From: Keith Busch <keith.busch@intel.com>
To: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
Cc: "Javier González" <jg@lightnvm.io>,
sagi@grimberg.me, linux-nvme@lists.infradead.org,
linux-block@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
"Javier González" <javier@cnexlabs.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/3] nvme: do not check for ns on rw path
Date: Mon, 6 Nov 2017 07:43:04 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20171106144303.GA11677@localhost.localdomain> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20171106091323.GA30382@lst.de>
On Mon, Nov 06, 2017 at 10:13:24AM +0100, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
> On Sat, Nov 04, 2017 at 09:38:45AM -0600, Keith Busch wrote:
> > That's not quite right. For non-PI metadata formats, we use the
> > 'nop_profile', which gets the metadata buffer allocated so we can safely
> > use a metadata formatted namespace. There's no in-kernel user of the
> > allocated payload, but we still need the metadata buffer in order to
> > use the namespace at all.
>
> You're right. But that means we will indeed always have a matching
> integrity payload here and the check should not be needed.
>
> Are you fine with turning it into something like:
>
> if (WARN_ON_ONCE(ns->ms && !blk_integrity_rq(req)))
> return BLK_STS_IOERR;
>
> ?
Yes, that looks fine. You're right that we are not supposed to be able
to get into this path for read/write since the driver sets the capacity
to 0 if a metadata format doesn't have integrity support, so hitting
this warning would indicate something has gone wrong.
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: keith.busch@intel.com (Keith Busch)
Subject: [PATCH 1/3] nvme: do not check for ns on rw path
Date: Mon, 6 Nov 2017 07:43:04 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20171106144303.GA11677@localhost.localdomain> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20171106091323.GA30382@lst.de>
On Mon, Nov 06, 2017@10:13:24AM +0100, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
> On Sat, Nov 04, 2017@09:38:45AM -0600, Keith Busch wrote:
> > That's not quite right. For non-PI metadata formats, we use the
> > 'nop_profile', which gets the metadata buffer allocated so we can safely
> > use a metadata formatted namespace. There's no in-kernel user of the
> > allocated payload, but we still need the metadata buffer in order to
> > use the namespace at all.
>
> You're right. But that means we will indeed always have a matching
> integrity payload here and the check should not be needed.
>
> Are you fine with turning it into something like:
>
> if (WARN_ON_ONCE(ns->ms && !blk_integrity_rq(req)))
> return BLK_STS_IOERR;
>
> ?
Yes, that looks fine. You're right that we are not supposed to be able
to get into this path for read/write since the driver sets the capacity
to 0 if a metadata format doesn't have integrity support, so hitting
this warning would indicate something has gone wrong.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2017-11-06 14:38 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 45+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2017-11-03 10:02 [PATCH 0/3] nvme: small fixes reported by smatch Javier González
2017-11-03 10:02 ` Javier González
2017-11-03 10:02 ` [PATCH 1/3] nvme: do not check for ns on rw path Javier González
2017-11-03 10:02 ` Javier González
2017-11-03 12:53 ` Christoph Hellwig
2017-11-03 12:53 ` Christoph Hellwig
2017-11-03 13:00 ` Javier González
2017-11-03 13:00 ` Javier González
2017-11-03 15:02 ` Keith Busch
2017-11-03 15:02 ` Keith Busch
2017-11-04 8:18 ` Christoph Hellwig
2017-11-04 8:18 ` Christoph Hellwig
2017-11-04 15:38 ` Keith Busch
2017-11-04 15:38 ` Keith Busch
2017-11-06 9:13 ` Christoph Hellwig
2017-11-06 9:13 ` Christoph Hellwig
2017-11-06 9:13 ` Christoph Hellwig
2017-11-06 14:43 ` Keith Busch [this message]
2017-11-06 14:43 ` Keith Busch
2017-11-03 10:02 ` [PATCH 2/3] nvme: compare NQN string with right size Javier González
2017-11-03 10:02 ` Javier González
2017-11-03 12:54 ` Christoph Hellwig
2017-11-03 12:54 ` Christoph Hellwig
2017-11-03 12:54 ` Christoph Hellwig
2017-11-03 12:56 ` Javier González
2017-11-03 12:56 ` Javier González
2017-11-03 10:02 ` [PATCH 3/3] nvme: fix eui_show() print format Javier González
2017-11-03 10:02 ` Javier González
2017-11-03 12:55 ` Christoph Hellwig
2017-11-03 12:55 ` Christoph Hellwig
2017-11-03 12:55 ` Christoph Hellwig
2017-11-03 15:13 ` Keith Busch
2017-11-03 15:13 ` Keith Busch
2017-11-03 15:13 ` Keith Busch
2017-11-03 15:16 ` Joe Perches
2017-11-03 15:16 ` Joe Perches
2017-11-03 15:16 ` Joe Perches
2017-11-04 11:22 ` Javier González
2017-11-04 11:22 ` Javier González
2017-11-07 16:28 ` Christoph Hellwig
2017-11-07 16:28 ` Christoph Hellwig
2017-11-07 16:28 ` Christoph Hellwig
2017-11-07 16:36 ` Javier González
2017-11-07 16:36 ` Javier González
2017-11-07 16:36 ` Javier González
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20171106144303.GA11677@localhost.localdomain \
--to=keith.busch@intel.com \
--cc=hch@lst.de \
--cc=javier@cnexlabs.com \
--cc=jg@lightnvm.io \
--cc=linux-block@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-nvme@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=sagi@grimberg.me \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.