All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Boris Brezillon <boris.brezillon-wi1+55ScJUtKEb57/3fJTNBPR1lH4CV8@public.gmane.org>
To: Bhuvanchandra DV
	<bhuvanchandra.dv-2KBjVHiyJgBBDgjK7y7TUQ@public.gmane.org>
Cc: shawnguo-DgEjT+Ai2ygdnm+yROfE0A@public.gmane.org,
	thierry.reding-Re5JQEeQqe8AvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org,
	mark.rutland-5wv7dgnIgG8@public.gmane.org,
	linux-pwm-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org,
	l.majewski-Sze3O3UU22JBDgjK7y7TUQ@public.gmane.org,
	devicetree-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org,
	linux-kernel-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org,
	stefan-XLVq0VzYD2Y@public.gmane.org,
	robh+dt-DgEjT+Ai2ygdnm+yROfE0A@public.gmane.org,
	kernel-bIcnvbaLZ9MEGnE8C9+IrQ@public.gmane.org,
	fabio.estevam-3arQi8VN3Tc@public.gmane.org,
	linux-arm-kernel-IAPFreCvJWM7uuMidbF8XUB+6BGkLq7r@public.gmane.org,
	Lothar Wassmann
	<LW-bxm8fMRDkQLDiMYJYoSAnRvVK+yQ3ZXh@public.gmane.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 3/6] pwm: imx: support output polarity inversion
Date: Sat, 22 Oct 2016 12:33:37 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20161022123337.57eaa34f@bbrezillon> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20161007151129.6043-4-bhuvanchandra.dv-2KBjVHiyJgBBDgjK7y7TUQ@public.gmane.org>

On Fri, 7 Oct 2016 20:41:26 +0530
Bhuvanchandra DV <bhuvanchandra.dv-2KBjVHiyJgBBDgjK7y7TUQ@public.gmane.org> wrote:

> From: Lothar Wassmann <LW-bxm8fMRDkQLDiMYJYoSAnRvVK+yQ3ZXh@public.gmane.org>
> 
> The i.MX pwm unit on i.MX27 and newer SoCs provides a configurable output
> polarity. This patch adds support to utilize this feature where available.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Lothar Waßmann <LW-bxm8fMRDkQLDiMYJYoSAnRvVK+yQ3ZXh@public.gmane.org>
> Signed-off-by: Lukasz Majewski <l.majewski-Sze3O3UU22JBDgjK7y7TUQ@public.gmane.org>
> Signed-off-by: Bhuvanchandra DV <bhuvanchandra.dv-2KBjVHiyJgBBDgjK7y7TUQ@public.gmane.org>
> Acked-by: Shawn Guo <shawn.guo-QSEj5FYQhm4dnm+yROfE0A@public.gmane.org>
> Reviewed-by: Sascha Hauer <s.hauer-bIcnvbaLZ9MEGnE8C9+IrQ@public.gmane.org>
> ---
>  Documentation/devicetree/bindings/pwm/imx-pwm.txt |  6 +--
>  drivers/pwm/pwm-imx.c                             | 51 +++++++++++++++++++++--
>  2 files changed, 51 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/pwm/imx-pwm.txt b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/pwm/imx-pwm.txt
> index e00c2e9..c61bdf8 100644
> --- a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/pwm/imx-pwm.txt
> +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/pwm/imx-pwm.txt
> @@ -6,8 +6,8 @@ Required properties:
>    - "fsl,imx1-pwm" for PWM compatible with the one integrated on i.MX1
>    - "fsl,imx27-pwm" for PWM compatible with the one integrated on i.MX27
>  - reg: physical base address and length of the controller's registers
> -- #pwm-cells: should be 2. See pwm.txt in this directory for a description of
> -  the cells format.
> +- #pwm-cells: 2 for i.MX1 and 3 for i.MX27 and newer SoCs. See pwm.txt
> +  in this directory for a description of the cells format.
>  - clocks : Clock specifiers for both ipg and per clocks.
>  - clock-names : Clock names should include both "ipg" and "per"
>  See the clock consumer binding,
> @@ -17,7 +17,7 @@ See the clock consumer binding,
>  Example:
>  
>  pwm1: pwm@53fb4000 {
> -	#pwm-cells = <2>;
> +	#pwm-cells = <3>;
>  	compatible = "fsl,imx53-pwm", "fsl,imx27-pwm";
>  	reg = <0x53fb4000 0x4000>;
>  	clocks = <&clks IMX5_CLK_PWM1_IPG_GATE>,
> diff --git a/drivers/pwm/pwm-imx.c b/drivers/pwm/pwm-imx.c
> index d600fd5..c37d223 100644
> --- a/drivers/pwm/pwm-imx.c
> +++ b/drivers/pwm/pwm-imx.c
> @@ -38,6 +38,7 @@
>  #define MX3_PWMCR_DOZEEN		(1 << 24)
>  #define MX3_PWMCR_WAITEN		(1 << 23)
>  #define MX3_PWMCR_DBGEN			(1 << 22)
> +#define MX3_PWMCR_POUTC			(1 << 18)
>  #define MX3_PWMCR_CLKSRC_IPG_HIGH	(2 << 16)
>  #define MX3_PWMCR_CLKSRC_IPG		(1 << 16)
>  #define MX3_PWMCR_SWR			(1 << 3)
> @@ -180,6 +181,9 @@ static int imx_pwm_config_v2(struct pwm_chip *chip,
>  	if (enable)
>  		cr |= MX3_PWMCR_EN;
>  
> +	if (pwm->args.polarity == PWM_POLARITY_INVERSED)
> +		cr |= MX3_PWMCR_POUTC;
> +
>  	writel(cr, imx->mmio_base + MX3_PWMCR);
>  
>  	return 0;
> @@ -240,27 +244,62 @@ static void imx_pwm_disable(struct pwm_chip *chip, struct pwm_device *pwm)
>  	clk_disable_unprepare(imx->clk_per);
>  }
>  
> -static struct pwm_ops imx_pwm_ops = {
> +static int imx_pwm_set_polarity(struct pwm_chip *chip, struct pwm_device *pwm,
> +				enum pwm_polarity polarity)
> +{
> +	struct imx_chip *imx = to_imx_chip(chip);
> +	u32 val;
> +
> +	if (polarity == pwm->args.polarity)
> +		return 0;
> +
> +	val = readl(imx->mmio_base + MX3_PWMCR);
> +
> +	if (polarity == PWM_POLARITY_INVERSED)
> +		val |= MX3_PWMCR_POUTC;
> +	else
> +		val &= ~MX3_PWMCR_POUTC;
> +
> +	writel(val, imx->mmio_base + MX3_PWMCR);
> +
> +	dev_dbg(imx->chip.dev, "%s: polarity set to %s\n", __func__,
> +		polarity == PWM_POLARITY_INVERSED ? "inverted" : "normal");
> +
> +	return 0;
> +}

I'll read the discussion Lukasz and Stefan had before reviewing this
part ;-).

> +
> +static struct pwm_ops imx_pwm_ops_v1 = {
>  	.enable = imx_pwm_enable,
>  	.disable = imx_pwm_disable,
>  	.config = imx_pwm_config,
>  	.owner = THIS_MODULE,
>  };
>  
> +static struct pwm_ops imx_pwm_ops_v2 = {
> +	.enable = imx_pwm_enable,
> +	.disable = imx_pwm_disable,
> +	.set_polarity = imx_pwm_set_polarity,
> +	.config = imx_pwm_config,
> +	.owner = THIS_MODULE,
> +};
> +
>  struct imx_pwm_data {
>  	int (*config)(struct pwm_chip *chip,
>  		struct pwm_device *pwm, int duty_ns, int period_ns);
>  	void (*set_enable)(struct pwm_chip *chip, bool enable);
> +	struct pwm_ops *pwm_ops;

Probably better to make that consistent: drop the ->config() and
->set_enable() hooks, and make both v1 and v2 define their own pwm_ops.
If you have common logic that is shared between v1 and v2, you can just
create helper functions implementing this common logic and call them
from your version-specific implementation.

>  };
>  
>  static struct imx_pwm_data imx_pwm_data_v1 = {
>  	.config = imx_pwm_config_v1,
>  	.set_enable = imx_pwm_set_enable_v1,
> +	.pwm_ops = &imx_pwm_ops_v1,
>  };
>  
>  static struct imx_pwm_data imx_pwm_data_v2 = {
>  	.config = imx_pwm_config_v2,
>  	.set_enable = imx_pwm_set_enable_v2,
> +	.pwm_ops = &imx_pwm_ops_v2,
>  };
>  
>  static const struct of_device_id imx_pwm_dt_ids[] = {
> @@ -282,6 +321,8 @@ static int imx_pwm_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
>  	if (!of_id)
>  		return -ENODEV;
>  
> +	data = of_id->data;
> +
>  	imx = devm_kzalloc(&pdev->dev, sizeof(*imx), GFP_KERNEL);
>  	if (imx == NULL)
>  		return -ENOMEM;
> @@ -300,18 +341,22 @@ static int imx_pwm_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
>  		return PTR_ERR(imx->clk_ipg);
>  	}
>  
> -	imx->chip.ops = &imx_pwm_ops;
> +	imx->chip.ops = data->pwm_ops;
>  	imx->chip.dev = &pdev->dev;
>  	imx->chip.base = -1;
>  	imx->chip.npwm = 1;
>  	imx->chip.can_sleep = true;
> +	if (data->pwm_ops->set_polarity) {
> +		dev_dbg(&pdev->dev, "PWM supports output inversion\n");
> +		imx->chip.of_xlate = of_pwm_xlate_with_flags;
> +		imx->chip.of_pwm_n_cells = 3;
> +	}

Not that I really care, but you are breaking the DT ABI here. One
solution to avoid that would be to retrieve #pwm-cells here and
decide which ->of_xlate should be used based on this information.

>  
>  	r = platform_get_resource(pdev, IORESOURCE_MEM, 0);
>  	imx->mmio_base = devm_ioremap_resource(&pdev->dev, r);
>  	if (IS_ERR(imx->mmio_base))
>  		return PTR_ERR(imx->mmio_base);
>  
> -	data = of_id->data;
>  	imx->config = data->config;
>  	imx->set_enable = data->set_enable;
>  

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe devicetree" in
the body of a message to majordomo-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: boris.brezillon@free-electrons.com (Boris Brezillon)
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: [PATCH v3 3/6] pwm: imx: support output polarity inversion
Date: Sat, 22 Oct 2016 12:33:37 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20161022123337.57eaa34f@bbrezillon> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20161007151129.6043-4-bhuvanchandra.dv@toradex.com>

On Fri, 7 Oct 2016 20:41:26 +0530
Bhuvanchandra DV <bhuvanchandra.dv@toradex.com> wrote:

> From: Lothar Wassmann <LW@KARO-electronics.de>
> 
> The i.MX pwm unit on i.MX27 and newer SoCs provides a configurable output
> polarity. This patch adds support to utilize this feature where available.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Lothar Wa?mann <LW@KARO-electronics.de>
> Signed-off-by: Lukasz Majewski <l.majewski@samsung.com>
> Signed-off-by: Bhuvanchandra DV <bhuvanchandra.dv@toradex.com>
> Acked-by: Shawn Guo <shawn.guo@linaro.org>
> Reviewed-by: Sascha Hauer <s.hauer@pengutronix.de>
> ---
>  Documentation/devicetree/bindings/pwm/imx-pwm.txt |  6 +--
>  drivers/pwm/pwm-imx.c                             | 51 +++++++++++++++++++++--
>  2 files changed, 51 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/pwm/imx-pwm.txt b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/pwm/imx-pwm.txt
> index e00c2e9..c61bdf8 100644
> --- a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/pwm/imx-pwm.txt
> +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/pwm/imx-pwm.txt
> @@ -6,8 +6,8 @@ Required properties:
>    - "fsl,imx1-pwm" for PWM compatible with the one integrated on i.MX1
>    - "fsl,imx27-pwm" for PWM compatible with the one integrated on i.MX27
>  - reg: physical base address and length of the controller's registers
> -- #pwm-cells: should be 2. See pwm.txt in this directory for a description of
> -  the cells format.
> +- #pwm-cells: 2 for i.MX1 and 3 for i.MX27 and newer SoCs. See pwm.txt
> +  in this directory for a description of the cells format.
>  - clocks : Clock specifiers for both ipg and per clocks.
>  - clock-names : Clock names should include both "ipg" and "per"
>  See the clock consumer binding,
> @@ -17,7 +17,7 @@ See the clock consumer binding,
>  Example:
>  
>  pwm1: pwm at 53fb4000 {
> -	#pwm-cells = <2>;
> +	#pwm-cells = <3>;
>  	compatible = "fsl,imx53-pwm", "fsl,imx27-pwm";
>  	reg = <0x53fb4000 0x4000>;
>  	clocks = <&clks IMX5_CLK_PWM1_IPG_GATE>,
> diff --git a/drivers/pwm/pwm-imx.c b/drivers/pwm/pwm-imx.c
> index d600fd5..c37d223 100644
> --- a/drivers/pwm/pwm-imx.c
> +++ b/drivers/pwm/pwm-imx.c
> @@ -38,6 +38,7 @@
>  #define MX3_PWMCR_DOZEEN		(1 << 24)
>  #define MX3_PWMCR_WAITEN		(1 << 23)
>  #define MX3_PWMCR_DBGEN			(1 << 22)
> +#define MX3_PWMCR_POUTC			(1 << 18)
>  #define MX3_PWMCR_CLKSRC_IPG_HIGH	(2 << 16)
>  #define MX3_PWMCR_CLKSRC_IPG		(1 << 16)
>  #define MX3_PWMCR_SWR			(1 << 3)
> @@ -180,6 +181,9 @@ static int imx_pwm_config_v2(struct pwm_chip *chip,
>  	if (enable)
>  		cr |= MX3_PWMCR_EN;
>  
> +	if (pwm->args.polarity == PWM_POLARITY_INVERSED)
> +		cr |= MX3_PWMCR_POUTC;
> +
>  	writel(cr, imx->mmio_base + MX3_PWMCR);
>  
>  	return 0;
> @@ -240,27 +244,62 @@ static void imx_pwm_disable(struct pwm_chip *chip, struct pwm_device *pwm)
>  	clk_disable_unprepare(imx->clk_per);
>  }
>  
> -static struct pwm_ops imx_pwm_ops = {
> +static int imx_pwm_set_polarity(struct pwm_chip *chip, struct pwm_device *pwm,
> +				enum pwm_polarity polarity)
> +{
> +	struct imx_chip *imx = to_imx_chip(chip);
> +	u32 val;
> +
> +	if (polarity == pwm->args.polarity)
> +		return 0;
> +
> +	val = readl(imx->mmio_base + MX3_PWMCR);
> +
> +	if (polarity == PWM_POLARITY_INVERSED)
> +		val |= MX3_PWMCR_POUTC;
> +	else
> +		val &= ~MX3_PWMCR_POUTC;
> +
> +	writel(val, imx->mmio_base + MX3_PWMCR);
> +
> +	dev_dbg(imx->chip.dev, "%s: polarity set to %s\n", __func__,
> +		polarity == PWM_POLARITY_INVERSED ? "inverted" : "normal");
> +
> +	return 0;
> +}

I'll read the discussion Lukasz and Stefan had before reviewing this
part ;-).

> +
> +static struct pwm_ops imx_pwm_ops_v1 = {
>  	.enable = imx_pwm_enable,
>  	.disable = imx_pwm_disable,
>  	.config = imx_pwm_config,
>  	.owner = THIS_MODULE,
>  };
>  
> +static struct pwm_ops imx_pwm_ops_v2 = {
> +	.enable = imx_pwm_enable,
> +	.disable = imx_pwm_disable,
> +	.set_polarity = imx_pwm_set_polarity,
> +	.config = imx_pwm_config,
> +	.owner = THIS_MODULE,
> +};
> +
>  struct imx_pwm_data {
>  	int (*config)(struct pwm_chip *chip,
>  		struct pwm_device *pwm, int duty_ns, int period_ns);
>  	void (*set_enable)(struct pwm_chip *chip, bool enable);
> +	struct pwm_ops *pwm_ops;

Probably better to make that consistent: drop the ->config() and
->set_enable() hooks, and make both v1 and v2 define their own pwm_ops.
If you have common logic that is shared between v1 and v2, you can just
create helper functions implementing this common logic and call them
from your version-specific implementation.

>  };
>  
>  static struct imx_pwm_data imx_pwm_data_v1 = {
>  	.config = imx_pwm_config_v1,
>  	.set_enable = imx_pwm_set_enable_v1,
> +	.pwm_ops = &imx_pwm_ops_v1,
>  };
>  
>  static struct imx_pwm_data imx_pwm_data_v2 = {
>  	.config = imx_pwm_config_v2,
>  	.set_enable = imx_pwm_set_enable_v2,
> +	.pwm_ops = &imx_pwm_ops_v2,
>  };
>  
>  static const struct of_device_id imx_pwm_dt_ids[] = {
> @@ -282,6 +321,8 @@ static int imx_pwm_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
>  	if (!of_id)
>  		return -ENODEV;
>  
> +	data = of_id->data;
> +
>  	imx = devm_kzalloc(&pdev->dev, sizeof(*imx), GFP_KERNEL);
>  	if (imx == NULL)
>  		return -ENOMEM;
> @@ -300,18 +341,22 @@ static int imx_pwm_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
>  		return PTR_ERR(imx->clk_ipg);
>  	}
>  
> -	imx->chip.ops = &imx_pwm_ops;
> +	imx->chip.ops = data->pwm_ops;
>  	imx->chip.dev = &pdev->dev;
>  	imx->chip.base = -1;
>  	imx->chip.npwm = 1;
>  	imx->chip.can_sleep = true;
> +	if (data->pwm_ops->set_polarity) {
> +		dev_dbg(&pdev->dev, "PWM supports output inversion\n");
> +		imx->chip.of_xlate = of_pwm_xlate_with_flags;
> +		imx->chip.of_pwm_n_cells = 3;
> +	}

Not that I really care, but you are breaking the DT ABI here. One
solution to avoid that would be to retrieve #pwm-cells here and
decide which ->of_xlate should be used based on this information.

>  
>  	r = platform_get_resource(pdev, IORESOURCE_MEM, 0);
>  	imx->mmio_base = devm_ioremap_resource(&pdev->dev, r);
>  	if (IS_ERR(imx->mmio_base))
>  		return PTR_ERR(imx->mmio_base);
>  
> -	data = of_id->data;
>  	imx->config = data->config;
>  	imx->set_enable = data->set_enable;
>  

WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Boris Brezillon <boris.brezillon@free-electrons.com>
To: Bhuvanchandra DV <bhuvanchandra.dv@toradex.com>
Cc: <shawnguo@kernel.org>, <thierry.reding@gmail.com>,
	mark.rutland@arm.com, linux-pwm@vger.kernel.org,
	l.majewski@samsung.com, devicetree@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, stefan@agner.ch,
	robh+dt@kernel.org, kernel@pengutronix.de, fabio.estevam@nxp.com,
	linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
	Lothar Wassmann <LW@KARO-electronics.de>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 3/6] pwm: imx: support output polarity inversion
Date: Sat, 22 Oct 2016 12:33:37 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20161022123337.57eaa34f@bbrezillon> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20161007151129.6043-4-bhuvanchandra.dv@toradex.com>

On Fri, 7 Oct 2016 20:41:26 +0530
Bhuvanchandra DV <bhuvanchandra.dv@toradex.com> wrote:

> From: Lothar Wassmann <LW@KARO-electronics.de>
> 
> The i.MX pwm unit on i.MX27 and newer SoCs provides a configurable output
> polarity. This patch adds support to utilize this feature where available.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Lothar Waßmann <LW@KARO-electronics.de>
> Signed-off-by: Lukasz Majewski <l.majewski@samsung.com>
> Signed-off-by: Bhuvanchandra DV <bhuvanchandra.dv@toradex.com>
> Acked-by: Shawn Guo <shawn.guo@linaro.org>
> Reviewed-by: Sascha Hauer <s.hauer@pengutronix.de>
> ---
>  Documentation/devicetree/bindings/pwm/imx-pwm.txt |  6 +--
>  drivers/pwm/pwm-imx.c                             | 51 +++++++++++++++++++++--
>  2 files changed, 51 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/pwm/imx-pwm.txt b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/pwm/imx-pwm.txt
> index e00c2e9..c61bdf8 100644
> --- a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/pwm/imx-pwm.txt
> +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/pwm/imx-pwm.txt
> @@ -6,8 +6,8 @@ Required properties:
>    - "fsl,imx1-pwm" for PWM compatible with the one integrated on i.MX1
>    - "fsl,imx27-pwm" for PWM compatible with the one integrated on i.MX27
>  - reg: physical base address and length of the controller's registers
> -- #pwm-cells: should be 2. See pwm.txt in this directory for a description of
> -  the cells format.
> +- #pwm-cells: 2 for i.MX1 and 3 for i.MX27 and newer SoCs. See pwm.txt
> +  in this directory for a description of the cells format.
>  - clocks : Clock specifiers for both ipg and per clocks.
>  - clock-names : Clock names should include both "ipg" and "per"
>  See the clock consumer binding,
> @@ -17,7 +17,7 @@ See the clock consumer binding,
>  Example:
>  
>  pwm1: pwm@53fb4000 {
> -	#pwm-cells = <2>;
> +	#pwm-cells = <3>;
>  	compatible = "fsl,imx53-pwm", "fsl,imx27-pwm";
>  	reg = <0x53fb4000 0x4000>;
>  	clocks = <&clks IMX5_CLK_PWM1_IPG_GATE>,
> diff --git a/drivers/pwm/pwm-imx.c b/drivers/pwm/pwm-imx.c
> index d600fd5..c37d223 100644
> --- a/drivers/pwm/pwm-imx.c
> +++ b/drivers/pwm/pwm-imx.c
> @@ -38,6 +38,7 @@
>  #define MX3_PWMCR_DOZEEN		(1 << 24)
>  #define MX3_PWMCR_WAITEN		(1 << 23)
>  #define MX3_PWMCR_DBGEN			(1 << 22)
> +#define MX3_PWMCR_POUTC			(1 << 18)
>  #define MX3_PWMCR_CLKSRC_IPG_HIGH	(2 << 16)
>  #define MX3_PWMCR_CLKSRC_IPG		(1 << 16)
>  #define MX3_PWMCR_SWR			(1 << 3)
> @@ -180,6 +181,9 @@ static int imx_pwm_config_v2(struct pwm_chip *chip,
>  	if (enable)
>  		cr |= MX3_PWMCR_EN;
>  
> +	if (pwm->args.polarity == PWM_POLARITY_INVERSED)
> +		cr |= MX3_PWMCR_POUTC;
> +
>  	writel(cr, imx->mmio_base + MX3_PWMCR);
>  
>  	return 0;
> @@ -240,27 +244,62 @@ static void imx_pwm_disable(struct pwm_chip *chip, struct pwm_device *pwm)
>  	clk_disable_unprepare(imx->clk_per);
>  }
>  
> -static struct pwm_ops imx_pwm_ops = {
> +static int imx_pwm_set_polarity(struct pwm_chip *chip, struct pwm_device *pwm,
> +				enum pwm_polarity polarity)
> +{
> +	struct imx_chip *imx = to_imx_chip(chip);
> +	u32 val;
> +
> +	if (polarity == pwm->args.polarity)
> +		return 0;
> +
> +	val = readl(imx->mmio_base + MX3_PWMCR);
> +
> +	if (polarity == PWM_POLARITY_INVERSED)
> +		val |= MX3_PWMCR_POUTC;
> +	else
> +		val &= ~MX3_PWMCR_POUTC;
> +
> +	writel(val, imx->mmio_base + MX3_PWMCR);
> +
> +	dev_dbg(imx->chip.dev, "%s: polarity set to %s\n", __func__,
> +		polarity == PWM_POLARITY_INVERSED ? "inverted" : "normal");
> +
> +	return 0;
> +}

I'll read the discussion Lukasz and Stefan had before reviewing this
part ;-).

> +
> +static struct pwm_ops imx_pwm_ops_v1 = {
>  	.enable = imx_pwm_enable,
>  	.disable = imx_pwm_disable,
>  	.config = imx_pwm_config,
>  	.owner = THIS_MODULE,
>  };
>  
> +static struct pwm_ops imx_pwm_ops_v2 = {
> +	.enable = imx_pwm_enable,
> +	.disable = imx_pwm_disable,
> +	.set_polarity = imx_pwm_set_polarity,
> +	.config = imx_pwm_config,
> +	.owner = THIS_MODULE,
> +};
> +
>  struct imx_pwm_data {
>  	int (*config)(struct pwm_chip *chip,
>  		struct pwm_device *pwm, int duty_ns, int period_ns);
>  	void (*set_enable)(struct pwm_chip *chip, bool enable);
> +	struct pwm_ops *pwm_ops;

Probably better to make that consistent: drop the ->config() and
->set_enable() hooks, and make both v1 and v2 define their own pwm_ops.
If you have common logic that is shared between v1 and v2, you can just
create helper functions implementing this common logic and call them
from your version-specific implementation.

>  };
>  
>  static struct imx_pwm_data imx_pwm_data_v1 = {
>  	.config = imx_pwm_config_v1,
>  	.set_enable = imx_pwm_set_enable_v1,
> +	.pwm_ops = &imx_pwm_ops_v1,
>  };
>  
>  static struct imx_pwm_data imx_pwm_data_v2 = {
>  	.config = imx_pwm_config_v2,
>  	.set_enable = imx_pwm_set_enable_v2,
> +	.pwm_ops = &imx_pwm_ops_v2,
>  };
>  
>  static const struct of_device_id imx_pwm_dt_ids[] = {
> @@ -282,6 +321,8 @@ static int imx_pwm_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
>  	if (!of_id)
>  		return -ENODEV;
>  
> +	data = of_id->data;
> +
>  	imx = devm_kzalloc(&pdev->dev, sizeof(*imx), GFP_KERNEL);
>  	if (imx == NULL)
>  		return -ENOMEM;
> @@ -300,18 +341,22 @@ static int imx_pwm_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
>  		return PTR_ERR(imx->clk_ipg);
>  	}
>  
> -	imx->chip.ops = &imx_pwm_ops;
> +	imx->chip.ops = data->pwm_ops;
>  	imx->chip.dev = &pdev->dev;
>  	imx->chip.base = -1;
>  	imx->chip.npwm = 1;
>  	imx->chip.can_sleep = true;
> +	if (data->pwm_ops->set_polarity) {
> +		dev_dbg(&pdev->dev, "PWM supports output inversion\n");
> +		imx->chip.of_xlate = of_pwm_xlate_with_flags;
> +		imx->chip.of_pwm_n_cells = 3;
> +	}

Not that I really care, but you are breaking the DT ABI here. One
solution to avoid that would be to retrieve #pwm-cells here and
decide which ->of_xlate should be used based on this information.

>  
>  	r = platform_get_resource(pdev, IORESOURCE_MEM, 0);
>  	imx->mmio_base = devm_ioremap_resource(&pdev->dev, r);
>  	if (IS_ERR(imx->mmio_base))
>  		return PTR_ERR(imx->mmio_base);
>  
> -	data = of_id->data;
>  	imx->config = data->config;
>  	imx->set_enable = data->set_enable;
>  

  parent reply	other threads:[~2016-10-22 10:33 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 54+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2016-10-07 15:11 [PATCH v3 0/6] Support PWM polarity control Bhuvanchandra DV
2016-10-07 15:11 ` Bhuvanchandra DV
2016-10-07 15:11 ` Bhuvanchandra DV
2016-10-07 15:11 ` [PATCH v3 1/6] pwm: print error messages with pr_err() instead of pr_debug() Bhuvanchandra DV
2016-10-07 15:11   ` Bhuvanchandra DV
2016-10-07 15:11   ` Bhuvanchandra DV
2016-10-07 15:11 ` [PATCH v3 2/6] pwm: core: make the PWM_POLARITY flag in DTB optional Bhuvanchandra DV
2016-10-07 15:11   ` Bhuvanchandra DV
2016-10-07 15:11   ` Bhuvanchandra DV
2016-10-07 15:11 ` [PATCH v3 3/6] pwm: imx: support output polarity inversion Bhuvanchandra DV
2016-10-07 15:11   ` Bhuvanchandra DV
2016-10-07 15:11   ` Bhuvanchandra DV
2016-10-08 14:32   ` Lukasz Majewski
2016-10-08 14:32     ` Lukasz Majewski
2016-10-08 14:32     ` Lukasz Majewski
     [not found]   ` <20161007151129.6043-4-bhuvanchandra.dv-2KBjVHiyJgBBDgjK7y7TUQ@public.gmane.org>
2016-10-10 17:10     ` Rob Herring
2016-10-10 17:10       ` Rob Herring
2016-10-10 17:10       ` Rob Herring
2016-10-22 10:33     ` Boris Brezillon [this message]
2016-10-22 10:33       ` Boris Brezillon
2016-10-22 10:33       ` Boris Brezillon
2016-10-10 21:01   ` Stefan Agner
2016-10-10 21:01     ` Stefan Agner
2016-10-12 22:15     ` Lukasz Majewski
2016-10-12 22:15       ` Lukasz Majewski
2016-10-12 22:15       ` Lukasz Majewski
2016-10-12 23:18       ` Stefan Agner
2016-10-12 23:18         ` Stefan Agner
2016-10-13  4:58         ` Lukasz Majewski
2016-10-13  4:58           ` Lukasz Majewski
2016-10-13  4:58           ` Lukasz Majewski
2016-10-20  8:30           ` Lukasz Majewski
2016-10-20  8:30             ` Lukasz Majewski
2016-10-20 22:46             ` Stefan Agner
2016-10-20 22:46               ` Stefan Agner
2016-10-21 21:49               ` Lukasz Majewski
2016-10-21 21:49                 ` Lukasz Majewski
2016-10-21 21:49                 ` Lukasz Majewski
2016-10-22 10:57                 ` Boris Brezillon
2016-10-22 10:57                   ` Boris Brezillon
2016-10-22 12:01                 ` Boris Brezillon
2016-10-22 12:01                   ` Boris Brezillon
2016-10-22 12:01                   ` Boris Brezillon
2016-10-23  6:40                   ` Lukasz Majewski
2016-10-23  6:40                     ` Lukasz Majewski
2016-10-07 15:11 ` [PATCH v3 4/6] arm: dts: imx7: Update #pwm-cells for PWM polarity control Bhuvanchandra DV
2016-10-07 15:11   ` Bhuvanchandra DV
2016-10-07 15:11   ` Bhuvanchandra DV
2016-10-07 15:11 ` [PATCH v3 5/6] arm: dts: imx7-colibri: Use pwm " Bhuvanchandra DV
2016-10-07 15:11   ` Bhuvanchandra DV
2016-10-07 15:11   ` Bhuvanchandra DV
2016-10-07 15:11 ` [PATCH v3 6/6] arm: dts: imx7-colibri: Use enable-gpios for BL_ON Bhuvanchandra DV
2016-10-07 15:11   ` Bhuvanchandra DV
2016-10-07 15:11   ` Bhuvanchandra DV

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20161022123337.57eaa34f@bbrezillon \
    --to=boris.brezillon-wi1+55scjutkeb57/3fjtnbpr1lh4cv8@public.gmane.org \
    --cc=LW-bxm8fMRDkQLDiMYJYoSAnRvVK+yQ3ZXh@public.gmane.org \
    --cc=bhuvanchandra.dv-2KBjVHiyJgBBDgjK7y7TUQ@public.gmane.org \
    --cc=devicetree-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org \
    --cc=fabio.estevam-3arQi8VN3Tc@public.gmane.org \
    --cc=kernel-bIcnvbaLZ9MEGnE8C9+IrQ@public.gmane.org \
    --cc=l.majewski-Sze3O3UU22JBDgjK7y7TUQ@public.gmane.org \
    --cc=linux-arm-kernel-IAPFreCvJWM7uuMidbF8XUB+6BGkLq7r@public.gmane.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org \
    --cc=linux-pwm-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org \
    --cc=mark.rutland-5wv7dgnIgG8@public.gmane.org \
    --cc=robh+dt-DgEjT+Ai2ygdnm+yROfE0A@public.gmane.org \
    --cc=shawnguo-DgEjT+Ai2ygdnm+yROfE0A@public.gmane.org \
    --cc=stefan-XLVq0VzYD2Y@public.gmane.org \
    --cc=thierry.reding-Re5JQEeQqe8AvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.