From: Ladislav Michl <ladis@linux-mips.org>
To: SF Markus Elfring <elfring@users.sourceforge.net>
Cc: linux-omap@vger.kernel.org, Lee Jones <lee.jones@linaro.org>,
Tony Lindgren <tony@atomide.com>, Roger Quadros <rogerq@ti.com>,
LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
kernel-janitors@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: mfd/omap-usb-tll: Allocate driver data at once in usbtll_omap_probe()
Date: Mon, 15 Jan 2018 19:23:03 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20180115192303.GA31762@lenoch> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <8144f711-b4fd-730c-4e9f-780c42d5e68f@users.sourceforge.net>
On Mon, Jan 15, 2018 at 08:04:03PM +0100, SF Markus Elfring wrote:
> >> So I hope that your solution approach will be also fine.
> >> Will it supersede my proposal?
> >
> > Who knows, perhaps it would be the best if you could judge yourself...
>
> I am also curious on how other contributors will respond to
> your following update suggestion.
>
>
> > 8<--------
> >
> > Subject: [PATCH] mfd/omap-usb-tll: Allocate driver data at once
>
> Would it have been clearer to use this information as the subject
> for this reply already?
>
> Are you fine with that this change approach was recorded in
> a possibly questionable format?
> https://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/10165193/
Sure. It does not seem anyone involved cares about patchwork.
> > Allocating memory to store clk array together with driver
> > data simplifies error unwinding and allows deleting memory
> > allocation failure message as there is now only single point
> > where allocation could fail.
>
> * Will it matter to mention the previous software situation a bit
> in such a commit description?
>
> * Would you like to add a tag “link”?
Are you okay with this one?
https://lkml.org/lkml/2018/1/15/411
> * Are you going to “supersede” any more source code adjustments
> around questionable error messages?
I'm going to handle it usual way:
- wait for feedback and modify accordingly
- collect tags
- resend as v2
Also, patch contains all your changes, so you should be credited
somehow - hence the need for v2 anyway.
What about:
[marcus: simplified error unwinding, error message removal]
Signed-off-by: Markus Elfring <elfring@users.sourceforge.net>
Feel free to propose anything else.
Best regards,
ladis
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Ladislav Michl <ladis@linux-mips.org>
To: SF Markus Elfring <elfring@users.sourceforge.net>
Cc: linux-omap@vger.kernel.org, Lee Jones <lee.jones@linaro.org>,
Tony Lindgren <tony@atomide.com>, Roger Quadros <rogerq@ti.com>,
LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
kernel-janitors@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: mfd/omap-usb-tll: Allocate driver data at once in usbtll_omap_probe()
Date: Mon, 15 Jan 2018 20:23:03 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20180115192303.GA31762@lenoch> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <8144f711-b4fd-730c-4e9f-780c42d5e68f@users.sourceforge.net>
On Mon, Jan 15, 2018 at 08:04:03PM +0100, SF Markus Elfring wrote:
> >> So I hope that your solution approach will be also fine.
> >> Will it supersede my proposal?
> >
> > Who knows, perhaps it would be the best if you could judge yourself...
>
> I am also curious on how other contributors will respond to
> your following update suggestion.
>
>
> > 8<--------
> >
> > Subject: [PATCH] mfd/omap-usb-tll: Allocate driver data at once
>
> Would it have been clearer to use this information as the subject
> for this reply already?
>
> Are you fine with that this change approach was recorded in
> a possibly questionable format?
> https://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/10165193/
Sure. It does not seem anyone involved cares about patchwork.
> > Allocating memory to store clk array together with driver
> > data simplifies error unwinding and allows deleting memory
> > allocation failure message as there is now only single point
> > where allocation could fail.
>
> * Will it matter to mention the previous software situation a bit
> in such a commit description?
>
> * Would you like to add a tag “link”?
Are you okay with this one?
https://lkml.org/lkml/2018/1/15/411
> * Are you going to “supersede” any more source code adjustments
> around questionable error messages?
I'm going to handle it usual way:
- wait for feedback and modify accordingly
- collect tags
- resend as v2
Also, patch contains all your changes, so you should be credited
somehow - hence the need for v2 anyway.
What about:
[marcus: simplified error unwinding, error message removal]
Signed-off-by: Markus Elfring <elfring@users.sourceforge.net>
Feel free to propose anything else.
Best regards,
ladis
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2018-01-15 19:23 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 51+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2018-01-15 13:14 [PATCH 0/3] mfd/omap-usb-tll: Adjustments for usbtll_omap_probe() SF Markus Elfring
2018-01-15 13:14 ` SF Markus Elfring
2018-01-15 13:15 ` [PATCH 1/3] mfd/omap-usb-tll: Delete two error messages for a failed memory allocation in usbtll_oma SF Markus Elfring
2018-01-15 13:15 ` [PATCH 1/3] mfd/omap-usb-tll: Delete two error messages for a failed memory allocation in usbtll_omap_probe() SF Markus Elfring
2018-01-15 13:41 ` [PATCH 1/3] mfd/omap-usb-tll: Delete two error messages for a failed memory allocation in usbtll Ladislav Michl
2018-01-15 13:41 ` [PATCH 1/3] mfd/omap-usb-tll: Delete two error messages for a failed memory allocation in usbtll_omap_probe() Ladislav Michl
2018-01-15 15:34 ` [PATCH 1/3] mfd/omap-usb-tll: Delete two error messages for a failed memory allocation in usbtll Roger Quadros
2018-01-15 15:34 ` [PATCH 1/3] mfd/omap-usb-tll: Delete two error messages for a failed memory allocation in usbtll_omap_probe() Roger Quadros
2018-01-15 15:34 ` Roger Quadros
2018-01-15 15:38 ` [PATCH 1/3] mfd/omap-usb-tll: Delete two error messages for a failed memory allocation in usbtll SF Markus Elfring
2018-01-15 15:38 ` [PATCH 1/3] mfd/omap-usb-tll: Delete two error messages for a failed memory allocation in usbtll_omap_probe() SF Markus Elfring
2018-01-15 16:05 ` [PATCH 1/3] mfd/omap-usb-tll: Delete two error messages for a failed memory allocation in usbtll Ladislav Michl
2018-01-15 16:05 ` [PATCH 1/3] mfd/omap-usb-tll: Delete two error messages for a failed memory allocation in usbtll_omap_probe() Ladislav Michl
2018-01-15 16:21 ` [1/3] mfd/omap-usb-tll: Delete two error messages for a failed memory allocation in usbtll_omap_ SF Markus Elfring
2018-01-15 16:21 ` [1/3] mfd/omap-usb-tll: Delete two error messages for a failed memory allocation in usbtll_omap_probe() SF Markus Elfring
2018-01-15 16:35 ` [1/3] mfd/omap-usb-tll: Delete two error messages for a failed memory allocation in usbtll_omap_ Ladislav Michl
2018-01-15 16:35 ` [1/3] mfd/omap-usb-tll: Delete two error messages for a failed memory allocation in usbtll_omap_probe() Ladislav Michl
2018-01-15 17:06 ` [1/3] mfd/omap-usb-tll: Delete two error messages for a failed memory allocation in usbtll_omap_ SF Markus Elfring
2018-01-15 17:06 ` [1/3] mfd/omap-usb-tll: Delete two error messages for a failed memory allocation in usbtll_omap_probe() SF Markus Elfring
2018-01-15 17:41 ` [1/3] mfd/omap-usb-tll: Delete two error messages for a failed memory allocation in usbtll_omap_ Ladislav Michl
2018-01-15 17:41 ` [1/3] mfd/omap-usb-tll: Delete two error messages for a failed memory allocation in usbtll_omap_probe() Ladislav Michl
2018-01-15 18:12 ` [1/3] mfd/omap-usb-tll: Delete two error messages for a failed memory allocation in usbtll_omap_ SF Markus Elfring
2018-01-15 18:12 ` [1/3] mfd/omap-usb-tll: Delete two error messages for a failed memory allocation in usbtll_omap_probe() SF Markus Elfring
2018-01-15 18:30 ` [1/3] mfd/omap-usb-tll: Delete two error messages for a failed memory allocation in usbtll_omap_ Ladislav Michl
2018-01-15 18:30 ` [1/3] mfd/omap-usb-tll: Delete two error messages for a failed memory allocation in usbtll_omap_probe() Ladislav Michl
2018-01-15 19:04 ` mfd/omap-usb-tll: Allocate driver data at once " SF Markus Elfring
2018-01-15 19:04 ` SF Markus Elfring
2018-01-15 19:23 ` Ladislav Michl [this message]
2018-01-15 19:23 ` Ladislav Michl
2018-01-15 19:40 ` SF Markus Elfring
2018-01-15 19:40 ` SF Markus Elfring
2018-01-15 19:26 ` SF Markus Elfring
2018-01-15 19:26 ` SF Markus Elfring
2018-01-15 19:33 ` Ladislav Michl
2018-01-15 19:33 ` Ladislav Michl
2018-01-15 13:16 ` [PATCH 2/3] mfd/omap-usb-tll: Improve a size determination " SF Markus Elfring
2018-01-15 13:16 ` SF Markus Elfring
2018-01-22 15:50 ` Lee Jones
2018-01-22 15:50 ` Lee Jones
2018-01-15 13:17 ` [PATCH 3/3] mfd/omap-usb-tll: Return an error code only as a constant " SF Markus Elfring
2018-01-15 13:17 ` SF Markus Elfring
2018-01-22 15:50 ` Lee Jones
2018-01-22 15:50 ` Lee Jones
2018-01-23 13:04 ` Lee Jones
2018-01-23 13:04 ` Lee Jones
2018-01-23 14:43 ` [3/3] " SF Markus Elfring
2018-01-23 14:43 ` SF Markus Elfring
2018-01-23 15:04 ` Lee Jones
2018-01-23 17:13 ` Ladislav Michl
2018-01-23 17:13 ` Ladislav Michl
2018-01-24 15:16 ` Lee Jones
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20180115192303.GA31762@lenoch \
--to=ladis@linux-mips.org \
--cc=elfring@users.sourceforge.net \
--cc=kernel-janitors@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=lee.jones@linaro.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-omap@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=rogerq@ti.com \
--cc=tony@atomide.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.