All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Minchan Kim <minchan@kernel.org>
To: Matthew Wilcox <willy@infradead.org>
Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-mm@kvack.org,
	Ross Zwisler <ross.zwisler@linux.intel.com>,
	"karam . lee" <karam.lee@lge.com>,
	seungho1.park@lge.com, Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>,
	Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@intel.com>,
	Dave Chinner <david@fromorbit.com>,
	jack@suse.cz, Jens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk>,
	Vishal Verma <vishal.l.verma@intel.com>,
	linux-nvdimm@lists.01.org, kernel-team <kernel-team@lge.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v1 2/6] fs: use on-stack-bio if backing device has BDI_CAP_SYNC capability
Date: Thu, 10 Aug 2017 13:00:14 +0900	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20170810040014.GA2042@bbox> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20170810030433.GG31390@bombadil.infradead.org>

On Wed, Aug 09, 2017 at 08:04:33PM -0700, Matthew Wilcox wrote:
> On Wed, Aug 09, 2017 at 11:41:50AM +0900, Minchan Kim wrote:
> > On Tue, Aug 08, 2017 at 07:31:22PM -0700, Matthew Wilcox wrote:
> > > On Wed, Aug 09, 2017 at 10:51:13AM +0900, Minchan Kim wrote:
> > > > On Tue, Aug 08, 2017 at 06:29:04AM -0700, Matthew Wilcox wrote:
> > > > > On Tue, Aug 08, 2017 at 05:49:59AM -0700, Matthew Wilcox wrote:
> > > > > > +	struct bio sbio;
> > > > > > +	struct bio_vec sbvec;
> > > > > 
> > > > > ... this needs to be sbvec[nr_pages], of course.
> > > > > 
> > > > > > -		bio = mpage_alloc(bdev, blocks[0] << (blkbits - 9),
> > > > > > +		if (bdi_cap_synchronous_io(inode_to_bdi(inode))) {
> > > > > > +			bio = &sbio;
> > > > > > +			bio_init(bio, &sbvec, nr_pages);
> > > > > 
> > > > > ... and this needs to be 'sbvec', not '&sbvec'.
> > > > 
> > > > I don't get it why we need sbvec[nr_pages].
> > > > On-stack-bio works with per-page.
> > > > May I miss something?
> > > 
> > > The way I redid it, it will work with an arbitrary number of pages.
> > 
> > IIUC, it would be good things with dynamic bio alloction with passing
> > allocated bio back and forth but on-stack bio cannot work like that.
> > It should be done in per-page so it is worth?
> 
> I'm not passing the bio back and forth between do_mpage_readpage() and
> its callers.  The version I sent allows for multiple pages in a single
> on-stack bio (when called from mpage_readpages()).

I'm confused. I want to confirm your thought before respinning.
Please correct me if I miss something.

The version you sent to me used on-stack bio within do_mpage_readpage
so that's why I said sbvec[nr_pages] would be pointless because it
works with per-page base unless if we use dynamic bio allocation.

But I guess now you suggest to use on-stack bio in mpage_readpages so
single on-stack bio in mpage_readpages's stack can batch multiple pages
in bvecs of a bio.

Right?

--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@kvack.org.  For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@kvack.org"> email@kvack.org </a>

WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Minchan Kim <minchan@kernel.org>
To: Matthew Wilcox <willy@infradead.org>
Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-mm@kvack.org,
	Ross Zwisler <ross.zwisler@linux.intel.com>,
	"karam . lee" <karam.lee@lge.com>,
	seungho1.park@lge.com, Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>,
	Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@intel.com>,
	Dave Chinner <david@fromorbit.com>,
	jack@suse.cz, Jens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk>,
	Vishal Verma <vishal.l.verma@intel.com>,
	linux-nvdimm@lists.01.org, kernel-team <kernel-team@lge.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v1 2/6] fs: use on-stack-bio if backing device has BDI_CAP_SYNC capability
Date: Thu, 10 Aug 2017 13:00:14 +0900	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20170810040014.GA2042@bbox> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20170810030433.GG31390@bombadil.infradead.org>

On Wed, Aug 09, 2017 at 08:04:33PM -0700, Matthew Wilcox wrote:
> On Wed, Aug 09, 2017 at 11:41:50AM +0900, Minchan Kim wrote:
> > On Tue, Aug 08, 2017 at 07:31:22PM -0700, Matthew Wilcox wrote:
> > > On Wed, Aug 09, 2017 at 10:51:13AM +0900, Minchan Kim wrote:
> > > > On Tue, Aug 08, 2017 at 06:29:04AM -0700, Matthew Wilcox wrote:
> > > > > On Tue, Aug 08, 2017 at 05:49:59AM -0700, Matthew Wilcox wrote:
> > > > > > +	struct bio sbio;
> > > > > > +	struct bio_vec sbvec;
> > > > > 
> > > > > ... this needs to be sbvec[nr_pages], of course.
> > > > > 
> > > > > > -		bio = mpage_alloc(bdev, blocks[0] << (blkbits - 9),
> > > > > > +		if (bdi_cap_synchronous_io(inode_to_bdi(inode))) {
> > > > > > +			bio = &sbio;
> > > > > > +			bio_init(bio, &sbvec, nr_pages);
> > > > > 
> > > > > ... and this needs to be 'sbvec', not '&sbvec'.
> > > > 
> > > > I don't get it why we need sbvec[nr_pages].
> > > > On-stack-bio works with per-page.
> > > > May I miss something?
> > > 
> > > The way I redid it, it will work with an arbitrary number of pages.
> > 
> > IIUC, it would be good things with dynamic bio alloction with passing
> > allocated bio back and forth but on-stack bio cannot work like that.
> > It should be done in per-page so it is worth?
> 
> I'm not passing the bio back and forth between do_mpage_readpage() and
> its callers.  The version I sent allows for multiple pages in a single
> on-stack bio (when called from mpage_readpages()).

I'm confused. I want to confirm your thought before respinning.
Please correct me if I miss something.

The version you sent to me used on-stack bio within do_mpage_readpage
so that's why I said sbvec[nr_pages] would be pointless because it
works with per-page base unless if we use dynamic bio allocation.

But I guess now you suggest to use on-stack bio in mpage_readpages so
single on-stack bio in mpage_readpages's stack can batch multiple pages
in bvecs of a bio.

Right?

  parent reply	other threads:[~2017-08-10  4:00 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 85+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2017-08-08  6:50 [PATCH v1 0/6] Remove rw_page Minchan Kim
2017-08-08  6:50 ` Minchan Kim
2017-08-08  6:50 ` [PATCH v1 1/6] bdi: introduce BDI_CAP_SYNC Minchan Kim
2017-08-08  6:50   ` Minchan Kim
2017-08-08  6:50   ` Minchan Kim
2017-08-08  6:50 ` [PATCH v1 2/6] fs: use on-stack-bio if backing device has BDI_CAP_SYNC capability Minchan Kim
2017-08-08  6:50   ` Minchan Kim
2017-08-08 12:49   ` Matthew Wilcox
2017-08-08 12:49     ` Matthew Wilcox
2017-08-08 13:29     ` Matthew Wilcox
2017-08-08 13:29       ` Matthew Wilcox
2017-08-09  1:51       ` Minchan Kim
2017-08-09  1:51         ` Minchan Kim
2017-08-09  1:51         ` Minchan Kim
2017-08-09  2:31         ` Matthew Wilcox
2017-08-09  2:31           ` Matthew Wilcox
2017-08-09  2:41           ` Minchan Kim
2017-08-09  2:41             ` Minchan Kim
2017-08-10  3:04             ` Matthew Wilcox
2017-08-10  3:04               ` Matthew Wilcox
2017-08-10  3:06               ` Dan Williams
2017-08-10  3:06                 ` Dan Williams
2017-08-11 10:46                 ` Christoph Hellwig
2017-08-11 10:46                   ` Christoph Hellwig
2017-08-11 10:46                   ` Christoph Hellwig
2017-08-11 14:26                   ` Jens Axboe
2017-08-11 14:26                     ` Jens Axboe
2017-08-14  8:50                     ` Minchan Kim
2017-08-14  8:50                       ` Minchan Kim
2017-08-14  8:50                       ` Minchan Kim
2017-08-14 14:36                       ` Jens Axboe
2017-08-14 14:36                         ` Jens Axboe
2017-08-14 15:06                         ` Minchan Kim
2017-08-14 15:06                           ` Minchan Kim
2017-08-14 15:06                           ` Minchan Kim
2017-08-14 15:14                           ` Jens Axboe
2017-08-14 15:14                             ` Jens Axboe
2017-08-14 15:14                             ` Jens Axboe
2017-08-14 15:31                             ` Minchan Kim
2017-08-14 15:31                               ` Minchan Kim
2017-08-14 15:31                               ` Minchan Kim
2017-08-14 15:38                               ` Jens Axboe
2017-08-14 15:38                                 ` Jens Axboe
2017-08-14 15:38                                 ` Jens Axboe
2017-08-14 16:17                                 ` Jens Axboe
2017-08-14 16:17                                   ` Jens Axboe
2017-08-14 16:17                                   ` Jens Axboe
2017-08-16  4:48                                   ` Minchan Kim
2017-08-16  4:48                                     ` Minchan Kim
2017-08-16  4:48                                     ` Minchan Kim
2017-08-16 15:56                                     ` Jens Axboe
2017-08-16 15:56                                       ` Jens Axboe
2017-08-16 15:56                                       ` Jens Axboe
2017-08-21  6:13                                       ` Minchan Kim
2017-08-21  6:13                                         ` Minchan Kim
2017-08-21  6:13                                         ` Minchan Kim
2017-08-14  8:48                   ` Minchan Kim
2017-08-14  8:48                     ` Minchan Kim
2017-08-14  8:48                     ` Minchan Kim
2017-08-10  4:00               ` Minchan Kim [this message]
2017-08-10  4:00                 ` Minchan Kim
2017-08-09  1:48     ` Minchan Kim
2017-08-09  1:48       ` Minchan Kim
2017-08-08  6:50 ` [PATCH v1 3/6] mm:swap: remove end_swap_bio_write argument Minchan Kim
2017-08-08  6:50   ` Minchan Kim
2017-08-08  6:50   ` Minchan Kim
2017-08-08  6:50 ` [PATCH v1 4/6] mm:swap: use on-stack-bio for BDI_CAP_SYNC devices Minchan Kim
2017-08-08  6:50   ` Minchan Kim
2017-08-08  6:50   ` Minchan Kim
2017-08-08  6:50 ` [PATCH v1 5/6] zram: remove zram_rw_page Minchan Kim
2017-08-08  6:50   ` Minchan Kim
2017-08-08  6:50   ` Minchan Kim
2017-08-08  7:02   ` Sergey Senozhatsky
2017-08-08  7:02     ` Sergey Senozhatsky
2017-08-08  8:13     ` Minchan Kim
2017-08-08  8:13       ` Minchan Kim
2017-08-08  8:13       ` Minchan Kim
2017-08-08  8:23       ` Sergey Senozhatsky
2017-08-08  8:23         ` Sergey Senozhatsky
2017-08-08  8:23         ` Sergey Senozhatsky
2017-08-08 15:48         ` Matthew Wilcox
2017-08-08 15:48           ` Matthew Wilcox
2017-08-08  6:50 ` [PATCH v1 6/6] fs: remove rw_page Minchan Kim
2017-08-08  6:50   ` Minchan Kim
2017-08-08  6:50   ` Minchan Kim

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20170810040014.GA2042@bbox \
    --to=minchan@kernel.org \
    --cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=axboe@kernel.dk \
    --cc=dan.j.williams@intel.com \
    --cc=david@fromorbit.com \
    --cc=hch@lst.de \
    --cc=jack@suse.cz \
    --cc=karam.lee@lge.com \
    --cc=kernel-team@lge.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
    --cc=linux-nvdimm@lists.01.org \
    --cc=ross.zwisler@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=seungho1.park@lge.com \
    --cc=vishal.l.verma@intel.com \
    --cc=willy@infradead.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.