* Glibc 2.24 _might_ require minimum kernel version 3.2
@ 2016-01-31 17:41 Khem Raj
2016-01-31 18:03 ` Phil Blundell
` (2 more replies)
0 siblings, 3 replies; 8+ messages in thread
From: Khem Raj @ 2016-01-31 17:41 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: openembedded-architecture,
Patches and discussions about the oe-core layer,
yocto@yoctoproject.org, openembeded-devel
Hi
This is FYI, as I have sent a RFT for glibc 2.24, there might be another change
coming which is under discussion on glibc mailing lists which is on
supported minimum
kernel version bump to 3.2 since 2.6.32 will be EOLed this summer [1]
If anyone is planning on using upcoming yocto/OE release and sticking
to kernels older than 3.2 then please plan for upgrading your kernel.
Thanks
-Khem
[1] - https://sourceware.org/ml/libc-alpha/2016-01/msg00885.html
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 8+ messages in thread* Re: Glibc 2.24 _might_ require minimum kernel version 3.2
2016-01-31 17:41 Glibc 2.24 _might_ require minimum kernel version 3.2 Khem Raj
@ 2016-01-31 18:03 ` Phil Blundell
2016-01-31 18:18 ` [Openembedded-architecture] " Denys Dmytriyenko
2016-02-01 18:10 ` akuster
2 siblings, 0 replies; 8+ messages in thread
From: Phil Blundell @ 2016-01-31 18:03 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Khem Raj; +Cc: Patches and discussions about the oe-core layer
[cross-posting trimmed...]
On Sun, 2016-01-31 at 09:41 -0800, Khem Raj wrote:
> This is FYI, as I have sent a RFT for glibc 2.24,
Um, have you? 2.23 hasn't been released yet and I think that's the
version you sent an RFT for. 2.24 is still some way off.
p.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 8+ messages in thread
* Re: [Openembedded-architecture] Glibc 2.24 _might_ require minimum kernel version 3.2
2016-01-31 17:41 Glibc 2.24 _might_ require minimum kernel version 3.2 Khem Raj
2016-01-31 18:03 ` Phil Blundell
@ 2016-01-31 18:18 ` Denys Dmytriyenko
2016-02-01 1:01 ` Khem Raj
2016-02-01 18:10 ` akuster
2 siblings, 1 reply; 8+ messages in thread
From: Denys Dmytriyenko @ 2016-01-31 18:18 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Khem Raj
Cc: yocto@yoctoproject.org, openembedded-architecture,
openembeded-devel,
Patches and discussions about the oe-core layer
On Sun, Jan 31, 2016 at 09:41:17AM -0800, Khem Raj wrote:
> Hi
>
> This is FYI, as I have sent a RFT for glibc 2.24, there might be another change
> coming which is under discussion on glibc mailing lists which is on
> supported minimum
> kernel version bump to 3.2 since 2.6.32 will be EOLed this summer [1]
>
> If anyone is planning on using upcoming yocto/OE release and sticking
> to kernels older than 3.2 then please plan for upgrading your kernel.
>
> Thanks
> -Khem
>
> [1] - https://sourceware.org/ml/libc-alpha/2016-01/msg00885.html
What about our timeline - is glibc 2.24 planned for the next 2.1 release?
--
Denys
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 8+ messages in thread
* Re: [Openembedded-architecture] Glibc 2.24 _might_ require minimum kernel version 3.2
2016-01-31 18:18 ` [Openembedded-architecture] " Denys Dmytriyenko
@ 2016-02-01 1:01 ` Khem Raj
0 siblings, 0 replies; 8+ messages in thread
From: Khem Raj @ 2016-02-01 1:01 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Denys Dmytriyenko
Cc: yocto, openembedded-architecture, openembeded-devel,
Patches and discussions about the oe-core layer
On Jan 31, 2016 10:18 AM, "Denys Dmytriyenko" <denis@denix.org> wrote:
>
> On Sun, Jan 31, 2016 at 09:41:17AM -0800, Khem Raj wrote:
> > Hi
> >
> > This is FYI, as I have sent a RFT for glibc 2.24, there might be
another change
> > coming which is under discussion on glibc mailing lists which is on
> > supported minimum
> > kernel version bump to 3.2 since 2.6.32 will be EOLed this summer [1]
> >
> > If anyone is planning on using upcoming yocto/OE release and sticking
> > to kernels older than 3.2 then please plan for upgrading your kernel.
> >
> > Thanks
> > -Khem
> >
> > [1] - https://sourceware.org/ml/libc-alpha/2016-01/msg00885.html
>
> What about our timeline - is glibc 2.24 planned for the next 2.1 release?
>
Sorry I meant to say 2.2 yocto/oe release not 2.1
> --
> Denys
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 8+ messages in thread
* Re: [Openembedded-architecture] Glibc 2.24 _might_ require minimum kernel version 3.2
@ 2016-02-01 1:01 ` Khem Raj
0 siblings, 0 replies; 8+ messages in thread
From: Khem Raj @ 2016-02-01 1:01 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Denys Dmytriyenko
Cc: yocto, openembedded-architecture, openembeded-devel,
Patches and discussions about the oe-core layer
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 816 bytes --]
On Jan 31, 2016 10:18 AM, "Denys Dmytriyenko" <denis@denix.org> wrote:
>
> On Sun, Jan 31, 2016 at 09:41:17AM -0800, Khem Raj wrote:
> > Hi
> >
> > This is FYI, as I have sent a RFT for glibc 2.24, there might be
another change
> > coming which is under discussion on glibc mailing lists which is on
> > supported minimum
> > kernel version bump to 3.2 since 2.6.32 will be EOLed this summer [1]
> >
> > If anyone is planning on using upcoming yocto/OE release and sticking
> > to kernels older than 3.2 then please plan for upgrading your kernel.
> >
> > Thanks
> > -Khem
> >
> > [1] - https://sourceware.org/ml/libc-alpha/2016-01/msg00885.html
>
> What about our timeline - is glibc 2.24 planned for the next 2.1 release?
>
Sorry I meant to say 2.2 yocto/oe release not 2.1
> --
> Denys
[-- Attachment #2: Type: text/html, Size: 1175 bytes --]
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 8+ messages in thread
* Re: Glibc 2.24 _might_ require minimum kernel version 3.2
2016-01-31 17:41 Glibc 2.24 _might_ require minimum kernel version 3.2 Khem Raj
2016-01-31 18:03 ` Phil Blundell
2016-01-31 18:18 ` [Openembedded-architecture] " Denys Dmytriyenko
@ 2016-02-01 18:10 ` akuster
2016-02-01 18:24 ` Khem Raj
2 siblings, 1 reply; 8+ messages in thread
From: akuster @ 2016-02-01 18:10 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Khem Raj, openembedded-architecture,
Patches and discussions about the oe-core layer,
yocto@yoctoproject.org, openembeded-devel
On 01/31/2016 09:41 AM, Khem Raj wrote:
> Hi
>
> This is FYI, as I have sent a RFT for glibc 2.24, there might be another change
> coming which is under discussion on glibc mailing lists which is on
> supported minimum
> kernel version bump to 3.2 since 2.6.32 will be EOLed this summer [1]
>
> If anyone is planning on using upcoming yocto/OE release and sticking
> to kernels older than 3.2 then please plan for upgrading your kernel.
Nope.
- armin
>
> Thanks
> -Khem
>
> [1] - https://sourceware.org/ml/libc-alpha/2016-01/msg00885.html
>
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 8+ messages in thread
* Re: [yocto] Glibc 2.24 _might_ require minimum kernel version 3.2
2016-02-01 18:10 ` akuster
@ 2016-02-01 18:24 ` Khem Raj
0 siblings, 0 replies; 8+ messages in thread
From: Khem Raj @ 2016-02-01 18:24 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: akuster
Cc: yocto@yoctoproject.org, openembedded-architecture,
openembeded-devel,
Patches and discussions about the oe-core layer
On Mon, Feb 1, 2016 at 10:10 AM, akuster <akuster@mvista.com> wrote:
>
>
> On 01/31/2016 09:41 AM, Khem Raj wrote:
>> Hi
>>
>> This is FYI, as I have sent a RFT for glibc 2.24, there might be another change
>> coming which is under discussion on glibc mailing lists which is on
>> supported minimum
>> kernel version bump to 3.2 since 2.6.32 will be EOLed this summer [1]
>>
>> If anyone is planning on using upcoming yocto/OE release and sticking
>> to kernels older than 3.2 then please plan for upgrading your kernel.
>
> Nope.
Thanks, its like 10month ahead of time warning so no one then forces
to keep us using 2.6.32
you have been informed
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 8+ messages in thread
* Re: Glibc 2.24 _might_ require minimum kernel version 3.2
@ 2016-02-01 18:24 ` Khem Raj
0 siblings, 0 replies; 8+ messages in thread
From: Khem Raj @ 2016-02-01 18:24 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: akuster
Cc: yocto@yoctoproject.org, openembedded-architecture,
openembeded-devel,
Patches and discussions about the oe-core layer
On Mon, Feb 1, 2016 at 10:10 AM, akuster <akuster@mvista.com> wrote:
>
>
> On 01/31/2016 09:41 AM, Khem Raj wrote:
>> Hi
>>
>> This is FYI, as I have sent a RFT for glibc 2.24, there might be another change
>> coming which is under discussion on glibc mailing lists which is on
>> supported minimum
>> kernel version bump to 3.2 since 2.6.32 will be EOLed this summer [1]
>>
>> If anyone is planning on using upcoming yocto/OE release and sticking
>> to kernels older than 3.2 then please plan for upgrading your kernel.
>
> Nope.
Thanks, its like 10month ahead of time warning so no one then forces
to keep us using 2.6.32
you have been informed
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 8+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2016-02-01 18:24 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 8+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2016-01-31 17:41 Glibc 2.24 _might_ require minimum kernel version 3.2 Khem Raj
2016-01-31 18:03 ` Phil Blundell
2016-01-31 18:18 ` [Openembedded-architecture] " Denys Dmytriyenko
2016-02-01 1:01 ` Khem Raj
2016-02-01 1:01 ` Khem Raj
2016-02-01 18:10 ` akuster
2016-02-01 18:24 ` [yocto] " Khem Raj
2016-02-01 18:24 ` Khem Raj
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.