From: Minchan Kim <minchan@kernel.org>
To: Matthew Wilcox <willy@infradead.org>
Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-mm@kvack.org,
Ross Zwisler <ross.zwisler@linux.intel.com>,
"karam . lee" <karam.lee@lge.com>,
seungho1.park@lge.com, Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>,
Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@intel.com>,
Dave Chinner <david@fromorbit.com>,
jack@suse.cz, Jens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk>,
Vishal Verma <vishal.l.verma@intel.com>,
linux-nvdimm@lists.01.org, kernel-team <kernel-team@lge.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v1 2/6] fs: use on-stack-bio if backing device has BDI_CAP_SYNC capability
Date: Wed, 9 Aug 2017 10:48:04 +0900 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20170809014804.GA32338@bbox> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20170808124959.GB31390@bombadil.infradead.org>
Hi Matthew,
On Tue, Aug 08, 2017 at 05:49:59AM -0700, Matthew Wilcox wrote:
> On Tue, Aug 08, 2017 at 03:50:20PM +0900, Minchan Kim wrote:
> > There is no need to use dynamic bio allocation for BDI_CAP_SYNC
> > devices. They can with on-stack-bio without concern about waiting
> > bio allocation from mempool under heavy memory pressure.
>
> This seems ... more complex than necessary? Why not simply do this:
>
> diff --git a/fs/mpage.c b/fs/mpage.c
> index baff8f820c29..6db6bf5131ed 100644
> --- a/fs/mpage.c
> +++ b/fs/mpage.c
> @@ -157,6 +157,8 @@ do_mpage_readpage(struct bio *bio, struct page *page, unsigned nr_pages,
> unsigned page_block;
> unsigned first_hole = blocks_per_page;
> struct block_device *bdev = NULL;
> + struct bio sbio;
> + struct bio_vec sbvec;
> int length;
> int fully_mapped = 1;
> unsigned nblocks;
> @@ -281,10 +283,17 @@ do_mpage_readpage(struct bio *bio, struct page *page, unsigned nr_pages,
> page))
> goto out;
> }
> - bio = mpage_alloc(bdev, blocks[0] << (blkbits - 9),
> + if (bdi_cap_synchronous_io(inode_to_bdi(inode))) {
> + bio = &sbio;
> + bio_init(bio, &sbvec, nr_pages);
> + sbio.bi_bdev = bdev;
> + sbio.bi_iter.bi_sector = blocks[0] << (blkbits - 9);
> + } else {
> + bio = mpage_alloc(bdev, blocks[0] << (blkbits - 9),
> min_t(int, nr_pages, BIO_MAX_PAGES), gfp);
> - if (bio == NULL)
> - goto confused;
> + if (bio == NULL)
> + goto confused;
> + }
> }
>
> length = first_hole << blkbits;
> @@ -301,6 +310,8 @@ do_mpage_readpage(struct bio *bio, struct page *page, unsigned nr_pages,
> else
> *last_block_in_bio = blocks[blocks_per_page - 1];
> out:
> + if (bio == &sbio)
> + bio = mpage_bio_submit(REQ_OP_READ, 0, bio);
Looks nicer but one nitpick:
For reusing mpage_bio_submit, we need to call bio_get for on-stack-bio which
doesn't make sense to me but if you think it's more readable and ok with
overhead with two unnecessary atomic instructions(bio_get/put), I will do it
in next spin.
Thanks.
--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@kvack.org. For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@kvack.org"> email@kvack.org </a>
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Minchan Kim <minchan@kernel.org>
To: Matthew Wilcox <willy@infradead.org>
Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-mm@kvack.org,
Ross Zwisler <ross.zwisler@linux.intel.com>,
"karam . lee" <karam.lee@lge.com>,
seungho1.park@lge.com, Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>,
Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@intel.com>,
Dave Chinner <david@fromorbit.com>,
jack@suse.cz, Jens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk>,
Vishal Verma <vishal.l.verma@intel.com>,
linux-nvdimm@lists.01.org, kernel-team <kernel-team@lge.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v1 2/6] fs: use on-stack-bio if backing device has BDI_CAP_SYNC capability
Date: Wed, 9 Aug 2017 10:48:04 +0900 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20170809014804.GA32338@bbox> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20170808124959.GB31390@bombadil.infradead.org>
Hi Matthew,
On Tue, Aug 08, 2017 at 05:49:59AM -0700, Matthew Wilcox wrote:
> On Tue, Aug 08, 2017 at 03:50:20PM +0900, Minchan Kim wrote:
> > There is no need to use dynamic bio allocation for BDI_CAP_SYNC
> > devices. They can with on-stack-bio without concern about waiting
> > bio allocation from mempool under heavy memory pressure.
>
> This seems ... more complex than necessary? Why not simply do this:
>
> diff --git a/fs/mpage.c b/fs/mpage.c
> index baff8f820c29..6db6bf5131ed 100644
> --- a/fs/mpage.c
> +++ b/fs/mpage.c
> @@ -157,6 +157,8 @@ do_mpage_readpage(struct bio *bio, struct page *page, unsigned nr_pages,
> unsigned page_block;
> unsigned first_hole = blocks_per_page;
> struct block_device *bdev = NULL;
> + struct bio sbio;
> + struct bio_vec sbvec;
> int length;
> int fully_mapped = 1;
> unsigned nblocks;
> @@ -281,10 +283,17 @@ do_mpage_readpage(struct bio *bio, struct page *page, unsigned nr_pages,
> page))
> goto out;
> }
> - bio = mpage_alloc(bdev, blocks[0] << (blkbits - 9),
> + if (bdi_cap_synchronous_io(inode_to_bdi(inode))) {
> + bio = &sbio;
> + bio_init(bio, &sbvec, nr_pages);
> + sbio.bi_bdev = bdev;
> + sbio.bi_iter.bi_sector = blocks[0] << (blkbits - 9);
> + } else {
> + bio = mpage_alloc(bdev, blocks[0] << (blkbits - 9),
> min_t(int, nr_pages, BIO_MAX_PAGES), gfp);
> - if (bio == NULL)
> - goto confused;
> + if (bio == NULL)
> + goto confused;
> + }
> }
>
> length = first_hole << blkbits;
> @@ -301,6 +310,8 @@ do_mpage_readpage(struct bio *bio, struct page *page, unsigned nr_pages,
> else
> *last_block_in_bio = blocks[blocks_per_page - 1];
> out:
> + if (bio == &sbio)
> + bio = mpage_bio_submit(REQ_OP_READ, 0, bio);
Looks nicer but one nitpick:
For reusing mpage_bio_submit, we need to call bio_get for on-stack-bio which
doesn't make sense to me but if you think it's more readable and ok with
overhead with two unnecessary atomic instructions(bio_get/put), I will do it
in next spin.
Thanks.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2017-08-09 1:48 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 85+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2017-08-08 6:50 [PATCH v1 0/6] Remove rw_page Minchan Kim
2017-08-08 6:50 ` Minchan Kim
2017-08-08 6:50 ` [PATCH v1 1/6] bdi: introduce BDI_CAP_SYNC Minchan Kim
2017-08-08 6:50 ` Minchan Kim
2017-08-08 6:50 ` Minchan Kim
2017-08-08 6:50 ` [PATCH v1 2/6] fs: use on-stack-bio if backing device has BDI_CAP_SYNC capability Minchan Kim
2017-08-08 6:50 ` Minchan Kim
2017-08-08 12:49 ` Matthew Wilcox
2017-08-08 12:49 ` Matthew Wilcox
2017-08-08 13:29 ` Matthew Wilcox
2017-08-08 13:29 ` Matthew Wilcox
2017-08-09 1:51 ` Minchan Kim
2017-08-09 1:51 ` Minchan Kim
2017-08-09 1:51 ` Minchan Kim
2017-08-09 2:31 ` Matthew Wilcox
2017-08-09 2:31 ` Matthew Wilcox
2017-08-09 2:41 ` Minchan Kim
2017-08-09 2:41 ` Minchan Kim
2017-08-10 3:04 ` Matthew Wilcox
2017-08-10 3:04 ` Matthew Wilcox
2017-08-10 3:06 ` Dan Williams
2017-08-10 3:06 ` Dan Williams
2017-08-11 10:46 ` Christoph Hellwig
2017-08-11 10:46 ` Christoph Hellwig
2017-08-11 10:46 ` Christoph Hellwig
2017-08-11 14:26 ` Jens Axboe
2017-08-11 14:26 ` Jens Axboe
2017-08-14 8:50 ` Minchan Kim
2017-08-14 8:50 ` Minchan Kim
2017-08-14 8:50 ` Minchan Kim
2017-08-14 14:36 ` Jens Axboe
2017-08-14 14:36 ` Jens Axboe
2017-08-14 15:06 ` Minchan Kim
2017-08-14 15:06 ` Minchan Kim
2017-08-14 15:06 ` Minchan Kim
2017-08-14 15:14 ` Jens Axboe
2017-08-14 15:14 ` Jens Axboe
2017-08-14 15:14 ` Jens Axboe
2017-08-14 15:31 ` Minchan Kim
2017-08-14 15:31 ` Minchan Kim
2017-08-14 15:31 ` Minchan Kim
2017-08-14 15:38 ` Jens Axboe
2017-08-14 15:38 ` Jens Axboe
2017-08-14 15:38 ` Jens Axboe
2017-08-14 16:17 ` Jens Axboe
2017-08-14 16:17 ` Jens Axboe
2017-08-14 16:17 ` Jens Axboe
2017-08-16 4:48 ` Minchan Kim
2017-08-16 4:48 ` Minchan Kim
2017-08-16 4:48 ` Minchan Kim
2017-08-16 15:56 ` Jens Axboe
2017-08-16 15:56 ` Jens Axboe
2017-08-16 15:56 ` Jens Axboe
2017-08-21 6:13 ` Minchan Kim
2017-08-21 6:13 ` Minchan Kim
2017-08-21 6:13 ` Minchan Kim
2017-08-14 8:48 ` Minchan Kim
2017-08-14 8:48 ` Minchan Kim
2017-08-14 8:48 ` Minchan Kim
2017-08-10 4:00 ` Minchan Kim
2017-08-10 4:00 ` Minchan Kim
2017-08-09 1:48 ` Minchan Kim [this message]
2017-08-09 1:48 ` Minchan Kim
2017-08-08 6:50 ` [PATCH v1 3/6] mm:swap: remove end_swap_bio_write argument Minchan Kim
2017-08-08 6:50 ` Minchan Kim
2017-08-08 6:50 ` Minchan Kim
2017-08-08 6:50 ` [PATCH v1 4/6] mm:swap: use on-stack-bio for BDI_CAP_SYNC devices Minchan Kim
2017-08-08 6:50 ` Minchan Kim
2017-08-08 6:50 ` Minchan Kim
2017-08-08 6:50 ` [PATCH v1 5/6] zram: remove zram_rw_page Minchan Kim
2017-08-08 6:50 ` Minchan Kim
2017-08-08 6:50 ` Minchan Kim
2017-08-08 7:02 ` Sergey Senozhatsky
2017-08-08 7:02 ` Sergey Senozhatsky
2017-08-08 8:13 ` Minchan Kim
2017-08-08 8:13 ` Minchan Kim
2017-08-08 8:13 ` Minchan Kim
2017-08-08 8:23 ` Sergey Senozhatsky
2017-08-08 8:23 ` Sergey Senozhatsky
2017-08-08 8:23 ` Sergey Senozhatsky
2017-08-08 15:48 ` Matthew Wilcox
2017-08-08 15:48 ` Matthew Wilcox
2017-08-08 6:50 ` [PATCH v1 6/6] fs: remove rw_page Minchan Kim
2017-08-08 6:50 ` Minchan Kim
2017-08-08 6:50 ` Minchan Kim
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20170809014804.GA32338@bbox \
--to=minchan@kernel.org \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=axboe@kernel.dk \
--cc=dan.j.williams@intel.com \
--cc=david@fromorbit.com \
--cc=hch@lst.de \
--cc=jack@suse.cz \
--cc=karam.lee@lge.com \
--cc=kernel-team@lge.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=linux-nvdimm@lists.01.org \
--cc=ross.zwisler@linux.intel.com \
--cc=seungho1.park@lge.com \
--cc=vishal.l.verma@intel.com \
--cc=willy@infradead.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.