All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Stephen Boyd <sboyd@codeaurora.org>
To: Chunyan Zhang <chunyan.zhang@spreadtrum.com>
Cc: Michael Turquette <mturquette@baylibre.com>,
	Rob Herring <robh+dt@kernel.org>,
	Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com>,
	linux-clk@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	devicetree@vger.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
	Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>, Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>,
	Xiaolong Zhang <xiaolong.zhang@spreadtrum.com>,
	Orson Zhai <orson.zhai@spreadtrum.com>,
	Geng Ren <geng.ren@spreadtrum.com>,
	Chunyan Zhang <zhang.lyra@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH V1 7/9] clk: sprd: add adjustable pll support
Date: Mon, 19 Jun 2017 18:37:10 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20170620013710.GJ4493@codeaurora.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20170618015855.27738-8-chunyan.zhang@spreadtrum.com>

On 06/18, Chunyan Zhang wrote:
> diff --git a/drivers/clk/sprd/Makefile b/drivers/clk/sprd/Makefile
> index 83232e5..c593a93 100644
> --- a/drivers/clk/sprd/Makefile
> +++ b/drivers/clk/sprd/Makefile
> @@ -1,3 +1,3 @@
>  ifneq ($(CONFIG_OF),)
> -obj-y	+= ccu_common.o ccu_gate.o ccu_mux.o ccu_div.o ccu_composite.o
> +obj-y	+= ccu_common.o ccu_gate.o ccu_mux.o ccu_div.o ccu_composite.o ccu_pll.o
>  endif
> diff --git a/drivers/clk/sprd/ccu_pll.c b/drivers/clk/sprd/ccu_pll.c
> new file mode 100644
> index 0000000..6c908e4
> --- /dev/null
> +++ b/drivers/clk/sprd/ccu_pll.c
> @@ -0,0 +1,241 @@
> +/*
> + * Spreadtrum pll clock driver
> + *
> + * Copyright (C) 2015~2017 Spreadtrum, Inc.
> + *
> + * SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0
> + */
> +
> +#include <linux/delay.h>
> +#include <linux/clk.h>

Is this include used? Should be clk-provider?

> +#include <linux/err.h>
> +#include <linux/slab.h>
> +
> +#include "ccu_pll.h"
> +
> +#define CCU_PLL_1M	1000000
> +#define CCU_PLL_10M	(CCU_PLL_1M * 10)
> +
> +#define pindex(pll, member)		\
> +	(pll->factors[member].shift / (8 * sizeof(pll->regs[0])))
> +
> +#define pshift(pll, member)		\
> +	(pll->factors[member].shift % (8 * sizeof(pll->regs[0])))
> +
> +#define pwidth(pll, member)		\
> +	pll->factors[member].width
> +
> +#define pmask(pll, member)					\
> +	((pwidth(pll, member)) ?				\
> +	GENMASK(pwidth(pll, member) + pshift(pll, member) - 1,	\
> +	pshift(pll, member)) : 0)
> +
> +#define pinternal(pll, cfg, member)	\
> +	(cfg[pindex(pll, member)] & pmask(pll, member))
> +
> +#define pinternal_val(pll, cfg, member)	\
> +	(pinternal(pll, cfg, member) >> pshift(pll, member))
> +
> +static unsigned long pll_get_refin_rate(struct ccu_pll *pll)

pll could be const?

> +{
> +	u8 shift, index, refin_id = 3;
> +	u32 mask;
> +	const unsigned long refin[4] = { 2, 4, 13, 26 };
> +
> +	if (pwidth(pll, PLL_REFIN)) {
> +		index = pindex(pll, PLL_REFIN);
> +		shift = pshift(pll, PLL_REFIN);
> +		mask = pmask(pll, PLL_REFIN);
> +		refin_id = (ccu_pll_readl(pll, index) & mask) >> shift;
> +		if (refin_id > 3)
> +			refin_id = 3;
> +	}
> +
> +	return refin[refin_id];
> +}
> +
> +static u8 pll_get_ibias(unsigned long rate, const u64 *table)
> +{
> +	u64 i;
> +	u8 num = table[0];
> +
> +	for (i = 0; i < num; i++)
> +		if (rate <= table[i + 1])
> +			break;
> +
> +	return i == num ? num - 1 : i;
> +}
> +
> +static unsigned long ccu_pll_helper_recalc_rate(struct ccu_pll *pll,
> +						unsigned long parent_rate)
> +{
> +	unsigned long rate, refin, k1, k2;
> +	unsigned long kint = 0, nint;
> +	u32 reg_num = pll->regs[0];
> +	u32 *cfg;
> +	u32 i;
> +	u32 mask;
> +
> +	cfg = kcalloc(reg_num, sizeof(*cfg), GFP_KERNEL);
> +	if (!cfg)
> +		return -ENOMEM;
> +
> +	for (i = 0; i < reg_num; i++)
> +		cfg[i] = ccu_pll_readl(pll, i);
> +
> +	refin = pll_get_refin_rate(pll);
> +
> +	if (pinternal(pll, cfg, PLL_PREDIV))
> +		refin = refin * 2;
> +
> +	if (pwidth(pll, PLL_POSTDIV) &&
> +	    ((pll->fflag == 1 && pinternal(pll, cfg, PLL_POSTDIV)) ||
> +	     (!pll->fflag && !pinternal(pll, cfg, PLL_POSTDIV))))
> +		refin = refin / 2;
> +
> +	if (!pinternal(pll, cfg, PLL_DIV_S))
> +		rate = refin * pinternal_val(pll, cfg, PLL_N) * CCU_PLL_10M;
> +	else {

Please include braces on the if as well when another branch has them.

> +		nint = pinternal_val(pll, cfg, PLL_NINT);
> +		if (pinternal(pll, cfg, PLL_SDM_EN))
> +			kint = pinternal_val(pll, cfg, PLL_KINT);
> +
> +		mask = pmask(pll, PLL_KINT);
> +#ifdef CONFIG_64BIT
> +		k1 = 1000;
> +		k2 = 1000;
> +		rate = DIV_ROUND_CLOSEST(refin * kint * k1,
> +					 ((mask >> __ffs(mask)) + 1)) *
> +					 k2 + refin * nint * CCU_PLL_1M;
> +#else
> +		k1 = 100;
> +		k2 = 10000;
> +		i = pwidth(pll, PLL_KINT);
> +		i = i < 21 ? 0 : i - 21;
> +		rate = DIV_ROUND_CLOSEST(refin * (kint >> i) * k1,
> +					 ((mask >> (__ffs(mask) + i)) + 1)) *
> +					 k2 + refin * nint * CCU_PLL_1M;
> +#endif
> +	}
> +
> +	return rate;
> +}
> +
> +static int ccu_pll_helper_set_rate(struct ccu_pll *pll,
> +				   unsigned long rate,
> +				   unsigned long parent_rate)
> +{
> +	u32 mask, shift, width, ibias_val, index, kint, nint;
> +	u32 reg_num = pll->regs[0], i = 0;
> +	unsigned long refin, fvco = rate;
> +	struct reg_cfg *cfg;
> +
> +	cfg = kcalloc(reg_num, sizeof(*cfg), GFP_KERNEL);
> +	if (!cfg)
> +		return -ENOMEM;
> +
> +	refin = pll_get_refin_rate(pll);
> +
> +	mask = pmask(pll, PLL_PREDIV);
> +	index = pindex(pll, PLL_PREDIV);
> +	width = pwidth(pll, PLL_PREDIV);
> +	if (width && (ccu_pll_readl(pll, index) & mask))
> +		refin = refin * 2;
> +
> +	mask = pmask(pll, PLL_POSTDIV);
> +	index = pindex(pll, PLL_POSTDIV);
> +	width = pwidth(pll, PLL_POSTDIV);
> +	cfg[index].msk = mask;
> +	if (width && ((pll->fflag == 1 && fvco <= pll->fvco) ||
> +		      (pll->fflag == 0 && fvco > pll->fvco)))
> +		cfg[index].val |= mask;
> +
> +	if (width && fvco <= pll->fvco)
> +		fvco = fvco * 2;
> +
> +	mask = pmask(pll, PLL_DIV_S);
> +	index = pindex(pll, PLL_DIV_S);
> +	cfg[index].val |= mask;
> +	cfg[index].msk |= mask;
> +
> +	mask = pmask(pll, PLL_SDM_EN);
> +	index = pindex(pll, PLL_SDM_EN);
> +	cfg[index].val |= mask;
> +	cfg[index].msk |= mask;
> +
> +	nint  = fvco/(refin * CCU_PLL_1M);
> +
> +	mask = pmask(pll, PLL_NINT);
> +	index = pindex(pll, PLL_NINT);
> +	shift = pshift(pll, PLL_NINT);
> +	cfg[index].val |= (nint << shift) & mask;
> +	cfg[index].msk |= mask;
> +
> +	mask = pmask(pll, PLL_KINT);
> +	index = pindex(pll, PLL_KINT);
> +	width = pwidth(pll, PLL_KINT);
> +	shift = pshift(pll, PLL_KINT);
> +#ifndef CONFIG_64BIT
> +	i = width < 21 ? 0 : i - 21;
> +#endif

What's this? Why do we depend on CONFIG_64BIT?

> +	kint = DIV_ROUND_CLOSEST(((fvco - refin * nint * CCU_PLL_1M)/10000) *
> +	((mask >> (shift + i)) + 1), refin * 100) << i;
> +	cfg[index].val |= (kint << shift) & mask;
> +	cfg[index].msk |= mask;
> +
> +	ibias_val = pll_get_ibias(fvco, pll->itable);
> +
> +	mask = pmask(pll, PLL_IBIAS);
> +	index = pindex(pll, PLL_IBIAS);
> +	shift = pshift(pll, PLL_IBIAS);
> +	cfg[index].val |= ibias_val << shift & mask;
> +	cfg[index].msk |= mask;
> +
> +	for (i = 0; i < reg_num; i++) {
> +		if (cfg[i].msk)
> +			ccu_pll_writel(pll, i, cfg[i].val, cfg[i].msk);
> +	}
> +

Are we waiting for the writel() to go through above? If so we
need a readl() of the same register to make sure the write has
completed before delaying.

> +	udelay(pll->udelay);
> +
> +	return 0;
> +}
> +
> +static unsigned long ccu_pll_recalc_rate(struct clk_hw *hw,
> +					 unsigned long parent_rate)
> +{
> +	struct ccu_pll *pll = hw_to_ccu_pll(hw);
> +
> +	return ccu_pll_helper_recalc_rate(pll, parent_rate);
> +}
> +
> +static int ccu_pll_set_rate(struct clk_hw *hw,
> +			    unsigned long rate,
> +			    unsigned long parent_rate)
> +{
> +	struct ccu_pll *pll = hw_to_ccu_pll(hw);
> +
> +	return ccu_pll_helper_set_rate(pll, rate, parent_rate);
> +}
> +
> +static int ccu_pll_clk_prepare(struct clk_hw *hw)
> +{
> +	struct ccu_pll *pll = hw_to_ccu_pll(hw);
> +
> +	udelay(pll->udelay);
> +
> +	return 0;
> +}
> +
> +static long ccu_pll_round_rate(struct clk_hw *hw, unsigned long rate,
> +			       unsigned long *prate)
> +{
> +	return rate;
> +}
> +
> +const struct clk_ops ccu_pll_ops = {
> +	.prepare = ccu_pll_clk_prepare,
> +	.recalc_rate = ccu_pll_recalc_rate,
> +	.round_rate = ccu_pll_round_rate,
> +	.set_rate = ccu_pll_set_rate,
> +};
> diff --git a/drivers/clk/sprd/ccu_pll.h b/drivers/clk/sprd/ccu_pll.h
> new file mode 100644
> index 0000000..66fe5d1
> --- /dev/null
> +++ b/drivers/clk/sprd/ccu_pll.h
> @@ -0,0 +1,123 @@
> +/*
> + * Spreadtrum clock pll configurations
> + *
> + * Copyright (C) 2015~2017 Spreadtrum, Inc.
> + *
> + * SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0
> + */
> +
> +#ifndef _CCU_PLL_H_
> +#define _CCU_PLL_H_
> +
> +#include "ccu_common.h"
> +
> +struct reg_cfg {
> +	u32 val;
> +	u32 msk;
> +};
> +
> +struct ccu_bit_field {
> +	u8 shift;
> +	u8 width;
> +};
> +
> +enum {
> +	PLL_LOCK_DONE = 0,

Drop the = 0 please unless it's needed for something?

> +	PLL_DIV_S,
> +	PLL_MOD_EN,
> +	PLL_SDM_EN,
> +	PLL_REFIN,
> +	PLL_IBIAS,
> +	PLL_N,
> +	PLL_NINT,
> +	PLL_KINT,
> +	PLL_PREDIV,
> +	PLL_POSTDIV,
> +
> +	PLL_FACT_MAX
> +};
> +
> +/*
> + * struct ccu_pll - defination of adjustable pll clock

s/defination/definition/

> + *
> + * @reg:	registers used to set the configuration of pll clock,
> + *		reg[0] shows how many registers this pll clock uses.
> + * @itable:	pll ibias table, itable[0] means how many items this
> + *		table includes
> + * @udelay	delay time after setting rate
> + * @factors	used to calculate the pll clock rate
> + * @fvco:	fvco threshold rate
> + * @fflag:	fvco flag
> + */
> +struct ccu_pll {
> +	const u32 *regs;
> +	const u64 *itable;
> +	u16 udelay;
> +	const struct ccu_bit_field *factors;

Does this change across the different PLLs? Would be nice to not
need the bit field thing.

> +	u64 fvco;
> +	u16 fflag;
> +
> +	struct ccu_common	common;

-- 
Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc. is a member of Code Aurora Forum,
a Linux Foundation Collaborative Project

WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: sboyd@codeaurora.org (Stephen Boyd)
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: [PATCH V1 7/9] clk: sprd: add adjustable pll support
Date: Mon, 19 Jun 2017 18:37:10 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20170620013710.GJ4493@codeaurora.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20170618015855.27738-8-chunyan.zhang@spreadtrum.com>

On 06/18, Chunyan Zhang wrote:
> diff --git a/drivers/clk/sprd/Makefile b/drivers/clk/sprd/Makefile
> index 83232e5..c593a93 100644
> --- a/drivers/clk/sprd/Makefile
> +++ b/drivers/clk/sprd/Makefile
> @@ -1,3 +1,3 @@
>  ifneq ($(CONFIG_OF),)
> -obj-y	+= ccu_common.o ccu_gate.o ccu_mux.o ccu_div.o ccu_composite.o
> +obj-y	+= ccu_common.o ccu_gate.o ccu_mux.o ccu_div.o ccu_composite.o ccu_pll.o
>  endif
> diff --git a/drivers/clk/sprd/ccu_pll.c b/drivers/clk/sprd/ccu_pll.c
> new file mode 100644
> index 0000000..6c908e4
> --- /dev/null
> +++ b/drivers/clk/sprd/ccu_pll.c
> @@ -0,0 +1,241 @@
> +/*
> + * Spreadtrum pll clock driver
> + *
> + * Copyright (C) 2015~2017 Spreadtrum, Inc.
> + *
> + * SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0
> + */
> +
> +#include <linux/delay.h>
> +#include <linux/clk.h>

Is this include used? Should be clk-provider?

> +#include <linux/err.h>
> +#include <linux/slab.h>
> +
> +#include "ccu_pll.h"
> +
> +#define CCU_PLL_1M	1000000
> +#define CCU_PLL_10M	(CCU_PLL_1M * 10)
> +
> +#define pindex(pll, member)		\
> +	(pll->factors[member].shift / (8 * sizeof(pll->regs[0])))
> +
> +#define pshift(pll, member)		\
> +	(pll->factors[member].shift % (8 * sizeof(pll->regs[0])))
> +
> +#define pwidth(pll, member)		\
> +	pll->factors[member].width
> +
> +#define pmask(pll, member)					\
> +	((pwidth(pll, member)) ?				\
> +	GENMASK(pwidth(pll, member) + pshift(pll, member) - 1,	\
> +	pshift(pll, member)) : 0)
> +
> +#define pinternal(pll, cfg, member)	\
> +	(cfg[pindex(pll, member)] & pmask(pll, member))
> +
> +#define pinternal_val(pll, cfg, member)	\
> +	(pinternal(pll, cfg, member) >> pshift(pll, member))
> +
> +static unsigned long pll_get_refin_rate(struct ccu_pll *pll)

pll could be const?

> +{
> +	u8 shift, index, refin_id = 3;
> +	u32 mask;
> +	const unsigned long refin[4] = { 2, 4, 13, 26 };
> +
> +	if (pwidth(pll, PLL_REFIN)) {
> +		index = pindex(pll, PLL_REFIN);
> +		shift = pshift(pll, PLL_REFIN);
> +		mask = pmask(pll, PLL_REFIN);
> +		refin_id = (ccu_pll_readl(pll, index) & mask) >> shift;
> +		if (refin_id > 3)
> +			refin_id = 3;
> +	}
> +
> +	return refin[refin_id];
> +}
> +
> +static u8 pll_get_ibias(unsigned long rate, const u64 *table)
> +{
> +	u64 i;
> +	u8 num = table[0];
> +
> +	for (i = 0; i < num; i++)
> +		if (rate <= table[i + 1])
> +			break;
> +
> +	return i == num ? num - 1 : i;
> +}
> +
> +static unsigned long ccu_pll_helper_recalc_rate(struct ccu_pll *pll,
> +						unsigned long parent_rate)
> +{
> +	unsigned long rate, refin, k1, k2;
> +	unsigned long kint = 0, nint;
> +	u32 reg_num = pll->regs[0];
> +	u32 *cfg;
> +	u32 i;
> +	u32 mask;
> +
> +	cfg = kcalloc(reg_num, sizeof(*cfg), GFP_KERNEL);
> +	if (!cfg)
> +		return -ENOMEM;
> +
> +	for (i = 0; i < reg_num; i++)
> +		cfg[i] = ccu_pll_readl(pll, i);
> +
> +	refin = pll_get_refin_rate(pll);
> +
> +	if (pinternal(pll, cfg, PLL_PREDIV))
> +		refin = refin * 2;
> +
> +	if (pwidth(pll, PLL_POSTDIV) &&
> +	    ((pll->fflag == 1 && pinternal(pll, cfg, PLL_POSTDIV)) ||
> +	     (!pll->fflag && !pinternal(pll, cfg, PLL_POSTDIV))))
> +		refin = refin / 2;
> +
> +	if (!pinternal(pll, cfg, PLL_DIV_S))
> +		rate = refin * pinternal_val(pll, cfg, PLL_N) * CCU_PLL_10M;
> +	else {

Please include braces on the if as well when another branch has them.

> +		nint = pinternal_val(pll, cfg, PLL_NINT);
> +		if (pinternal(pll, cfg, PLL_SDM_EN))
> +			kint = pinternal_val(pll, cfg, PLL_KINT);
> +
> +		mask = pmask(pll, PLL_KINT);
> +#ifdef CONFIG_64BIT
> +		k1 = 1000;
> +		k2 = 1000;
> +		rate = DIV_ROUND_CLOSEST(refin * kint * k1,
> +					 ((mask >> __ffs(mask)) + 1)) *
> +					 k2 + refin * nint * CCU_PLL_1M;
> +#else
> +		k1 = 100;
> +		k2 = 10000;
> +		i = pwidth(pll, PLL_KINT);
> +		i = i < 21 ? 0 : i - 21;
> +		rate = DIV_ROUND_CLOSEST(refin * (kint >> i) * k1,
> +					 ((mask >> (__ffs(mask) + i)) + 1)) *
> +					 k2 + refin * nint * CCU_PLL_1M;
> +#endif
> +	}
> +
> +	return rate;
> +}
> +
> +static int ccu_pll_helper_set_rate(struct ccu_pll *pll,
> +				   unsigned long rate,
> +				   unsigned long parent_rate)
> +{
> +	u32 mask, shift, width, ibias_val, index, kint, nint;
> +	u32 reg_num = pll->regs[0], i = 0;
> +	unsigned long refin, fvco = rate;
> +	struct reg_cfg *cfg;
> +
> +	cfg = kcalloc(reg_num, sizeof(*cfg), GFP_KERNEL);
> +	if (!cfg)
> +		return -ENOMEM;
> +
> +	refin = pll_get_refin_rate(pll);
> +
> +	mask = pmask(pll, PLL_PREDIV);
> +	index = pindex(pll, PLL_PREDIV);
> +	width = pwidth(pll, PLL_PREDIV);
> +	if (width && (ccu_pll_readl(pll, index) & mask))
> +		refin = refin * 2;
> +
> +	mask = pmask(pll, PLL_POSTDIV);
> +	index = pindex(pll, PLL_POSTDIV);
> +	width = pwidth(pll, PLL_POSTDIV);
> +	cfg[index].msk = mask;
> +	if (width && ((pll->fflag == 1 && fvco <= pll->fvco) ||
> +		      (pll->fflag == 0 && fvco > pll->fvco)))
> +		cfg[index].val |= mask;
> +
> +	if (width && fvco <= pll->fvco)
> +		fvco = fvco * 2;
> +
> +	mask = pmask(pll, PLL_DIV_S);
> +	index = pindex(pll, PLL_DIV_S);
> +	cfg[index].val |= mask;
> +	cfg[index].msk |= mask;
> +
> +	mask = pmask(pll, PLL_SDM_EN);
> +	index = pindex(pll, PLL_SDM_EN);
> +	cfg[index].val |= mask;
> +	cfg[index].msk |= mask;
> +
> +	nint  = fvco/(refin * CCU_PLL_1M);
> +
> +	mask = pmask(pll, PLL_NINT);
> +	index = pindex(pll, PLL_NINT);
> +	shift = pshift(pll, PLL_NINT);
> +	cfg[index].val |= (nint << shift) & mask;
> +	cfg[index].msk |= mask;
> +
> +	mask = pmask(pll, PLL_KINT);
> +	index = pindex(pll, PLL_KINT);
> +	width = pwidth(pll, PLL_KINT);
> +	shift = pshift(pll, PLL_KINT);
> +#ifndef CONFIG_64BIT
> +	i = width < 21 ? 0 : i - 21;
> +#endif

What's this? Why do we depend on CONFIG_64BIT?

> +	kint = DIV_ROUND_CLOSEST(((fvco - refin * nint * CCU_PLL_1M)/10000) *
> +	((mask >> (shift + i)) + 1), refin * 100) << i;
> +	cfg[index].val |= (kint << shift) & mask;
> +	cfg[index].msk |= mask;
> +
> +	ibias_val = pll_get_ibias(fvco, pll->itable);
> +
> +	mask = pmask(pll, PLL_IBIAS);
> +	index = pindex(pll, PLL_IBIAS);
> +	shift = pshift(pll, PLL_IBIAS);
> +	cfg[index].val |= ibias_val << shift & mask;
> +	cfg[index].msk |= mask;
> +
> +	for (i = 0; i < reg_num; i++) {
> +		if (cfg[i].msk)
> +			ccu_pll_writel(pll, i, cfg[i].val, cfg[i].msk);
> +	}
> +

Are we waiting for the writel() to go through above? If so we
need a readl() of the same register to make sure the write has
completed before delaying.

> +	udelay(pll->udelay);
> +
> +	return 0;
> +}
> +
> +static unsigned long ccu_pll_recalc_rate(struct clk_hw *hw,
> +					 unsigned long parent_rate)
> +{
> +	struct ccu_pll *pll = hw_to_ccu_pll(hw);
> +
> +	return ccu_pll_helper_recalc_rate(pll, parent_rate);
> +}
> +
> +static int ccu_pll_set_rate(struct clk_hw *hw,
> +			    unsigned long rate,
> +			    unsigned long parent_rate)
> +{
> +	struct ccu_pll *pll = hw_to_ccu_pll(hw);
> +
> +	return ccu_pll_helper_set_rate(pll, rate, parent_rate);
> +}
> +
> +static int ccu_pll_clk_prepare(struct clk_hw *hw)
> +{
> +	struct ccu_pll *pll = hw_to_ccu_pll(hw);
> +
> +	udelay(pll->udelay);
> +
> +	return 0;
> +}
> +
> +static long ccu_pll_round_rate(struct clk_hw *hw, unsigned long rate,
> +			       unsigned long *prate)
> +{
> +	return rate;
> +}
> +
> +const struct clk_ops ccu_pll_ops = {
> +	.prepare = ccu_pll_clk_prepare,
> +	.recalc_rate = ccu_pll_recalc_rate,
> +	.round_rate = ccu_pll_round_rate,
> +	.set_rate = ccu_pll_set_rate,
> +};
> diff --git a/drivers/clk/sprd/ccu_pll.h b/drivers/clk/sprd/ccu_pll.h
> new file mode 100644
> index 0000000..66fe5d1
> --- /dev/null
> +++ b/drivers/clk/sprd/ccu_pll.h
> @@ -0,0 +1,123 @@
> +/*
> + * Spreadtrum clock pll configurations
> + *
> + * Copyright (C) 2015~2017 Spreadtrum, Inc.
> + *
> + * SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0
> + */
> +
> +#ifndef _CCU_PLL_H_
> +#define _CCU_PLL_H_
> +
> +#include "ccu_common.h"
> +
> +struct reg_cfg {
> +	u32 val;
> +	u32 msk;
> +};
> +
> +struct ccu_bit_field {
> +	u8 shift;
> +	u8 width;
> +};
> +
> +enum {
> +	PLL_LOCK_DONE = 0,

Drop the = 0 please unless it's needed for something?

> +	PLL_DIV_S,
> +	PLL_MOD_EN,
> +	PLL_SDM_EN,
> +	PLL_REFIN,
> +	PLL_IBIAS,
> +	PLL_N,
> +	PLL_NINT,
> +	PLL_KINT,
> +	PLL_PREDIV,
> +	PLL_POSTDIV,
> +
> +	PLL_FACT_MAX
> +};
> +
> +/*
> + * struct ccu_pll - defination of adjustable pll clock

s/defination/definition/

> + *
> + * @reg:	registers used to set the configuration of pll clock,
> + *		reg[0] shows how many registers this pll clock uses.
> + * @itable:	pll ibias table, itable[0] means how many items this
> + *		table includes
> + * @udelay	delay time after setting rate
> + * @factors	used to calculate the pll clock rate
> + * @fvco:	fvco threshold rate
> + * @fflag:	fvco flag
> + */
> +struct ccu_pll {
> +	const u32 *regs;
> +	const u64 *itable;
> +	u16 udelay;
> +	const struct ccu_bit_field *factors;

Does this change across the different PLLs? Would be nice to not
need the bit field thing.

> +	u64 fvco;
> +	u16 fflag;
> +
> +	struct ccu_common	common;

-- 
Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc. is a member of Code Aurora Forum,
a Linux Foundation Collaborative Project

  reply	other threads:[~2017-06-20  1:37 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 89+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2017-06-18  1:58 [PATCH V1 0/9] add clock driver for Spreadtrum platforms Chunyan Zhang
2017-06-18  1:58 ` Chunyan Zhang
2017-06-18  1:58 ` Chunyan Zhang
2017-06-18  1:58 ` [PATCH V1 1/9] dt-bindings: Add Spreadtrum CCU binding documentation Chunyan Zhang
2017-06-18  1:58   ` Chunyan Zhang
2017-06-18  1:58   ` Chunyan Zhang
2017-06-23 20:05   ` Rob Herring
2017-06-23 20:05     ` Rob Herring
2017-06-18  1:58 ` [PATCH V1 2/9] clk: sprd: Add common infrastructure Chunyan Zhang
2017-06-18  1:58   ` Chunyan Zhang
2017-06-18  1:58   ` Chunyan Zhang
2017-06-20  1:29   ` Stephen Boyd
2017-06-20  1:29     ` Stephen Boyd
2017-06-22 10:12     ` Chunyan Zhang
2017-06-22 10:12       ` Chunyan Zhang
2017-06-18  1:58 ` [PATCH V1 3/9] clk: sprd: add gate clock support Chunyan Zhang
2017-06-18  1:58   ` Chunyan Zhang
2017-06-18  1:58   ` Chunyan Zhang
2017-06-20  1:31   ` Stephen Boyd
2017-06-20  1:31     ` Stephen Boyd
2017-06-20  1:31     ` Stephen Boyd
2017-06-22 10:16     ` Chunyan Zhang
2017-06-22 10:16       ` Chunyan Zhang
2017-06-30  1:43       ` Stephen Boyd
2017-06-30  1:43         ` Stephen Boyd
2017-06-30  1:43         ` Stephen Boyd
2017-06-18  1:58 ` [PATCH V1 4/9] clk: sprd: add mux " Chunyan Zhang
2017-06-18  1:58   ` Chunyan Zhang
2017-06-18  1:58   ` Chunyan Zhang
2017-06-18  1:58 ` [PATCH V1 5/9] clk: sprd: add divider " Chunyan Zhang
2017-06-18  1:58   ` Chunyan Zhang
2017-06-18  1:58   ` Chunyan Zhang
2017-06-18  1:58 ` [PATCH V1 6/9] clk: sprd: add composite " Chunyan Zhang
2017-06-18  1:58   ` Chunyan Zhang
2017-06-18  1:58   ` Chunyan Zhang
2017-06-19  0:13   ` kbuild test robot
2017-06-19  0:13     ` kbuild test robot
2017-06-19  0:13     ` kbuild test robot
2017-06-18  1:58 ` [PATCH V1 7/9] clk: sprd: add adjustable pll support Chunyan Zhang
2017-06-18  1:58   ` Chunyan Zhang
2017-06-18  1:58   ` Chunyan Zhang
2017-06-20  1:37   ` Stephen Boyd [this message]
2017-06-20  1:37     ` Stephen Boyd
2017-06-22 10:17     ` Chunyan Zhang
2017-06-22 10:17       ` Chunyan Zhang
2017-06-22 10:17       ` Chunyan Zhang
2017-06-22 11:15       ` Arnd Bergmann
2017-06-22 11:15         ` Arnd Bergmann
2017-06-22 12:06         ` Chunyan Zhang
2017-06-22 12:06           ` Chunyan Zhang
2017-06-30  1:44       ` Stephen Boyd
2017-06-30  1:44         ` Stephen Boyd
2017-06-30  1:44         ` Stephen Boyd
2017-06-30  7:55         ` Chunyan Zhang
2017-06-30  7:55           ` Chunyan Zhang
2017-06-30 19:22           ` Stephen Boyd
2017-06-30 19:22             ` Stephen Boyd
2017-07-03  7:41             ` Chunyan Zhang
2017-07-03  7:41               ` Chunyan Zhang
2017-07-03  7:41               ` Chunyan Zhang
2017-06-18  1:58 ` [PATCH V1 8/9] clk: sprd: add clocks support for SC9860 Chunyan Zhang
2017-06-18  1:58   ` Chunyan Zhang
2017-06-18  1:58   ` Chunyan Zhang
2017-06-20  1:41   ` Stephen Boyd
2017-06-20  1:41     ` Stephen Boyd
2017-06-20  1:41     ` Stephen Boyd
2017-06-22 10:21     ` Chunyan Zhang
2017-06-22 10:21       ` Chunyan Zhang
2017-06-30  1:41       ` Stephen Boyd
2017-06-30  1:41         ` Stephen Boyd
2017-06-30  1:41         ` Stephen Boyd
2017-06-18  1:58 ` [PATCH V1 9/9] arm64: dts: add ccu " Chunyan Zhang
2017-06-18  1:58   ` Chunyan Zhang
2017-06-18  1:58   ` Chunyan Zhang
2017-06-20  1:24   ` Stephen Boyd
2017-06-20  1:24     ` Stephen Boyd
2017-06-22 10:24     ` Chunyan Zhang
2017-06-22 10:24       ` Chunyan Zhang
2017-06-22 10:24       ` Chunyan Zhang
2017-06-30  0:57       ` Stephen Boyd
2017-06-30  0:57         ` Stephen Boyd
2017-06-30  7:37         ` Chunyan Zhang
2017-06-30  7:37           ` Chunyan Zhang
2017-06-20  1:25 ` [PATCH V1 0/9] add clock driver for Spreadtrum platforms Stephen Boyd
2017-06-20  1:25   ` Stephen Boyd
2017-06-22 10:07   ` Chunyan Zhang
2017-06-22 10:07     ` Chunyan Zhang
2017-06-30  0:45     ` Stephen Boyd
2017-06-30  0:45       ` Stephen Boyd

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20170620013710.GJ4493@codeaurora.org \
    --to=sboyd@codeaurora.org \
    --cc=arnd@arndb.de \
    --cc=broonie@kernel.org \
    --cc=chunyan.zhang@spreadtrum.com \
    --cc=devicetree@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=geng.ren@spreadtrum.com \
    --cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=linux-clk@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mark.rutland@arm.com \
    --cc=mturquette@baylibre.com \
    --cc=orson.zhai@spreadtrum.com \
    --cc=robh+dt@kernel.org \
    --cc=xiaolong.zhang@spreadtrum.com \
    --cc=zhang.lyra@gmail.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.