All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Joerg Roedel <joro-zLv9SwRftAIdnm+yROfE0A@public.gmane.org>
To: Robin Murphy <robin.murphy-5wv7dgnIgG8@public.gmane.org>
Cc: iommu-cunTk1MwBs9QetFLy7KEm3xJsTq8ys+cHZ5vskTnxNA@public.gmane.org,
	Will Deacon <will.deacon-5wv7dgnIgG8@public.gmane.org>,
	linux-arm-kernel-IAPFreCvJWM7uuMidbF8XUB+6BGkLq7r@public.gmane.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/5] iommu/arm-smmu: Restrict domain attributes to UNMANAGED domains
Date: Thu, 26 Jan 2017 18:06:09 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20170126170609.GC27598@8bytes.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <89d795b9-a6d7-7f41-705c-b918ee66ebf0-5wv7dgnIgG8@public.gmane.org>

On Thu, Jan 19, 2017 at 06:41:34PM +0000, Robin Murphy wrote:
> For the sake of discussion, would it make sense to enforce this in
> domain_set_attr() itself? The intersection of drivers providing these
> callbacks and drivers supporting anything other than unmanaged domains
> is currently these two below, so it clearly wouldn't break anything to
> put this check in core code today. Looking forward, is there likely to
> be any plausible situation where users of a managed domain would be
> legitimate in mucking about with its attrs, on any platform?

No, this belongs in driver code. I am pretty certain there will be a use
for attributes in unmanaged domains at some point. Crazy things happen
all the time :)


	Joerg

WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: joro@8bytes.org (Joerg Roedel)
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: [PATCH 1/5] iommu/arm-smmu: Restrict domain attributes to UNMANAGED domains
Date: Thu, 26 Jan 2017 18:06:09 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20170126170609.GC27598@8bytes.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <89d795b9-a6d7-7f41-705c-b918ee66ebf0@arm.com>

On Thu, Jan 19, 2017 at 06:41:34PM +0000, Robin Murphy wrote:
> For the sake of discussion, would it make sense to enforce this in
> domain_set_attr() itself? The intersection of drivers providing these
> callbacks and drivers supporting anything other than unmanaged domains
> is currently these two below, so it clearly wouldn't break anything to
> put this check in core code today. Looking forward, is there likely to
> be any plausible situation where users of a managed domain would be
> legitimate in mucking about with its attrs, on any platform?

No, this belongs in driver code. I am pretty certain there will be a use
for attributes in unmanaged domains at some point. Crazy things happen
all the time :)


	Joerg

  parent reply	other threads:[~2017-01-26 17:06 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 50+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2017-01-19 18:19 [PATCH 0/5] Implement SMMU passthrough using the default domain Will Deacon
2017-01-19 18:19 ` Will Deacon
     [not found] ` <1484849955-1871-1-git-send-email-will.deacon-5wv7dgnIgG8@public.gmane.org>
2017-01-19 18:19   ` [PATCH 1/5] iommu/arm-smmu: Restrict domain attributes to UNMANAGED domains Will Deacon
2017-01-19 18:19     ` Will Deacon
     [not found]     ` <1484849955-1871-2-git-send-email-will.deacon-5wv7dgnIgG8@public.gmane.org>
2017-01-19 18:41       ` Robin Murphy
2017-01-19 18:41         ` Robin Murphy
     [not found]         ` <89d795b9-a6d7-7f41-705c-b918ee66ebf0-5wv7dgnIgG8@public.gmane.org>
2017-01-26 17:06           ` Joerg Roedel [this message]
2017-01-26 17:06             ` Joerg Roedel
2017-01-26 17:03       ` Joerg Roedel
2017-01-26 17:03         ` Joerg Roedel
     [not found]         ` <20170126170329.GB27598-zLv9SwRftAIdnm+yROfE0A@public.gmane.org>
2017-01-26 17:57           ` Will Deacon
2017-01-26 17:57             ` Will Deacon
2017-01-19 18:19   ` [PATCH 2/5] iommu/arm-smmu: Install bypass S2CRs for IOMMU_DOMAIN_IDENTITY domains Will Deacon
2017-01-19 18:19     ` Will Deacon
2017-01-19 18:50     ` Robin Murphy
2017-01-19 18:50       ` Robin Murphy
2017-01-19 18:19   ` [PATCH 3/5] iommu/arm-smmu-v3: Install bypass STEs " Will Deacon
2017-01-19 18:19     ` Will Deacon
     [not found]     ` <1484849955-1871-4-git-send-email-will.deacon-5wv7dgnIgG8@public.gmane.org>
2017-01-19 18:56       ` Robin Murphy
2017-01-19 18:56         ` Robin Murphy
2017-01-19 18:19   ` [PATCH 4/5] arm64: dma-mapping: Only swizzle DMA ops for IOMMU_DOMAIN_DMA Will Deacon
2017-01-19 18:19     ` Will Deacon
     [not found]     ` <1484849955-1871-5-git-send-email-will.deacon-5wv7dgnIgG8@public.gmane.org>
2017-01-19 19:00       ` Robin Murphy
2017-01-19 19:00         ` Robin Murphy
2017-01-26 17:57         ` Will Deacon
2017-01-26 17:57           ` Will Deacon
2017-01-19 18:19   ` [PATCH 5/5] iommu: Allow default domain type to be set on the kernel command line Will Deacon
2017-01-19 18:19     ` Will Deacon
     [not found]     ` <1484849955-1871-6-git-send-email-will.deacon-5wv7dgnIgG8@public.gmane.org>
2017-01-26 17:15       ` Joerg Roedel
2017-01-26 17:15         ` Joerg Roedel
     [not found]         ` <20170126171555.GD27598-zLv9SwRftAIdnm+yROfE0A@public.gmane.org>
2017-01-26 17:26           ` Robin Murphy
2017-01-26 17:26             ` Robin Murphy
2017-01-26 17:48           ` Will Deacon
2017-01-26 17:48             ` Will Deacon
2017-01-24 15:12   ` [PATCH 0/5] Implement SMMU passthrough using the default domain Sricharan
2017-01-24 15:12     ` Sricharan
2017-01-26 17:18     ` Joerg Roedel
2017-01-26 17:18       ` Joerg Roedel
     [not found]       ` <20170126171857.GE27598-zLv9SwRftAIdnm+yROfE0A@public.gmane.org>
2017-02-02 15:02         ` Rob Clark
2017-02-02 15:02           ` Rob Clark
     [not found]           ` <CAF6AEGtfrrwVZ_W86_HqVsiqfcM=XFa+g2LECFYQJmvv7-JSqQ-JsoAwUIsXosN+BqQ9rBEUg@public.gmane.org>
2017-02-02 15:12             ` Will Deacon
2017-02-02 15:12               ` Will Deacon
     [not found]               ` <20170202151241.GE13839-5wv7dgnIgG8@public.gmane.org>
2017-02-03 12:20                 ` Rob Clark
2017-02-03 12:20                   ` Rob Clark
2017-02-02 15:45             ` Sricharan
2017-02-02 15:45               ` Sricharan
2017-02-02 16:10               ` Will Deacon
2017-02-02 16:10                 ` Will Deacon
     [not found]                 ` <20170202161047.GG13839-5wv7dgnIgG8@public.gmane.org>
2017-02-03 16:33                   ` Sricharan
2017-02-03 16:33                     ` Sricharan

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20170126170609.GC27598@8bytes.org \
    --to=joro-zlv9swrftaidnm+yrofe0a@public.gmane.org \
    --cc=iommu-cunTk1MwBs9QetFLy7KEm3xJsTq8ys+cHZ5vskTnxNA@public.gmane.org \
    --cc=linux-arm-kernel-IAPFreCvJWM7uuMidbF8XUB+6BGkLq7r@public.gmane.org \
    --cc=robin.murphy-5wv7dgnIgG8@public.gmane.org \
    --cc=will.deacon-5wv7dgnIgG8@public.gmane.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.