Glibc 2.24 _might_ require minimum kernel version 3.2

Glibc 2.24 _might_ require minimum kernel version 3.2

[Khem Raj]

Hi

This is FYI, as I have sent a RFT for glibc 2.24, there might be another change
coming which is under discussion on glibc mailing lists which is on
supported minimum
kernel version bump to 3.2 since 2.6.32 will be EOLed this summer [1]

If anyone is planning on using upcoming yocto/OE release and sticking
to kernels older than  3.2 then please plan for upgrading your kernel.

Thanks
-Khem

[1] - https://sourceware.org/ml/libc-alpha/2016-01/msg00885.html

Re: Glibc 2.24 _might_ require minimum kernel version 3.2

[Phil Blundell]

[cross-posting trimmed...]

On Sun, 2016-01-31 at 09:41 -0800, Khem Raj wrote:
> This is FYI, as I have sent a RFT for glibc 2.24,

Um, have you?  2.23 hasn't been released yet and I think that's the
version you sent an RFT for.  2.24 is still some way off.

p.

Re: [Openembedded-architecture] Glibc 2.24 _might_ require minimum kernel version 3.2

[Denys Dmytriyenko]

On Sun, Jan 31, 2016 at 09:41:17AM -0800, Khem Raj wrote:
> Hi
> 
> This is FYI, as I have sent a RFT for glibc 2.24, there might be another change
> coming which is under discussion on glibc mailing lists which is on
> supported minimum
> kernel version bump to 3.2 since 2.6.32 will be EOLed this summer [1]
> 
> If anyone is planning on using upcoming yocto/OE release and sticking
> to kernels older than  3.2 then please plan for upgrading your kernel.
> 
> Thanks
> -Khem
> 
> [1] - https://sourceware.org/ml/libc-alpha/2016-01/msg00885.html

What about our timeline - is glibc 2.24 planned for the next 2.1 release?

-- 
Denys

Re: [Openembedded-architecture] Glibc 2.24 _might_ require minimum kernel version 3.2

[Khem Raj]

On Jan 31, 2016 10:18 AM, "Denys Dmytriyenko" <denis@denix.org> wrote:
>
> On Sun, Jan 31, 2016 at 09:41:17AM -0800, Khem Raj wrote:
> > Hi
> >
> > This is FYI, as I have sent a RFT for glibc 2.24, there might be
another change
> > coming which is under discussion on glibc mailing lists which is on
> > supported minimum
> > kernel version bump to 3.2 since 2.6.32 will be EOLed this summer [1]
> >
> > If anyone is planning on using upcoming yocto/OE release and sticking
> > to kernels older than  3.2 then please plan for upgrading your kernel.
> >
> > Thanks
> > -Khem
> >
> > [1] - https://sourceware.org/ml/libc-alpha/2016-01/msg00885.html
>
> What about our timeline - is glibc 2.24 planned for the next 2.1 release?
>

Sorry I meant to say 2.2 yocto/oe release not 2.1
> --
> Denys

Re: [Openembedded-architecture] Glibc 2.24 _might_ require minimum kernel version 3.2

[Khem Raj]

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 816 bytes --]

On Jan 31, 2016 10:18 AM, "Denys Dmytriyenko" <denis@denix.org> wrote:
>
> On Sun, Jan 31, 2016 at 09:41:17AM -0800, Khem Raj wrote:
> > Hi
> >
> > This is FYI, as I have sent a RFT for glibc 2.24, there might be
another change
> > coming which is under discussion on glibc mailing lists which is on
> > supported minimum
> > kernel version bump to 3.2 since 2.6.32 will be EOLed this summer [1]
> >
> > If anyone is planning on using upcoming yocto/OE release and sticking
> > to kernels older than  3.2 then please plan for upgrading your kernel.
> >
> > Thanks
> > -Khem
> >
> > [1] - https://sourceware.org/ml/libc-alpha/2016-01/msg00885.html
>
> What about our timeline - is glibc 2.24 planned for the next 2.1 release?
>

Sorry I meant to say 2.2 yocto/oe release not 2.1
> --
> Denys

[-- Attachment #2: Type: text/html, Size: 1175 bytes --]

Re: Glibc 2.24 _might_ require minimum kernel version 3.2

[akuster]

On 01/31/2016 09:41 AM, Khem Raj wrote:
> Hi
> 
> This is FYI, as I have sent a RFT for glibc 2.24, there might be another change
> coming which is under discussion on glibc mailing lists which is on
> supported minimum
> kernel version bump to 3.2 since 2.6.32 will be EOLed this summer [1]
> 
> If anyone is planning on using upcoming yocto/OE release and sticking
> to kernels older than  3.2 then please plan for upgrading your kernel.

Nope.

- armin
> 
> Thanks
> -Khem
> 
> [1] - https://sourceware.org/ml/libc-alpha/2016-01/msg00885.html
> 

Re: [yocto] Glibc 2.24 _might_ require minimum kernel version 3.2

[Khem Raj]

On Mon, Feb 1, 2016 at 10:10 AM, akuster <akuster@mvista.com> wrote:
>
>
> On 01/31/2016 09:41 AM, Khem Raj wrote:
>> Hi
>>
>> This is FYI, as I have sent a RFT for glibc 2.24, there might be another change
>> coming which is under discussion on glibc mailing lists which is on
>> supported minimum
>> kernel version bump to 3.2 since 2.6.32 will be EOLed this summer [1]
>>
>> If anyone is planning on using upcoming yocto/OE release and sticking
>> to kernels older than  3.2 then please plan for upgrading your kernel.
>
> Nope.

Thanks, its like 10month ahead of time warning so no one then forces
to keep us using 2.6.32
you have been informed

Re: Glibc 2.24 _might_ require minimum kernel version 3.2

[Khem Raj]

On Mon, Feb 1, 2016 at 10:10 AM, akuster <akuster@mvista.com> wrote:
>
>
> On 01/31/2016 09:41 AM, Khem Raj wrote:
>> Hi
>>
>> This is FYI, as I have sent a RFT for glibc 2.24, there might be another change
>> coming which is under discussion on glibc mailing lists which is on
>> supported minimum
>> kernel version bump to 3.2 since 2.6.32 will be EOLed this summer [1]
>>
>> If anyone is planning on using upcoming yocto/OE release and sticking
>> to kernels older than  3.2 then please plan for upgrading your kernel.
>
> Nope.

Thanks, its like 10month ahead of time warning so no one then forces
to keep us using 2.6.32
you have been informed