From: Lukasz Majewski <l.majewski@majess.pl>
To: Stefan Agner <stefan@agner.ch>
Cc: mark.rutland@arm.com, linux-pwm@vger.kernel.org,
Bhuvanchandra DV <bhuvanchandra.dv@toradex.com>,
boris.brezillon@free-electrons.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
robh+dt@kernel.org, thierry.reding@gmail.com,
kernel@pengutronix.de, fabio.estevam@nxp.com,
shawnguo@kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
Lothar Wassmann <LW@karo-electronics.de>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 3/6] pwm: imx: support output polarity inversion
Date: Thu, 13 Oct 2016 06:58:12 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20161013065812.0da91859@jawa> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <ff9ba34df2729204c617685dd26ea625@agner.ch>
[-- Attachment #1.1: Type: text/plain, Size: 8568 bytes --]
Hi Stefan,
> On 2016-10-12 15:15, Lukasz Majewski wrote:
> > Hi Stefan,
> >
> >> On 2016-10-07 08:11, Bhuvanchandra DV wrote:
> >> > From: Lothar Wassmann <LW@KARO-electronics.de>
> >> >
> >> > The i.MX pwm unit on i.MX27 and newer SoCs provides a
> >> > configurable output polarity. This patch adds support to utilize
> >> > this feature where available.
> >> >
> >> > Signed-off-by: Lothar Waßmann <LW@KARO-electronics.de>
> >> > Signed-off-by: Lukasz Majewski <l.majewski@samsung.com>
> >> > Signed-off-by: Bhuvanchandra DV <bhuvanchandra.dv@toradex.com>
> >> > Acked-by: Shawn Guo <shawn.guo@linaro.org>
> >> > Reviewed-by: Sascha Hauer <s.hauer@pengutronix.de>
> >> > ---
> >> > Documentation/devicetree/bindings/pwm/imx-pwm.txt | 6 +--
> >> > drivers/pwm/pwm-imx.c | 51
> >> > +++++++++++++++++++++-- 2 files changed, 51 insertions(+), 6
> >> > deletions(-)
> >> >
> >> > diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/pwm/imx-pwm.txt
> >> > b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/pwm/imx-pwm.txt
> >> > index e00c2e9..c61bdf8 100644
> >> > --- a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/pwm/imx-pwm.txt
> >> > +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/pwm/imx-pwm.txt
> >> > @@ -6,8 +6,8 @@ Required properties:
> >> > - "fsl,imx1-pwm" for PWM compatible with the one integrated on
> >> > i.MX1
> >> > - "fsl,imx27-pwm" for PWM compatible with the one integrated
> >> > on i.MX27
> >> > - reg: physical base address and length of the controller's
> >> > registers -- #pwm-cells: should be 2. See pwm.txt in this
> >> > directory for a description of
> >> > - the cells format.
> >> > +- #pwm-cells: 2 for i.MX1 and 3 for i.MX27 and newer SoCs. See
> >> > pwm.txt
> >> > + in this directory for a description of the cells format.
> >> > - clocks : Clock specifiers for both ipg and per clocks.
> >> > - clock-names : Clock names should include both "ipg" and "per"
> >> > See the clock consumer binding,
> >> > @@ -17,7 +17,7 @@ See the clock consumer binding,
> >> > Example:
> >> >
> >> > pwm1: pwm@53fb4000 {
> >> > - #pwm-cells = <2>;
> >> > + #pwm-cells = <3>;
> >> > compatible = "fsl,imx53-pwm", "fsl,imx27-pwm";
> >> > reg = <0x53fb4000 0x4000>;
> >> > clocks = <&clks IMX5_CLK_PWM1_IPG_GATE>,
> >> > diff --git a/drivers/pwm/pwm-imx.c b/drivers/pwm/pwm-imx.c
> >> > index d600fd5..c37d223 100644
> >> > --- a/drivers/pwm/pwm-imx.c
> >> > +++ b/drivers/pwm/pwm-imx.c
> >> > @@ -38,6 +38,7 @@
> >> > #define MX3_PWMCR_DOZEEN (1 << 24)
> >> > #define MX3_PWMCR_WAITEN (1 << 23)
> >> > #define MX3_PWMCR_DBGEN (1 << 22)
> >> > +#define MX3_PWMCR_POUTC (1 << 18)
> >> > #define MX3_PWMCR_CLKSRC_IPG_HIGH (2 << 16)
> >> > #define MX3_PWMCR_CLKSRC_IPG (1 << 16)
> >> > #define MX3_PWMCR_SWR (1 << 3)
> >> > @@ -180,6 +181,9 @@ static int imx_pwm_config_v2(struct pwm_chip
> >> > *chip, if (enable)
> >> > cr |= MX3_PWMCR_EN;
> >> >
> >> > + if (pwm->args.polarity == PWM_POLARITY_INVERSED)
> >> > + cr |= MX3_PWMCR_POUTC;
> >> > +
> >>
> >> This seems wrong to me, the config callback is meant for
> >> period/duty cycle only.
> >
> > If it is meant only for that, then the polarity should be removed
> > from it.
> >
> > However after very quick testing, at least on my setup, it turns out
> > that removing this lines causes polarity to _not_ being set (and the
> > polarity is not inverted).
> >
> > I will investigate this further on my setup and hopefully sent
> > proper patch.
> >
> >> The set_polarity callback should get called in case a
> >> different polarity is requested.
> >
> > On my setup the pwm2 is set from DT and pwm_backlight_probe() calls
> > pwm_apply_args(), so everything should work. However, as I mentioned
> > above there still is some problem with inversion setting.
> >
> >>
> >>
> >> > writel(cr, imx->mmio_base + MX3_PWMCR);
> >> >
> >> > return 0;
> >> > @@ -240,27 +244,62 @@ static void imx_pwm_disable(struct pwm_chip
> >> > *chip, struct pwm_device *pwm)
> >> > clk_disable_unprepare(imx->clk_per);
> >> > }
> >> >
> >> > -static struct pwm_ops imx_pwm_ops = {
> >> > +static int imx_pwm_set_polarity(struct pwm_chip *chip, struct
> >> > pwm_device *pwm,
> >> > + enum pwm_polarity polarity)
> >> > +{
> >> > + struct imx_chip *imx = to_imx_chip(chip);
> >> > + u32 val;
> >> > +
> >> > + if (polarity == pwm->args.polarity)
> >> > + return 0;
> >>
> >> I don't think that this is right. Today, pwm_apply_args (in
> >> include/linux/pwm.h) copies the polarity from args to
> >> state.polarity, which is then passed as polarity argument to this
> >> function. So this will always return 0 afaict.
> >
> > Yes, I've overlooked it (that the state is copied).
> >
> > It can be dropped.
>
> Did you do the above test with that line dropped?
Yes. The above code has been also removed.
Best regards,
Łukasz Majewski
>
> >
> >>
> >> I would just drop that.
> >>
> >> There is probably one little problem in the current state of
> >> affairs: If the bootloader makes use of a PWM channel with
> >> inverted state, then the kernel would not know about that and
> >> currently assume a wrong initial state... I guess at one point in
> >> time we should implement the state retrieval callback and move to
> >> the new atomic PWM API, which would mean to implement apply
> >> callback.
> >
> > Are there any patches on the horizon?
> >
>
> Not that I know of...
>
> --
> Stefan
>
> >>
> >> --
> >> Stefan
> >>
> >>
> >> > +
> >> > + val = readl(imx->mmio_base + MX3_PWMCR);
> >> > +
> >> > + if (polarity == PWM_POLARITY_INVERSED)
> >> > + val |= MX3_PWMCR_POUTC;
> >> > + else
> >> > + val &= ~MX3_PWMCR_POUTC;
> >> > +
> >> > + writel(val, imx->mmio_base + MX3_PWMCR);
> >> > +
> >> > + dev_dbg(imx->chip.dev, "%s: polarity set to %s\n",
> >> > __func__,
> >> > + polarity == PWM_POLARITY_INVERSED ? "inverted" :
> >> > "normal"); +
> >> > + return 0;
> >> > +}
> >> > +
> >> > +static struct pwm_ops imx_pwm_ops_v1 = {
> >> > .enable = imx_pwm_enable,
> >> > .disable = imx_pwm_disable,
> >> > .config = imx_pwm_config,
> >> > .owner = THIS_MODULE,
> >> > };
> >> >
> >> > +static struct pwm_ops imx_pwm_ops_v2 = {
> >> > + .enable = imx_pwm_enable,
> >> > + .disable = imx_pwm_disable,
> >> > + .set_polarity = imx_pwm_set_polarity,
> >> > + .config = imx_pwm_config,
> >> > + .owner = THIS_MODULE,
> >> > +};
> >> > +
> >> > struct imx_pwm_data {
> >> > int (*config)(struct pwm_chip *chip,
> >> > struct pwm_device *pwm, int duty_ns, int
> >> > period_ns); void (*set_enable)(struct pwm_chip *chip, bool
> >> > enable);
> >> > + struct pwm_ops *pwm_ops;
> >> > };
> >> >
> >> > static struct imx_pwm_data imx_pwm_data_v1 = {
> >> > .config = imx_pwm_config_v1,
> >> > .set_enable = imx_pwm_set_enable_v1,
> >> > + .pwm_ops = &imx_pwm_ops_v1,
> >> > };
> >> >
> >> > static struct imx_pwm_data imx_pwm_data_v2 = {
> >> > .config = imx_pwm_config_v2,
> >> > .set_enable = imx_pwm_set_enable_v2,
> >> > + .pwm_ops = &imx_pwm_ops_v2,
> >> > };
> >> >
> >> > static const struct of_device_id imx_pwm_dt_ids[] = {
> >> > @@ -282,6 +321,8 @@ static int imx_pwm_probe(struct
> >> > platform_device *pdev) if (!of_id)
> >> > return -ENODEV;
> >> >
> >> > + data = of_id->data;
> >> > +
> >> > imx = devm_kzalloc(&pdev->dev, sizeof(*imx),
> >> > GFP_KERNEL); if (imx == NULL)
> >> > return -ENOMEM;
> >> > @@ -300,18 +341,22 @@ static int imx_pwm_probe(struct
> >> > platform_device *pdev) return PTR_ERR(imx->clk_ipg);
> >> > }
> >> >
> >> > - imx->chip.ops = &imx_pwm_ops;
> >> > + imx->chip.ops = data->pwm_ops;
> >> > imx->chip.dev = &pdev->dev;
> >> > imx->chip.base = -1;
> >> > imx->chip.npwm = 1;
> >> > imx->chip.can_sleep = true;
> >> > + if (data->pwm_ops->set_polarity) {
> >> > + dev_dbg(&pdev->dev, "PWM supports output
> >> > inversion\n");
> >> > + imx->chip.of_xlate = of_pwm_xlate_with_flags;
> >> > + imx->chip.of_pwm_n_cells = 3;
> >> > + }
> >> >
> >> > r = platform_get_resource(pdev, IORESOURCE_MEM, 0);
> >> > imx->mmio_base = devm_ioremap_resource(&pdev->dev, r);
> >> > if (IS_ERR(imx->mmio_base))
> >> > return PTR_ERR(imx->mmio_base);
> >> >
> >> > - data = of_id->data;
> >> > imx->config = data->config;
> >> > imx->set_enable = data->set_enable;
> >>
> >
> > Best regards,
> >
> > Łukasz Majewski
[-- Attachment #1.2: OpenPGP digital signature --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 181 bytes --]
[-- Attachment #2: Type: text/plain, Size: 176 bytes --]
_______________________________________________
linux-arm-kernel mailing list
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: l.majewski@majess.pl (Lukasz Majewski)
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: [PATCH v3 3/6] pwm: imx: support output polarity inversion
Date: Thu, 13 Oct 2016 06:58:12 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20161013065812.0da91859@jawa> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <ff9ba34df2729204c617685dd26ea625@agner.ch>
Hi Stefan,
> On 2016-10-12 15:15, Lukasz Majewski wrote:
> > Hi Stefan,
> >
> >> On 2016-10-07 08:11, Bhuvanchandra DV wrote:
> >> > From: Lothar Wassmann <LW@KARO-electronics.de>
> >> >
> >> > The i.MX pwm unit on i.MX27 and newer SoCs provides a
> >> > configurable output polarity. This patch adds support to utilize
> >> > this feature where available.
> >> >
> >> > Signed-off-by: Lothar Wa?mann <LW@KARO-electronics.de>
> >> > Signed-off-by: Lukasz Majewski <l.majewski@samsung.com>
> >> > Signed-off-by: Bhuvanchandra DV <bhuvanchandra.dv@toradex.com>
> >> > Acked-by: Shawn Guo <shawn.guo@linaro.org>
> >> > Reviewed-by: Sascha Hauer <s.hauer@pengutronix.de>
> >> > ---
> >> > Documentation/devicetree/bindings/pwm/imx-pwm.txt | 6 +--
> >> > drivers/pwm/pwm-imx.c | 51
> >> > +++++++++++++++++++++-- 2 files changed, 51 insertions(+), 6
> >> > deletions(-)
> >> >
> >> > diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/pwm/imx-pwm.txt
> >> > b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/pwm/imx-pwm.txt
> >> > index e00c2e9..c61bdf8 100644
> >> > --- a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/pwm/imx-pwm.txt
> >> > +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/pwm/imx-pwm.txt
> >> > @@ -6,8 +6,8 @@ Required properties:
> >> > - "fsl,imx1-pwm" for PWM compatible with the one integrated on
> >> > i.MX1
> >> > - "fsl,imx27-pwm" for PWM compatible with the one integrated
> >> > on i.MX27
> >> > - reg: physical base address and length of the controller's
> >> > registers -- #pwm-cells: should be 2. See pwm.txt in this
> >> > directory for a description of
> >> > - the cells format.
> >> > +- #pwm-cells: 2 for i.MX1 and 3 for i.MX27 and newer SoCs. See
> >> > pwm.txt
> >> > + in this directory for a description of the cells format.
> >> > - clocks : Clock specifiers for both ipg and per clocks.
> >> > - clock-names : Clock names should include both "ipg" and "per"
> >> > See the clock consumer binding,
> >> > @@ -17,7 +17,7 @@ See the clock consumer binding,
> >> > Example:
> >> >
> >> > pwm1: pwm at 53fb4000 {
> >> > - #pwm-cells = <2>;
> >> > + #pwm-cells = <3>;
> >> > compatible = "fsl,imx53-pwm", "fsl,imx27-pwm";
> >> > reg = <0x53fb4000 0x4000>;
> >> > clocks = <&clks IMX5_CLK_PWM1_IPG_GATE>,
> >> > diff --git a/drivers/pwm/pwm-imx.c b/drivers/pwm/pwm-imx.c
> >> > index d600fd5..c37d223 100644
> >> > --- a/drivers/pwm/pwm-imx.c
> >> > +++ b/drivers/pwm/pwm-imx.c
> >> > @@ -38,6 +38,7 @@
> >> > #define MX3_PWMCR_DOZEEN (1 << 24)
> >> > #define MX3_PWMCR_WAITEN (1 << 23)
> >> > #define MX3_PWMCR_DBGEN (1 << 22)
> >> > +#define MX3_PWMCR_POUTC (1 << 18)
> >> > #define MX3_PWMCR_CLKSRC_IPG_HIGH (2 << 16)
> >> > #define MX3_PWMCR_CLKSRC_IPG (1 << 16)
> >> > #define MX3_PWMCR_SWR (1 << 3)
> >> > @@ -180,6 +181,9 @@ static int imx_pwm_config_v2(struct pwm_chip
> >> > *chip, if (enable)
> >> > cr |= MX3_PWMCR_EN;
> >> >
> >> > + if (pwm->args.polarity == PWM_POLARITY_INVERSED)
> >> > + cr |= MX3_PWMCR_POUTC;
> >> > +
> >>
> >> This seems wrong to me, the config callback is meant for
> >> period/duty cycle only.
> >
> > If it is meant only for that, then the polarity should be removed
> > from it.
> >
> > However after very quick testing, at least on my setup, it turns out
> > that removing this lines causes polarity to _not_ being set (and the
> > polarity is not inverted).
> >
> > I will investigate this further on my setup and hopefully sent
> > proper patch.
> >
> >> The set_polarity callback should get called in case a
> >> different polarity is requested.
> >
> > On my setup the pwm2 is set from DT and pwm_backlight_probe() calls
> > pwm_apply_args(), so everything should work. However, as I mentioned
> > above there still is some problem with inversion setting.
> >
> >>
> >>
> >> > writel(cr, imx->mmio_base + MX3_PWMCR);
> >> >
> >> > return 0;
> >> > @@ -240,27 +244,62 @@ static void imx_pwm_disable(struct pwm_chip
> >> > *chip, struct pwm_device *pwm)
> >> > clk_disable_unprepare(imx->clk_per);
> >> > }
> >> >
> >> > -static struct pwm_ops imx_pwm_ops = {
> >> > +static int imx_pwm_set_polarity(struct pwm_chip *chip, struct
> >> > pwm_device *pwm,
> >> > + enum pwm_polarity polarity)
> >> > +{
> >> > + struct imx_chip *imx = to_imx_chip(chip);
> >> > + u32 val;
> >> > +
> >> > + if (polarity == pwm->args.polarity)
> >> > + return 0;
> >>
> >> I don't think that this is right. Today, pwm_apply_args (in
> >> include/linux/pwm.h) copies the polarity from args to
> >> state.polarity, which is then passed as polarity argument to this
> >> function. So this will always return 0 afaict.
> >
> > Yes, I've overlooked it (that the state is copied).
> >
> > It can be dropped.
>
> Did you do the above test with that line dropped?
Yes. The above code has been also removed.
Best regards,
?ukasz Majewski
>
> >
> >>
> >> I would just drop that.
> >>
> >> There is probably one little problem in the current state of
> >> affairs: If the bootloader makes use of a PWM channel with
> >> inverted state, then the kernel would not know about that and
> >> currently assume a wrong initial state... I guess at one point in
> >> time we should implement the state retrieval callback and move to
> >> the new atomic PWM API, which would mean to implement apply
> >> callback.
> >
> > Are there any patches on the horizon?
> >
>
> Not that I know of...
>
> --
> Stefan
>
> >>
> >> --
> >> Stefan
> >>
> >>
> >> > +
> >> > + val = readl(imx->mmio_base + MX3_PWMCR);
> >> > +
> >> > + if (polarity == PWM_POLARITY_INVERSED)
> >> > + val |= MX3_PWMCR_POUTC;
> >> > + else
> >> > + val &= ~MX3_PWMCR_POUTC;
> >> > +
> >> > + writel(val, imx->mmio_base + MX3_PWMCR);
> >> > +
> >> > + dev_dbg(imx->chip.dev, "%s: polarity set to %s\n",
> >> > __func__,
> >> > + polarity == PWM_POLARITY_INVERSED ? "inverted" :
> >> > "normal"); +
> >> > + return 0;
> >> > +}
> >> > +
> >> > +static struct pwm_ops imx_pwm_ops_v1 = {
> >> > .enable = imx_pwm_enable,
> >> > .disable = imx_pwm_disable,
> >> > .config = imx_pwm_config,
> >> > .owner = THIS_MODULE,
> >> > };
> >> >
> >> > +static struct pwm_ops imx_pwm_ops_v2 = {
> >> > + .enable = imx_pwm_enable,
> >> > + .disable = imx_pwm_disable,
> >> > + .set_polarity = imx_pwm_set_polarity,
> >> > + .config = imx_pwm_config,
> >> > + .owner = THIS_MODULE,
> >> > +};
> >> > +
> >> > struct imx_pwm_data {
> >> > int (*config)(struct pwm_chip *chip,
> >> > struct pwm_device *pwm, int duty_ns, int
> >> > period_ns); void (*set_enable)(struct pwm_chip *chip, bool
> >> > enable);
> >> > + struct pwm_ops *pwm_ops;
> >> > };
> >> >
> >> > static struct imx_pwm_data imx_pwm_data_v1 = {
> >> > .config = imx_pwm_config_v1,
> >> > .set_enable = imx_pwm_set_enable_v1,
> >> > + .pwm_ops = &imx_pwm_ops_v1,
> >> > };
> >> >
> >> > static struct imx_pwm_data imx_pwm_data_v2 = {
> >> > .config = imx_pwm_config_v2,
> >> > .set_enable = imx_pwm_set_enable_v2,
> >> > + .pwm_ops = &imx_pwm_ops_v2,
> >> > };
> >> >
> >> > static const struct of_device_id imx_pwm_dt_ids[] = {
> >> > @@ -282,6 +321,8 @@ static int imx_pwm_probe(struct
> >> > platform_device *pdev) if (!of_id)
> >> > return -ENODEV;
> >> >
> >> > + data = of_id->data;
> >> > +
> >> > imx = devm_kzalloc(&pdev->dev, sizeof(*imx),
> >> > GFP_KERNEL); if (imx == NULL)
> >> > return -ENOMEM;
> >> > @@ -300,18 +341,22 @@ static int imx_pwm_probe(struct
> >> > platform_device *pdev) return PTR_ERR(imx->clk_ipg);
> >> > }
> >> >
> >> > - imx->chip.ops = &imx_pwm_ops;
> >> > + imx->chip.ops = data->pwm_ops;
> >> > imx->chip.dev = &pdev->dev;
> >> > imx->chip.base = -1;
> >> > imx->chip.npwm = 1;
> >> > imx->chip.can_sleep = true;
> >> > + if (data->pwm_ops->set_polarity) {
> >> > + dev_dbg(&pdev->dev, "PWM supports output
> >> > inversion\n");
> >> > + imx->chip.of_xlate = of_pwm_xlate_with_flags;
> >> > + imx->chip.of_pwm_n_cells = 3;
> >> > + }
> >> >
> >> > r = platform_get_resource(pdev, IORESOURCE_MEM, 0);
> >> > imx->mmio_base = devm_ioremap_resource(&pdev->dev, r);
> >> > if (IS_ERR(imx->mmio_base))
> >> > return PTR_ERR(imx->mmio_base);
> >> >
> >> > - data = of_id->data;
> >> > imx->config = data->config;
> >> > imx->set_enable = data->set_enable;
> >>
> >
> > Best regards,
> >
> > ?ukasz Majewski
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 181 bytes
Desc: OpenPGP digital signature
URL: <http://lists.infradead.org/pipermail/linux-arm-kernel/attachments/20161013/03447ea2/attachment-0001.sig>
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Lukasz Majewski <l.majewski@majess.pl>
To: Stefan Agner <stefan@agner.ch>
Cc: Bhuvanchandra DV <bhuvanchandra.dv@toradex.com>,
shawnguo@kernel.org, thierry.reding@gmail.com,
robh+dt@kernel.org, mark.rutland@arm.com, kernel@pengutronix.de,
fabio.estevam@nxp.com, linux-pwm@vger.kernel.org,
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
Lothar Wassmann <LW@karo-electronics.de>,
boris.brezillon@free-electrons.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 3/6] pwm: imx: support output polarity inversion
Date: Thu, 13 Oct 2016 06:58:12 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20161013065812.0da91859@jawa> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <ff9ba34df2729204c617685dd26ea625@agner.ch>
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 8568 bytes --]
Hi Stefan,
> On 2016-10-12 15:15, Lukasz Majewski wrote:
> > Hi Stefan,
> >
> >> On 2016-10-07 08:11, Bhuvanchandra DV wrote:
> >> > From: Lothar Wassmann <LW@KARO-electronics.de>
> >> >
> >> > The i.MX pwm unit on i.MX27 and newer SoCs provides a
> >> > configurable output polarity. This patch adds support to utilize
> >> > this feature where available.
> >> >
> >> > Signed-off-by: Lothar Waßmann <LW@KARO-electronics.de>
> >> > Signed-off-by: Lukasz Majewski <l.majewski@samsung.com>
> >> > Signed-off-by: Bhuvanchandra DV <bhuvanchandra.dv@toradex.com>
> >> > Acked-by: Shawn Guo <shawn.guo@linaro.org>
> >> > Reviewed-by: Sascha Hauer <s.hauer@pengutronix.de>
> >> > ---
> >> > Documentation/devicetree/bindings/pwm/imx-pwm.txt | 6 +--
> >> > drivers/pwm/pwm-imx.c | 51
> >> > +++++++++++++++++++++-- 2 files changed, 51 insertions(+), 6
> >> > deletions(-)
> >> >
> >> > diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/pwm/imx-pwm.txt
> >> > b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/pwm/imx-pwm.txt
> >> > index e00c2e9..c61bdf8 100644
> >> > --- a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/pwm/imx-pwm.txt
> >> > +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/pwm/imx-pwm.txt
> >> > @@ -6,8 +6,8 @@ Required properties:
> >> > - "fsl,imx1-pwm" for PWM compatible with the one integrated on
> >> > i.MX1
> >> > - "fsl,imx27-pwm" for PWM compatible with the one integrated
> >> > on i.MX27
> >> > - reg: physical base address and length of the controller's
> >> > registers -- #pwm-cells: should be 2. See pwm.txt in this
> >> > directory for a description of
> >> > - the cells format.
> >> > +- #pwm-cells: 2 for i.MX1 and 3 for i.MX27 and newer SoCs. See
> >> > pwm.txt
> >> > + in this directory for a description of the cells format.
> >> > - clocks : Clock specifiers for both ipg and per clocks.
> >> > - clock-names : Clock names should include both "ipg" and "per"
> >> > See the clock consumer binding,
> >> > @@ -17,7 +17,7 @@ See the clock consumer binding,
> >> > Example:
> >> >
> >> > pwm1: pwm@53fb4000 {
> >> > - #pwm-cells = <2>;
> >> > + #pwm-cells = <3>;
> >> > compatible = "fsl,imx53-pwm", "fsl,imx27-pwm";
> >> > reg = <0x53fb4000 0x4000>;
> >> > clocks = <&clks IMX5_CLK_PWM1_IPG_GATE>,
> >> > diff --git a/drivers/pwm/pwm-imx.c b/drivers/pwm/pwm-imx.c
> >> > index d600fd5..c37d223 100644
> >> > --- a/drivers/pwm/pwm-imx.c
> >> > +++ b/drivers/pwm/pwm-imx.c
> >> > @@ -38,6 +38,7 @@
> >> > #define MX3_PWMCR_DOZEEN (1 << 24)
> >> > #define MX3_PWMCR_WAITEN (1 << 23)
> >> > #define MX3_PWMCR_DBGEN (1 << 22)
> >> > +#define MX3_PWMCR_POUTC (1 << 18)
> >> > #define MX3_PWMCR_CLKSRC_IPG_HIGH (2 << 16)
> >> > #define MX3_PWMCR_CLKSRC_IPG (1 << 16)
> >> > #define MX3_PWMCR_SWR (1 << 3)
> >> > @@ -180,6 +181,9 @@ static int imx_pwm_config_v2(struct pwm_chip
> >> > *chip, if (enable)
> >> > cr |= MX3_PWMCR_EN;
> >> >
> >> > + if (pwm->args.polarity == PWM_POLARITY_INVERSED)
> >> > + cr |= MX3_PWMCR_POUTC;
> >> > +
> >>
> >> This seems wrong to me, the config callback is meant for
> >> period/duty cycle only.
> >
> > If it is meant only for that, then the polarity should be removed
> > from it.
> >
> > However after very quick testing, at least on my setup, it turns out
> > that removing this lines causes polarity to _not_ being set (and the
> > polarity is not inverted).
> >
> > I will investigate this further on my setup and hopefully sent
> > proper patch.
> >
> >> The set_polarity callback should get called in case a
> >> different polarity is requested.
> >
> > On my setup the pwm2 is set from DT and pwm_backlight_probe() calls
> > pwm_apply_args(), so everything should work. However, as I mentioned
> > above there still is some problem with inversion setting.
> >
> >>
> >>
> >> > writel(cr, imx->mmio_base + MX3_PWMCR);
> >> >
> >> > return 0;
> >> > @@ -240,27 +244,62 @@ static void imx_pwm_disable(struct pwm_chip
> >> > *chip, struct pwm_device *pwm)
> >> > clk_disable_unprepare(imx->clk_per);
> >> > }
> >> >
> >> > -static struct pwm_ops imx_pwm_ops = {
> >> > +static int imx_pwm_set_polarity(struct pwm_chip *chip, struct
> >> > pwm_device *pwm,
> >> > + enum pwm_polarity polarity)
> >> > +{
> >> > + struct imx_chip *imx = to_imx_chip(chip);
> >> > + u32 val;
> >> > +
> >> > + if (polarity == pwm->args.polarity)
> >> > + return 0;
> >>
> >> I don't think that this is right. Today, pwm_apply_args (in
> >> include/linux/pwm.h) copies the polarity from args to
> >> state.polarity, which is then passed as polarity argument to this
> >> function. So this will always return 0 afaict.
> >
> > Yes, I've overlooked it (that the state is copied).
> >
> > It can be dropped.
>
> Did you do the above test with that line dropped?
Yes. The above code has been also removed.
Best regards,
Łukasz Majewski
>
> >
> >>
> >> I would just drop that.
> >>
> >> There is probably one little problem in the current state of
> >> affairs: If the bootloader makes use of a PWM channel with
> >> inverted state, then the kernel would not know about that and
> >> currently assume a wrong initial state... I guess at one point in
> >> time we should implement the state retrieval callback and move to
> >> the new atomic PWM API, which would mean to implement apply
> >> callback.
> >
> > Are there any patches on the horizon?
> >
>
> Not that I know of...
>
> --
> Stefan
>
> >>
> >> --
> >> Stefan
> >>
> >>
> >> > +
> >> > + val = readl(imx->mmio_base + MX3_PWMCR);
> >> > +
> >> > + if (polarity == PWM_POLARITY_INVERSED)
> >> > + val |= MX3_PWMCR_POUTC;
> >> > + else
> >> > + val &= ~MX3_PWMCR_POUTC;
> >> > +
> >> > + writel(val, imx->mmio_base + MX3_PWMCR);
> >> > +
> >> > + dev_dbg(imx->chip.dev, "%s: polarity set to %s\n",
> >> > __func__,
> >> > + polarity == PWM_POLARITY_INVERSED ? "inverted" :
> >> > "normal"); +
> >> > + return 0;
> >> > +}
> >> > +
> >> > +static struct pwm_ops imx_pwm_ops_v1 = {
> >> > .enable = imx_pwm_enable,
> >> > .disable = imx_pwm_disable,
> >> > .config = imx_pwm_config,
> >> > .owner = THIS_MODULE,
> >> > };
> >> >
> >> > +static struct pwm_ops imx_pwm_ops_v2 = {
> >> > + .enable = imx_pwm_enable,
> >> > + .disable = imx_pwm_disable,
> >> > + .set_polarity = imx_pwm_set_polarity,
> >> > + .config = imx_pwm_config,
> >> > + .owner = THIS_MODULE,
> >> > +};
> >> > +
> >> > struct imx_pwm_data {
> >> > int (*config)(struct pwm_chip *chip,
> >> > struct pwm_device *pwm, int duty_ns, int
> >> > period_ns); void (*set_enable)(struct pwm_chip *chip, bool
> >> > enable);
> >> > + struct pwm_ops *pwm_ops;
> >> > };
> >> >
> >> > static struct imx_pwm_data imx_pwm_data_v1 = {
> >> > .config = imx_pwm_config_v1,
> >> > .set_enable = imx_pwm_set_enable_v1,
> >> > + .pwm_ops = &imx_pwm_ops_v1,
> >> > };
> >> >
> >> > static struct imx_pwm_data imx_pwm_data_v2 = {
> >> > .config = imx_pwm_config_v2,
> >> > .set_enable = imx_pwm_set_enable_v2,
> >> > + .pwm_ops = &imx_pwm_ops_v2,
> >> > };
> >> >
> >> > static const struct of_device_id imx_pwm_dt_ids[] = {
> >> > @@ -282,6 +321,8 @@ static int imx_pwm_probe(struct
> >> > platform_device *pdev) if (!of_id)
> >> > return -ENODEV;
> >> >
> >> > + data = of_id->data;
> >> > +
> >> > imx = devm_kzalloc(&pdev->dev, sizeof(*imx),
> >> > GFP_KERNEL); if (imx == NULL)
> >> > return -ENOMEM;
> >> > @@ -300,18 +341,22 @@ static int imx_pwm_probe(struct
> >> > platform_device *pdev) return PTR_ERR(imx->clk_ipg);
> >> > }
> >> >
> >> > - imx->chip.ops = &imx_pwm_ops;
> >> > + imx->chip.ops = data->pwm_ops;
> >> > imx->chip.dev = &pdev->dev;
> >> > imx->chip.base = -1;
> >> > imx->chip.npwm = 1;
> >> > imx->chip.can_sleep = true;
> >> > + if (data->pwm_ops->set_polarity) {
> >> > + dev_dbg(&pdev->dev, "PWM supports output
> >> > inversion\n");
> >> > + imx->chip.of_xlate = of_pwm_xlate_with_flags;
> >> > + imx->chip.of_pwm_n_cells = 3;
> >> > + }
> >> >
> >> > r = platform_get_resource(pdev, IORESOURCE_MEM, 0);
> >> > imx->mmio_base = devm_ioremap_resource(&pdev->dev, r);
> >> > if (IS_ERR(imx->mmio_base))
> >> > return PTR_ERR(imx->mmio_base);
> >> >
> >> > - data = of_id->data;
> >> > imx->config = data->config;
> >> > imx->set_enable = data->set_enable;
> >>
> >
> > Best regards,
> >
> > Łukasz Majewski
[-- Attachment #2: OpenPGP digital signature --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 181 bytes --]
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2016-10-13 4:58 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 54+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2016-10-07 15:11 [PATCH v3 0/6] Support PWM polarity control Bhuvanchandra DV
2016-10-07 15:11 ` Bhuvanchandra DV
2016-10-07 15:11 ` Bhuvanchandra DV
2016-10-07 15:11 ` [PATCH v3 1/6] pwm: print error messages with pr_err() instead of pr_debug() Bhuvanchandra DV
2016-10-07 15:11 ` Bhuvanchandra DV
2016-10-07 15:11 ` Bhuvanchandra DV
2016-10-07 15:11 ` [PATCH v3 2/6] pwm: core: make the PWM_POLARITY flag in DTB optional Bhuvanchandra DV
2016-10-07 15:11 ` Bhuvanchandra DV
2016-10-07 15:11 ` Bhuvanchandra DV
2016-10-07 15:11 ` [PATCH v3 3/6] pwm: imx: support output polarity inversion Bhuvanchandra DV
2016-10-07 15:11 ` Bhuvanchandra DV
2016-10-07 15:11 ` Bhuvanchandra DV
2016-10-08 14:32 ` Lukasz Majewski
2016-10-08 14:32 ` Lukasz Majewski
2016-10-08 14:32 ` Lukasz Majewski
2016-10-10 21:01 ` Stefan Agner
2016-10-10 21:01 ` Stefan Agner
2016-10-12 22:15 ` Lukasz Majewski
2016-10-12 22:15 ` Lukasz Majewski
2016-10-12 22:15 ` Lukasz Majewski
2016-10-12 23:18 ` Stefan Agner
2016-10-12 23:18 ` Stefan Agner
2016-10-13 4:58 ` Lukasz Majewski [this message]
2016-10-13 4:58 ` Lukasz Majewski
2016-10-13 4:58 ` Lukasz Majewski
2016-10-20 8:30 ` Lukasz Majewski
2016-10-20 8:30 ` Lukasz Majewski
2016-10-20 22:46 ` Stefan Agner
2016-10-20 22:46 ` Stefan Agner
2016-10-21 21:49 ` Lukasz Majewski
2016-10-21 21:49 ` Lukasz Majewski
2016-10-21 21:49 ` Lukasz Majewski
2016-10-22 10:57 ` Boris Brezillon
2016-10-22 10:57 ` Boris Brezillon
2016-10-22 12:01 ` Boris Brezillon
2016-10-22 12:01 ` Boris Brezillon
2016-10-22 12:01 ` Boris Brezillon
2016-10-23 6:40 ` Lukasz Majewski
2016-10-23 6:40 ` Lukasz Majewski
[not found] ` <20161007151129.6043-4-bhuvanchandra.dv-2KBjVHiyJgBBDgjK7y7TUQ@public.gmane.org>
2016-10-10 17:10 ` Rob Herring
2016-10-10 17:10 ` Rob Herring
2016-10-10 17:10 ` Rob Herring
2016-10-22 10:33 ` Boris Brezillon
2016-10-22 10:33 ` Boris Brezillon
2016-10-22 10:33 ` Boris Brezillon
2016-10-07 15:11 ` [PATCH v3 4/6] arm: dts: imx7: Update #pwm-cells for PWM polarity control Bhuvanchandra DV
2016-10-07 15:11 ` Bhuvanchandra DV
2016-10-07 15:11 ` Bhuvanchandra DV
2016-10-07 15:11 ` [PATCH v3 5/6] arm: dts: imx7-colibri: Use pwm " Bhuvanchandra DV
2016-10-07 15:11 ` Bhuvanchandra DV
2016-10-07 15:11 ` Bhuvanchandra DV
2016-10-07 15:11 ` [PATCH v3 6/6] arm: dts: imx7-colibri: Use enable-gpios for BL_ON Bhuvanchandra DV
2016-10-07 15:11 ` Bhuvanchandra DV
2016-10-07 15:11 ` Bhuvanchandra DV
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20161013065812.0da91859@jawa \
--to=l.majewski@majess.pl \
--cc=LW@karo-electronics.de \
--cc=bhuvanchandra.dv@toradex.com \
--cc=boris.brezillon@free-electrons.com \
--cc=fabio.estevam@nxp.com \
--cc=kernel@pengutronix.de \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-pwm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mark.rutland@arm.com \
--cc=robh+dt@kernel.org \
--cc=shawnguo@kernel.org \
--cc=stefan@agner.ch \
--cc=thierry.reding@gmail.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.