Re: [RFC][PATCH v3 1/5] mm/zsmalloc: introduce class auto-compaction

[Minchan Kim <minchan@kernel.org>]

Hey Sergey,

Sorry for late review.

On Thu, Mar 03, 2016 at 11:45:59PM +0900, Sergey Senozhatsky wrote:
> zsmalloc classes are known to be affected by internal fragmentation.
> 
> For example, /sys/kernel/debug/zsmalloc/zramX/classes
>  class  size almost_full almost_empty obj_allocated   obj_used pages_used pages_per_zspage freeable
>     54   896           1           12           117         57         26                2       12
> ...
>    107  1744           1           23           196         76         84                3       51
>    111  1808           0            0            63         63         28                4        0
>    126  2048           0          160           568        408        284                1       80
>    144  2336          52          620          8631       5747       4932                4     1648
>    151  2448         123          406         10090       8736       6054                3      810
>    168  2720           0          512         15738      14926      10492                2      540
>    190  3072           0            2           136        130        102                3        3
> ...
> 
> demonstrates that class-896 has 12/26=46% of unused pages, class-2336 has
> 1648/4932=33% of unused pages, etc. And the more classes we will have as
> 'normal' classes (more than one object per-zspage) the bigger this problem
> will grow. The existing compaction relies on a user space (user can trigger
> compaction via `compact' zram's sysfs attr) or a shrinker; it does not
> happen automatically.
> 
> This patch introduces a 'watermark' value of unused pages and schedules a
> compaction work on a per-class basis once class's fragmentation becomes
> too big. So compaction is not performed in current I/O operation context,
> but in workqueue workers later.
> 
> The current watermark is set to 40% -- if class has 40+% of `freeable'
> pages then compaction work will be scheduled.

Could you explain why you select per-class watermark?
Because my plan was we kick background work based on total fragmented memory
(i.e., considering used_pages/allocated_pages < some threshold).

IOW, if used_pages/allocated_pages is less than some ratio,
we kick background job with marking index of size class just freed
and then the job scans size_class from the index circulary.
As well, we should put a upper bound to scan zspages to make it
deterministic.

What do you think about it?

> 
> TEST
> ====
> 
>   2G zram, ext4, lz0
> 
>   iozone -t 1 -R -r 64K -s 1200M -I +Z
> 
>                         BASE       PATCHED
> "  Initial write "   959670.94    966724.62
> "        Rewrite "  1276167.62   1237632.88
> "           Read "  3334708.25   3345357.50
> "        Re-read "  3405310.75   3337137.25
> "   Reverse Read "  3284499.75   3241283.50
> "    Stride read "  3293417.75   3268364.00
> "    Random read "  3255253.50   3241685.00
> " Mixed workload "  3274398.00   3231498.00
> "   Random write "  1253207.50   1216247.00
> "         Pwrite "   873682.25    877045.81
> "          Pread "  3173266.00   3318471.75
> "         Fwrite "   881278.38    897622.81
> "          Fread "  4397147.00   4501131.50
> 
>   iozone -t 3 -R -r 64K -s 60M -I +Z
> 
>                         BASE       PATCHED
> "  Initial write "  1855931.62   1869576.31
> "        Rewrite "  2223531.06   2221543.62
> "           Read "  7958435.75   8023044.75
> "        Re-read "  7912776.75   8068961.00
> "   Reverse Read "  7832227.50   7788237.50
> "    Stride read "  7952113.50   7919778.00
> "    Random read "  7908816.00   7881792.50
> " Mixed workload "  6364520.38   6332493.94
> "   Random write "  2230115.69   2176777.19
> "         Pwrite "  1915939.31   1929464.75
> "          Pread "  3857052.91   3840517.91
> "         Fwrite "  2271730.44   2272800.31
> "          Fread "  9053867.00   8880966.25
> 
> Signed-off-by: Sergey Senozhatsky <sergey.senozhatsky@gmail.com>

> ---
>  mm/zsmalloc.c | 37 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>  1 file changed, 37 insertions(+)
> 
> diff --git a/mm/zsmalloc.c b/mm/zsmalloc.c
> index e72efb1..a4ef7e7 100644
> --- a/mm/zsmalloc.c
> +++ b/mm/zsmalloc.c
> @@ -219,6 +219,10 @@ struct size_class {
>  	int pages_per_zspage;
>  	/* huge object: pages_per_zspage == 1 && maxobj_per_zspage == 1 */
>  	bool huge;
> +
> +	bool compact_scheduled;
> +	struct zs_pool *pool;
> +	struct work_struct compact_work;
>  };
>  
>  /*
> @@ -1467,6 +1471,8 @@ static void obj_free(struct zs_pool *pool, struct size_class *class,
>  	zs_stat_dec(class, OBJ_USED, 1);
>  }
>  
> +static bool class_watermark_ok(struct size_class *class);
> +
>  void zs_free(struct zs_pool *pool, unsigned long handle)
>  {
>  	struct page *first_page, *f_page;
> @@ -1495,6 +1501,11 @@ void zs_free(struct zs_pool *pool, unsigned long handle)
>  		atomic_long_sub(class->pages_per_zspage,
>  				&pool->pages_allocated);
>  		free_zspage(first_page);
> +	} else {
> +		if (!class_watermark_ok(class) && !class->compact_scheduled) {
> +			queue_work(system_long_wq, &class->compact_work);
> +			class->compact_scheduled = true;
> +		}
>  	}
>  	spin_unlock(&class->lock);
>  	unpin_tag(handle);
> @@ -1745,6 +1756,19 @@ static unsigned long zs_can_compact(struct size_class *class)
>  	return obj_wasted * class->pages_per_zspage;
>  }
>  
> +static bool class_watermark_ok(struct size_class *class)
> +{
> +	unsigned long pages_used = zs_stat_get(class, OBJ_ALLOCATED);
> +
> +	pages_used /= get_maxobj_per_zspage(class->size,
> +			class->pages_per_zspage) * class->pages_per_zspage;
> +
> +	if (!pages_used)
> +		return true;
> +
> +	return (100 * zs_can_compact(class) / pages_used) < 40;
> +}
> +
>  static void __zs_compact(struct zs_pool *pool, struct size_class *class)
>  {
>  	struct zs_compact_control cc;
> @@ -1789,9 +1813,17 @@ static void __zs_compact(struct zs_pool *pool, struct size_class *class)
>  	if (src_page)
>  		putback_zspage(pool, class, src_page);
>  
> +	class->compact_scheduled = false;
>  	spin_unlock(&class->lock);
>  }
>  
> +static void class_compaction_work(struct work_struct *work)
> +{
> +	struct size_class *class = container_of(work, struct size_class, compact_work);
> +
> +	__zs_compact(class->pool, class);
> +}
> +
>  unsigned long zs_compact(struct zs_pool *pool)
>  {
>  	int i;
> @@ -1948,6 +1980,9 @@ struct zs_pool *zs_create_pool(const char *name, gfp_t flags)
>  		if (pages_per_zspage == 1 &&
>  			get_maxobj_per_zspage(size, pages_per_zspage) == 1)
>  			class->huge = true;
> +
> +		INIT_WORK(&class->compact_work, class_compaction_work);
> +		class->pool = pool;
>  		spin_lock_init(&class->lock);
>  		pool->size_class[i] = class;
>  
> @@ -1990,6 +2025,8 @@ void zs_destroy_pool(struct zs_pool *pool)
>  		if (class->index != i)
>  			continue;
>  
> +		cancel_work_sync(&class->compact_work);
> +
>  		for (fg = 0; fg < _ZS_NR_FULLNESS_GROUPS; fg++) {
>  			if (class->fullness_list[fg]) {
>  				pr_info("Freeing non-empty class with size %db, fullness group %d\n",
> -- 
> 2.8.0.rc0
> 

--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@kvack.org.  For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@kvack.org"> email@kvack.org </a>