All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "Ville Syrjälä" <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>
To: Tvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko.ursulin@linux.intel.com>
Cc: intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org, kernel-janitors@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org,
	Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@intel.com>,
	Colin King <colin.king@canonical.com>
Subject: Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH][drm-next] drm/i915/cnl: make function cnl_ddi_dp_set_dpll_hw_state static
Date: Thu, 15 Jun 2017 13:16:03 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20170615131603.GZ12629@intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <3662e55c-1507-3089-6d97-f96fad013a9c@linux.intel.com>

On Wed, Jun 14, 2017 at 02:03:05PM +0100, Tvrtko Ursulin wrote:
> 
> On 13/06/2017 14:47, Colin King wrote:
> > From: Colin Ian King <colin.king@canonical.com>
> > 
> > The function cnl_ddi_dp_set_dpll_hw_state does not need to be in global
> > scope, so make it static.
> > 
> > Cleans up sparse warning:
> > "symbol 'cnl_ddi_dp_set_dpll_hw_state' was not declared. Should it
> >   be static?"
> > 
> > Signed-off-by: Colin Ian King <colin.king@canonical.com>
> > ---
> >   drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_dpll_mgr.c | 5 +++--
> >   1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
> > 
> > diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_dpll_mgr.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_dpll_mgr.c
> > index 8e669b6254ae..2f7b0e64f628 100644
> > --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_dpll_mgr.c
> > +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_dpll_mgr.c
> > @@ -2292,8 +2292,9 @@ static bool cnl_ddi_hdmi_pll_dividers(struct intel_crtc *crtc,
> >   	return true;
> >   }
> >   
> > -bool cnl_ddi_dp_set_dpll_hw_state(int clock,
> > -				  struct intel_dpll_hw_state *dpll_hw_state)
> > +static bool
> > +cnl_ddi_dp_set_dpll_hw_state(int clock,
> > +			     struct intel_dpll_hw_state *dpll_hw_state)
> >   {
> >   	uint32_t cfgcr0;
> >   
> > 
> 
> Reviewed-by: Tvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko.ursulin@intel.com>

Thanks for the patch and review. Pushed to dinq.

-- 
Ville Syrjälä
Intel OTC
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe kernel-janitors" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: "Ville Syrjälä" <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>
To: Tvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko.ursulin@linux.intel.com>
Cc: intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org, kernel-janitors@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org,
	Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@intel.com>,
	Colin King <colin.king@canonical.com>
Subject: Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH][drm-next] drm/i915/cnl: make function cnl_ddi_dp_set_dpll_hw_state static
Date: Thu, 15 Jun 2017 16:16:03 +0300	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20170615131603.GZ12629@intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <3662e55c-1507-3089-6d97-f96fad013a9c@linux.intel.com>

On Wed, Jun 14, 2017 at 02:03:05PM +0100, Tvrtko Ursulin wrote:
> 
> On 13/06/2017 14:47, Colin King wrote:
> > From: Colin Ian King <colin.king@canonical.com>
> > 
> > The function cnl_ddi_dp_set_dpll_hw_state does not need to be in global
> > scope, so make it static.
> > 
> > Cleans up sparse warning:
> > "symbol 'cnl_ddi_dp_set_dpll_hw_state' was not declared. Should it
> >   be static?"
> > 
> > Signed-off-by: Colin Ian King <colin.king@canonical.com>
> > ---
> >   drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_dpll_mgr.c | 5 +++--
> >   1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
> > 
> > diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_dpll_mgr.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_dpll_mgr.c
> > index 8e669b6254ae..2f7b0e64f628 100644
> > --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_dpll_mgr.c
> > +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_dpll_mgr.c
> > @@ -2292,8 +2292,9 @@ static bool cnl_ddi_hdmi_pll_dividers(struct intel_crtc *crtc,
> >   	return true;
> >   }
> >   
> > -bool cnl_ddi_dp_set_dpll_hw_state(int clock,
> > -				  struct intel_dpll_hw_state *dpll_hw_state)
> > +static bool
> > +cnl_ddi_dp_set_dpll_hw_state(int clock,
> > +			     struct intel_dpll_hw_state *dpll_hw_state)
> >   {
> >   	uint32_t cfgcr0;
> >   
> > 
> 
> Reviewed-by: Tvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko.ursulin@intel.com>

Thanks for the patch and review. Pushed to dinq.

-- 
Ville Syrjälä
Intel OTC
_______________________________________________
dri-devel mailing list
dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/dri-devel

WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: "Ville Syrjälä" <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>
To: Tvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko.ursulin@linux.intel.com>
Cc: Colin King <colin.king@canonical.com>,
	Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@intel.com>,
	Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@linux.intel.com>,
	David Airlie <airlied@linux.ie>,
	intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org, dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org,
	kernel-janitors@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH][drm-next] drm/i915/cnl: make function cnl_ddi_dp_set_dpll_hw_state static
Date: Thu, 15 Jun 2017 16:16:03 +0300	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20170615131603.GZ12629@intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <3662e55c-1507-3089-6d97-f96fad013a9c@linux.intel.com>

On Wed, Jun 14, 2017 at 02:03:05PM +0100, Tvrtko Ursulin wrote:
> 
> On 13/06/2017 14:47, Colin King wrote:
> > From: Colin Ian King <colin.king@canonical.com>
> > 
> > The function cnl_ddi_dp_set_dpll_hw_state does not need to be in global
> > scope, so make it static.
> > 
> > Cleans up sparse warning:
> > "symbol 'cnl_ddi_dp_set_dpll_hw_state' was not declared. Should it
> >   be static?"
> > 
> > Signed-off-by: Colin Ian King <colin.king@canonical.com>
> > ---
> >   drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_dpll_mgr.c | 5 +++--
> >   1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
> > 
> > diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_dpll_mgr.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_dpll_mgr.c
> > index 8e669b6254ae..2f7b0e64f628 100644
> > --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_dpll_mgr.c
> > +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_dpll_mgr.c
> > @@ -2292,8 +2292,9 @@ static bool cnl_ddi_hdmi_pll_dividers(struct intel_crtc *crtc,
> >   	return true;
> >   }
> >   
> > -bool cnl_ddi_dp_set_dpll_hw_state(int clock,
> > -				  struct intel_dpll_hw_state *dpll_hw_state)
> > +static bool
> > +cnl_ddi_dp_set_dpll_hw_state(int clock,
> > +			     struct intel_dpll_hw_state *dpll_hw_state)
> >   {
> >   	uint32_t cfgcr0;
> >   
> > 
> 
> Reviewed-by: Tvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko.ursulin@intel.com>

Thanks for the patch and review. Pushed to dinq.

-- 
Ville Syrjälä
Intel OTC

  reply	other threads:[~2017-06-15 13:16 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2017-06-13 13:47 [PATCH][drm-next] drm/i915/cnl: make function cnl_ddi_dp_set_dpll_hw_state static Colin King
2017-06-13 13:47 ` Colin King
2017-06-13 13:47 ` Colin King
2017-06-13 14:07 ` ✓ Fi.CI.BAT: success for " Patchwork
2017-06-14 13:03 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH][drm-next] " Tvrtko Ursulin
2017-06-14 13:03   ` Tvrtko Ursulin
2017-06-14 13:03   ` Tvrtko Ursulin
2017-06-15 13:16   ` Ville Syrjälä [this message]
2017-06-15 13:16     ` [Intel-gfx] " Ville Syrjälä
2017-06-15 13:16     ` Ville Syrjälä

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20170615131603.GZ12629@intel.com \
    --to=ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=colin.king@canonical.com \
    --cc=daniel.vetter@intel.com \
    --cc=dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org \
    --cc=intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org \
    --cc=kernel-janitors@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=tvrtko.ursulin@linux.intel.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.