All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: hch@lst.de (Christoph Hellwig)
Subject: [PATCH 1/2] PCI: Provide sensible irq vector alloc/free routines
Date: Thu, 12 May 2016 09:35:52 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20160512073552.GA4027@lst.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20160511094432.GB31347@agordeev.lab.eng.brq.redhat.com>

Hi Alex,

what do you think about the incremental patch below?  This should
address the concerns about the strange PPC bridges, although I don't
have a way to test one:

diff --git a/drivers/pci/msi.c b/drivers/pci/msi.c
index a510484..32ce65e 100644
--- a/drivers/pci/msi.c
+++ b/drivers/pci/msi.c
@@ -1177,6 +1177,7 @@ int pci_alloc_irq_vectors(struct pci_dev *dev, unsigned int nr_vecs,
 	if (WARN_ON_ONCE(dev->msi_enabled || dev->msix_enabled))
 		return -EINVAL;
 
+retry:
 	if (!pci_msi_supported(dev, 1))
 		goto use_legacy_irq;
 
@@ -1191,17 +1192,26 @@ int pci_alloc_irq_vectors(struct pci_dev *dev, unsigned int nr_vecs,
 	if (!dev->irqs)
 		return -ENOMEM;
 
-	if (dev->msix_cap && !(flags & PCI_IRQ_NOMSIX))
+	if (dev->msix_cap && !(flags & PCI_IRQ_NOMSIX)) {
 		ret = __pci_enable_msix(dev, nr_vecs);
-	else
+		if (ret < 0)
+			flags |= PCI_IRQ_NOMSIX;
+	} else {
 		ret = __pci_enable_msi(dev, nr_vecs);
-	if (ret)
-		goto out_free_irqs;
+	}
 
-	return 0;
+	/* if we succeeded getting all vectors return the number we got: */
+	if (!ret)
+		return nr_vecs;
 
-out_free_irqs:
 	kfree(dev->irqs);
+	/* if ret is positive it's the numbers of vectors we can use, retry: */
+	if (ret > 0) {
+		nr_vecs = ret;
+		goto retry;
+	}
+
+	/* no MSI or MSI-X vectors available, fall back to the legacy IRQ: */
 use_legacy_irq:
 	dev->irqs = &dev->irq;
 	return 1;

WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
To: Alexander Gordeev <agordeev@redhat.com>
Cc: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>,
	helgaas@kernel.org, pjw@netapp.com, axboe@fb.com,
	keith.busch@intel.com, linux-pci@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-nvme@lists.infradead.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] PCI: Provide sensible irq vector alloc/free routines
Date: Thu, 12 May 2016 09:35:52 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20160512073552.GA4027@lst.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20160511094432.GB31347@agordeev.lab.eng.brq.redhat.com>

Hi Alex,

what do you think about the incremental patch below?  This should
address the concerns about the strange PPC bridges, although I don't
have a way to test one:

diff --git a/drivers/pci/msi.c b/drivers/pci/msi.c
index a510484..32ce65e 100644
--- a/drivers/pci/msi.c
+++ b/drivers/pci/msi.c
@@ -1177,6 +1177,7 @@ int pci_alloc_irq_vectors(struct pci_dev *dev, unsigned int nr_vecs,
 	if (WARN_ON_ONCE(dev->msi_enabled || dev->msix_enabled))
 		return -EINVAL;
 
+retry:
 	if (!pci_msi_supported(dev, 1))
 		goto use_legacy_irq;
 
@@ -1191,17 +1192,26 @@ int pci_alloc_irq_vectors(struct pci_dev *dev, unsigned int nr_vecs,
 	if (!dev->irqs)
 		return -ENOMEM;
 
-	if (dev->msix_cap && !(flags & PCI_IRQ_NOMSIX))
+	if (dev->msix_cap && !(flags & PCI_IRQ_NOMSIX)) {
 		ret = __pci_enable_msix(dev, nr_vecs);
-	else
+		if (ret < 0)
+			flags |= PCI_IRQ_NOMSIX;
+	} else {
 		ret = __pci_enable_msi(dev, nr_vecs);
-	if (ret)
-		goto out_free_irqs;
+	}
 
-	return 0;
+	/* if we succeeded getting all vectors return the number we got: */
+	if (!ret)
+		return nr_vecs;
 
-out_free_irqs:
 	kfree(dev->irqs);
+	/* if ret is positive it's the numbers of vectors we can use, retry: */
+	if (ret > 0) {
+		nr_vecs = ret;
+		goto retry;
+	}
+
+	/* no MSI or MSI-X vectors available, fall back to the legacy IRQ: */
 use_legacy_irq:
 	dev->irqs = &dev->irq;
 	return 1;

  reply	other threads:[~2016-05-12  7:35 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 54+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2016-05-05 14:04 PCI: Provide sensible irq vector alloc/free routines Christoph Hellwig
2016-05-05 14:04 ` Christoph Hellwig
2016-05-05 14:04 ` [PATCH 1/2] " Christoph Hellwig
2016-05-05 14:04   ` Christoph Hellwig
2016-05-06 16:04   ` Bjorn Helgaas
2016-05-06 16:04     ` Bjorn Helgaas
2016-05-06 16:28     ` Christoph Hellwig
2016-05-06 16:28       ` Christoph Hellwig
2016-05-06 16:35       ` Bjorn Helgaas
2016-05-06 16:35         ` Bjorn Helgaas
2016-05-08  9:05         ` Christoph Hellwig
2016-05-08  9:05           ` Christoph Hellwig
2016-05-09 22:46   ` Bjorn Helgaas
2016-05-09 22:46     ` Bjorn Helgaas
2016-05-11  8:52     ` Christoph Hellwig
2016-05-11  8:52       ` Christoph Hellwig
2016-05-16 19:39     ` Bjorn Helgaas
2016-05-16 19:39       ` Bjorn Helgaas
2016-05-17 16:45       ` Christoph Hellwig
2016-05-17 16:45         ` Christoph Hellwig
2016-05-11  7:45   ` Alexander Gordeev
2016-05-11  7:45     ` Alexander Gordeev
2016-05-11  8:50     ` Christoph Hellwig
2016-05-11  8:50       ` Christoph Hellwig
2016-05-11  9:44       ` Alexander Gordeev
2016-05-11  9:44         ` Alexander Gordeev
2016-05-12  7:35         ` Christoph Hellwig [this message]
2016-05-12  7:35           ` Christoph Hellwig
2016-05-12  9:44           ` Alexander Gordeev
2016-05-12  9:44             ` Alexander Gordeev
2016-05-12 11:03             ` Christoph Hellwig
2016-05-12 11:03               ` Christoph Hellwig
2016-05-12 12:11               ` Alexander Gordeev
2016-05-12 12:11                 ` Alexander Gordeev
2016-05-12 12:19                 ` Christoph Hellwig
2016-05-12 12:19                   ` Christoph Hellwig
2016-05-12 14:29                   ` Christoph Hellwig
2016-05-12 14:29                     ` Christoph Hellwig
2016-05-13  8:29                     ` Alexander Gordeev
2016-05-13  8:29                       ` Alexander Gordeev
2016-06-11  1:14                       ` Bjorn Helgaas
2016-06-11  1:14                         ` Bjorn Helgaas
2016-06-13 15:15                         ` Christoph Hellwig
2016-06-13 15:15                           ` Christoph Hellwig
2016-06-21 14:33                         ` Christoph Hellwig
2016-06-21 14:33                           ` Christoph Hellwig
2016-05-12 11:04   ` Alexander Gordeev
2016-05-12 11:04     ` Alexander Gordeev
2016-05-12 11:04     ` Christoph Hellwig
2016-05-12 11:04       ` Christoph Hellwig
2016-05-05 14:04 ` [PATCH 2/2] nvme: switch to use pci_alloc_irq_vectors Christoph Hellwig
2016-05-05 14:04   ` Christoph Hellwig
2016-05-10 15:27   ` Keith Busch
2016-05-10 15:27     ` Keith Busch

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20160512073552.GA4027@lst.de \
    --to=hch@lst.de \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.