handle the writes would be in one
place.
This should work, regardless.
Thanks,
Mark.
>
> /* Write a value to a given set of counters */
> @@ -861,7 +870,10 @@ static void __pmu_write_counters(struct cci_pmu *cci_pmu, unsigned long *mask, u
> static void __maybe_unused
> pmu_write_counters(struct cci_pmu *cci_pmu, unsigned long *mask, u32 value)
> {
> - __pmu_write_counters(cci_pmu, mask, value);
> + if (cci_pmu->model->write_counters)
> + cci_pmu->model->write_counters(cci_pmu, mask, value);
> + else
> + __pmu_write_counters(cci_pmu, mask, value);
> }
>
> static u64 pmu_event_update(struct perf_event *event)
> --
> 1.7.9.5
>
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com>
To: "Suzuki K. Poulose" <suzuki.poulose@arm.com>
Cc: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, arm@kernel.org,
punit.agrawal@arm.com, peterz@infradead.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 08/11] arm-cci: Provide hook for writing to PMU counters
Date: Mon, 11 Jan 2016 10:54:54 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20160111105454.GG6499@leverpostej> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1451908490-2615-9-git-send-email-suzuki.poulose@arm.com>
On Mon, Jan 04, 2016 at 11:54:47AM +0000, Suzuki K. Poulose wrote:
> Add a hook for writing to CCI PMU counters. This callback
> can be used for CCI models which requires some extra work
> to program the PMU counter values. To accommodate group writes
> and single counter writes, the call back accepts a bitmask
> of the counter indices which need to be programmed with the
> given value.
>
> Cc: Punit Agrawal <punit.agrawal@arm.com>
> Cc: Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com>
> Signed-off-by: Suzuki K. Poulose <suzuki.poulose@arm.com>
> ---
> drivers/bus/arm-cci.c | 16 ++++++++++++++--
> 1 file changed, 14 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/bus/arm-cci.c b/drivers/bus/arm-cci.c
> index 2f1fcf0..47c9581 100644
> --- a/drivers/bus/arm-cci.c
> +++ b/drivers/bus/arm-cci.c
> @@ -134,6 +134,7 @@ struct cci_pmu_model {
> struct event_range event_ranges[CCI_IF_MAX];
> int (*validate_hw_event)(struct cci_pmu *, unsigned long);
> int (*get_event_idx)(struct cci_pmu *, struct cci_pmu_hw_events *, unsigned long);
> + void (*write_counters)(struct cci_pmu *, unsigned long *, u32 val);
> };
>
> static struct cci_pmu_model cci_pmu_models[];
> @@ -846,7 +847,15 @@ static void pmu_write_counter(struct perf_event *event, u32 value)
> dev_err(&cci_pmu->plat_device->dev, "Invalid CCI PMU counter %d\n", idx);
> return;
> }
> - __pmu_write_counter(cci_pmu, value, idx);
> +
> + if (cci_pmu->model->write_counters) {
> + unsigned long mask[BITS_TO_LONGS(cci_pmu->num_cntrs)];
> +
> + memset(mask, 0, BITS_TO_LONGS(cci_pmu->num_cntrs) * sizeof(unsigned long));
> + set_bit(idx, mask);
> + cci_pmu->model->write_counters(cci_pmu, mask, value);
> + } else
> + __pmu_write_counter(cci_pmu, value, idx);
> }
It would be much simpler to always log writes here, and only do the real
wirtes in batches when we re-enable the PMU (with appropriate
disable/enable calls in the IRQ handler).
We'd still need special hooks for CCIs which require a special dance to
program them, but all the logic to handle the writes would be in one
place.
This should work, regardless.
Thanks,
Mark.
>
> /* Write a value to a given set of counters */
> @@ -861,7 +870,10 @@ static void __pmu_write_counters(struct cci_pmu *cci_pmu, unsigned long *mask, u
> static void __maybe_unused
> pmu_write_counters(struct cci_pmu *cci_pmu, unsigned long *mask, u32 value)
> {
> - __pmu_write_counters(cci_pmu, mask, value);
> + if (cci_pmu->model->write_counters)
> + cci_pmu->model->write_counters(cci_pmu, mask, value);
> + else
> + __pmu_write_counters(cci_pmu, mask, value);
> }
>
> static u64 pmu_event_update(struct perf_event *event)
> --
> 1.7.9.5
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2016-01-11 10:54 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 58+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2016-01-04 11:54 [PATCH v5 00/11] arm-cci: PMU updates Suzuki K. Poulose
2016-01-04 11:54 ` Suzuki K. Poulose
2016-01-04 11:54 ` [PATCH v5 01/11] arm-cci: Define CCI counter period Suzuki K. Poulose
2016-01-04 11:54 ` Suzuki K. Poulose
2016-01-04 18:27 ` Mark Rutland
2016-01-04 18:27 ` Mark Rutland
2016-01-05 9:50 ` Suzuki K. Poulose
2016-01-05 9:50 ` Suzuki K. Poulose
2016-01-04 11:54 ` [PATCH v5 02/11] arm-cci: Refactor pmu_write_counter Suzuki K. Poulose
2016-01-04 11:54 ` Suzuki K. Poulose
2016-01-04 19:01 ` Mark Rutland
2016-01-04 19:01 ` Mark Rutland
2016-01-04 11:54 ` [PATCH v5 03/11] arm-cci: Group writes to counter Suzuki K. Poulose
2016-01-04 11:54 ` Suzuki K. Poulose
2016-01-04 19:03 ` Mark Rutland
2016-01-04 19:03 ` Mark Rutland
2016-01-05 10:51 ` Suzuki K. Poulose
2016-01-05 10:51 ` Suzuki K. Poulose
2016-01-11 10:44 ` Mark Rutland
2016-01-11 10:44 ` Mark Rutland
2016-01-11 10:48 ` Suzuki K. Poulose
2016-01-11 10:48 ` Suzuki K. Poulose
2016-01-04 11:54 ` [PATCH v5 04/11] arm-cci: Refactor CCI PMU enable/disable methods Suzuki K. Poulose
2016-01-04 11:54 ` Suzuki K. Poulose
2016-01-04 11:54 ` [PATCH v5 05/11] arm-cci PMU: Delay counter writes to pmu_enable Suzuki K. Poulose
2016-01-04 11:54 ` Suzuki K. Poulose
2016-01-04 19:24 ` Mark Rutland
2016-01-04 19:24 ` Mark Rutland
2016-01-05 9:59 ` Suzuki K. Poulose
2016-01-05 9:59 ` Suzuki K. Poulose
2016-01-11 10:46 ` Mark Rutland
2016-01-11 10:46 ` Mark Rutland
2016-01-11 11:08 ` Suzuki K. Poulose
2016-01-11 11:08 ` Suzuki K. Poulose
2016-01-11 11:24 ` Mark Rutland
2016-01-11 11:24 ` Mark Rutland
2016-01-11 18:12 ` Suzuki K. Poulose
2016-01-11 18:12 ` Suzuki K. Poulose
2016-01-04 11:54 ` [PATCH v5 06/11] arm-cci: Get the status of a counter Suzuki K. Poulose
2016-01-04 11:54 ` Suzuki K. Poulose
2016-01-04 11:54 ` [PATCH v5 07/11] arm-cci: Add routines to save/restore all counters Suzuki K. Poulose
2016-01-04 11:54 ` Suzuki K. Poulose
2016-01-11 10:50 ` Mark Rutland
2016-01-11 10:50 ` Mark Rutland
2016-01-11 10:58 ` Suzuki K. Poulose
2016-01-11 10:58 ` Suzuki K. Poulose
2016-01-04 11:54 ` [PATCH v5 08/11] arm-cci: Provide hook for writing to PMU counters Suzuki K. Poulose
2016-01-04 11:54 ` Suzuki K. Poulose
2016-01-11 10:54 ` Mark Rutland [this message]
2016-01-11 10:54 ` Mark Rutland
2016-01-11 12:14 ` Suzuki K. Poulose
2016-01-11 12:14 ` Suzuki K. Poulose
2016-01-04 11:54 ` [PATCH v5 09/11] arm-cci: CCI-500: Work around PMU counter writes Suzuki K. Poulose
2016-01-04 11:54 ` Suzuki K. Poulose
2016-01-04 11:54 ` [PATCH v5 10/11] arm-cci500: Rearrange PMU driver for code sharing with CCI-550 PMU Suzuki K. Poulose
2016-01-04 11:54 ` Suzuki K. Poulose
2016-01-04 11:54 ` [PATCH v5 11/11] arm-cci: CoreLink CCI-550 PMU driver Suzuki K. Poulose
2016-01-04 11:54 ` Suzuki K. Poulose
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20160111105454.GG6499@leverpostej \
--to=mark.rutland@arm.com \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.