All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Jason Gunthorpe <jgunthorpe-ePGOBjL8dl3ta4EC/59zMFaTQe2KTcn/@public.gmane.org>
To: Jarkko Sakkinen
	<jarkko.sakkinen-VuQAYsv1563Yd54FQh9/CA@public.gmane.org>
Cc: tpmdd-devel-5NWGOfrQmneRv+LV9MX5uipxlwaOVQ5f@public.gmane.org,
	linux-kernel-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] tpm_crb: fix bad name pointer usage with struct resource
Date: Tue, 16 Feb 2016 21:52:19 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20160217045219.GA26086@obsidianresearch.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1455668874-13261-1-git-send-email-jarkko.sakkinen-VuQAYsv1563Yd54FQh9/CA@public.gmane.org>

On Wed, Feb 17, 2016 at 02:27:54AM +0200, Jarkko Sakkinen wrote:
> -	if (acpi_dev_resource_memory(ares, &res))
> +	if (acpi_dev_resource_memory(ares, &res)) {
> +		res.name = NULL;

What? How is this not a bug in acpi_dev_resource_memory? Maybe it
needs to memcpy into devm allocated memory instead, but I'm confused
how/why/when acpi could free name.

The same code exists in tpm_tis as well.

>  {
> -	struct resource new_res = {
> -		.start	= start,
> -		.end	= start + size - 1,
> -		.flags	= IORESOURCE_MEM,
> -	};
> +	struct resource new_res;
> +
> +	memset(&new_res, 0, sizeof(new_res));
> +
> +	new_res.start	= start;
> +	new_res.end	= start + size - 1;
> +	new_res.flags	= IORESOURCE_MEM;

These two things are equivalent (C requires non-initialized members of
an initalized struct to be 0), why this change?

Jason

------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Site24x7 APM Insight: Get Deep Visibility into Application Performance
APM + Mobile APM + RUM: Monitor 3 App instances at just $35/Month
Monitor end-to-end web transactions and take corrective actions now
Troubleshoot faster and improve end-user experience. Signup Now!
http://pubads.g.doubleclick.net/gampad/clk?id=272487151&iu=/4140

WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Jason Gunthorpe <jgunthorpe@obsidianresearch.com>
To: Jarkko Sakkinen <jarkko.sakkinen@linux.intel.com>
Cc: Peter Huewe <peterhuewe@gmx.de>,
	tpmdd-devel@lists.sourceforge.net, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [tpmdd-devel] [PATCH] tpm_crb: fix bad name pointer usage with struct resource
Date: Tue, 16 Feb 2016 21:52:19 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20160217045219.GA26086@obsidianresearch.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1455668874-13261-1-git-send-email-jarkko.sakkinen@linux.intel.com>

On Wed, Feb 17, 2016 at 02:27:54AM +0200, Jarkko Sakkinen wrote:
> -	if (acpi_dev_resource_memory(ares, &res))
> +	if (acpi_dev_resource_memory(ares, &res)) {
> +		res.name = NULL;

What? How is this not a bug in acpi_dev_resource_memory? Maybe it
needs to memcpy into devm allocated memory instead, but I'm confused
how/why/when acpi could free name.

The same code exists in tpm_tis as well.

>  {
> -	struct resource new_res = {
> -		.start	= start,
> -		.end	= start + size - 1,
> -		.flags	= IORESOURCE_MEM,
> -	};
> +	struct resource new_res;
> +
> +	memset(&new_res, 0, sizeof(new_res));
> +
> +	new_res.start	= start;
> +	new_res.end	= start + size - 1;
> +	new_res.flags	= IORESOURCE_MEM;

These two things are equivalent (C requires non-initialized members of
an initalized struct to be 0), why this change?

Jason

  parent reply	other threads:[~2016-02-17  4:52 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 14+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2016-02-17  0:27 [PATCH] tpm_crb: fix bad name pointer usage with struct resource Jarkko Sakkinen
2016-02-17  0:27 ` Jarkko Sakkinen
     [not found] ` <1455668874-13261-1-git-send-email-jarkko.sakkinen-VuQAYsv1563Yd54FQh9/CA@public.gmane.org>
2016-02-17  4:52   ` Jason Gunthorpe [this message]
2016-02-17  4:52     ` [tpmdd-devel] " Jason Gunthorpe
     [not found]     ` <20160217045219.GA26086-ePGOBjL8dl3ta4EC/59zMFaTQe2KTcn/@public.gmane.org>
2016-02-17  9:36       ` Jarkko Sakkinen
2016-02-17  9:36         ` [tpmdd-devel] " Jarkko Sakkinen
     [not found]         ` <20160217093623.GA9831-ral2JQCrhuEAvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org>
2016-02-17 14:20           ` Jarkko Sakkinen
2016-02-17 14:20             ` [tpmdd-devel] " Jarkko Sakkinen
     [not found]             ` <20160217142016.GA6951-ral2JQCrhuEAvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org>
2016-02-18 17:31               ` Jason Gunthorpe
2016-02-18 17:31                 ` [tpmdd-devel] " Jason Gunthorpe
2016-02-19 15:06                 ` Jarkko Sakkinen
     [not found]                   ` <20160219150606.GB7474-ral2JQCrhuEAvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org>
2016-02-19 17:44                     ` Jason Gunthorpe
2016-02-19 17:44                       ` [tpmdd-devel] " Jason Gunthorpe
2016-02-20  8:04                       ` Jarkko Sakkinen

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20160217045219.GA26086@obsidianresearch.com \
    --to=jgunthorpe-epgobjl8dl3ta4ec/59zmfatqe2ktcn/@public.gmane.org \
    --cc=jarkko.sakkinen-VuQAYsv1563Yd54FQh9/CA@public.gmane.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org \
    --cc=tpmdd-devel-5NWGOfrQmneRv+LV9MX5uipxlwaOVQ5f@public.gmane.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.